Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pharmacokinetic Comparison Of All FK-506 Formulations (NCT NCT02339246)
NCT ID: NCT02339246
Last Updated: 2016-01-18
Results Overview
Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate T(max). Nominal time points used were: Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24. Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27. Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
32 participants
8 days
2016-01-18
Participant Flow
32 patients were screened (enrolled) and 31 were randomized to treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Envarsus XR
Envarsus XR tablets once daily.
|
Astagraf XL
Astagraf XL capsules once daily.
|
Prograf
Prograf capsules twice daily.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
First Intervention (7 Days)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
31
|
|
First Intervention (7 Days)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
31
|
|
First Intervention (7 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention (7 Days)
STARTED
|
16
|
15
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention (7 Days)
COMPLETED
|
16
|
15
|
0
|
|
Second Intervention (7 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Third Period (7 Days)
STARTED
|
15
|
16
|
0
|
|
Third Period (7 Days)
COMPLETED
|
15
|
16
|
0
|
|
Third Period (7 Days)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Pharmacokinetic Comparison Of All FK-506 Formulations
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Prograf vs Envarsus XR vs Astagraf XL
n=16 Participants
Prograft capsules Twice daily Envarsus XR tablets once daily Astagraf XL capsules once daily
Prograf vs Envarsus XR vs Astagraf XL: prograf vs Envarsus XR vs Astagraf XL
|
Prograf vs Astagraf XL vs Envarsus XR
n=15 Participants
Prograf capsules twice daily Astagraf XL capsules once daily Envarsus XR tablets once daily
Prograf vs Astagraf XL vs Envarsus XR: Prograf vs Astagraf XL vs Envarsus XR
|
Total
n=31 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.00 • n=5 Participants
|
46.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.30 • n=7 Participants
|
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.11 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 participants
n=7 Participants
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 daysPopulation: One patient in the Envarsus XR arm was excluded from the analysis due to non compliance.
Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate T(max). Nominal time points used were: Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24. Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27. Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Envarsus XR
n=30 Participants
Envarsus XR tablets once daily.
|
Astagraf XL
n=30 Participants
Astagraf XL capsules once daily.
|
Prograf
n=30 Participants
Prograf capsules twice daily.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of T(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.
|
5.91 hour
Interval 1.45 to 13.95
|
1.93 hour
Interval 0.92 to 5.92
|
1.48 hour
Interval 0.93 to 19.97
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 daysPopulation: One patient in the Envarsus XR arm was excluded from the analysis due to non compliance.
Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate C(max). Nominal time points used were: Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24. Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27. Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Envarsus XR
n=30 Participants
Envarsus XR tablets once daily.
|
Astagraf XL
n=30 Participants
Astagraf XL capsules once daily.
|
Prograf
n=30 Participants
Prograf capsules twice daily.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.
|
13.88 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 5.331
|
13.17 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 12.49
|
14.54 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 13.60
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8 daysPopulation: One patient in the Envarsus XR arm was excluded from the analysis due to non compliance.
Tacrolimus whole blood concentrations obtained from the central lab was used for PK analysis. Actual sampling times was used to calculate AUC(0-24). Nominal time points used were: Prograf sampling strategy (21 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 12.5, 13, 13.5, 14, 14.5, 15, 16, 18, 20, and 24. Envarsus XR sampling strategy (18 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, 24, and 27. Astagraf XL sampling strategy (17 samples): Pre-dose (C0) and then 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 21, and 24.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Envarsus XR
n=30 Participants
Envarsus XR tablets once daily.
|
Astagraf XL
n=30 Participants
Astagraf XL capsules once daily.
|
Prograf
n=30 Participants
Prograf capsules twice daily.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.
|
213.41 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 83.095
|
165.02 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 48.910
|
176.52 hr*ng/mL
Standard Deviation 50.799
|
Adverse Events
Envarsus XR
Astagraf XR
Prograf
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Envarsus XR
n=31 participants at risk
Envarsus XR tablets once daily.
|
Astagraf XR
n=31 participants at risk
Astagraf XR capsules once daily.
|
Prograf
n=31 participants at risk
Prograf capsules twice daily.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
9.7%
3/31 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/31 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
3.2%
1/31 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
6.5%
2/31 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from time of first dose of study drug and until last visit which was approximately 1 month.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60