Health Economics of the Use of Ferrous Iron Salts in Primary Care in the UK.

NCT ID: NCT02300428

Last Updated: 2018-03-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

406902 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) affects approximately 4.7 million of people in the UK, with children and pre-menopausal women being at higher risk (1). Each year more than 6.8 million prescriptions for oral iron are filled in England alone (NHS Information Centre data). However, gastrointestinal symptoms limit adherence in 10-30% of otherwise healthy patients (2-4) and in up to 50% of patients with gastrointestinal disorders (5). Simple ferrous iron salts constitute the vast majority of currently prescribed oral iron because these are cheap and well absorbed. However, they are also poorly tolerated and thus, we believe, are expensive to the NHS.

Funded by the Medical Research Council, we have developed an alternative oral iron supplement, that we name IHAT (iron hydroxide adipate tartrate), as an efficacious therapy for IDA with minimal side-effects.

In the study proposed here we aim to assess the total health cost associated with current oral iron supplements and, hence, define the clinical unmet need for alternative treatments. We will use Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD data to (i) estimate the pattern of prescribing to oral iron in primary care in the general population and (ii) develop a health economics model in pre-menopausal women. These data will provide evidence for the total health system costs associated with current oral iron treatment. Furthermore, this study will provide data from which the cost-effectiveness and total health system costs of alternative effective and treatments with minimal side-effects could be estimated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our research objective is to gather evidence for the unmet clinical need for safe, low-side-effect oral iron in the UK.

To achieve this objective we aim to determine:

1. Pattern of prescribing to oral iron in primary care in GP practices in England: estimate prescription rates, efficacy and intolerance of treatment with all forms of currently prescribed oral iron.
2. Health economics of the use of ferrous iron salts in primary care: estimate patterns of individual response to treatment; determine the costs of ferrous iron (sulphate, fumarate and gluconate) therapy in pre-menopausal women in primary care, and develop a cost-effectiveness model for alternative treatments with minimal side-effects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1-year cohort

Patients with at least 1 prescription of any oral iron preparation in the last 2 years and who have at least 1 year of follow up data post-prescription.

It is anticipated that ca. 123,000 patients in CPRD fulfil this criteria.

oral iron

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

BNF code for section 9.1.1.1 (Oral iron preparations for iron-deficiency anaemias)

10-year cohort

All pre-menopausal women (18-45 years old) with at least 1 prescription of one ferrous iron salt (i.e. sulphate, fumarate and gluconate) since January 2000.

It is anticipated that ca. 299,000 patients in CPRD fulfil this criteria.

oral iron

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

BNF code for section 9.1.1.1 (Oral iron preparations for iron-deficiency anaemias)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

oral iron

BNF code for section 9.1.1.1 (Oral iron preparations for iron-deficiency anaemias)

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dried ferrous sulphate tablets 200mg Ferrous fumarate tablets 210mg Ferrous gluconate tablets 300mg Ferrous fumarate tablets 322mg (incl. Fersaday) Ferrous fumarate capsules 305mg (incl. Galfer) Dried ferrous sulphate MR tab 325mg (incl. Ferrograd)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients prescribed oral iron in primary care practices included in the UK CPRD database

Exclusion Criteria

* N/A
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Cambridge

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bangor University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

dora pereira

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

dora pereira

Senior Investigator Scientist

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dora Pereira, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MRC Human Nutrition Research

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

MRC Human Nutrition Research

Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6531

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.