Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of mFOLFOX6 + Panitumumab Combination Therapy and 5-FU/LV + Panitumumab Combination Therapy in Participants With Chemotherapy-naïve Unresectable Advanced Recurrent Colorectal Carcinoma (NCT NCT02337946)
NCT ID: NCT02337946
Last Updated: 2019-09-10
Results Overview
PFS rate was defined as the gross percentage of participants who survived with no evidence of progression from the day of randomization (Day 0) until 9 months after Day 0. The presence/absence of progressive disease (PD) was determined based on imaging, consideration of clinical PD, or survival research results. PD based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
164 participants
Up to 9 months after randomization
2019-09-10
Participant Flow
Participants took part in the study at 72 investigative sites in Japan from 16 October 2014 to 31 March 2017 (as Primary Completion Date). After that, overall study completion of this study was occurred on 31 August 2017.
Participants with a diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma were enrolled to receive protocol treatment (1) up to cycle 6 followed by randomization, received 1 out of 2 treatments from protocol treatment (2) group A and group B.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Protocol Treatment 1
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1.
|
Protocol Treatment Period 2: Group A
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Protocol Treatment Period 2: Group B
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
STARTED
|
164
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
COMPLETED
|
114
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
50
|
0
|
0
|
|
In-between Period
STARTED
|
114
|
0
|
0
|
|
In-between Period
COMPLETED
|
113
|
0
|
0
|
|
In-between Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
STARTED
|
0
|
56
|
57
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
Safety Population
|
0
|
56
|
54
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
COMPLETED
|
0
|
5
|
7
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
51
|
50
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Protocol Treatment 1
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1.
|
Protocol Treatment Period 2: Group A
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Protocol Treatment Period 2: Group B
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
Adverse Event
|
7
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
Major Protocol Deviation
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
Voluntary Withdrawal
|
6
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
Lack of Efficacy
|
15
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
Death During Protocol Treatment
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
Surgery Aimed at Curative Resection
|
9
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
Did not Meet Entrance Criteria
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 1 Period
Reason not specified
|
8
|
0
|
0
|
|
In-between Period
Without Informed Consent
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
Adverse Event
|
0
|
9
|
9
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
Voluntary Withdrawal
|
0
|
3
|
1
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
29
|
29
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
Death During Protocol Treatment
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
Surgery Aimed at Curative Resection
|
0
|
5
|
7
|
|
Protocol Treatment 2 Period
Reason not specified
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Entire Study Population
n=164 Participants
Participants who received Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by either Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance or Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
66.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=164 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
55 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
109 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
164 participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Histological Type of Adenocarcinoma
Well differentiated adenocarcinoma
|
47 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Histological Type of Adenocarcinoma
Moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma
|
91 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Histological Type of Adenocarcinoma
Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma
|
15 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Histological Type of Adenocarcinoma
Mucinous adenocarcinoma
|
3 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Histological Type of Adenocarcinoma
Other
|
8 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Single, Multiple or Unknown
Single
|
120 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Single, Multiple or Unknown
Multiple
|
4 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Single, Multiple or Unknown
Unknown
|
40 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Primary Lesion Site
Cecum
|
8 Participants
n=124 Participants • Primary tumor location data was collected/analyzed for 124 participants with multiple choices allowed, and total 134 data was available.
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Primary Lesion Site
Ascending colon
|
15 Participants
n=124 Participants • Primary tumor location data was collected/analyzed for 124 participants with multiple choices allowed, and total 134 data was available.
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Primary Lesion Site
Transverse colon
|
10 Participants
n=124 Participants • Primary tumor location data was collected/analyzed for 124 participants with multiple choices allowed, and total 134 data was available.
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Primary Lesion Site
Descending colon
|
4 Participants
n=124 Participants • Primary tumor location data was collected/analyzed for 124 participants with multiple choices allowed, and total 134 data was available.
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Primary Lesion Site
Sigmoid colon
|
43 Participants
n=124 Participants • Primary tumor location data was collected/analyzed for 124 participants with multiple choices allowed, and total 134 data was available.
