Evaluation of the Efficacy of Low-dose Acetylsalicylic Acid on Diarrhea Induced by Anti-cancer Targeted Therapies.

NCT ID: NCT02323516

Last Updated: 2015-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The mechanisms of action of the side effects associated with targeted therapies are still poorly understood. He was found in patients treated with gefitinib, increased levels of thromboxane B2 and P-selectin Thromboxane B2 is the result of the hydrolysis of thromboxane A2, which is itself obtained from Prostaglandin H2 under the action of the thromboxane synthetase. The thromboxane A2 is produced by platelets and the active pro-thrombotic properties as follows: stimulation of platelets and activation of other increased platelet aggregation.

The selectins are cell adhesion proteins with a role in the adhesion phenomena. P-selectin is expressed by platelets and endothelial cells.

The demonstration of increased plasma levels of thromboxane B2 and P-selectin leaves suggest a role of platelet activation in the occurrence of side effects associated with targeted therapies.

Kanazawa's study was conducted in 39 Japanese patients, trying to assess the value of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid or 100mg per day, that is to say, anti-aggrégantes doses, the occurrence rash and diarrhea induced by gefitinib.

In this study, the group of patients treated with acetylsalicylic acid presented a lower rate of side effects significantly, 58.3% versus 77.8%. The frequency of diarrhea was 18.5% (or 5 patients) in the standard group versus 0% in the group with acetylsalicylic acid. Similarly, it was found a reduction in the occurrence of skin rash, 33.3% or 4 patients in the acetylsalicylic acid group versus 74.1% s, 20 patients in the standard group. Finally, in this study, it was not revealed significant differences in terms of response to treatment with gefitinib (37% in the standard group versus 33% in the group treated with aspirin patient) It does not exist in our knowledge of prospective data evaluating the effect of acetylsalicylic acid on the reduction of side effects associated with targeted in a population of patients of Caucasian-type treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Acetylsalicylic acid + loperamide

Acetylsalicylic acid + loperamide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

diosmectite + loperamide

Intervention Type DRUG

In case of inefficiency in one month, according to predefined criteria, diosmectite will be stopped and replaced by acetylsalicylic acid.

diosmectite + loperamide

Acetylsalicylic acid + loperamide

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acetylsalicylic acid + loperamide

Intervention Type DRUG

In case of inefficiency in one month, according to predefined criteria, acetylsalicylic acid will be stopped and replaced by diosmectite.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acetylsalicylic acid + loperamide

In case of inefficiency in one month, according to predefined criteria, acetylsalicylic acid will be stopped and replaced by diosmectite.

Intervention Type DRUG

diosmectite + loperamide

In case of inefficiency in one month, according to predefined criteria, diosmectite will be stopped and replaced by acetylsalicylic acid.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged at least 18 years old patient;
* WHO 0 to 2;
* Any solid tumor or hematologic malignancy requiring a tyrosine kinase inhibitor prescription in the absence of digestive disorders related to tumor disease;
* Treatment with one of the following targeted therapies: Gefitinib, erlotinib, sunitinib, sorafenib, Axitinib, Pazopanib, Lapatinib, Imatinib, afatinib,vemurafenib and Dabrafenib;
* Targeted therapy treatment whatever the processing line monotherapy, administered over a period of at least 15 days with continued dosing, with usual care recommendations;
* Diarrhea grade 1-3 according to NCI criteria CTCAE.4, in the absence of complications signs with at least 2 doses of loperamide per day.

Exclusion Criteria

* Processing acetylsalicylic acid;
* Allergy or against-indications to acetylsalicylic acid (including concomitant antiplatelet or anticoagulant considered as increasing the risk of bleeding by the investigator) acid;
* Treatment with anti vitamin K or new oral anticoagulants;
* Absolute in pursuit of targeted therapy contraindication;
* Chronic diarrhea prior to clinical introduction of targeted therapy;
* Diarrhoea unrelated to targeted therapy such as:

* extended resection of esophagus, inflammatory bowel disease, etc ...
* carcinoid syndrome;
* occlusive syndrome;
* Grade 3 diarrhea with signs of complications or grade 4
* Patients with a history of grade 3 diarrhea with signs of complications or grade 4 during previous treatment with TKI;
* Participation in other medical test;
* Pregnant women / nursing;
* Association with methotrexate at doses \> 15 mg / d;
* Patient Trust or deprived of liberty.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ligue contre le cancer, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canceropôle Nord Ouest

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre Francois Baclesse

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Centre François Baclesse

Caen, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier public du Cotentin

Cherbourg, , France

Site Status

Centre hospitalier

Compiègne, , France

Site Status

Centre Léon Bérard

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ASPIDIA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id