A Phase II Multicentre Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas

NCT ID: NCT02343692

Last Updated: 2019-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

97 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2020-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Up to 13.5% of patients that undergo a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of their abdomen without pancreatic symptoms are found to have an incidental pancreatic cyst, with the frequency increasing with age. In a post-mortem series, 25% of patients had a pancreatic cyst, of which 32% were potentially premalignant and 3% malignant. Premalignant cysts are currently either observed or removed surgically according to international guidelines. Observation is associated with significant anxiety for patients and a growing cost to the National Health Service, while surgery for this usually benign condition is associated with not insignificant morbidity and mortality. Premalignant pancreatic cysts may be indolent for a number of years before malignant transformation, creating a window of opportunity for minimally invasive intervention and cure. New early treatment options for premalignant tumours are urgently required. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel minimally invasive technique for the treatment of pancreatic cystic tumours; endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation (EUSRFA).

If successful it will offer an alternative to long term observation or surgery for patients with this condition.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pancreatic cystic tumours are an emerging and growing diagnostic challenge for the clinician. Due to the widespread use of high quality crosssectional imaging techniques, between 1.2 to 2.6% of patients that undergo a CT for a nonpancreatic indication are found to have an incidental pancreatic cystic tumour. Pancreatic cysts encompass a range of pathologies from benign to malignant. Premalignant pancreatic cysts are known to be indolent for a number of years before transforming into an invasive cancer, creating a window of opportunity for intervention and cure. There is a strong correlation between pancreatic cysts and age. In a recent series of patients with incidental pancreatic cystic tumours, no cases were found in patients less than 40 years of age, while 8.7 percent of the patients aged 80 to 89 years had a pancreatic cyst. The natural history of pancreatic cystic tumours remains poorly understood, so significant uncertainty exists regarding the appropriate diagnostic workup, how to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions and choice of therapy.

Characterisation of pancreatic cystic lesions is usually made by a combination of noninvasive cross sectional imaging and where necessary, endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUSFNA) of tissue and/or cyst fluid. In those undergoing EUSFNA, fluid aspirates for cytology are obtained in up to 80% of cases but samples frequently have a low cellularity so sensitivity for diagnostic cytology ranges between 31% and 85%. Pancreatic EUSFNA is a safe test, with complication rates (mainly pancreatitis, rarely infection and bleeding) occurring in approximately 12.4%. Our own published complication rates demonstrated a 0% mortality and 0.6% morbidity (mild acute pancreatitis).

To guide treatment a consensus document was published by the International Association of Pancreatology in 2006 and updated in 2012. The guidelines recommend the surgical resection of all pancreatic cysts that cause symptoms or are larger than 3 cm, contain a mural nodule or are associated with dilatation of the main pancreatic duct. If the cyst is less than 3cm and does not have any of these features the guidelines recommend that the lesions can be safely followed up with serial imaging. They recommended annual imaging for lesions \<10mm, 6 monthly imaging for lesions 1020mm and 3 monthly imaging for lesions \>20mm. How long patients should be followed up for or when they should be referred for surgical resection is unclear and is associated with a growing surveillance cost to the NHS.

Surgical resection of the pancreas is a considerable undertaking and is associated with a significant morbidity (21 to 59%) and mortality (07%). In addition, many elderly patients have significant comorbidity and will not be fit enough to undergo pancreatic surgery. To date, there have been only a few small studies using ablative techniques as an alternative to surgical resection. EUSguided injection of alcohol has been associated with cyst ablation rates of 35 to 62%, on short term follow up. However, this technique did not achieve total cyst ablation in cysts with septations and was associated with complication rates (pain and pancreatitis) of 4 to 20%. A major potential advantage of EUS guided RFA is that ablation of septated cystic tumours is feasible and that treatment effects can be monitored under realtime EUS control.

