Treosulfan-based Conditioning in Paediatric Patients With Haematological Malignancies

NCT ID: NCT02333058

Last Updated: 2020-05-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-21

Study Completion Date

2019-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate an alternative myeloablative, but reduced toxicity conditioning regimen in children, to describe the safety and efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) Treosulfan administered as part of a standardised Fludarabine-containing conditioning and to contribute to the current pharmacokinetic model to be able to finally give age (or body surface area) dependent dose recommendations. The treatment regimens given in the protocol MC-FludT.17/M are based on sufficient clinical safety and efficacy data. Considering the vital indication for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation of the selected patient population, the risk-benefit assessment is therefore reasonably in favour of the study conduct.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The protocol MC-FludT.17/M is a clinical phase II trial to describe the safety and efficacy of Treosulfan-based conditioning therapy prior to allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in at least 70 paediatric patients with haematological malignancies (male and female children with haematological malignant diseases as acute lymphoblastic leukaemias (ALL), acute myeloid leukaemias (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and juvenile myelomonocytic leukaemias (JMML), requiring myeloablative conditioning treatment with following allo-HSCT).

Treosulfan dose per day is to be calculated by using body surface area (BSA). Two background conditioning regimens with Treosulfan are allowed: One regimen consists of a standardised Fludarabine-containing regimen and the other consists of an intensified regimen with Fludarabine and ThioTEPA.

Freedom from transplant (treatment)-related mortality (TRM), defined as death from any transplant-related cause from the day of first administration of study medication until day +100 after HSCT is the primary objective of the trial.

Moreover, the current pharmacokinetic (PK) model should be contributed to be able to finally give age (or BSA) dependent dose recommendations.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemias (ALL) Acute Myeloid Leukaemias (AML) Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukaemias (JMML)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treosulfan

Treosulfan dose per day is to be calculated by using BSA. One dose of Treosulfan per day on three consecutive days (day -6, day -5 and day -4) as intravenous (i.v.) infusion, given over 2 hours.

Two background conditioning regimens with Treosulfan are allowed: One regimen consists of a standardised Fludarabine-containing regimen (regimen A) and the other consists of an intensified regimen with Fludarabine and ThioTEPA (regimen B). The investigator decides for each individual patient whether to treat the patient with regimen A or with regimen B.

Treosulfan: i.v., BSA adapted: 10, 12 or 14 g/m²/day within 120 min to be administered prior to Fludarabine; Fludarabine: i.v., 30 mg/m2/day on days from -7 to -3 prior to HSCT; ThioTEPA (Regimen B): i.v., 2 x 5mg/kg/day on day -2.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Treosulfan

Intervention Type DRUG

Treosulfan dose per day is to be calculated by using BSA:

One dose of Treosulfan per day on three consecutive days (day -6, day -5 and day -4) as intravenous (i.v.) infusion, given over 2 hours.

Two background conditioning regimens with Treosulfan are allowed: One regimen consists of a standardised Fludarabine-containing regimen (regimen A) and the other consists of an intensified regimen with Fludarabine and ThioTEPA (regimen B). The investigator decides for each individual patient whether to treat the patient with regimen A or with regimen B.

Treosulfan: i.v., BSA adapted: 10, 12 or 14 g/m²/day within 120 min to be administered prior to Fludarabine; Fludarabine: i.v., 30 mg/m2/day on days from -7 to -3 prior to HSCT; ThioTEPA (Regimen B): i.v., 2 x 5mg/kg/day on day -2.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Treosulfan

Treosulfan dose per day is to be calculated by using BSA:

One dose of Treosulfan per day on three consecutive days (day -6, day -5 and day -4) as intravenous (i.v.) infusion, given over 2 hours.

Two background conditioning regimens with Treosulfan are allowed: One regimen consists of a standardised Fludarabine-containing regimen (regimen A) and the other consists of an intensified regimen with Fludarabine and ThioTEPA (regimen B). The investigator decides for each individual patient whether to treat the patient with regimen A or with regimen B.

