Trial Outcomes & Findings for Positive Valence System Enhancement Treatment for Anxiety and Depression: Clinical Efficacy and Neural Changes (NCT NCT02330627)
NCT ID: NCT02330627
Last Updated: 2021-11-08
Results Overview
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) measures positive affect. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 1 (Very slightly or not at all) to 5 (Extremely). The positive affect scale ranges from 10-50 and higher scores indicate greater levels of positive affect. The Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) measures positive emotions. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 0 (Never/Not at all) to 4 (Most of the time/Extremely). Higher scores on the positive emotions sub-scale indicate higher levels of positive emotion. Participants' scores on the PANAS and mDES were first standardized across assessment sessions by converting to Z scores (M=0, SD=1) across both groups. The composite index of positive affect at each assessment point was the mean of the Z scores for that occasion. Higher z-scores indicate an increase in positive affect from baseline to post-treatment.
COMPLETED
NA
29 participants
Baseline, 10 weeks
2021-11-08
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Positive Valence System Treatment
10 one-hour individual sessions comprised of psychoeducation and positive activity interventions designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
Positive Valence System Treatment: Clinician-administered one-hour treatment sessions focused on presenting rationale and instructions for completing positive activity exercises (e.g., gratitude, acts of kindness) between sessions.
|
Delayed Treatment (Waitlist)
No treatment received for 10 weeks
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
16
|
13
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Positive Valence System Enhancement Treatment for Anxiety and Depression: Clinical Efficacy and Neural Changes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Positive Valence System Treatment
n=16 Participants
10 one-hour individual sessions comprised of psychoeducation and positive activity interventions designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
Positive Valence System Treatment: Clinician-administered one-hour treatment sessions focused on presenting rationale and instructions for completing positive activity exercises (e.g., gratitude, acts of kindness) between sessions.
|
Delayed Treatment (Waitlist)
n=12 Participants
|
Total
n=28 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
29.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=5 Participants
|
29.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=7 Participants
|
29.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 weeksPopulation: One participant in the delayed treatment (waitlist) arm initiated an alternate treatment following the pre-assessment and was thus excluded from the analysis.
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) measures positive affect. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 1 (Very slightly or not at all) to 5 (Extremely). The positive affect scale ranges from 10-50 and higher scores indicate greater levels of positive affect. The Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) measures positive emotions. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 0 (Never/Not at all) to 4 (Most of the time/Extremely). Higher scores on the positive emotions sub-scale indicate higher levels of positive emotion. Participants' scores on the PANAS and mDES were first standardized across assessment sessions by converting to Z scores (M=0, SD=1) across both groups. The composite index of positive affect at each assessment point was the mean of the Z scores for that occasion. Higher z-scores indicate an increase in positive affect from baseline to post-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Positive Valence System Treatment
n=16 Participants
10 one-hour individual sessions comprised of psychoeducation and positive activity interventions designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
Positive Valence System Treatment: Clinician-administered one-hour treatment sessions focused on presenting rationale and instructions for completing positive activity exercises (e.g., gratitude, acts of kindness) between sessions.
|
Delayed Treatment (Waitlist)
n=12 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive Affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; Modified Differential Emotions Scale; Composite)
Pre-assessment
|
-0.41 z-score
Standard Deviation .96
|
-0.40 z-score
Standard Deviation .54
|
|
Change From Baseline in Positive Affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; Modified Differential Emotions Scale; Composite)
Post-assessment
|
0.73 z-score
Standard Deviation .87
|
-0.02 z-score
Standard Deviation .79
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 weeksChange from pre- to post-assessment in neural activation during reward trials on the MID task.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 weeksPopulation: One participant in the delayed treatment (waitlist) arm initiated an alternate treatment following the pre-assessment and was thus excluded from the analysis.
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) measures negative affect. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 1 (Very slightly or not at all) to 5 (Extremely). The negative affect scale ranges from 10-50 and lower scores indicate lower levels of negative affect. The Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) measures negative emotions. Items are answered on a 5 point scale, 0 (Never/Not at all) to 4 (Most of the time/Extremely). Lower scores on the negative emotions sub-scale indicate lower levels of negative emotion. Participants' composite scores on the PANAS and mDES were first standardized across assessment sessions by converting to Z scores (M=0, SD=1) across both groups. The composite index of negative affect at each assessment point (i.e., pre assessment - at baseline, post assessment - 10 weeks after baseline) was the mean of the Z scores for that occasion. Lower z-scores indicate a decrease in negative affect from baseline to post-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Positive Valence System Treatment
n=16 Participants
10 one-hour individual sessions comprised of psychoeducation and positive activity interventions designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
Positive Valence System Treatment: Clinician-administered one-hour treatment sessions focused on presenting rationale and instructions for completing positive activity exercises (e.g., gratitude, acts of kindness) between sessions.
|
Delayed Treatment (Waitlist)
n=12 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Negative Affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; Modified Differential Emotions Scale; Composite)
Pre Assessment
|
0.17 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.62
|
0.70 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Negative Affect (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule; Modified Differential Emotions Scale; Composite)
Post Assessment
|
-0.19 z-score
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
0.29 z-score
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 weeksChange from pre- to post-assessment in neural activation during loss trials on the MID
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 weeksPopulation: One participant in the delayed treatment (waitlist) arm initiated an alternate treatment following the pre-assessment and was thus excluded from the analysis.
The Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) measures the degree of satisfaction experienced by participants in various areas of daily functioning. Items are rated on a 5 point scale, 1 (Very Poor) to 5 (Very Good). The scale ranges from 14-70; higher scores indicate higher levels of life satisfaction. The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) measures global cognitive judgments of one's life satisfaction. Items are rated on a 7 point scale, 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree). The scale ranges from 5-35; higher scores indicate higher levels of life satisfaction. Participants' scores on the Q-LES-Q and the SWLS were first standardized across assessment sessions by converting to Z scores (M=0, SD=1) across both groups. The composite index of quality of life and well-being at each assessment point was the mean of the Z scores for that occasion. Higher z-scores indicate an increase in quality of life and well-being from baseline to post-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Positive Valence System Treatment
n=16 Participants
10 one-hour individual sessions comprised of psychoeducation and positive activity interventions designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
Positive Valence System Treatment: Clinician-administered one-hour treatment sessions focused on presenting rationale and instructions for completing positive activity exercises (e.g., gratitude, acts of kindness) between sessions.
|
Delayed Treatment (Waitlist)
n=12 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life and Well-being (Composite of Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire; Satisfaction With Life Scale)
Pre-assessment
|
-.25 z-score
Standard Deviation .77
|
-.34 z-score
Standard Deviation .81
|
|
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life and Well-being (Composite of Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire; Satisfaction With Life Scale)
Post-assessment
|
.76 z-score
Standard Deviation .81
|
-.35 z-score
Standard Deviation .87
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 weeksPopulation: One participant in the delayed treatment (waitlist) arm initiated an alternate treatment following the pre-assessment and was thus excluded from the analysis.
The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) measures frequency, severity, and functional impairment of anxiety symptoms. Items are rated on a 4 point scale, 0 (None) to 4 (Extreme). The scale ranges from 0-20 and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. The State Trait Anxiety Inventory - Trait (STAI-T) measures general anxiety. Items are rated on a 4 point scale, 1 (Almost Never) to 4 (Almost Always). The scale ranges from 20-80 and higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety. Participants' composite scores on the OASIS and the STAI were first standardized across assessment sessions by converting to Z scores (M=0, SD=1) across both groups. The composite index of anxiety at each assessment point (i.e., pre assessment - at baseline, post assessment - 10 weeks after baseline) was the mean of the Z scores for that occasion. Lower z-scores indicate a decrease in anxiety from baseline to post-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Positive Valence System Treatment
n=16 Participants
10 one-hour individual sessions comprised of psychoeducation and positive activity interventions designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
Positive Valence System Treatment: Clinician-administered one-hour treatment sessions focused on presenting rationale and instructions for completing positive activity exercises (e.g., gratitude, acts of kindness) between sessions.
|
Delayed Treatment (Waitlist)
n=12 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Anxiety (Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale; State Trait Anxiety Inventory - Trait Composite)
Pre Assessment
|
.14 z-score
Standard Deviation .54
|
.40 z-score
Standard Deviation .62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Anxiety (Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale; State Trait Anxiety Inventory - Trait Composite)
Post Assessment
|
-.61 z-score
Standard Deviation .68
|
.23 z-score
Standard Deviation .91
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 10 weeksPopulation: One participant in the delayed treatment (waitlist) arm initiated an alternate treatment following the pre-assessment and was thus excluded from the analysis.
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) measures depression symptoms. Items are rated on a 4 point scale, 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). The scale ranges from 0-27 and higher scores indicate higher levels of depression. The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) measures the severity of depression. Participants choose 1 of 4 response options; a value of 0 to 3 is assigned to each response option. The scale ranges from 0-63 and higher scores indicate higher severity of depression. Participants' composite scores on the PHQ-9 and the BDI-II were first standardized across assessment sessions by converting to Z scores (M=0, SD=1) across both groups. The composite index of depression at each assessment point (i.e., pre assessment - at baseline, post assessment - 10 weeks after baseline) was the mean of the Z scores for that occasion. Lower z-scores indicate a decrease in depression from baseline to post-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Positive Valence System Treatment
n=16 Participants
10 one-hour individual sessions comprised of psychoeducation and positive activity interventions designed to increase positive emotions, cognitions, and behaviors.
Positive Valence System Treatment: Clinician-administered one-hour treatment sessions focused on presenting rationale and instructions for completing positive activity exercises (e.g., gratitude, acts of kindness) between sessions.
|
Delayed Treatment (Waitlist)
n=12 Participants
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Beck Depression Inventory-II Composite)
Pre Assessment
|
.29 z-score
Standard Deviation .90
|
.47 z-score
Standard Deviation .77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Beck Depression Inventory-II Composite)
Post Assessment
|
-.87 z-score
Standard Deviation .55
|
.29 z-score
Standard Deviation .97
|
Adverse Events
Positive Valence System Treatment
Delayed Treatment (Waitlist)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place