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Primary Lesion Site
Rectosigmoid
|
12 Participants
n=124 Participants • Primary tumor location data was collected/analyzed for 124 participants with multiple choices allowed, and total 134 data was available.
|
|
Information on Primary Lesion: Primary Lesion Site
Rectum
|
42 Participants
n=124 Participants • Primary tumor location data was collected/analyzed for 124 participants with multiple choices allowed, and total 134 data was available.
|
|
History of Surgery
Had No History of Surgery
|
51 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
History of Surgery
Had History of Surgery
|
113 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
History of Radiotherapy
Had No History of Radiotherapy
|
163 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
History of Radiotherapy
Had History of Radiotherapy
|
1 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
History of Preoperative and/or Postoperative Adjuvant (Adj) Chemotherapy (CT)
Had No History of Pre/Postoperative Adj CT
|
151 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
History of Preoperative and/or Postoperative Adjuvant (Adj) Chemotherapy (CT)
Had History of Pre/Postoperative Adj CT
|
13 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Number of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
0
|
3 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Number of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
1
|
72 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Number of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
≥2
|
89 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Type of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
Liver
|
119 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Type of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
Lung
|
57 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Type of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
Peritoneum
|
28 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Type of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
Lymph node
|
60 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Type of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
Bone
|
9 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Type of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
Adrenal gland
|
2 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Type of Metastatic Organs at Enrollment
Other
|
13 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) [Cycle 1]
0
|
122 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) [Cycle 1]
1
|
42 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Neuroblastoma Rat Sarcoma (NRAS) + Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) Testing
Mutant-type
|
10 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Neuroblastoma Rat Sarcoma (NRAS) + Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) Testing
Wild Type (WT)
|
152 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Neuroblastoma Rat Sarcoma (NRAS) + Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) Testing
Unknown
|
2 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Worst Grade of Laboratory Tests/Clinical Findings During Protocol Treatment 1
None
|
103 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Worst Grade of Laboratory Tests/Clinical Findings During Protocol Treatment 1
Grade 2
|
21 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Worst Grade of Laboratory Tests/Clinical Findings During Protocol Treatment 1
Grade ≥3
|
40 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Worst Grade of Peripheral Neuropathy During Protocol Treatment 1
None
|
100 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Worst Grade of Peripheral Neuropathy During Protocol Treatment 1
Grade 1
|
51 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Worst Grade of Peripheral Neuropathy During Protocol Treatment 1
Grade 2
|
12 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Worst Grade of Peripheral Neuropathy During Protocol Treatment 1
Grade ≥3
|
1 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants without Curative Resection During Protocol Treatment 1
|
164 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Treatment Status for Protocol Treatment 1: Reduced or Not Reduced
Reduced
|
59 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Treatment Status for Protocol Treatment 1: Reduced or Not Reduced
Not Reduced
|
105 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Treatment Status for Protocol Treatment 1: Postponed or Not Postponed
Postponed
|
121 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
|
Treatment Status for Protocol Treatment 1: Postponed or Not Postponed
Not Postponed
|
43 Participants
n=164 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 9 months after randomizationPopulation: Full Analysis Set (FAS) was defined as all randomized participants.
PFS rate was defined as the gross percentage of participants who survived with no evidence of progression from the day of randomization (Day 0) until 9 months after Day 0. The presence/absence of progressive disease (PD) was determined based on imaging, consideration of clinical PD, or survival research results. PD based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 Participants
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=57 Participants
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival Rate (PFS Rate) at 9 Months After Randomization
|
46.4 percentage of participants
Interval 38.1 to 54.9
|
47.4 percentage of participants
Interval 39.1 to 55.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately 31 monthsPopulation: FAS was defined as all randomized participants.
The PFS is the period from the date of randomization (Day 0) until the date of judgment of progression from the date of randomization, or until death by all causes, whichever comes first. The presence/absence of progressive disease (PD) was determined based on imaging, consideration of clinical PD, or survival research results. PD based on response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 Participants
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=57 Participants
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
|
9.1 months
Interval 8.6 to 11.1
|
9.3 months
Interval 6.0 to 13.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately 31 monthsPopulation: FAS was defined as all randomized participants.
OS was defined as the time from the day of randomization (Day 0) until death by all causes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 Participants
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=57 Participants
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
|
NA months
Median and upper and lower limits of overall survival is not estimable at final analysis due to low number of participants with events.
|
NA months
Median and upper and lower limits of overall survival is not estimable at final analysis due to low number of participants with events.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately 31 monthsPopulation: FAS was defined as all randomized participants.
RR was defined as the percentage of participants who had shown complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as the best overall response in accordance with the RECIST 1.1 criteria after randomization. The best overall response was CR, followed by PR, stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), and not evaluable (NE). CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes must have reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters as the best overall response after randomization., SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 Participants
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=57 Participants
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Response Rate (RR)
|
80.4 percentage of participants
Interval 68.0 to 88.8
|
87.7 percentage of participants
Interval 76.4 to 94.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to approximately 31 monthsPopulation: FAS was defined as all randomized participants.
