Treosulfan-based Conditioning in Paediatric Patients With Haematological Malignancies
NCT ID: NCT02333058
Last Updated: 2020-05-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-21
2019-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treosulfan Based Conditioning Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML)
NCT01063660
Evaluation of Treosulfan Versus Melphalan Conditioning Followed by PTCy in Patients With AML and MDS Undergoing Allogeneic Transplantation
NCT07025824
Treosulfan-based Conditioning for Transplantation in AML/MDS
NCT00491634
Effect of Moderate Renal Impairment and Race/Ethnicity on Treosulfan Pharmacokinetics
NCT05534620
Treosulfan-Based Versus Clofarabine-Based Conditioning Before Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT04994808
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treosulfan dose per day is to be calculated by using body surface area (BSA). Two background conditioning regimens with Treosulfan are allowed: One regimen consists of a standardised Fludarabine-containing regimen and the other consists of an intensified regimen with Fludarabine and ThioTEPA.
Freedom from transplant (treatment)-related mortality (TRM), defined as death from any transplant-related cause from the day of first administration of study medication until day +100 after HSCT is the primary objective of the trial.
Moreover, the current pharmacokinetic (PK) model should be contributed to be able to finally give age (or BSA) dependent dose recommendations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treosulfan
Treosulfan dose per day is to be calculated by using BSA. One dose of Treosulfan per day on three consecutive days (day -6, day -5 and day -4) as intravenous (i.v.) infusion, given over 2 hours.
Two background conditioning regimens with Treosulfan are allowed: One regimen consists of a standardised Fludarabine-containing regimen (regimen A) and the other consists of an intensified regimen with Fludarabine and ThioTEPA (regimen B). The investigator decides for each individual patient whether to treat the patient with regimen A or with regimen B.
Treosulfan: i.v., BSA adapted: 10, 12 or 14 g/m²/day within 120 min to be administered prior to Fludarabine; Fludarabine: i.v., 30 mg/m2/day on days from -7 to -3 prior to HSCT; ThioTEPA (Regimen B): i.v., 2 x 5mg/kg/day on day -2.
Treosulfan
Treosulfan dose per day is to be calculated by using BSA:
One dose of Treosulfan per day on three consecutive days (day -6, day -5 and day -4) as intravenous (i.v.) infusion, given over 2 hours.
Two background conditioning regimens with Treosulfan are allowed: One regimen consists of a standardised Fludarabine-containing regimen (regimen A) and the other consists of an intensified regimen with Fludarabine and ThioTEPA (regimen B). The investigator decides for each individual patient whether to treat the patient with regimen A or with regimen B.
Treosulfan: i.v., BSA adapted: 10, 12 or 14 g/m²/day within 120 min to be administered prior to Fludarabine; Fludarabine: i.v., 30 mg/m2/day on days from -7 to -3 prior to HSCT; ThioTEPA (Regimen B): i.v., 2 x 5mg/kg/day on day -2.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Treosulfan
Treosulfan dose per day is to be calculated by using BSA:
One dose of Treosulfan per day on three consecutive days (day -6, day -5 and day -4) as intravenous (i.v.) infusion, given over 2 hours.
Two background conditioning regimens with Treosulfan are allowed: One regimen consists of a standardised Fludarabine-containing regimen (regimen A) and the other consists of an intensified regimen with Fludarabine and ThioTEPA (regimen B). The investigator decides for each individual patient whether to treat the patient with regimen A or with regimen B.
Treosulfan: i.v., BSA adapted: 10, 12 or 14 g/m²/day within 120 min to be administered prior to Fludarabine; Fludarabine: i.v., 30 mg/m2/day on days from -7 to -3 prior to HSCT; ThioTEPA (Regimen B): i.v., 2 x 5mg/kg/day on day -2.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Indication for first allo-HSCT or second allo-HSCT due to disease relapse, graft failure, or secondary malignancy after previous HSCT.
3. Available matched sibling donor (MSD), matched family donor (MFD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD). For bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) match is defined as 9/10 or 10/10 allele match after four digit typing in human leucocyte antigens (HLA)-A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1.
