Development and Evaluation of a Methadone Protocol for Severe Chronic Pain Management
NCT ID: NCT02335398
Last Updated: 2015-01-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-07-31
2013-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Methadone Monitoring for Insights Into Adverse Events
NCT01191242
Methadone Maintenance Treatment Outcome Study in Taiwan
NCT01093248
The Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture as an Adjunct to Methadone Treatment Services for Heroin Addicts
NCT01512433
A Methadone Maintenance Treatment Outcome Study in Three Provinces in China
NCT01315054
Adjunct Methadone to Decrease the Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in the Medical Intensive Care Unit
NCT02025855
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In Thailand, the use of methadone for pain management has been limited because physicians are not familiar with its dosing and concern about the risk of drug accumulation and cardiac arrhythmia. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a protocol of methadone dosing in outpatients with severe chronic pain.
Thirty four chronic pain patients will be included to initiate methadone use following the protocol. Pain scores, pain interferences scores, neuropathic pain score, severity of adverse effects, and QTc intervals will be assessed at baseline, and two, four, eight, and twelve weeks after starting methadone.
The approved protocol of methadone therapy obtained from this study could be clinically utilized by physicians for severe chronic pain management.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
methadone
single group
Methadone
The starting methadone dose for naïve-opioid patients was 2.5-5 mg every 8-12 hours. In patients who required opioid rotation, the conversion ratios, morphine:methadone, were 4:1, 8:1, and 12:1 for patients receiving less than 90 mg of morphine, receiving 90-300 mg of morphine, and receiving more than 300 mg of morphine , respectively. A fixed dose ratio of 1:20 was applied for changing from transdermal fentanyl to oral methadone. Then, the daily calculated methadone dose was divided into 8-12 hourly dosing. Calculated rescue dose was estimated to be 10-15% of total daily dose of methadone which there was switched to be morphine syrup in the ratio of 1:4.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Methadone
The starting methadone dose for naïve-opioid patients was 2.5-5 mg every 8-12 hours. In patients who required opioid rotation, the conversion ratios, morphine:methadone, were 4:1, 8:1, and 12:1 for patients receiving less than 90 mg of morphine, receiving 90-300 mg of morphine, and receiving more than 300 mg of morphine , respectively. A fixed dose ratio of 1:20 was applied for changing from transdermal fentanyl to oral methadone. Then, the daily calculated methadone dose was divided into 8-12 hourly dosing. Calculated rescue dose was estimated to be 10-15% of total daily dose of methadone which there was switched to be morphine syrup in the ratio of 1:4.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* History of opioid addiction
* Having structural heart diseases
* During pregnancy or lactation period
* Patients who have hypersensitivity to methadone
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chuthamanee Suthisisang, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Thailand: Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University
Phutsadee Pudchakan, Bsc.Pharm
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Thailand: Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University
Krittika Tanyasaensook, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Thailand: Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University
Pongparadee Chaudakshetrin, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Thailand: Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Siriraj Hospital
Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mercadante S, Casuccio A, Calderone L. Rapid switching from morphine to methadone in cancer patients with poor response to morphine. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Oct;17(10):3307-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.10.3307.
Mercadante S, Casuccio A, Fulfaro F, Groff L, Boffi R, Villari P, Gebbia V, Ripamonti C. Switching from morphine to methadone to improve analgesia and tolerability in cancer patients: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jun 1;19(11):2898-904. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.11.2898.
Ripamonti C, Groff L, Brunelli C, Polastri D, Stavrakis A, De Conno F. Switching from morphine to oral methadone in treating cancer pain: what is the equianalgesic dose ratio? J Clin Oncol. 1998 Oct;16(10):3216-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3216.
Bruera E, Sweeney C. Methadone use in cancer patients with pain: a review. J Palliat Med. 2002 Feb;5(1):127-38. doi: 10.1089/10966210252785097.
Pearson EC, Woosley RL. QT prolongation and torsades de pointes among methadone users: reports to the FDA spontaneous reporting system. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Nov;14(11):747-53. doi: 10.1002/pds.1112.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
289/2554(EC4)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.