Health Economics of the Use of Ferrous Iron Salts in Primary Care in the UK.
NCT ID: NCT02300428
Last Updated: 2018-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
406902 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-11-30
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Funded by the Medical Research Council, we have developed an alternative oral iron supplement, that we name IHAT (iron hydroxide adipate tartrate), as an efficacious therapy for IDA with minimal side-effects.
In the study proposed here we aim to assess the total health cost associated with current oral iron supplements and, hence, define the clinical unmet need for alternative treatments. We will use Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD data to (i) estimate the pattern of prescribing to oral iron in primary care in the general population and (ii) develop a health economics model in pre-menopausal women. These data will provide evidence for the total health system costs associated with current oral iron treatment. Furthermore, this study will provide data from which the cost-effectiveness and total health system costs of alternative effective and treatments with minimal side-effects could be estimated.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safe and Effective Delivery of Supplemental Iron to Healthy Volunteers
NCT03212677
Evaluation of the Effects of Routine Iron Supplementation in Children on Gastrointestinal Iron Losses
NCT04721964
Prevention of Iron Deficiency in Breastfed Infants
NCT01444261
Iron Supplementation to Reduce Preschoolers Anemia: Comparison Between Intermittent and Cyclic Procedure
NCT00992823
The Efficacy and Safety of Iron Supplementation
NCT01590134
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To achieve this objective we aim to determine:
1. Pattern of prescribing to oral iron in primary care in GP practices in England: estimate prescription rates, efficacy and intolerance of treatment with all forms of currently prescribed oral iron.
2. Health economics of the use of ferrous iron salts in primary care: estimate patterns of individual response to treatment; determine the costs of ferrous iron (sulphate, fumarate and gluconate) therapy in pre-menopausal women in primary care, and develop a cost-effectiveness model for alternative treatments with minimal side-effects.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1-year cohort
Patients with at least 1 prescription of any oral iron preparation in the last 2 years and who have at least 1 year of follow up data post-prescription.
It is anticipated that ca. 123,000 patients in CPRD fulfil this criteria.
oral iron
BNF code for section 9.1.1.1 (Oral iron preparations for iron-deficiency anaemias)
10-year cohort
All pre-menopausal women (18-45 years old) with at least 1 prescription of one ferrous iron salt (i.e. sulphate, fumarate and gluconate) since January 2000.
It is anticipated that ca. 299,000 patients in CPRD fulfil this criteria.
oral iron
BNF code for section 9.1.1.1 (Oral iron preparations for iron-deficiency anaemias)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
oral iron
BNF code for section 9.1.1.1 (Oral iron preparations for iron-deficiency anaemias)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cambridge
OTHER
Bangor University
OTHER
University of Oxford
OTHER
dora pereira
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
dora pereira
Senior Investigator Scientist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dora Pereira, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MRC Human Nutrition Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MRC Human Nutrition Research
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6531
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.