Multicentric Evaluation of UPP, UHS and Ultra Pro Comfort Plug for Inguinal Hernia Surgery Including Quality of Life Evaluation
NCT ID: NCT02315209
Last Updated: 2014-12-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
4000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-01-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. In the care of inguinal hernias exists a considerable diversity of methods. Germany is expected to experience a significant shift of service delivery from inpatient to outpatient care within the next few years. As a result of this, the need for quality-controlled procedures in the ambulatory use has emerged.
2. A first register phase for open inguinal hernia was designed in 2010 and is now almost finished. After the evaluation of approximately 6,000 patient records, the process is considered to be extremely successful.
3. As a central result of this first register phase can already be stated that the integration of 3D meshes in a standardized process proved to be extremely effective in open inguinal hernia. In all of the examined relevant parameters, a quality of care well above the status quo could be exhibited.
4. This data quality is unique to the hernia care not only in Germany. In Contrast, the results also achieved considerable international attention. Hence, the working group received the Fruchaud prize for presenting the results of the American Hernia Society 2013. (see Annex, www.americanherniasociety.org)
* Objective
a. Since this approach has proven successful in the first register phase in every respect, it is now to be continued for another two years in order to develop the basis to establish this concept as widespread (outpatient) standard. The central question will be investigated of whether the outstanding results of register phase 1 will also occur in a wide and distributed application to more centers. If this can be proved, the conditions based on worldwide unique scientific data (methodology and follow-up rates, see below) are created to establish the standard surgical procedure with central integration of 3D meshes (UPP UHS) as gold standard against the Lichtenstein method in the outpatient sector.
* Design
1. Prospective multicenter observational study of online-based (daily updated) recording of all relevant pre-, peri-and postoperative data, including patient- as well as physician-specific follow up.
2. Analysis of the most relevant patient-specific endpoints recurrence, pain and quality of life with a 4, 12 and 52 weeks follow-up and the use of psychometrically validated Carolina Comfort Scale (anonymous and tamper-resistant).
3. Significant expansion of the participating centers with a special comparison of the quality of results between newly added centers and centers, that have been proven already.
4. Duration: 01/01/2014 - 12/31/2015 with an additional one-year follow-up to 12/31/2016.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
UHS, UPP, Comfort Plug
only Repairs with 3D Devices (UPP,UHS,Comfort Plug)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age\>18ys
* using 3D devices
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Magdeburg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr.Andreas Koch MD, FACS
Member of the Scientific Board
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andreas Koch, MD, FACS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institute for Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine
Ralph Lorenz, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Institute for Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Heniford BT, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW. Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Apr;206(4):638-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.11.025. Epub 2008 Feb 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GR13-108
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id