Trial Outcomes & Findings for Carillon Mitral Contour System® for Reducing Functional Mitral Regurgitation (NCT NCT02325830)

NCT ID: NCT02325830

Last Updated: 2024-08-05

Results Overview

The primary echocardiographic index and primary endpoint of the REDUCE FMR study was Regurgitant Volume (RV) in the ITT population (N=120). RV was analyzed for the ITT patient population calculated as the mean change per randomization group among subjects with evaluable data. Between group comparisons were performed using the Students' t-test.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

163 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and 12 months

Results posted on

2024-08-05

Participant Flow

163 subjects consented to randomize 120. 28 Screen Failed prior to procedure 15 Excluded at the procedure due to angiographic results

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Treatment Group
CARILLON Mitral Contour System: Percutaneous mitral valve repair
Control Group
Optimized stable medical therapy
Overall Study
STARTED
87
33
Overall Study
COMPLETED
70
24
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
17
9

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Treatment Group
n=87 Participants
CARILLON Mitral Contour System: Percutaneous mitral valve repair
Control Group
n=33 Participants
Optimized stable medical therapy
Total
n=120 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
70.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=87 Participants
69.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=33 Participants
69.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
n=87 Participants
9 Participants
n=33 Participants
33 Participants
n=120 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants
n=87 Participants
24 Participants
n=33 Participants
87 Participants
n=120 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
NYHA
NYHA II Mild symptoms
39 Participants
n=87 Participants
16 Participants
n=33 Participants
55 Participants
n=120 Participants
NYHA
NYHA III Marked limitation
46 Participants
n=87 Participants
17 Participants
n=33 Participants
63 Participants
n=120 Participants
NYHA
NYHA IV Severe limitations
2 Participants
n=87 Participants
0 Participants
n=33 Participants
2 Participants
n=120 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

Population: Image quality from sites reduced ultimate number of images able to be analyze by central review committee for RV values.

The primary echocardiographic index and primary endpoint of the REDUCE FMR study was Regurgitant Volume (RV) in the ITT population (N=120). RV was analyzed for the ITT patient population calculated as the mean change per randomization group among subjects with evaluable data. Between group comparisons were performed using the Students' t-test.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment Group
n=55 Participants
Implantation of the Carillon Mitral Contour System Carillon Mitral Contour System: Percutaneous mitral valve repair
Control Group
n=13 Participants
Optimized stable medical therapy
Change in Baseline Regurgitant Volume Associated With the Carillon Device Relative to the Control Population at 12 Months
-7.07 ml/beat
Interval -11.68 to -2.46
3.32 ml/beat
Interval -5.98 to 12.62

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

Population: 120 randomized subjects, regardless of follow-up period.

Cumulative number of events for Death, Myocardial Infarction, Cardiac Perforation, Device embolization, and surgical or percutaneous intervention related to device.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment Group
n=87 Participants
Implantation of the Carillon Mitral Contour System Carillon Mitral Contour System: Percutaneous mitral valve repair
Control Group
n=33 Participants
Optimized stable medical therapy
Difference in the Rate of Major Adverse Events Between Treatment (Carillon) and Control Groups
-7.07 Mitral Regurgitant Volume (mL)
Interval -11.68 to -2.46
3.32 Mitral Regurgitant Volume (mL)
Interval -5.98 to 12.62

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 12 months

Population: Randomized subjects, per treatment arm

A diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure hospitalization (ADHF) requires an in-hospital stay that includes at least one calendar date change and requires intravenous or mechanical heart failure treatment. The length of hospital stay will be calculated from admission to discharge to home or other disposition. The diagnosis of ADHF will be based on: * Symptoms of worsening heart failure such as increased shortness of breath, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, fatigue, decreased exercise tolerance or history of weight gain; * Physical examination evidence such as neck vein distention, the presence of a third heart sound, bilateral pulmonary rales, worsening ascites or pedal edema, hypotension or signs of worsening end-organ perfusion; and/or * Laboratory evidence, which may include pulmonary congestion on chest x-ray, elevated natriuretic peptide level, worsening oxygenation or respiratory acidosis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment Group
n=87 Participants
Implantation of the Carillon Mitral Contour System Carillon Mitral Contour System: Percutaneous mitral valve repair
Control Group
n=33 Participants
Optimized stable medical therapy
Rate of Heart Failure Hospitalizations Between Treatment (Carillon) and Control Groups
0.57 Rate of HFH per patient-year
Interval 0.41 to 0.72
0.73 Rate of HFH per patient-year
Interval 0.44 to 1.03

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months

Population: Randomized subjects

Subjects had 6-MWT conducted at baseline and each follow-up visit. The subject walked as far as they could within a 6-minute period. They were allowed to rest. The distance (in whole meters) was captured at each visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment Group
n=87 Participants
Implantation of the Carillon Mitral Contour System Carillon Mitral Contour System: Percutaneous mitral valve repair
Control Group
n=33 Participants
Optimized stable medical therapy
Change in Six-minute Walk Distance Between Treatment (Carillon) and Control Groups
32.0 Meters
Interval -10.0 to 70.0
17.5 Meters
Interval -20.0 to 46.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 12 Months

Population: Randomized population with paired images from baseline to 12-month only.

The volume of the left ventricle will be measured by a blinded echosonographer ajdn submitted to the core lab for blinded analysis. The ventricle will be measured as systole and diastole.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Treatment Group
n=47 Participants
Implantation of the Carillon Mitral Contour System Carillon Mitral Contour System: Percutaneous mitral valve repair
Control Group
n=16 Participants
Optimized stable medical therapy
Change in Left Ventricular Volumes Between Treatment (Carillon) and Control Groups
LVEDV
-10.42 mL
Interval -18.18 to -2.37
6.54 mL
Interval -5.14 to 18.22
Change in Left Ventricular Volumes Between Treatment (Carillon) and Control Groups
LVESV
-6.19 mL
Interval -12.78 to 0.39
6.1 mL
Interval -1.42 to 13.63

Adverse Events

Treatment Group

Serious events: 46 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 11 deaths

Control Group

Serious events: 19 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 5 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Treatment Group
n=87 participants at risk
Implantation of the CARILLON Mitral Contour System CARILLON Mitral Contour System: Percutaneous mitral valve repair
Control Group
n=33 participants at risk
Optimized stable medical therapy
Cardiac disorders
Acute Coronary Syndromes
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia - Atrial Fibrillation
4.6%
4/87 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia - Ventricular Fibrillation
1.1%
1/87 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
0.00%
0/33 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia - Ventricular Tachycardia
1.1%
1/87 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
0.00%
0/33 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary Spasm
1.1%
1/87 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
0.00%
0/33 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Cardiac disorders
ICD Device Shock
1.1%
1/87 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
0.00%
0/33 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Cardiac disorders
Heart Failure Exacerbation
27.6%
24/87 • Number of events 24 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
33.3%
11/33 • Number of events 11 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Cardiac disorders
Endocarditis
0.00%
0/87 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Cardiac disorders
Sick Sinus Syndrome
1.1%
1/87 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
0.00%
0/33 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Cardiac disorders
Worsening of Mitral Regurgitation
2.3%
2/87 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
0.00%
0/33 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal
4.6%
4/87 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Infections and infestations
Infection
4.6%
4/87 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Vascular disorders
Intracerebral Bleeding
0.00%
0/87 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
Vascular disorders
Lacunar Stroke
1.1%
1/87 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.
0.00%
0/33 • Adverse Event Data was collected from the time of consent to 12-month post randomization.

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Vice President of Clinica Affairs

Cardiac Dimensions

Phone: 425-605-5922

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: LTE60