MR-PET for Staging and Assessment of Operability in Ovarian Cancer - a Feasibility Study
NCT ID: NCT02334371
Last Updated: 2016-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-04-30
2016-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PET/MR Versus CECT Scans in Imaging Patients With Ovarian Cancer or Highly Suspected Ovarian Cancer
NCT03965481
[18F]Fluoro-PEG-folate PET/CT Imaging in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
NCT05215496
A Prospective Cohort Study of 68ga-FAPI-pet-ct Versus FDG-pet-ct for Ovarian Cancer
NCT05824247
Dual PETOvac - Dual Time PET/CT in the Preoperative Assessment of Ovarian Cancer
NCT01889615
Pilot Study to Evaluate 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography /Computed Tomography (PET/CT) in Prediction of Early Response to Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer.
NCT00620243
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The importance of selecting patients with ovarian cancer who will benefit from either primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery has been acknowledged worldwide but the optimal diagnostic modality to serve in this matter remains to be discovered. We believe that combined magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography (MR-PET) can be of great clinical value in preoperative staging of patients with ovarian cancer. Both positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have proved to be useful in ovarian cancer staging but understaging due to difficulties in depicting peritoneal dissemination remains a great problem. In conclusion, the best method for staging ovarian cancer and assessing operability remains to be discovered, hence this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MR-PET
Preoperative whole-body MR-PET with 18F-FDG
MR-PET
The MR-PET will be performed with the Biograph mMR system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). This system integrates a 3Tesla MRI and PET scan which makes simultaneous acquisition of whole-body MRI and PET images possible. The Biograph mMR holds the CE mark and was FDA approved in June 2011. The Biograph mMR is intended to be used in the Academical hospita! Maastricht for standard patient care. The radiotracer that will be used is 18F-Iabeled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), according to standard PET -protocol.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MR-PET
The MR-PET will be performed with the Biograph mMR system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). This system integrates a 3Tesla MRI and PET scan which makes simultaneous acquisition of whole-body MRI and PET images possible. The Biograph mMR holds the CE mark and was FDA approved in June 2011. The Biograph mMR is intended to be used in the Academical hospita! Maastricht for standard patient care. The radiotracer that will be used is 18F-Iabeled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), according to standard PET -protocol.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for primary debulking or interval debulking surgery
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Ineligibility to undergo MR-PET examination (Non-MR compatible metallic implants or foreign bodies (ferromagnetic aneurysm clip, pacemaker, neurostimulation system, metal splinters etcetera) or claustrophobia)
* Pregnant or lactating patients.
* Incapacitated subjects
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Iris Rutten
Drs.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Toon Van Gorp
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Westphalen AC, Hricak H, Okuno WT, Powell B. Role of CT and MR imaging in predicting optimal cytoreduction of newly diagnosed primary epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Feb;96(2):301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.06.054.
Kumar Dhingra V, Kand P, Basu S. Impact of FDG-PET and -PET/CT imaging in the clinical decision-making of ovarian carcinoma: an evidence-based approach. Womens Health (Lond). 2012 Mar;8(2):191-203. doi: 10.2217/whe.11.91.
De Iaco P, Musto A, Orazi L, Zamagni C, Rosati M, Allegri V, Cacciari N, Al-Nahhas A, Rubello D, Venturoli S, Fanti S. FDG-PET/CT in advanced ovarian cancer staging: value and pitfalls in detecting lesions in different abdominal and pelvic quadrants compared with laparoscopy. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):e98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
Wakefield JC, Downey K, Kyriazi S, deSouza NM. New MR techniques in gynecologic cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Feb;200(2):249-60. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.8932.
Booth SJ, Turnbull LW, Poole DR, Richmond I. The accurate staging of ovarian cancer using 3T magnetic resonance imaging--a realistic option. BJOG. 2008 Jun;115(7):894-901. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01716.x.
Fujii S, Matsusue E, Kanasaki Y, Kanamori Y, Nakanishi J, Sugihara S, Kigawa J, Terakawa N, Ogawa T. Detection of peritoneal dissemination in gynecological malignancy: evaluation by diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008 Jan;18(1):18-23. doi: 10.1007/s00330-007-0732-9. Epub 2007 Aug 14.
Partovi S, Kohan A, Rubbert C, Vercher-Conejero JL, Gaeta C, Yuh R, Zipp L, Herrmann KA, Robbin MR, Lee Z, Muzic RF Jr, Faulhaber P, Ros PR. Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Mar 20;4(2):202-12. eCollection 2014.
Michielsen K, Vergote I, Op de Beeck K, Amant F, Leunen K, Moerman P, Deroose C, Souverijns G, Dymarkowski S, De Keyzer F, Vandecaveye V. Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT. Eur Radiol. 2014 Apr;24(4):889-901. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3083-8. Epub 2013 Dec 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL50080.068.14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.