Treosulfan: i.v., BSA adapted: 10, 12 or 14 g/m²/day within 120 min to be administered prior to Fludarabine; Fludarabine: i.v., 30 mg/m2/day on days from -7 to -3 prior to HSCT; ThioTEPA (Regimen B): i.v., 2 x 5mg/kg/day on day -2.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Treograft® Ovastat®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Haematological malignant disease i.e. ALL, AML, MDS or JMML, indicated for allo-HSCT.
2. Indication for first allo-HSCT or second allo-HSCT due to disease relapse, graft failure, or secondary malignancy after previous HSCT.
3. Available matched sibling donor (MSD), matched family donor (MFD) or matched unrelated donor (MUD). For bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) match is defined as 9/10 or 10/10 allele match after four digit typing in human leucocyte antigens (HLA)-A, B, C, DRB1 and DQB1.
4. Patients with ALL or AML in complete morphologic remission (blast counts \<5 % in BM) and patients with MDS or JMML with blast counts \< 20 % in BM at study entry.
5. Age at time of registration from 28 days to less than 18 years of age.
6. Lansky (patients aged \<16 years) or Karnofsky (patients aged ≥ 16 years) performance score of at least 70 %.
7. Written informed consent of the parents/ legal guardians and patient's assent/consent according to national regulations.
8. Females of child-bearing potential or male patients' partners with child-bearing potential must use a highly effective method of contraception (pearl index \< 1 %) such as complete sexual abstinence, combined oral contraceptive, hormone intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD), vaginal hormone ring, transdermal contraceptive patch, contraceptive implant or depot contraceptive injection in combination with a second method of contraception like a condom or a cervical cap / diaphragm with spermicide or surgical sterilisation (vasectomy) in male patients or male partners during the study and at least 6 months thereafter.
9. Negative pregnancy test for females of child-bearing potential.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Third or later allo-HSCT.
2. HSCT from haploidentical or umbilical cord blood donor.
3. Symptomatic involvement of central nervous system (CNS) at study entry.
4. Treatment with cytotoxic drugs within 10 days prior to day 7.
5. Obese paediatric patients with body mass index: weight (kg)/\[height (m)\]² \> 30 kg/m².
6. Solid tumours (e.g. neuroblastoma, peripheral neuroectodermal tumour \[PNET\], Ewing sarcoma).
7. Fanconi anaemia and other deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) breakage repair disorders.
8. Impaired liver function indicated by Bilirubin \> three times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) \> five times ULN, or active infectious hepatitis.
9. Impaired renal function indicated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (\[GFR\], according to the Schwartz formula) \< 60 mL/min/1,73m2.
10. Impaired cardiac function: severe cardiac insufficiency indicated by left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) \< 35 %.
11. Requirement for supplementary continuous oxygen.
12. Severe active infection requiring deferral of conditioning.
13. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity.
14. Known pregnancy, breast feeding.
15. Known hypersensitivity to Treosulfan and/or Fludarabine.
Minimum Eligible Age

28 Days

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Celerion

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Syneos Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

medac GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ajay Vora, MD, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Anna Children Hospital

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

University Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

University Clinic Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic Erlangen-Nürnberg

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Essen

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

University Hospital Johann Wolfgang Goethe

Frankfurt, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Medical University Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic Jena

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic München

München, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic Münster

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic Regensburg

Regensburg, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic Ulm

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

University Clinic Würzburg

Würzburg, , Germany

Site Status

Ospedale Bambino Gesu Roma

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Ospedale Infantile Regina Margherita Torino

Turin, , Italy

Site Status

Bydgoszcz Medical University

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Kraków Medical University

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lublin Medical University

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw Medical University

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Birmingham Children's Hospital

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Central Manchester University Hospital

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sheffield Children's Hospital

Sheffield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Czechia Germany Italy Poland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kalwak K, Mielcarek M, Patrick K, Styczynski J, Bader P, Corbacioglu S, Burkhardt B, Sykora KW, Drabko K, Gozdzik J, Fagioli F, Greil J, Gruhn B, Beier R, Locatelli F, Muller I, Schlegel PG, Sedlacek P, Stachel KD, Hemmelmann C, Moller AK, Baumgart J, Vora A. Treosulfan-fludarabine-thiotepa-based conditioning treatment before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric patients with hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Oct;55(10):1996-2007. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0869-6. Epub 2020 Mar 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32203268 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.medac.de

sponsor's homepage

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MC-FludT.17/M

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Twice-per-weekSelinexor, 2 Days Melphalan
NCT06613035 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3