Bone Innervation Around Implants

NCT ID: NCT02314910

Last Updated: 2021-11-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-08-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

If implants are osseointegrated, there might be innervation of the bone close to the implants. This event might explain the so-called osseoperception phenomena: Functioning with implant-supported oral prostheses is better than with removable prostheses due to physiologic integration and thus sensory feedback.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Several studies confirm improved oral functions in patients who wear dentures on implants, compared with patients with a removable denture. This could possibly be explained by sensory innervation around the implant. However, the mechanism of the phenomenon is not yet completely elucidated.

A first step is to identify and describe nerve fibers around implants that are integrated in human jawbone. The results of this study can then be used to identify the factors that promote such innervation (implant surface, surgical procedure, patient-related factors, ...).

Goal The purpose of this study is to identify and characterize nerve fibers around osseogeïntegreerde implants.

Materials and methods Inclusion and exclusion Only implants that were lost due to mechanical failure or because of severe bone loss will be used. In the case of bone loss, an analysis will only be performed if sufficient osseointegration took place apical to the implant, at least about ¼ of the length of the implant. All these failed implants should be removed from a clinical point of view, but the extensive osseointegration purpose necessitates the clinical use of a trepanbur, a cylindrical bur to remove jaw bone. All patients will, prior to surgery, give informed consent to use their implants for further research, as well as the data from their clinical file.

Collection of samples It is not possible to identify nerve fibers around the implants on the basis of radiological images, because the resolution is not high enough and because radiology of material with very high density (titanium) results in a distorted picture, exactly in the space around the implant . Therefore, a histological analysis will be made on the implants.

For this study, over a period of 5 years, as far as possible, implants will be collected with a minimum of 20. The implants will be collected from patients in three clinical centers where implants are placed: UZ Leuven, ZOL Genk and a private practice in Leuven.

The implants are removed with a trepanbur and immediately preserved in glutaraldehyde or formaldehyde.

Analysis of the samples The fixed samples are decalcified in 10% EDTA, hydrated through graded concentrations of ethanol and finally placed in Araldite. They can then be cut with a bonemicrotome (Reichert Ultracut E Microtome, Vienna, Austria) and further prepared for light microscopic and ultrastructural analysis. Staining with methylene blue (0.1% aqueous solution) will be done on sections of 0.5 um. These sections will be viewed with a light microscope and digitized at a high resolution Mirax Scan (Carl Zeiss Micro-Imaging GmbH, Germany). The images will be evaluated by an expert at a magnification of 20x, 40x and 100x on a 30inch LCD screen with custom software (Mirax Viewer 1.1, Göttingen, Germany). For the analysis of the ultrastructural features, the investigators will make ultrathin sections (0.06μm) and on plates coated with 0.7% formvar places, contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. These sections are EM208S analyzed with a transmission electron microscope (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at 80 kV.

Expected results Following a pilot study, the investigators expect in certain cases to discover new nerve fibers in bone around implants. These nerve fibers can be described, and their nature identified. If sufficient fibers are detected with these results, the investigators can prove the osseoperception phenomena. This information can then be used for the optimization of therapies with implants, so that the best possible integration, both biologically and physiologically, can take place.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Innervation of Bone Around Implants

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Innervation Jaw Bone Implants Stereognostic Osseoperception

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Failed implant

There is only one group, being the group of patients of which the oral implant needed to be removed for clinical reasons.

Sample histology

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sample histology

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Implant lost due to clinical reasons

Exclusion Criteria

* No osseointegration
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UZ Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BAI_040413

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id