AZD9291 Versus Gefitinib or Erlotinib in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02296125

Last Updated: 2026-01-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

674 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-03

Study Completion Date

2025-11-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the efficacy and safety of AZD9291 versus a standard of care epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with locally advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase III, double-blind, randomised study assessing the efficacy and safety of AZD9291 (80 mg orally, once daily) versus a standard of care (SoC) Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) (either gefitinib \[250 mg orally, once daily\] or erlotinib \[150 mg orally, once daily\]) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) that is known to be EGFR sensitising mutation (EGFRm) positive, treatment-naïve and eligible for first-line treatment with an EGFR-TKI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Locally Advanced or Metastatic EGFR Sensitising Mutation Positive Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AZD9291+ placebo

AZD9291 (80 mg or 40 mg orally, once daily) plus placebo Erlotinib (150mg or 100mg orally, once daily) or placebo Gefitinib (250 mg orally, once daily), in accordance with the randomization schedule.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AZD9291 80 mg/40 mg + placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

The initial dose of AZD9291 80 mg once daily can be reduced to 40 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment.

Number of Cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Placebo Erlotinib 150/100mg

Intervention Type DRUG

The initial dose of Placebo Erlotinib 150 mg once daily can be reduced to Placebo 100 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment. Number of cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Placebo Gefitinib 250 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

The initial dose of Placebo Gefitinib 250 mg once daily cannot be reduced. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment. Number of cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Standard of Care + placebo AZD9291

Erlotinib (150 mg or 100 mg orally, once daily) or placebo Gefitinib (250 mg orally, once daily) plus placebo AZD9291 (80 mg or 40 mg orally, once daily), in accordance with the randomisation schedule.

Following objective disease progression according to RECIST 1.1, as per investigator assessment, patients who were randomized to Standard of Care arm may have the option to receive open-label AZD9291 (crossover to active AZD9291).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Erlotinib 150/100 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

The initial dose of Erlotinib 150mg once daily can be reduced to 10 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment.

Number of Cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Following objective disease progression according to RECIST 1.1, as per investigator assessment, patients who were randomized to Standard of Care arm may have the option to receive open-label AZD9291 (crossover to active AZD9291).

Gefitinib 250 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

The initial dose of Gefitinib 250mg once daily cannot be reduced. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment.

Number of Cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Following objective disease progression according to RECIST 1.1, as per investigator assessment, patients who were randomized to Standard of Care arm may have the option to receive open-label AZD9291 (crossover to active AZD9291).

Placebo AZD9291 80 mg/ 40 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

The initial dose of Placebo AZD9291 80 mg once daily can be reduced to Placebo AZD9291 40 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment. Number of cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AZD9291 80 mg/40 mg + placebo

The initial dose of AZD9291 80 mg once daily can be reduced to 40 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment.

Number of Cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Erlotinib 150/100mg

The initial dose of Placebo Erlotinib 150 mg once daily can be reduced to Placebo 100 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment. Number of cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Gefitinib 250 mg

The initial dose of Placebo Gefitinib 250 mg once daily cannot be reduced. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment. Number of cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Intervention Type DRUG

Erlotinib 150/100 mg

The initial dose of Erlotinib 150mg once daily can be reduced to 10 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment.

Number of Cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Following objective disease progression according to RECIST 1.1, as per investigator assessment, patients who were randomized to Standard of Care arm may have the option to receive open-label AZD9291 (crossover to active AZD9291).

Intervention Type DRUG

Gefitinib 250 mg

The initial dose of Gefitinib 250mg once daily cannot be reduced. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment.

Number of Cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Following objective disease progression according to RECIST 1.1, as per investigator assessment, patients who were randomized to Standard of Care arm may have the option to receive open-label AZD9291 (crossover to active AZD9291).

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo AZD9291 80 mg/ 40 mg

The initial dose of Placebo AZD9291 80 mg once daily can be reduced to Placebo AZD9291 40 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment. Number of cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Placebo Tarceva 150/100 mg Placebo Iressa 250 mg Tarceva 150/100 mg Iressa 250mg

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female, aged at least 18 years.
2. Pathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the lung.
3. Locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy.
4. The tumour harbours one of the 2 common EGFR mutations known to be associated with EGFR-TKI sensitivity (Ex19del, L858R).
5. Mandatory provision of an unstained, archived tumour tissue sample in a quantity sufficient to allow for central analysis of EGFR mutation status.
6. Patients must be treatment-naïve for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and eligible to receive first-line treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib as selected by the participating centre. Prior adjuvant and neo-adjuvant therapy is permitted(chemotherapy, radiotherapy, investigational agents).
7. Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures, sampling, and analysis.
8. World Health Organization Performance Status of 0 to 1 with no clinically significant deterioration over the previous 2 weeks and a minimum life expectancy of 12 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

