Safety and Efficacy of the Swallow Expansion Device (SED) for Improvement of Swallowing in Patients
NCT ID: NCT02296528
Last Updated: 2023-05-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-06-30
2022-10-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluate Retention of an Orally Administered Device Using Gamma Scintigraphy
NCT00754091
Use and Acceptability Study of Swallis DSA™ Device for Distanced Swallowing Assessment for Older Adults In Nursing Home CHEZ LES PERSONNES AGEES EN EHPAD
NCT05366374
Safety and Usability Evaluation of the Fidmi Low-Profile Enteral Feeding Device
NCT03007511
Demonstrating the Feasibility of a Novel Oxygen Delivery Device
NCT02824211
Safety of the PET-512MC Transesophageal Transducer
NCT01186380
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Swallowing Expansion Device
Titanium swallowing expansion device
Swallowing Expansion Device
SED looks like the letter "T" and has a plate and a post. The plate is like the top part of the "T" or smooth part of the tack. The plate is attached to the cartilage or flexible connective tissue of the throat. The SED post is like the bottom part of the "T" with a small ring. The post permanently sticks out from the throat, like a skin piercing. The SED is made out of titanium because this metal is extremely strong and commonly used in medical devices put into the body, such as hip joints or bone plates.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Swallowing Expansion Device
SED looks like the letter "T" and has a plate and a post. The plate is like the top part of the "T" or smooth part of the tack. The plate is attached to the cartilage or flexible connective tissue of the throat. The SED post is like the bottom part of the "T" with a small ring. The post permanently sticks out from the throat, like a skin piercing. The SED is made out of titanium because this metal is extremely strong and commonly used in medical devices put into the body, such as hip joints or bone plates.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must be receiving 100% of nutritional requirements by enterogastric tube.
* 18 years of age and older, acceptable forms of documentation for verification of age include birth certificate, passport, and/or driver's license.
* Diminished upper esophageal sphincter opening defined as less than .55 cm for individuals under 65 years of age and less than .40 cm for individuals over 65 years of age on fluoroscopic swallow study.
* Failure of \> 3 months of dysphagia therapy within 3 months of study enrollment.
* No documented history of noncompliance with feeding recommendations.
* Cognition that is within normal limits, as evidenced by an Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) score greater than 6.
* Manual dexterity that is within normal limits for age, sex, and hand, as evaluated by a Block and Box Test (BBT).
* Physical strength to pull the SED forward, as evidenced by the ability to lift a 5 lb weight off of a table and keep it elevated for 10 seconds.
* Ability to understand the informed consent and comply with follow-up, as evidenced by appropriate questions, responses, and comments during the initial evaluations and a normal Abbreviated Mental Test Score.
* Bilateral vocal fold mobility or unilateral vocal fold immobility in which the individual is able to attain complete glottic closure as evidenced on endoscopy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Esophageal phase dysphagia as defined as personal history and/or documented diagnosis of esophageal dysmotility, hiatal hernia, stricture, eosinophilic esophagitis, erosive peptic esophagitis, and/or systemic disease affecting the esophagus.
* Able to safely consume any food or liquid by mouth, as documented by fluoroscopic swallow study.
* Normal UES opening, as evidenced by UES opening greater than .55 cm for individuals under 65 years of age and greater than .40 cm for individuals over 65 years of age on fluoroscopic swallow study.
* Currently pregnant, as evidenced by a positive result on a pregnancy test if the patient is within child bearing age (younger than 60 years of age).
* 17 years of age and younger, acceptable forms of documentation for verification of age include birth certificate, passport, and/or license.
* Success full receipt of dysphagia therapy or \< 3 months of dysphagia therapy within 3 months of study enrollment.
* Lack of manual dexterity to operate swallowing expansion device as determined by a Block and Box Test (BBT) score below the normal limits per age, sex, and hand.
* Inability to lift a 5 lb weight off of a table and keep it elevated for 10 seconds.
* Lack of cognitive ability to operate swallowing expansion device or provide informed consent as evidenced by an Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) score less than 6.
* Active tumor involving the cricoid or laryngeal cartilage.
* Known allergic reaction to titanium as evidenced by personal history of allergic or adverse reaction to titanium.
* Infection of cartilage, head, and/or neck at time of evaluation and/or implantation as documented by recent imaging study or abnormal physical examination.
* Presence of a tracheotomy tube or airway obstruction necessitating a tracheotomy tube.
* A documented history of noncompliance with recommendations to take nothing by mouth.
* Patients with an insensate larynx. Laryngeal sensation will be assessed with laryngopharyngeal sensory testing. An insensate larynx is defined as a laryngopharyngeal sensory threshold \< 6 mmHg air pulse pressure or a complete absence of the laryngeal adductor reflex on palpation of the arytenoid with a flexible laryngoscope.
* Patients with a current, at the time of evaluation, and/or history of Zenker's diverticulum.
* Patients with sialorrhea at the time of evaluation with or without oral commissure incompetence.
* Patients with profound xerostomia at the time of evaluation.
* Patients with orocutaneous or pharyngocutaneous fistulae at the time of evaluation.
* Patients with a current, at the time of evaluation, and/or history of immunosuppression, as defined by the patient having a diagnosed immunodeficiency disorder or on immunosuppressive medication.
* Patients with a current, at the time of evaluation, and/or history of coagulopathy, as defined by the patient having a diagnosed coagulation disorder or on anticoagulation medication (e.g., baby aspirin, over-the-counter non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, herbal agents, and warfarin, etc.) that cannot be temporarily stopped for the procedure.
* Patients taking sedatives, narcotics, muscle-relaxants, anxiolytics, medical marijuana, alcohol, nicotine, medicinal nicotine, or other mind-altering medications that may affect safe patient use of the swallowing device.
* Patients taking antifibrotic medications.
* Patients with bilateral vocal fold immobility in any position, as evidenced on endoscopy.
* Patients with unilateral vocal fold immobility and unable to attain complete glottic closure, as evidenced on endoscopy.
* Patients with current, at the time of evaluation, and/or documented history of subglottic stenosis, as evidenced on endoscopy.
* Patients with current, at the time of evaluation, and/or documented history of airway obstruction, as evidenced on endoscopy.
* Patients with a life expectancy \< 2 years.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peter Belafsky, MD
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Peter Belafsky, MD
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Belafsky, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, Davis
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California Department of Otolaryngology
Sacramento, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
619595
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.