Evaluation of Fluorescence-image Guided Wound Assessment vs. Standard Practice

NCT ID: NCT02315092

Last Updated: 2018-02-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current trial aims to compare the assessment of diabetic foot ulcers by fluorescence image guidance to standard practice. The device will be used to acquire fluorescence images of diabetic foot ulcers: when wounds are illuminated by violet/blue light, most pathogenic bacterial species emit a unique red fluorescence signal. The device is intended to be used as part of the clinical assessment process, which may include visual assessment, signs of heat or high temperature, the presence of exudate, and redness in the area. Images will guide the clinician to inspect, sample or further evaluate areas where fluorescing bacteria is present. This study will allow us to determine the benefit of fluorescence image-guided procedure as compared to standard clinical practice to assess bacterial burden in diabetic foot ulcers. Microbiological swabbing under standard practice and fluoresce-guided imaging will be performed in order to compare the two techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Chronic wounds and their associated care are a burden to patients and health care systems worldwide. Microbiological testing of wound samples is often used to identify and quantify bacterial species, the latter of which may be both an objective quantitative indicator of infection and a predictive correlate of healing. Microbiology reports contain useful information about microbial identities, antibiotic susceptibility, and semi-quantitative bacterial growth rates, but these data typically represent the bacterial load in the wound centre only, and often arrive 3-5 days later. There is an unmet clinical need to improve the microbiological sampling and treatment of wound infections. To address this need, we developed a handheld portable imaging device that obtains white light (WL) and fluorescence (FL) images (or video) of normal skin and wounds in high-resolution and in real-time, which can be used at the point-of-care. It was demonstrated in previous studies that the device1) provides image-guidance for tissue sampling, detecting clinically-significant levels of pathogenic bacteria and wound infection otherwise overlooked by conventional sampling and 2) provides image-guidance for wound treatment, accelerating wound closure compared with conventional therapies and quantitatively tracking long-term changes in bacterial bioburden and distribution in wounds.

The current trial aims to compare the assessment of diabetic foot ulcers by fluorescence image guidance to standard practice. The device will be used to acquire fluorescence images of diabetic foot ulcers: when wounds are illuminated by violet/blue light, most pathogenic bacterial species emit a unique red fluorescence signal. The device is intended to be used as part of the clinical assessment process, which may include visual assessment, signs of heat or high temperature, the presence of exudate, and redness in the area. Images will guide the clinician to inspect, sample or further evaluate areas where fluorescing bacteria is present. This study will allow us to determine the benefit of fluorescence image-guided procedure as compared to standard clinical practice to assess bacterial burden in diabetic foot ulcers. Microbiological swabbing under standard practice and fluoresce-guided imaging will be performed in order to compare the two techniques.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Foot Ulcer, Diabetic Bacteria

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Diabetic foot ulcers

Patients who present with diabetic foot ulcers will undergo fluorescence imaging.

Fluorescence Imaging

Intervention Type DEVICE

Wounds will be imaged using violet light (405 nm) illumination to locate areas with bacterial presence to guide swabbing.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fluorescence Imaging

Wounds will be imaged using violet light (405 nm) illumination to locate areas with bacterial presence to guide swabbing.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female who present with a diabetic foot ulcer and are receiving standard wound care treatment.
* 18 years and older

Exclusion Criteria

* Treatment with an investigational drug within 1 month before study enrolment
* Inability to consent
* Any contra-indication to routine wound care and/or monitoring
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Judy Dan Research and Treatment Centre

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ralph DaCosta

Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ralph S DaCosta, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Judy Dan Research and Treatment Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14-8303

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Diabetic Foot Ulcer Imaging- Study 2
NCT03942081 RECRUITING NA