Radiofrequency ablation:

Radiofrequency ablation is achieved through a high frequency alternating current which generates high temperatures causing a coagulative necrosis. It has been used widely, percutaneously and intraoperatively, to treat primary and secondary cancers in the liver, lung, kidney, bone, pancreas and oesophagus. The Habib EUS RFA catheter is a single use sterile catheter for use during endoscopic ultrasound. It is an endoscopic monopolar catheter that has been designed to ablate cystic tumours of the pancreas and has European Conformity approval for this purpose. Following identification and puncture of the pancreatic cyst, the EUS RFA catheter can be introduced through a standard 19G EUSFNA needle. The catheter has an active metallic electrode which will be placed at the most distal part of the pancreatic cyst under EUSguidance. The catheter can be used with a variety of commercially available RF Generators, such as the RITA 1500, RITA 1500X, or ERBE VIO200D/300D. A dose of 10W for 90 seconds will be administered to each cystic tumour. EUSguided needle placement into pancreatic cysts is a standard technique, and will be performed by experienced (at least 5 years) endoscopists carrying out regular EUS interventions (at least 150 cases per year).

Animal studies of pancreatic RFA:

The safety and efficacy of the monopolar Habib EUS RFA catheter to be used in this study has been examined in the porcine model. The pancreas was visualized in all five cases and in four cases multiple punctures of the pancreas was possible. Each animal received up to 12 minutes of EUSguided RFA to the pancreas at a variety of currents (46W), catheter exposure (610mm) and length of time (0.25 minutes). Following the procedure, blood tests did not reveal any evidence of pancreatitis but at post mortem on day 7, three pigs had focal fat necrosis surrounding the pancreas. Analysis of the size of the area of ablation in the normal porcine pancreas found it to be proportionally related to the catheter length, power or time to which the tissue was exposed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cyst

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Radiofrequency abalation

Intervention: Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cystic tumours of the pancreas

Device: An RFA generator (ERBE VIO 300D, Dolby medical products, Scotland)

Procedure: Delivery of sequential doses of electrical energy at 10W for a total of up to 4 minutes 30 seconds (3 x 90 second applications) to ablate the cystic lesion.

Ablation of cystic tumours of the pancreas

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreas

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic cysts

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreas

Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic cysts

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. A diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic tumour based on multidisciplinary review of imaging, for which further surveillance with non-invasive imaging is indicated.
2. Pancreatic cystic tumour between 0.5 and 3cm in size. Cysts greater than 3cm or with mural nodules can be included only if patients are unsuitable for surgical resection.
3. ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2.
4. Estimated life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
5. Age \>18 years.
6. Capable of giving written informed consent.
7. Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (qualitative serum hCG) in the week before treatment, AND be using an adequate contraception method, which must be continued for at least 1 week after RF.

Exclusion Criteria

1. A diagnosis of a pancreatic cystic tumour where surgical resection is indicated.
2. Pancreatic cysts greater than 3cm or less than 0.5cm in size.
3. Benign pancreatic cysts (e.g. pseudocyst).
4. Serous cystadenomas.
5. Pancreatic cysts with malignant transformation.
6. Cysts involving or in close proximity to vessels or the biliary tree where the zone of ablation is likely to compromise these structures.
7. Cysts arising from the main pancreatic duct.
8. History of active or prior malignancy that will interfere with the response evaluation (exceptions include in-situ carcinoma of the cervix treated by cone-biopsy/resection, nonmetastatic basal and/or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, any early stage (stage l) malignancy adequately resected for cure greater than 5 years previously).
9. Acute pancreatitis within the previous 4 weeks.
10. Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases or laboratory finding that in the view of the investigator makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial.
11. Any psychiatric disorder making reliable informed consent impossible.
12. Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
13. ECOG performance status 3 or 4
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University College, London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen P Pereira, MB BS, FRCP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Free London

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Melbourne Hospital, Epworth Richmond

Melbourne, , Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

University Hospital Birmingham NHS FoundationTrust

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Glasgow Royal Infirmary

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Royal Free London

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Barts Health NHS Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

The London Clinic

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

Nottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Bina Shah

Role: CONTACT

Chris Brew-Graves

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Andrew Metz

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

13/0427

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.