4. Patients with ALL or AML in complete morphologic remission (blast counts \<5 % in BM) and patients with MDS or JMML with blast counts \< 20 % in BM at study entry.
5. Age at time of registration from 28 days to less than 18 years of age.
6. Lansky (patients aged \<16 years) or Karnofsky (patients aged ≥ 16 years) performance score of at least 70 %.
7. Written informed consent of the parents/ legal guardians and patient's assent/consent according to national regulations.
8. Females of child-bearing potential or male patients' partners with child-bearing potential must use a highly effective method of contraception (pearl index \< 1 %) such as complete sexual abstinence, combined oral contraceptive, hormone intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD), vaginal hormone ring, transdermal contraceptive patch, contraceptive implant or depot contraceptive injection in combination with a second method of contraception like a condom or a cervical cap / diaphragm with spermicide or surgical sterilisation (vasectomy) in male patients or male partners during the study and at least 6 months thereafter.
9. Negative pregnancy test for females of child-bearing potential.
Exclusion Criteria
2. HSCT from haploidentical or umbilical cord blood donor.
3. Symptomatic involvement of central nervous system (CNS) at study entry.
4. Treatment with cytotoxic drugs within 10 days prior to day 7.
5. Obese paediatric patients with body mass index: weight (kg)/\[height (m)\]² \> 30 kg/m².
6. Solid tumours (e.g. neuroblastoma, peripheral neuroectodermal tumour \[PNET\], Ewing sarcoma).
7. Fanconi anaemia and other deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) breakage repair disorders.
8. Impaired liver function indicated by Bilirubin \> three times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) \> five times ULN, or active infectious hepatitis.
9. Impaired renal function indicated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (\[GFR\], according to the Schwartz formula) \< 60 mL/min/1,73m2.
10. Impaired cardiac function: severe cardiac insufficiency indicated by left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 35 %.
11. Requirement for supplementary continuous oxygen.
12. Severe active infection requiring deferral of conditioning.
13. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity.
14. Known pregnancy, breast feeding.
15. Known hypersensitivity to Treosulfan and/or Fludarabine.
28 Days
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Celerion
INDUSTRY
Syneos Health
OTHER
medac GmbH
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ajay Vora, MD, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Anna Children Hospital
Vienna, , Austria
University Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague
Prague, , Czechia
University Clinic Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, , Germany
University Clinic Erlangen-Nürnberg
Erlangen, , Germany
Universitätsklinikum Essen
Essen, , Germany
University Hospital Johann Wolfgang Goethe
Frankfurt, , Germany
University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, , Germany
Medical University Hannover
Hanover, , Germany
University Clinic Heidelberg
Heidelberg, , Germany
University Clinic Jena
Jena, , Germany
University Clinic München
München, , Germany
University Clinic Münster
Münster, , Germany
University Clinic Regensburg
Regensburg, , Germany
University Clinic Ulm
Ulm, , Germany
University Clinic Würzburg
Würzburg, , Germany
Ospedale Bambino Gesu Roma
Rome, , Italy
Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita Torino
Turin, , Italy
Bydgoszcz Medical University
Bydgoszcz, , Poland
Kraków Medical University
Krakow, , Poland
Lublin Medical University
Lublin, , Poland
Wroclaw Medical University
Wroclaw, , Poland
Birmingham Children's Hospital
Birmingham, , United Kingdom
Central Manchester University Hospital
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Sheffield Children's Hospital
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kalwak K, Mielcarek M, Patrick K, Styczynski J, Bader P, Corbacioglu S, Burkhardt B, Sykora KW, Drabko K, Gozdzik J, Fagioli F, Greil J, Gruhn B, Beier R, Locatelli F, Muller I, Schlegel PG, Sedlacek P, Stachel KD, Hemmelmann C, Moller AK, Baumgart J, Vora A. Treosulfan-fludarabine-thiotepa-based conditioning treatment before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric patients with hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Oct;55(10):1996-2007. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0869-6. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
sponsor's homepage
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MC-FludT.17/M
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.