1. Treatment with any of the following:

* Prior treatment with any systemic anti-cancer therapy for locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC.
* Prior treatment with an EGFR-TKI.
* Major surgery within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug.
* Radiotherapy treatment to more than 30% of the bone marrow or with a wide field of radiation within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug.
* Patients currently receiving medications or herbal supplements known to be potent inducers of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4.
* Alternative anti-cancer treatment
* Treatment with an investigational drug within five half-lives of the compound or any of its related material.
2. Any concurrent and/or other active malignancy that has required treatment within 2 years of first dose of study drug.
3. Spinal cord compression, symptomatic and unstable brain metastases, except for those patients who have completed definitive therapy, are not on steroids, have a stable neurologic status for at least 2 weeks after completion of the definitive therapy and steroids.
4. Any evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic diseases, including uncontrolled hypertension and active bleeding diatheses; or active infection including hepatitis B, hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
5. Refractory nausea and vomiting, chronic gastrointestinal diseases, inability to swallow the formulated product, or previous significant bowel resection that would preclude adequate absorption of AZD9291.
6. Any of the following cardiac criteria:

* Mean resting corrected QT interval (QTc) \>470 msec, obtained from 3 ECGs, using the screening clinic ECG machine-derived QTcF value.
* Any clinically important abnormalities in rhythm, conduction, or morphology of resting ECG.
* Any patient with any factors that increase the risk of QTc prolongation or risk of arrhythmic events or unexplained sudden death under 40 years of age in first-degree relatives or any concomitant medication known to prolong the QT interval.
7. Past medical history of ILD, drug-induced ILD, radiation pneumonitis which required steroid treatment, or any evidence of clinically active ILD.
8. Involvement in the planning and/or conduct of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Parexel

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Rosa, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salisbury, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Camperdown, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Chermside, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Clayton, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Kogarah, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Nedlands, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Woolloongabba, , Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Research Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Research Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Changchun, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Changchun, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Chongqing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Fuzhou, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Guangzhou, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Hangzhou, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Nanjing, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Nanning, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Shenyang, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Suzhou, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Ürümqi, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Wuhan, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Xi'an, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Xi'an, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Yangzhou, , China

Site Status

Research Site

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Caen, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Toulon Naval, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Gauting, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Halle, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Karlsruhe, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Lübeck, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

München, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Farkasgyepü, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gyöngyös - Mátraháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Tatabánya, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Tel Litwinsky, , Israel

Site Status

Research Site

Cremona, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Lecce, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Lecco, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Orbassano, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Parma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Sondrio, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Terni, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Chūōku, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Hirakata-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kanazawa, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kashiwa, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kobe, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Matsuyama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Natori-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Osakasayama-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sagamihara-shi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sakaishi, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sendai, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Sunto-gun, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Research Site

Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Kuantan, , Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Kuching, , Malaysia

Site Status

Research Site

Cebu, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Quezon City, , Philippines

Site Status

Research Site

Brzozoów, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Otwock, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Amadora, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Vila Nova de Gaia, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Craiova, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Cheongju-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seongnam-si, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Lleida, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Lugo, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Zaragoza, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Research Site

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Winterthur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Tainan, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Tainan, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Taoyuan, , Taiwan

Site Status

Research Site

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Hat Yai, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Muang, , Thailand

Site Status

Research Site

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Research Site

Dnipro, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Kryvyi Rih, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Sumy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Research Site

Edinburgh, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Maidstone, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Withington, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Hanoi, , Vietnam

Site Status

Research Site

Hanoi, , Vietnam

Site Status

Research Site

Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada China Czechia France Germany Hungary Israel Italy Japan Malaysia Philippines Poland Portugal Romania Russia South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland Taiwan Thailand Turkey (Türkiye) Ukraine United Kingdom Vietnam

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Markovets A, Merino Vega D, Abbosh C, Quinn K, Chang K, Wienke S, Hartmaier R, Barrett JC, Hodgson D. Variability of Circulating Tumor DNA Levels in Plasma Samples From Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Absence of Treatment. JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Oct;9:e2500287. doi: 10.1200/PO-25-00287. Epub 2025 Oct 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41166679 (View on PubMed)

Murat-Onana ML, Ramalingam SS, Janne PA, Gray JE, Ahn MJ, John T, Yatabe Y, Huang X, Rukazenkov Y, Javey M, Brown H, Li-Sucholeiki X. EGFR mutation testing across the osimertinib clinical program. Lung Cancer. 2025 Jun;204:108549. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2025.108549. Epub 2025 Apr 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40311309 (View on PubMed)

