Trial Outcomes & Findings for Long-Term Efficacy & Safety of Aflibercept IVT for the Treatment of DME in Subjects Who Completed the VISTA-DME Trial (NCT NCT02299336)
NCT ID: NCT02299336
Last Updated: 2019-06-04
Results Overview
Measured by evaluating mean number of injections required for subjects who were enrolled and completed the 3-year VISTA DME (VGFT-OD-1009) trial
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
Week 104
2019-06-04
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
60
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Long-Term Efficacy & Safety of Aflibercept IVT for the Treatment of DME in Subjects Who Completed the VISTA-DME Trial
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
62.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
60 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Glycated Hemoglobin
|
7.5 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Duration of Diabetes
|
18.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Best-Corrected Visual Acuity
|
69.6 letters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Central Retinal Thickness
|
290 Microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 88.8 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 104Measured by evaluating mean number of injections required for subjects who were enrolled and completed the 3-year VISTA DME (VGFT-OD-1009) trial
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=46 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Number of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injections for Subjects Who Were Enrolled and Completed the 3-year VISTA DME (VGFT-OD-1009) Trial
|
9.5 injections
Standard Error 6.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104Population: All participants were included in analysis. Due to participant attrition, missed visits, and variable follow-up intervals, the population analyzed at each time point is equal to or smaller than the population still enrolled at that time point.
Evaluate the mean change over time in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity at week 52 from baseline and at week 104 from baseline. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of an eye chart (5 letters per line) in standardized lighting conditions. Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until they reached a row where a minimum of three letters on a line could be read, and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Best-corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104
52 Weeks
|
0.61 letters
Standard Error 1.28
|
|
Mean Change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Best-corrected Visual Acuity From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104
104 Weeks
|
0.83 letters
Standard Error 1.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Before First Focal Laser Treatment (FLT) at Week 12 or later; After First FLT at up to 104 weeksPopulation: Only participants who were eligible for focal laser treatment were analyzed.
Measure the role of focal laser treatment (fluorescein angiography-guided, if applicable) in decreasing the treatment burden among subjects who require ongoing aflibercept treatment in the management of diabetic macular edema.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=27 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Number of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injections Before and After Receiving First Focal Laser Application.
Injections Before First Focal Laser
|
7.5 Injections
Standard Deviation 3.7
|
|
Mean Number of Intravitreal Aflibercept Injections Before and After Receiving First Focal Laser Application.
Injections After First Focal Laser
|
6.7 Injections
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104Population: All participants were included in analysis. Due to participant attrition, missed visits, and variable follow-up intervals, the population analyzed at each time point is equal to or smaller than the population still enrolled at that time point.
Evaluate the percentage of subjects with a gain or loss in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity letters in patients treated with aflibercept from baseline to week 52 and baseline to week 104
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects With Gain or Loss of 0 to 5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Best-corrected Visual Acuity Letters From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104
Week 52
|
35 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Subjects With Gain or Loss of 0 to 5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Best-corrected Visual Acuity Letters From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104
Week 104
|
30 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104Population: All participants were included in analysis. Due to participant attrition, missed visits, and variable follow-up intervals, the population analyzed at each time point is equal to or smaller than the population still enrolled at that time point.
Evaluate the mean change in central retinal thickness from baseline to week 52 and baseline to week 104 in patients treated with aflibercept.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104.
Week 52
|
-7 Microns
Standard Error 8.6
|
|
Mean Change in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104.
Week 104
|
1 Microns
Standard Error 11.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104Population: All participants were included in analysis. Due to participant attrition, missed visits, and variable follow-up intervals, the population analyzed at each time point is equal to or smaller than the population still enrolled at that time point.
Evaluate the number of subjects with no clinically-relevant diabetic macular edema (as defined in the protocol) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography from baseline to week 52 and baseline to week 104 in patients treated with aflibercept.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With no Clinically-relevant Diabetic Macular Edema (as Defined in the Protocol) on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104.
Week 52
|
39 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With no Clinically-relevant Diabetic Macular Edema (as Defined in the Protocol) on Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography From Baseline to Week 52 and Baseline to Week 104.
Week 104
|
29 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104Population: All participants were included in analysis. Due to participant attrition, missed visits, and variable follow-up intervals, the population analyzed at each time point is equal to or smaller than the population still enrolled at that time point.
