Trial Outcomes & Findings for Changes in Exhaled 13CO2/12CO2 Breath Delta Value as an Early Indicator of Infection in ICU Patients (NCT NCT02327130)
NCT ID: NCT02327130
Last Updated: 2019-01-03
Results Overview
The variation in breath delta value was assessed regardless of infection status. Exhaled breath samples were collected from participants upon enrollment and every four hours thereafter until the end of the subject's study duration per protocol. Each subject was used as its own control for the purpose of trend analysis.The first breath sample collected was considered an individual's "baseline" sample. The change in the breath delta value was calculated from this baseline sample.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
Baseline to ICU discharge or 7 days, whichever came first
2019-01-03
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Isomark Canary
All subjects were enrolled were at risk for developing infections during the study but did not currently exhibit signs of ongoing infection. The 'at risk' enrolled subjects utilized the Isomark Canary to take exhaled breath samples to assess for infection status.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
32
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Isomark Canary
All subjects were enrolled were at risk for developing infections during the study but did not currently exhibit signs of ongoing infection. The 'at risk' enrolled subjects utilized the Isomark Canary to take exhaled breath samples to assess for infection status.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Discharged in less than 5 days
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Unable to provide breath sample
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Incorrectly place ventilator adaptor
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Met exclusion criteria
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Changes in Exhaled 13CO2/12CO2 Breath Delta Value as an Early Indicator of Infection in ICU Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Critically Ill Subjects at Risk for Infection
n=20 Participants
Critically ill adult ICU subjects who are not suspected of having an infection at the time of ICU admission were enrolled as study subjects.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to ICU discharge or 7 days, whichever came firstThe variation in breath delta value was assessed regardless of infection status. Exhaled breath samples were collected from participants upon enrollment and every four hours thereafter until the end of the subject's study duration per protocol. Each subject was used as its own control for the purpose of trend analysis.The first breath sample collected was considered an individual's "baseline" sample. The change in the breath delta value was calculated from this baseline sample.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exhaled Breath
n=20 Participants
Exhaled breath samples were collected 6 times per day for 7 days. We will use the Isomark Canary™ to determine the BDV of breath samples collected during this study.
|
Specificity
Percent specificity for BDV to predict an infection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Breath Delta Value
|
0.44 parts per mil (‰)
Standard Error 1.09
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1 through 7Daily analysis infection status from blood samples given from each participant.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exhaled Breath
n=20 Participants
Exhaled breath samples were collected 6 times per day for 7 days. We will use the Isomark Canary™ to determine the BDV of breath samples collected during this study.
|
Specificity
Percent specificity for BDV to predict an infection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With an Infection Diagnosis
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 7 daysBased on an ROC analysis the optimal cutoff value for indicating the presence of infection using the BDV is 1.4‰. Based on this cutoff value the sensitivity and specificity were calculated. Sensitivity, or the true positive rate, is the proportion of actual positives that are correctly identified. In this case, the sensitivity is the percentage of people who have an infection and were identified by the Isomark Canary as having an 'infection'. The specificity, or the true negative rate, is the promotion of actual negatives that are correctly identified as negative. In this case, the specificity is the proportion of people without infections that were correctly classified by the Isomark Canary as having 'no infection'.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Exhaled Breath
n=20 Participants
Exhaled breath samples were collected 6 times per day for 7 days. We will use the Isomark Canary™ to determine the BDV of breath samples collected during this study.
|
Specificity
n=20 Participants
Percent specificity for BDV to predict an infection
|
|---|---|---|
|
Positive and Negative Predictive Value of BDV for Infection Diagnosis
|
90.1 percent
|
66.7 percent
|
Adverse Events
At Risk for Infection
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Daniel Butz, Chief Scientific Officer
Isomark, LLC
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place