Diagnostic Utility of Different Airway Resistance Assessment Techniques in the Methacholine Challenge Test

NCT ID: NCT02343419

Last Updated: 2016-11-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare standard spirometric evaluation of methacholine challenge test with plethysmographic, interrupter technique and forced oscillation technique (FOT) evaluation of the airways resistance.

The study group will consist of patients referred for methacholine challenge test. All patient will undergo spirometric, plethysmographic, interrupter technique and FOT examinations - before and after inhalation of aerosols. Patients will also undergo the measurement of nitric oxide concentration in exhaled air and laboratory tests, including: blood count, measurement of serum C-reactive protein, sodium, potassium, creatinine, immunoglobulin E and N-Terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration.

The investigators intend to assess, if plethysmographic, and/or interrupter, and/or FOT measurement of bronchial reactivity can replace standard spirometric assessment. Plethysmography, interrupter technique and FOT are much more easier to perform for patients. Furthermore, those two techniques are less dependent on patient's motivation and cooperation ability. Thus, usage of FOT, interrupter technique and/or plethysmography in bronchial hyperreactivity testing could make methacholine challenge test more comfortable and available for more patients. The investigators are also going to analyze the relationship between exhaled nitric oxide and functional indices of bronchial hyperreactivity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bronchial hyperreactivity is defined as the increased respiratory tract responsiveness to multiple stimuli, which results in bronchial muscles constriction and bronchial lumen narrowing. Bronchial hyperreactivity is a hallmark of asthma, however it may also be present in other diseases, e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methacholine challenge test is one of the bronchial reactivity assessment methods. Methacholine acts directly on bronchial smooth muscles receptors and causes bronchoconstriction. Bronchial reactivity is increased in the presence of active inflammation. Methacholine challenge testing is commonly performed in patients with symptoms suggestive of asthma and negative result of spirometry reversibility test. The measurement of methacholine concentration which causes 20% forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) decrease in post-inhalation spirometry (PC20) is a standard method of hyperreactivity evaluation. However, above method could be used among patients who are able to perform acceptable spirometry. Furthermore, results of spirometry might be influenced by level of compliance and motivation of patients. Moreover, whereas spirometric methacholine challenge test has high negative predictive values, its positive predictive value is relatively low. Thus, diagnostic utility of other pulmonary function tests should be assessed in methacholine challenge test evaluation.

In plethysmography airway resistance is performed during tidal breathing. The increase of specific airway resistance of 200% and the decrease of specific airway conductance of 40% after methacholine inhalation, respectively, are proposed as a cut-off levels for bronchial hyperreactivity diagnosis.

In forced oscillation technique (FOT), sinusoidal oscillations are emitted by membrane into airway lumen and airway resistance is calculated on the basis of changes in air flow induced by oscillations. The increase of resistance and decrease of reactance in FOT are typical for bronchoconstriction.

Finally, also interrupter technique (IT) allows for airway resistance assessment during tidal breathing. In IT, airway resistance is calculated on the basis of mouth pressure measured directly after airway occlusion and airflow measured directly before occlusion.

The aim of the study is to compare standard spirometric evaluation of methacholine challenge test with plethysmographic, interrupter technique and forced oscillation technique (FOT) evaluation of the airways resistance.

All patient will undergo:

* clinical examination
* measurement of nitric oxide concentration in exhaled air
* spirometric, plethysmographic, interrupter technique and FOT examinations - before inhalation and after inhalation of aerosols
* following laboratory tests: blood count, measurement of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), sodium, potassium, creatinine, immunoglobulin E and NT-proBNP concentration

Patients will be provided with written and spoken information about study protocol. Written informed consent will be obtained from every patient.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bronchial Hyperreactivity Abnormal Respiratory Airway Resistance

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Bronchial Hyperreactivity Bronchial Provocation Tests Methacholine Chloride Respiratory Function Tests Spirometry Airway Resistance Plethysmography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bronchial challenge test

Patients will undergo Methacholine Challenge Test assessed by forced oscillation technique (FOT), plethysmography, interrupter technique and spirometry.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Methacholine Challenge Test

Intervention Type OTHER

Forced oscillation technique test, plethysmography, interrupter technique test and spirometry will be performed in a row before any intervention and after inhalation of aerosols - normal saline, followed by increasing concentrations of methacholine: 0.03 mg/ml; 0.06 mg/ml; 0.125 mg/ml; 0.25 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml, 2 mg/ml, 4 mg/ml, 8 mg/ml, 16 mg/ml.

In case of FEV1 decrease of ≥ 20% of the initial value methacholine challenge test will be ceased and patient will be administered 200 µg of salbutamol in inhalation. Then, pulmonary function tests will be performed after 15 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Methacholine Challenge Test

Forced oscillation technique test, plethysmography, interrupter technique test and spirometry will be performed in a row before any intervention and after inhalation of aerosols - normal saline, followed by increasing concentrations of methacholine: 0.03 mg/ml; 0.06 mg/ml; 0.125 mg/ml; 0.25 mg/ml, 0.5 mg/ml, 1 mg/ml, 2 mg/ml, 4 mg/ml, 8 mg/ml, 16 mg/ml.

In case of FEV1 decrease of ≥ 20% of the initial value methacholine challenge test will be ceased and patient will be administered 200 µg of salbutamol in inhalation. Then, pulmonary function tests will be performed after 15 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* presence of asthma symptoms without confirmation of diagnosis by standard methods
* dyspnea and/or cough of unknown etiology

Exclusion Criteria

* FEV1 \<1.2 L or \<60% of predicted value
* acute heart failure
* myocardial infarction in last 3 months
* transient ischaemic attack or stroke in last 3 months
* aneurysms
* methacholine allergy
* pregnant and lactating women
* administration of β2-mimetic, anticholinergic agent or theophylline before methacholine challenge test in 6, 8 and 24 hours, respectively
* respiratory tract infection in last 6 weeks
* patient inability to cooperate
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Warsaw

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tomasz A Urbankowski, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Internal Medicine, Pneumonology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Internal Medicine, Pneumonology and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw

Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Urbankowski T, Przybylowski T. Methacholine Challenge Testing: Comparison of FEV1 and Airway Resistance Parameters. Respir Care. 2021 Mar;66(3):449-459. doi: 10.4187/respcare.08331. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33203723 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PFT-DIMPA-WUM1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id