Number of subjects with stable, worsened, or improved diabetic retinopathy through 104 weeks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With Stable, Worsened, or Improved Diabetic Retinopathy
Week 52 · Worsened Diabetic Retinopathy
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Stable, Worsened, or Improved Diabetic Retinopathy
Week 52 · Stable Diabetic Retinopathy
|
46 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Stable, Worsened, or Improved Diabetic Retinopathy
Week 52 · Improved Diabetic Retinopathy
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Stable, Worsened, or Improved Diabetic Retinopathy
Week 104 · Worsened Diabetic Retinopathy
|
15 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Stable, Worsened, or Improved Diabetic Retinopathy
Week 104 · Stable Diabetic Retinopathy
|
27 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With Stable, Worsened, or Improved Diabetic Retinopathy
Week 104 · Improved Diabetic Retinopathy
|
4 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104Population: All participants were included in analysis. Due to participant attrition, missed visits, and variable follow-up intervals, the population analyzed at each time point is equal to or smaller than the population still enrolled at that time point.
Number of subjects that receive focal laser treatment from baseline to week 52 and from baseline to week 104.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects That Receive Focal Laser Treatment.
Week 104
|
27 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects That Receive Focal Laser Treatment.
Week 52
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 104 weeksPopulation: All participants receiving laser were included in analysis.
Evaluation of the effect of laser on Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity outcomes. Participants were challenged with reading letters on lines of an eye chart (5 letters per line) in standardized lighting conditions. Lines became smaller as participants progressed from the top to the bottom of the chart. Participants read down the chart until they reached a row where a minimum of three letters on a line could be read, and were scored by how many letters could be correctly identified.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=27 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Best-corrected Visual Acuity Before and After Focal Laser Therapy
Before First FLT
|
0.4 letters
Standard Deviation 6.2
|
|
Mean Change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Best-corrected Visual Acuity Before and After Focal Laser Therapy
After First FLT
|
0.3 letters
Standard Deviation 11.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 104 weeksPopulation: All participants were included in analysis. Due to participant attrition, missed visits, and variable follow-up intervals, the population analyzed at each time point is equal to or smaller than the population still enrolled at that time point.
Evaluate the mean change in central retinal thickness before and after first focal laser treatment in patients treated with pro re nata aflibercept.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 Participants
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Central Retinal Thickness Before and After First Focal Laser Treatment
Before First FLT
|
-8.5 microns
Standard Error 52.6
|
|
Mean Change in Central Retinal Thickness Before and After First Focal Laser Treatment
After First FLT
|
-6.8 microns
Standard Error 41.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104Population: This analysis was never performed because we were logistically unable to collect the data.
Mean number of injections in 52 weeks and 104 weeks based on quantification of ischemic areas
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104Population: This analysis was never performed because we were logistically unable to collect the data.
Mean change in visual acuity from baseline to week 52 and baseline to week 104 based on quantification of ischemic areas
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52, Week 104Population: This analysis was never performed because we were logistically unable to collect the data.
Mean change in central retinal thickness from baseline to week 52 based on quantification of ischemic areas
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
PRN (Pro re Nata)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 participants at risk
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial Infarction
|
3.3%
2/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Stroke
|
3.3%
2/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Worsening congestive heart failure
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Acute vision loss secondary to vitreous hemorrhage
|
3.3%
2/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Acute vision loss due to worsening cataract
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Worsening staph infection
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Acute gastroenteritis
|
3.3%
2/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cellulitis
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Worsening arrhythmia
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chronic kidney disease
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Worsening coronary artery disease
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Blocked fistula
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Flu
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Blocked artery
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Accelerated hypertension
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
PRN (Pro re Nata)
n=60 participants at risk
2 mg intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea) PRN, focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria, 104 weeks
Aflibercept: pro re nata (PRN)
Focal Laser: Focal laser administered based on pre-specified criteria
|
|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous hemorrhage
|
15.0%
9/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Neovascularization elsewhere
|
3.3%
2/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Neovascularization of the disc
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Worsening cataract
|
13.3%
8/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal abrasion
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Subconjunctival hemorrhage
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Superficial punctate keratitis
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye swelling post-cataract extraction
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Posterior vitreous detachment
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Floaters
|
8.3%
5/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual disturbance
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Epiphora
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Posterior capsule opafication
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Iritis
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pain
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous debris
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Optic nerve pallor
|
1.7%
1/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Decreased vision
|
6.7%
4/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular sensitivity
|
8.3%
5/60 • 104 weeks.
Adverse events were assessed at every study visit during the 2-year study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place