TTF was defined as the time from the day of randomization (Day 0) until the day of protocol treatment discontinuation determination, the day of PD decision during protocol treatment, or death from any cause, whichever came the earliest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 Participants
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=57 Participants
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
|
8.1 months
Interval 5.9 to 9.5
|
6.1 months
Interval 4.5 to 9.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug or start of subsequent therapy (data cut off: 31 August 2017; Overall study completion date)Population: Safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
Safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 Participants
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=54 Participants
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
|
100 percentage of participants
|
100 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug or start of subsequent therapy (data cut off: 31 August 2017; Overall study completion date)Population: Safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
An AE is any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure that may or may not be considered related to the medical treatment or procedure. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living (ADL). Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 Participants
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=54 Participants
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events by Severity Graded Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade
Grade 1
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events by Severity Graded Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade
Grade 2
|
19.6 percentage of participants
|
27.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events by Severity Graded Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Grade
Grade 3, 4 and 5
|
80.4 percentage of participants
|
72.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug or start of subsequent therapy (data cut off: 31 August 2017; Overall study completion date)Population: Safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
Peripheral neuropathy was defined as events classified with a preferred term (PT) of "peripheral neuropathy" according to Standardized MedDRA Queries.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 Participants
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=54 Participants
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Grade 2 or Higher Peripheral Neuropathy
|
30.4 percentage of participants
Interval 19.8 to 43.4
|
3.7 percentage of participants
Interval 0.3 to 13.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 28 days after discontinuation of study drug or start of subsequent therapy (data cut off: 31 August 2017; Overall study completion date)Population: Safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
Skin toxicity was defined as events classified with an system organ class of "Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders" or a preferred term of "paronychia".
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 Participants
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=54 Participants
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Skin Toxicity
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
|
17.9 percentage of participants
|
18.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Skin Toxicity
Paronychia
|
7.1 percentage of participants
|
9.3 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Group A
Group B
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 participants at risk
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=54 participants at risk
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mechanical ileus
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enterocolitis haemorrhagic
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pelvic abscess
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Biliary tract infection
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
7.1%
4/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Investigations
Nutritional condition abnormal
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo positional
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
5.4%
3/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer pain
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
3.6%
2/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
3.7%
2/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ischaemic
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fistula
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ascites
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Proctalgia
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enteritis infectious
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pulmonary tuberculosis
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Heat illness
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
|
0.00%
0/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Embolism
|
1.8%
1/56 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Group A
n=56 participants at risk
Panitumumab (Pmab) 6 mg/kg, intravenous drip infusion (DIV), at Day 1, oxaliplatin (OXA) 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, levofolinate (l LV) 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m\^2, intravenous (IV) at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, continuous intravenous infusion (CIV), at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
Group B
n=54 participants at risk
Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, OXA 85 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 1 through cycle 6 as protocol treatment 1 followed by Pmab 6 mg/kg, DIV, at Day 1, l LV 200 mg/m\^2, DIV, at Day 1, 5-FU 400 mg/m\^2, IV, at Day 1, 5-FU 2400 mg/m\^2, CIV, at Day 2 once every two weeks from cycle 7 until progressive disease or intolerance.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
32.1%
18/56 • Number of events 44 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
27.8%
15/54 • Number of events 19 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
12.5%
7/56 • Number of events 12 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
16.7%
9/54 • Number of events 18 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
8.9%
5/56 • Number of events 17 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
3.7%
2/54 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
14.3%
8/56 • Number of events 8 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
11.1%
6/54 • Number of events 6 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
12.5%
7/56 • Number of events 7 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
7.4%
4/54 • Number of events 4 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
5.6%
3/54 • Number of events 3 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
25.0%
14/56 • Number of events 14 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
29.6%
16/54 • Number of events 16 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
17.9%
10/56 • Number of events 10 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
20.4%
11/54 • Number of events 12 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
8.9%
5/56 • Number of events 5 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
7.4%
4/54 • Number of events 5 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
5.6%
3/54 • Number of events 3 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
7.4%
4/54 • Number of events 4 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis acneiform
|
3.6%
2/56 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
5.6%
3/54 • Number of events 3 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
1.8%
1/56 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
5.6%
3/54 • Number of events 4 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
8.9%
5/56 • Number of events 5 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
9.3%
5/54 • Number of events 6 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
5.6%
3/54 • Number of events 4 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 7 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 5 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
7.4%
4/54 • Number of events 4 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
7.1%
4/56 • Number of events 4 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
5.6%
3/54 • Number of events 3 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
10.7%
6/56 • Number of events 8 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
0.00%
0/54 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
3.7%
2/54 • Number of events 2 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
5.4%
3/56 • Number of events 3 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
1.9%
1/54 • Number of events 1 • Up to approximately 34 months
At each visit the investigators had to record any occurrence of adverse events. Adverse events were any unfavorable or unintended sign (including clinically problematic abnormalities of laboratory test data), symptoms, or diseases that developed after the administration of a drug, irrespective of whether there was a causal relationship with the relevant treatment. Safety population included participants who received at least one dose of protocol treatment after randomization.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER