Standardisation of Investigations of Mild Bleeding Disorders
NCT ID: NCT02329899
Last Updated: 2016-11-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
208 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-07-31
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective of this diagnostic study is to evaluate the efficiency of a standardised procedure of MBD in children and adults referred to their respective outpatient clinics for bleeding symptoms. The following endpoints will be evaluated:
1. The relative number of precise diagnosis (according to recognised classification of haemostatic disorders) in each clinical probability category;
2. The number of biological tests performed per patient in each clinical probability category;
3. The relative number of patients with no specialised investigations in the low risk group.
The secondary objective is to evaluate the bleeding events during a one-year follow-up. Follow-up will be performed with a phone call one year after the last consultation of the patient. The definition of a bleeding event will be any bleeding that promotes any specific medical attention (consultation, hospitalisation, transfusion, re-intervention in case of surgery). The detailed clinical history regarding each event will be collected. Bleeding events will be correlated to the clinical probability assessed at inclusion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Possible MBD
Defined by:
* a bleeding score \>= 4 in adults;
* a bleeding score \>= 2 in children (for girls, up to menses);
* a past medical history that include menorrhagia, haemorrhage from the umbilical stump, bleeding at circumcision, cephalhematoma at birth, hematuria, whatever the bleeding score is;
* a past medical history suggestive of a MBD with no haemostatic challenge and a low bleeding score.
In this group, the second step of investigations will be performed.
Second step of investigations
Second step according to results of the first step:
* exploration of coagulation factors;
* factor XIII and fibrinolysis investigations;
* investigation of platelet function;
* investigation of thrombocytopenia.
MBD unlikely
Patients without criteria for possible MBD as listed above.
In this group, no further investigation will be performed if the first step is normal. The second step of investigations will be performed only in case of significant abnormalities in the first step of investigation.
Second step of investigations
Second step according to results of the first step:
* exploration of coagulation factors;
* factor XIII and fibrinolysis investigations;
* investigation of platelet function;
* investigation of thrombocytopenia.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Second step of investigations
Second step according to results of the first step:
* exploration of coagulation factors;
* factor XIII and fibrinolysis investigations;
* investigation of platelet function;
* investigation of thrombocytopenia.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Geneva
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Françoise Boehlen, MD
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Boehlen Francoise, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Haemostasis unit, University Hospitals of Geneva, Switerland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Haemostasis unit, University Hospitals of Geneva
Geneva, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-246
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id