Trial Outcomes & Findings for The Management of Closed Surgical Incisions Resulting From Incisional Hernia Repair and/or Functional Panniculectomy Using the Prevena™ Customizable™ Dressing (NCT NCT02302222)
NCT ID: NCT02302222
Last Updated: 2024-10-16
Results Overview
Surgical Site Complications: * Dehiscence * Surgical site infection (SSI)
Recruitment status
TERMINATED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
71 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
Within 30 Days Post-Surgical Procedure
Results posted on
2024-10-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Standard of Care
dry sterile dressing/gauze and steristrips
|
Customizable
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
34
|
37
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
33
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Standard of Care
dry sterile dressing/gauze and steristrips
|
Customizable
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Treatment discontinued before day 5
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawn prior to any treatment
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
The Management of Closed Surgical Incisions Resulting From Incisional Hernia Repair and/or Functional Panniculectomy Using the Prevena™ Customizable™ Dressing
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Standard of Care
n=34 Participants
dry sterile dressing/gauze and steristrips
Standard of Care Dressing
|
Customizable
n=36 Participants
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
|
Total
n=70 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.79 • n=5 Participants
|
41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.83 • n=7 Participants
|
42.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.78 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
34 participants
n=5 Participants
|
36 participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Within 30 Days Post-Surgical ProcedurePopulation: Intent to Treat population
Surgical Site Complications: * Dehiscence * Surgical site infection (SSI)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard of Care
n=34 Participants
dry sterile dressing/gauze and steristrips
Standard of Care Dressing
|
Customizable
n=35 Participants
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Surgical Site Complications
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Standard of Care
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Customizable
Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 7 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Standard of Care
n=34 participants at risk
dry sterile dressing/gauze and steristrips
Standard of Care Dressing
|
Customizable
n=36 participants at risk
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
|
|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/34 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
5.6%
2/36 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Shock haemorrhagic
|
0.00%
0/34 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
2.8%
1/36 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Standard of Care
n=34 participants at risk
dry sterile dressing/gauze and steristrips
Standard of Care Dressing
|
Customizable
n=36 participants at risk
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
Customizable Dressing with ActiV.A.C. Therapy Unit
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
2.9%
1/34 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
13.9%
5/36 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.9%
2/34 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
0.00%
0/36 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound dehiscence
|
2.9%
1/34 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
8.3%
3/36 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haematoma
|
0.00%
0/34 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
5.6%
2/36 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Seroma
|
0.00%
0/34 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
5.6%
2/36 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Postoperative wound infection
|
0.00%
0/34 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
13.9%
5/36 • 30 days
Adverse Events were assessed at each protocol scheduled visit. The safety population had one subject less than the ITT population as they were randomized to Standard of Care yet a received Customizable dressing. The Customizable dressing was applied without any negative pressure.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60