Does the Addition of Massage to Manual Therapy and Exercise Improve Outcome in Chronic Neck Pain?

NCT ID: NCT02313480

Last Updated: 2014-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

39 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2013-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To date, the benefits of massage in chronic neck pain patients has only been investigated as a singular treatment, rather than as part of a treatment package. The need for this research has been highlighted in the literature (Ezzo et al, 2007; Haraldsson et al, 2006) This research aimed to establish whether the addition of massage to a program of exercise and manual therapy offers any additional benefits over exercise and manual therapy alone in the treatment of patients with chronic neck pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

39 patients with neck pain of greater than three months duration were randomised to either a massage or non-massage group in a primary care setting in the Dublin region. One therapist administered all treatments. Randomisation was carried out by the use of sequential sampling, utilising permuted blocks. Patients were excluded from the study if they had severe co-existing disease, had neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or other non-mechanical causes, or if the patient had a diagnosis of osteoporosis anywhere in the body.

Both groups underwent up to eight weekly physiotherapy sessions. The non-massage group received exercise, manual therapy and advice over the 30 minute intervention period, in conjunction with an exercise program to perform at home. The massage group received all of the above as well as Swedish massage. Follow up was for the duration of treatment only.

A number of T-tests and non-parametric tests were conducted to establish if the two groups were comparable at baseline.

A mixed ANOVA was then used to analyse between-group and within-group data simultaneously. No blinding was possible, although the questionnaires were self-administered which may have limited bias.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neck Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

non-massage group

received exercise, manual therapy and advice over the 30 minute intervention period, in conjunction with an exercise program to perform at home.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

massage

Intervention Type OTHER

Swedish massage was included in one arm of the study and not the other. Administered by a trained therapist as part of the usual 30 minute treatment time. Amount of massage administered dependant on Therapist's clinical reasoning

massage group

Received massage, exercise, manual therapy and advice over the 30 minute intervention period, in conjunction with an exercise program to perform at home.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

massage

Intervention Type OTHER

Swedish massage was included in one arm of the study and not the other. Administered by a trained therapist as part of the usual 30 minute treatment time. Amount of massage administered dependant on Therapist's clinical reasoning

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

massage

Swedish massage was included in one arm of the study and not the other. Administered by a trained therapist as part of the usual 30 minute treatment time. Amount of massage administered dependant on Therapist's clinical reasoning

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* neck pain for greater than three months
* over 18 years of age
* had not received treatment for their neck pain in the previous month
* could speak conversational English
* were not involved in any current compensation case and
* had provided written, informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* severe co-existing disease,
* neck pain due to fracture, tumour, infection or other non-mechanical causes,
* if the patient had a diagnosis of osteoporosis anywhere in the body.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Society of Musculoskeletal Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elaine Atkins, Physio

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Society of Musculoskeletal Medicine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ezzo J, Haraldsson BG, Gross AR, Myers CD, Morien A, Goldsmith CH, Bronfort G, Peloso PM; Cervical Overview Group. Massage for mechanical neck disorders: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):353-62. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000254099.07294.21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17268268 (View on PubMed)

Haraldsson BG, Gross AR, Myers CD, Ezzo JM, Morien A, Goldsmith C, Peloso PM, Bronfort G; Cervical Overview Group. Massage for mechanical neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD004871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004871.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16856066 (View on PubMed)

Cleland JA, Childs JD, Whitman JM. Psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with mechanical neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jan;89(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18164333 (View on PubMed)

Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11690728 (View on PubMed)

Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Sep;31(7):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18803999 (View on PubMed)

Gay RE, Madson TJ, Cieslak KR. Comparison of the Neck Disability Index and the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in a sample of patients with chronic uncomplicated neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007 May;30(4):259-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.009.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17509434 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RM01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id