A Phase II Multicentre Trial of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas
NCT ID: NCT02343692
Last Updated: 2019-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
97 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-31
2020-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
If successful it will offer an alternative to long term observation or surgery for patients with this condition.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Guided Ablation of Pancreatic Cysts
NCT01643460
Registry of Pancreatic Fluid Collections and Pancreatic Cysts
NCT02422095
Safety and Efficacy of EUS-RFA in the Treatment of Pancreatic Lesions: A Prospective Registry
NCT07136324
EUS-guided Ablation of Pancreatic Cyst Neoplasms
NCT02422147
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts
NCT03022110
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Characterisation of pancreatic cystic lesions is usually made by a combination of noninvasive cross sectional imaging and where necessary, endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration (EUSFNA) of tissue and/or cyst fluid. In those undergoing EUSFNA, fluid aspirates for cytology are obtained in up to 80% of cases but samples frequently have a low cellularity so sensitivity for diagnostic cytology ranges between 31% and 85%. Pancreatic EUSFNA is a safe test, with complication rates (mainly pancreatitis, rarely infection and bleeding) occurring in approximately 12.4%. Our own published complication rates demonstrated a 0% mortality and 0.6% morbidity (mild acute pancreatitis).
To guide treatment a consensus document was published by the International Association of Pancreatology in 2006 and updated in 2012. The guidelines recommend the surgical resection of all pancreatic cysts that cause symptoms or are larger than 3 cm, contain a mural nodule or are associated with dilatation of the main pancreatic duct. If the cyst is less than 3cm and does not have any of these features the guidelines recommend that the lesions can be safely followed up with serial imaging. They recommended annual imaging for lesions \<10mm, 6 monthly imaging for lesions 1020mm and 3 monthly imaging for lesions \>20mm. How long patients should be followed up for or when they should be referred for surgical resection is unclear and is associated with a growing surveillance cost to the NHS.
Surgical resection of the pancreas is a considerable undertaking and is associated with a significant morbidity (21 to 59%) and mortality (07%). In addition, many elderly patients have significant comorbidity and will not be fit enough to undergo pancreatic surgery. To date, there have been only a few small studies using ablative techniques as an alternative to surgical resection. EUSguided injection of alcohol has been associated with cyst ablation rates of 35 to 62%, on short term follow up. However, this technique did not achieve total cyst ablation in cysts with septations and was associated with complication rates (pain and pancreatitis) of 4 to 20%. A major potential advantage of EUS guided RFA is that ablation of septated cystic tumours is feasible and that treatment effects can be monitored under realtime EUS control.
Radiofrequency ablation:
Radiofrequency ablation is achieved through a high frequency alternating current which generates high temperatures causing a coagulative necrosis. It has been used widely, percutaneously and intraoperatively, to treat primary and secondary cancers in the liver, lung, kidney, bone, pancreas and oesophagus. The Habib EUS RFA catheter is a single use sterile catheter for use during endoscopic ultrasound. It is an endoscopic monopolar catheter that has been designed to ablate cystic tumours of the pancreas and has European Conformity approval for this purpose. Following identification and puncture of the pancreatic cyst, the EUS RFA catheter can be introduced through a standard 19G EUSFNA needle. The catheter has an active metallic electrode which will be placed at the most distal part of the pancreatic cyst under EUSguidance. The catheter can be used with a variety of commercially available RF Generators, such as the RITA 1500, RITA 1500X, or ERBE VIO200D/300D. A dose of 10W for 90 seconds will be administered to each cystic tumour. EUSguided needle placement into pancreatic cysts is a standard technique, and will be performed by experienced (at least 5 years) endoscopists carrying out regular EUS interventions (at least 150 cases per year).
Animal studies of pancreatic RFA:
The safety and efficacy of the monopolar Habib EUS RFA catheter to be used in this study has been examined in the porcine model. The pancreas was visualized in all five cases and in four cases multiple punctures of the pancreas was possible. Each animal received up to 12 minutes of EUSguided RFA to the pancreas at a variety of currents (46W), catheter exposure (610mm) and length of time (0.25 minutes). Following the procedure, blood tests did not reveal any evidence of pancreatitis but at post mortem on day 7, three pigs had focal fat necrosis surrounding the pancreas. Analysis of the size of the area of ablation in the normal porcine pancreas found it to be proportionally related to the catheter length, power or time to which the tissue was exposed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Radiofrequency abalation
Intervention: Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of cystic tumours of the pancreas
Device: An RFA generator (ERBE VIO 300D, Dolby medical products, Scotland)
Procedure: Delivery of sequential doses of electrical energy at 10W for a total of up to 4 minutes 30 seconds (3 x 90 second applications) to ablate the cystic lesion.
Ablation of cystic tumours of the pancreas
EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreas
Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic cysts
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS guided RFA of cystic tumours of the pancreas
Endoscopic ultrasound guided radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic cysts
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pancreatic cystic tumour between 0.5 and 3cm in size. Cysts greater than 3cm or with mural nodules can be included only if patients are unsuitable for surgical resection.
3. ECOG performance status 0, 1 or 2.
4. Estimated life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
5. Age \>18 years.
6. Capable of giving written informed consent.
7. Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (qualitative serum hCG) in the week before treatment, AND be using an adequate contraception method, which must be continued for at least 1 week after RF.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pancreatic cysts greater than 3cm or less than 0.5cm in size.
3. Benign pancreatic cysts (e.g. pseudocyst).
4. Serous cystadenomas.
5. Pancreatic cysts with malignant transformation.
6. Cysts involving or in close proximity to vessels or the biliary tree where the zone of ablation is likely to compromise these structures.
7. Cysts arising from the main pancreatic duct.
8. History of active or prior malignancy that will interfere with the response evaluation (exceptions include in-situ carcinoma of the cervix treated by cone-biopsy/resection, nonmetastatic basal and/or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, any early stage (stage l) malignancy adequately resected for cure greater than 5 years previously).
9. Acute pancreatitis within the previous 4 weeks.
10. Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases or laboratory finding that in the view of the investigator makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the trial.
11. Any psychiatric disorder making reliable informed consent impossible.
12. Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
13. ECOG performance status 3 or 4
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University College, London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen P Pereira, MB BS, FRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Free London
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Melbourne Hospital, Epworth Richmond
Melbourne, , Australia
University Hospital Birmingham NHS FoundationTrust
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Leeds, , United Kingdom
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Royal Free London
London, , United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Barts Health NHS Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
The London Clinic
London, , United Kingdom
The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Andrew Metz
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13/0427
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.