Viray H, Piper-Vallillo AJ, Widick P, Academia E, Shea M, Rangachari D, VanderLaan PA, Kobayashi SS, Costa DB. A Real-World Study of Patient Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes in EGFR Mutated Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line Osimertinib: Expanding the FLAURA Trial Results into Routine Clinical Practice. Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 7;16(6):1079. doi: 10.3390/cancers16061079.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38539415 (View on PubMed)

Johnson M, Serra Traynor C, Vishwanathan K, Overend P, Hartmaier R, Markovets A, Chmielecki J, Mugundu GM, Barrett JC, Tomkinson H, Ramalingam SS. Longitudinal Circulating Tumor DNA Modeling to Predict Disease Progression in First-Line Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Feb;115(2):349-360. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3113. Epub 2023 Dec 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38010260 (View on PubMed)

Walding A, Skaltsa K, Casamayor M, Ryden A. Time to deterioration of patient-reported outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer: exploring different definitions. Qual Life Res. 2022 Aug;31(8):2535-2543. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03088-0. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35099678 (View on PubMed)

Cheng Y, He Y, Li W, Zhang HL, Zhou Q, Wang B, Liu C, Walding A, Saggese M, Huang X, Fan M, Wang J, Ramalingam SS. Osimertinib Versus Comparator EGFR TKI as First-Line Treatment for EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: FLAURA China, A Randomized Study. Target Oncol. 2021 Mar;16(2):165-176. doi: 10.1007/s11523-021-00794-6. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33544337 (View on PubMed)

Leighl NB, Karaseva N, Nakagawa K, Cho BC, Gray JE, Hovey T, Walding A, Ryden A, Novello S. Patient-reported outcomes from FLAURA: Osimertinib versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jan;125:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31838405 (View on PubMed)

Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D, Cho BC, Gray JE, Ohe Y, Zhou C, Reungwetwattana T, Cheng Y, Chewaskulyong B, Shah R, Cobo M, Lee KH, Cheema P, Tiseo M, John T, Lin MC, Imamura F, Kurata T, Todd A, Hodge R, Saggese M, Rukazenkov Y, Soria JC; FLAURA Investigators. Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 2;382(1):41-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1913662. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31751012 (View on PubMed)

Brown H, Vansteenkiste J, Nakagawa K, Cobo M, John T, Barker C, Kohlmann A, Todd A, Saggese M, Chmielecki J, Markovets A, Scott M, Ramalingam SS. Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Untreated EGFR Mutated Advanced NSCLC and Response to Osimertinib Versus Comparator in FLAURA. J Thorac Oncol. 2020 Jan;15(1):138-143. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31605792 (View on PubMed)

Gray JE, Okamoto I, Sriuranpong V, Vansteenkiste J, Imamura F, Lee JS, Pang YK, Cobo M, Kasahara K, Cheng Y, Nogami N, Cho EK, Su WC, Zhang G, Huang X, Li-Sucholeiki X, Lentrichia B, Dearden S, Jenkins S, Saggese M, Rukazenkov Y, Ramalingam SS. Tissue and Plasma EGFR Mutation Analysis in the FLAURA Trial: Osimertinib versus Comparator EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor as First-Line Treatment in Patients with EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 15;25(22):6644-6652. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1126. Epub 2019 Aug 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31439584 (View on PubMed)

Planchard D, Boyer MJ, Lee JS, Dechaphunkul A, Cheema PK, Takahashi T, Gray JE, Tiseo M, Ramalingam SS, Todd A, McKeown A, Rukazenkov Y, Ohe Y. Postprogression Outcomes for Osimertinib versus Standard-of-Care EGFR-TKI in Patients with Previously Untreated EGFR-mutated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;25(7):2058-2063. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3325. Epub 2019 Jan 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30659024 (View on PubMed)

Ohe Y, Imamura F, Nogami N, Okamoto I, Kurata T, Kato T, Sugawara S, Ramalingam SS, Uchida H, Hodge R, Vowler SL, Walding A, Nakagawa K. Osimertinib versus standard-of-care EGFR-TKI as first-line treatment for EGFRm advanced NSCLC: FLAURA Japanese subset. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;49(1):29-36. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy179.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30508196 (View on PubMed)

Soria JC, Ohe Y, Vansteenkiste J, Reungwetwattana T, Chewaskulyong B, Lee KH, Dechaphunkul A, Imamura F, Nogami N, Kurata T, Okamoto I, Zhou C, Cho BC, Cheng Y, Cho EK, Voon PJ, Planchard D, Su WC, Gray JE, Lee SM, Hodge R, Marotti M, Rukazenkov Y, Ramalingam SS; FLAURA Investigators. Osimertinib in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):113-125. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713137. Epub 2017 Nov 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29151359 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1160-2242

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2014-002694-11

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

D5160C00007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Phase I, Study in Chinese NSCLC Patients
NCT02529995 COMPLETED PHASE1
AZD9291 First Time In Patients Ascending Dose Study
NCT01802632 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2