Gentamicin Versus Clindamycin Versus Normal Saline Lavage in Axilla

NCT ID: NCT02314806

Last Updated: 2014-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection were randomized into 3 groups: patients undergoing lavages with normal saline (Group 1), patients undergoing lavage gentamicin solution (Group 2) and patients undergoing lavage with a clindamycin solution (Group 3). Drainage volume discharge is investigated

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection were randomized into 3 groups: patients undergoing 2 lavages with 500 ml normal saline (Group 1), patients first undergoing lavage with 500 ml normal saline followed by a second lavage with a 500 ml of a gentamicin (240 mg) solution (Group 2) and patients first undergoing lavage with 500 ml normal saline followed by a second lavage with 500ml of a clindamycin (600mg) solution (Group 3). Drainage volume discharge is investigated

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Irrigation with Gentamicin solution

The surgical bed is irrigated with a gentamicin solution

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Irrigation with gentamicin solution

Intervention Type DRUG

The surgical bed is irrigated with a gentamicin solution

Irrigation with Clindamycin solution

The surgical bed is irrigated with a clindamycin solution

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Irrigation with Clindamycin solution

Intervention Type DRUG

The surgical bed is irrigated with a clindamycin solution

Irrigation with Normal saline

The surgical bed is irrigated with normal saline

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Irrigation with Normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

The surgical bed is irrigated with normal saline

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Irrigation with gentamicin solution

The surgical bed is irrigated with a gentamicin solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Irrigation with Clindamycin solution

The surgical bed is irrigated with a clindamycin solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Irrigation with Normal saline

The surgical bed is irrigated with normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Irrigation of the surgical bed with gentamicin solution Irrigation of the surgical bed with Clindamycin solution Irrigation of the surgical bed with normal saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* diagnosis of breast neoplasms
* plans to undergo an elective ALND of Berg's levels I and II due to axillary metastasis determined preoperatively by core biopsy or evidence of metastasis in the SLNB in the intraoperative or in the differed analysis.

Exclusion Criteria

* allergy to any of the antibiotic drugs used
* chronic renal failure due to possible toxicity of gentamicin
* patients undergoing a modified radical mastectomy.
Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital General Universitario Elche

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, MD, PhD

Medicine Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jaime Ruiz-Tovar, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital General de Elche

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Oller I, Ruiz-Tovar J, Cansado P, Zubiaga L, Calpena R. Effect of Lavage with Gentamicin vs. Clindamycin vs. Physiologic Saline on Drainage Discharge of the Axillary Surgical Bed after Lymph Node Dissection. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Dec;16(6):781-4. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.020. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26244837 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HGUE 2014-12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id