An Evaluation of the Utility of the ExSpiron Respiratory Variation Monitor During Upper GI Endoscopy

NCT ID: NCT02310230

Last Updated: 2024-06-25

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-22

Study Completion Date

2016-05-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose: To assess the utility of a new medical device that monitors a patient's breathing during medical procedures in which a patient is sedated, but not mechanically ventilated. In minor procedures, such as endoscopy (where the doctor examines a patient's digestive tract by a TV camera inserted through the mouth), patients do not require general anesthesia, in which a machine would take over their breathing while they are unconscious for surgery. However, during endoscopic procedures it is sometimes difficult for the anesthesiologist to monitor the patient's breathing-specifically, to monitor changes in breathing patterns and the adequacy of breathing. In endoscopy procedures, the room is darkened, and the patient's mouth is generally occupied by the endoscope. While the anesthesiologist can listen to the patient's breathing sounds with a stethoscope, this type of monitoring can only be done periodically, and there is limited ability to gauge the adequacy of ventilation. This study will use the ExSpiron Respiratory Volume Monitor (RVM), which measures non-invasive minute ventilation (MV), tidal volume (TV) and respiratory rate (RR), in patients undergoing an endoscopic procedure to provide additional information regarding the effects of clinical interventions such as drug administrations or airway maneuvers on the patient's respiratory status.

For patients who give informed consent, study participation means that they will have a PadSet consisting of 3 electrodes applied to the chest. Another component, a nasal cannula (a thin clear plastic tube that goes under the nose) will give patients supplemental oxygen, and is standard of care for endoscopy at UVM Medical Center. Patients will then be asked to breathe in and out of a portable spirometer (breath meter) for 30 seconds up to five times. This data will be compared to data recorded by the monitor to confirm that the monitor is recording accurately. The procedure will then go forward in the normal fashion. Patients will be randomly placed into one of two groups. In the first group during the procedure, the anesthesiologist will not be able to see the numbers (MV, TV, and RR) displayed screen of the monitor, so the data will not be used to guide the patient's clinical care. In the second group, the anesthesiologist will be able to see the RVM measurements of MV, TV, and RR to evaluate the effect of the interventions. Monitoring for both groups will continue in the recovery room, until discharge.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to assess the utility of the ExSpiron Respiratory Variation Monitor in patients undergoing an interventional procedure with anesthesia. The primary outcome measure will be the average minute ventilation of the patient during the procedure. This study will also examine the correlation between clinical interventions such as drug administrations or airway maneuvers with data from the monitor. Additionally the study may provide information about the ability of this new monitoring system to prevent hypoxemia during these procedures and to consider its utility, compared with capnography, to detect hypopnea.

Background Assessing the adequacy of ventilation during Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) and sedation is difficult. Agents used to provide procedural sedation can depress ventilatory drive and can interfere with airway patency, making it much more likely that the patient will hypoventilate and experience partial or complete obstruction to ventilation. \[It is actually clinically easier to administer general anesthesia and insert an airway management device such as an endotracheal tube or a laryngeal mask airway , however given the superior recovery profile following sedation vs. general anesthesia, it is usually preferable to administer sedation, if the procedure can be performed with its use.\] The American Society of Anesthesiologists maintains a database of closed malpractice claims which allows analysis of patterns of injury. A study considering claims from MAC/sedation cases found that 40% of the MAC claims resulted in death or brain damage, that 25% of the claims that were associated with oversedation/hypoventilation occurred in the endoscopy suite, and that 44% of the oversedation cases could have been prevented by better monitoring.1 A study comparing claims from remote locations (such as endoscopy) with operating rooms, found that 50% of remote location claims involving monitored anesthesia care, the proportion of claims for death was increased in remote location claims \[54 vs. 29% (operating room claims)\], respiratory damaging events were more common in remote location claims (44 vs. 20%), with inadequate oxygenation/ventilation the most common specific event (21 vs. 3% in operating room claims), and that remote location claims were more often judged as being preventable by better monitoring (32 vs. 8% for operating room claims).2

Upper endoscopy procedures, such as upper GI endoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), are particularly challenging where the anesthesiologist has limited access to the patient's head and is working in darkened rooms. Indeed investigators have found it very difficult to find a combination of propofol and short acting opioid that allows instrumentation of the esophagus without "intolerable ventilatory depression".3 Trying to assess ventilation by observing chest excursion or listening to ventilation with a stethoscope under these conditions can be difficult and can be done only periodically. Side-stream nasal cannula end-tidal capnography offers a possible solution, but the cannula can become dislodged and the proceduralist's endoscope often interferes with its function. End-tidal capnography in the non-intubated patient is very insensitive to changes in minute ventilation. At best, this technology can usually assess only the presence or absence of ventilation: there is limited ability to judge the adequacy of ventilation or to quantify it.4

