Trial Outcomes & Findings for Postplacental Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Mixed Methods Assessment of Women's Experience (NCT NCT02312726)
NCT ID: NCT02312726
Last Updated: 2016-04-04
Results Overview
A semi-structured interview guide(available in both English and Spanish) which was developed in consultation with an expert in qualitative methodology at the UNM Clinical \& Translational Science Center (CTSC), and UNMH family planning experts, will be administered to all participants. The interview will incorporate the following domains of women's perceptions of the postplacental IUD insertion experience: decisional influence, experience during the procedure, decisional regret, prior knowledge/ awareness of the method and postpartum contraception in general. The interview will conclude with an overall patient satisfaction score measured on a five-point Likert scale: 1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = somewhat dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = somewhat satisfied, 5 = very satisfied.
COMPLETED
135 participants
Within 24-48 hours after vaginal delivery, prior to hospital discharge
2016-04-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Epidural Group
Participants who elect to have an epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
Non Epidural Group
Participants who elect not to have epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
Excluded
Participants who did not meet inclusion criteria or declined after consent.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
38
|
30
|
67
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
38
|
30
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
67
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Postplacental Intrauterine Device Insertion: A Mixed Methods Assessment of Women's Experience
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Total Participants Enrolled in Study
n=68 Participants
Participant characteristics for those enrolled in the study, in both the epidural and non-epidural group
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
Median Age
|
27 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
68 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
61 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian/Alaskan
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian American
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
68 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education
Did not complete high school
|
21 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education
Completed high school/ GED
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education
In college/completed some college
|
16 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education
Completed college
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment
Employed part time
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment
Employed full time
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment
Student
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment
Homemaker
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment
Temporary work leave
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment
Unemployed
|
12 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Income
Less than $20,000
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Income
$20,000 - $40,000
|
23 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Income
$40,000 - $60,000
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Income
$60,000 - $80,000
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Income
Declined to answer
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Language of Preference
English
|
38 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Language of Preference
Spanish
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Insurance
None
|
39 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Insurance
Medicaid
|
26 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Insurance
Commercial
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 24-48 hours after vaginal delivery, prior to hospital dischargePopulation: 21 participants (out of the 68 included in the study) consented to an interview regarding their experience. We conducted 21 interviews; 9 with women who did not have an epidural and 12 with women who had an epidural.
A semi-structured interview guide(available in both English and Spanish) which was developed in consultation with an expert in qualitative methodology at the UNM Clinical \& Translational Science Center (CTSC), and UNMH family planning experts, will be administered to all participants. The interview will incorporate the following domains of women's perceptions of the postplacental IUD insertion experience: decisional influence, experience during the procedure, decisional regret, prior knowledge/ awareness of the method and postpartum contraception in general. The interview will conclude with an overall patient satisfaction score measured on a five-point Likert scale: 1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = somewhat dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = somewhat satisfied, 5 = very satisfied.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epidural Group
n=12 Participants
Participants who elect to have an epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion.
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
Non Epidural Group
n=9 Participants
Participants who elect not to have epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Women's Experiences With Ring Forceps Postplacental IUD Placement Through Semi-structured Interviews
Very Satified
|
12 participants
|
7 participants
|
|
Assessment of Women's Experiences With Ring Forceps Postplacental IUD Placement Through Semi-structured Interviews
Satisfied
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
|
Assessment of Women's Experiences With Ring Forceps Postplacental IUD Placement Through Semi-structured Interviews
Neutral
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Assessment of Women's Experiences With Ring Forceps Postplacental IUD Placement Through Semi-structured Interviews
Dissatisfied
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Assessment of Women's Experiences With Ring Forceps Postplacental IUD Placement Through Semi-structured Interviews
Very Dissatisfied
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately prior to and within 5 minutes after IUD insertion following vaginal delivery; women who undergo a postpartum interview will be asked to perform a recall VAS pain assessmentThis is a validated instrument used extensively in the assessment of acute pain. When prompted, patients will be asked to mark the continuous 100 mm VAS line at the point which most accurately represents their pain level; 0 = no pain, 100 = pain as bad as it could be.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epidural Group
n=38 Participants
Participants who elect to have an epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion.
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
Non Epidural Group
n=30 Participants
Participants who elect not to have epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Score: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Pre-insertion
|
10.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.9
|
35.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 29.3
|
|
Pain Score: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Procedure
|
10.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.5
|
41.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 34.1
|
|
Pain Score: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Recall
|
5.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.4
|
28.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately prior to and within 5 minutes after IUD insertion following vaginal delivery. Women who undergo a postpartum interview will be asked to perform a recal VRS pain assessmentThis is a 4-item ordinal pain scale which has been used for pain level assessment. When prompted, patients will be asked to indicate which level of pain most accurately represents their pain level; 0 = No pain, 1 = Mild pain, 2 = Moderate pain, 3 = Severe pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epidural Group
n=38 Participants
Participants who elect to have an epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion.
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
Non Epidural Group
n=30 Participants
Participants who elect not to have epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Pain Score: Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
No Pain or Mild Pain during IUD placement
|
32 participants
|
16 participants
|
|
Pain Score: Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
Moderate Pain or Severe Pain before IUD placement
|
2 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Pain Score: Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
No Pain or Mild Pain before IUD placement
|
34 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Pain Score: Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
No Pain or Mild Pain at recall
|
12 participants
|
6 participants
|
|
Pain Score: Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
Moderate Pain or Severe Pain during IUD placement
|
4 participants
|
14 participants
|
|
Pain Score: Verbal Rating Scale (VRS)
Moderate Pain or Severe Pain at recall
|
0 participants
|
3 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Within 5 minutes following postpartum IUD insertionThe provider who inserts the IUD will be asked to complete a 4-item Likert scale rating perceived difficultly of insertion: 1 = easy; 2 = somewhat easy; 3 = somewhat difficult, 4 = difficult.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Epidural Group
n=38 Participants
Participants who elect to have an epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion.
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
Non Epidural Group
n=30 Participants
Participants who elect not to have epidural anesthesia during labor, delivery and postplacental IUD insertion
Postplacental IUD insertion: Postplacental IUD insertion using the standardized ring forceps technique (Speroff and Mishell 2008) under ultrasound guidance, within 10-30 minutes of vaginal delivery.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Provider Ease-of-insertion
Easy
|
19 participants
|
15 participants
|
|
Provider Ease-of-insertion
Somewhat easy
|
16 participants
|
11 participants
|
|
Provider Ease-of-insertion
Somewhat difficult
|
3 participants
|
3 participants
|
|
Provider Ease-of-insertion
Difficult
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Provider Ease-of-insertion
Unanswered
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
Adverse Events
Epidural Group
Non Epidural Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Michel Paves, Research Specialist
University of New Mexico - Family Planning Research Division
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place