Trial Outcomes & Findings for Minimal Effective Dose of Hyperbaric Spinal Bupivacaine for Saddle Block (NCT NCT02299167)
NCT ID: NCT02299167
Last Updated: 2020-11-24
Results Overview
the minimal effective dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
35 participants
10 min after dural puncture
2020-11-24
Participant Flow
Four independent anesthetists were assigned for the study from January 2014.one to select patients in the anesthesia clinic, the 2nd to prepare the studied drug in the OR, the 3rd one to inject the drug and the 4th one was to collect the data
35 patients were enrolled However; after they have signed the consent. 7 patients were excluded because they have received analgesics in the morning of surgery. and 4 patients refused the saddle block in the operating room. So actually 24 patients out of 35 participants underwent intervention. That has been already specified in the protocol
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Single Group Study / Saddle Block
The dose of bupivacaine given to each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patient using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method
Dixon's up-and-down method: using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
Dural Puncture
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
Success Rate
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Effects
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Single Group Study / Saddle Block
The dose of bupivacaine given to each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patient using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method
Dixon's up-and-down method: using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
patients were excluded from the study
|
11
|
Baseline Characteristics
Minimal Effective Dose of Hyperbaric Spinal Bupivacaine for Saddle Block
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Saddle Block
n=24 Participants
The dose of bupivacaine given to each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patient using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method
Dixon's up-and-down method: using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
33.71 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.24 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Saudi Arabia
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 min after dural puncturethe minimal effective dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Group Study / Saddle Block
n=24 Participants
The dose of bupivacaine given to each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patient using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method
Dixon's up-and-down method: using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
|
|---|---|
|
Minimal Effective Dose of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine
|
1.9 milligrams
Interval 1.7 to 2.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: every 30 min until complete regression of the block (approximately 90 min)Population: * Immediately before surgery S4 (S3-S4) * At conclusion of surgery S4 (S3-S4) * Maximum blocked dermatome S4 (S3-S4)
The level of sensory block was tested using a long surgical toothless clamp gently applied radially, starting from the anal orifice, in different diagonal directions
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Group Study / Saddle Block
n=12 Participants
The dose of bupivacaine given to each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patient using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method
Dixon's up-and-down method: using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
|
|---|---|
|
Sacral Level of Sensory Block
Maximum blocked dermatome
|
4 Sacral level of sensory block
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
|
|
Sacral Level of Sensory Block
At conclusion of surgery
|
4 Sacral level of sensory block
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
|
|
Sacral Level of Sensory Block
Immediately before surgery
|
4 Sacral level of sensory block
Interval 3.0 to 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: every 30 min until Time to ambulation (approximately 2 hours)Population: The block characteristics for patients with successful block (12 patients)
The motor block was tested by a modified Bromage scale (0 = no motor block, 1 = able to flex the ankle and bend knees, 2 = able to flex ankle, and 3 = full motor block). A successful block was defined as one that was sufficient to proceed with the surgery without any supplementation (intravenous analgesic, local anesthetic infiltration, or general anesthesia).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Group Study / Saddle Block
n=12 Participants
The dose of bupivacaine given to each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patient using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method
Dixon's up-and-down method: using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
|
|---|---|
|
Motor Block Score as Assessed Using the Bromage Scale
Immediately before surgery
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
|
Motor Block Score as Assessed Using the Bromage Scale
At conclusion of surgery 0 Aided patient positioni
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours after surgeryPopulation: All patient with successful block were satisfied
Patient's satisfactions were evaluated with a 4-point satisfaction score (0=poor satisfaction, 1=good satisfaction 2=very good satisfaction, 3= excellent satisfaction
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Group Study / Saddle Block
n=12 Participants
The dose of bupivacaine given to each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patient using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method
Dixon's up-and-down method: using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
|
|---|---|
|
Patient's Satisfactions
|
3 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours after procedurePopulation: All surgeon who operated on the patient with successful block (12 patients ) were satisfied
Surgeon's satisfactions were evaluated with a 4-point satisfaction score (0=poor satisfaction, 1=good satisfaction 2=very good satisfaction, 3= excellent satisfaction
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Single Group Study / Saddle Block
n=12 Participants
The dose of bupivacaine given to each patient was determined by the response of the previously tested patient using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method
Dixon's up-and-down method: using a modified Dixon's up-and-down method (using 0.5 mg as a step size) (16). The first patient was tested at a dose 1.5 mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with failed block then the next patient received an increment of 0.5mg bupivacaine, if patient responded with successful block, then the next patient received a decrement of 0.5mg bupivacaine. The research continued until we obtained seven crossover midpoints.
|
|---|---|
|
Surgeon's Satisfactions
|
3 score on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 3.0
|
Adverse Events
Single Group Study / Saddle Block
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place