The Study Device The ExSpiron Respiratory Volume Monitor (Respiratory Motion, Inc., Waltham MA) has FDA 501(k) clearance to be used for patient care. It consists of a proprietary PadSet that is placed on the chest in the mid-axillary line and connected to a free standing monitor. This monitor measures and analyzes the changes in thoracic electrical impedance that occur during the respiratory duty cycle. It is able to quantify respiratory rate and also determine tidal volume and minute ventilation as well as graphically display changes in lung volumes. It has been shown to accurately measure the effect of interventions (medications, airway maneuvers) in endoscopy patients.5 Preliminary work has determined optimal lead placement demonstrated excellent correlation to spirometry with an R value of 0.94-0.98 and excellent accuracy and precision.6

Preliminary work cited below has shown that the monitor provides information about the effect of medications and airway maneuvers on breathing patterns that is not available with routine monitoring. This study seeks to extend that knowledge by investigating whether using this information in real-time results in different respiratory measurements compared to patients with routine monitoring.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biliary Tract Diseases Stomach Neoplasms Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal Barrett Esophagus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blinded Group

Data from the ExSpiron Respiratory Variation Monitor (minute ventilation, tidal volume, and respiratory rate) will not be displayed. The anesthesia provider will care for the patient in the usual manner.

Group Type OTHER

ExSpiron Respiratory Variation Monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Non-invasive monitoring of minute ventilation, tidal volume, and respiratory rate.

Monitor Group

The ExSpiron Respiratory Variation Monitor will display continuous real-time measurements of minute ventilation, tidal volume, and respiratory rate, and the anesthesia provider will be instructed to utilize this information in the care of the patient as they deem appropriate.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ExSpiron Respiratory Variation Monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

Non-invasive monitoring of minute ventilation, tidal volume, and respiratory rate.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ExSpiron Respiratory Variation Monitor

Non-invasive monitoring of minute ventilation, tidal volume, and respiratory rate.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a history of thoracotomy with resection of lung tissue
* Patients with a history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (defined as an inability to climb a flight of stairs or FEV1/VC of less than 30% of predicted)
* BMI greater than 43.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Respiratory Motion, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Donald Mathews

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Donald Mathews

Attending Anesthesiologist and Professor of Anesthesiology

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Donald M Mathews, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Vermont

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Vermont Medical Center

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bhananker SM, Posner KL, Cheney FW, Caplan RA, Lee LA, Domino KB. Injury and liability associated with monitored anesthesia care: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2006 Feb;104(2):228-34. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200602000-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16436839 (View on PubMed)

Metzner J, Posner KL, Domino KB. The risk and safety of anesthesia at remote locations: the US closed claims analysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Aug;22(4):502-8. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32832dba50.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19506473 (View on PubMed)

LaPierre CD, Johnson KB, Randall BR, White JL, Egan TD. An exploration of remifentanil-propofol combinations that lead to a loss of response to esophageal instrumentation, a loss of responsiveness, and/or onset of intolerable ventilatory depression. Anesth Analg. 2011 Sep;113(3):490-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318210fc45. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21415430 (View on PubMed)

Holley K, Mathews D, Freeman J, Brayanov J, Schapiro H. The Use of a Respiratory Volume Monitor to Assess Ventilation Before & After Airway Maneuvers during Upper Endoscopy. Poster Presentation, American Society of Anesthesiologists, October 2013, San Francisco, CA

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Voscopoulos C, Brayanov J, Ladd D, Lalli M, Panasyuk A, Freeman J. Special article: evaluation of a novel noninvasive respiration monitor providing continuous measurement of minute ventilation in ambulatory subjects in a variety of clinical scenarios. Anesth Analg. 2013 Jul;117(1):91-100. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182918098. Epub 2013 Jun 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23733842 (View on PubMed)

Freeman J, Lalli M, Yocum N, Panasyuk A, Panasyuk S, and Lew R, 328: Non-invasive Monitoring of Tidal Volume and Minute Ventilation in Non-intubated Patients. Critical Care Medicine, 2011. 39(12): p. 88 10.1097/01.ccm.0000408627.24229.88.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

M14-281

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.