Ventilation-drive Coupling to Evaluate The Efficacy of Inhaled Bronchodilators in Patients With COPD

NCT ID: NCT02296047

Last Updated: 2015-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-31

Study Completion Date

2015-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major cause of chronic morbidity, mortality and disability throughout the world, leading to a heavy social and economic burden.Bronchodilators, the most commonly used drugs in COPD patients, have been shown to reduce dyspnea, improve exercise tolerance and improve health status. However,conventional lung function parameters such as forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) frequently fail to detect significant functional responses to bronchodilators in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. It is necessary for clinical and scientific reasons to develop a new tool to objectively assess the effect of different treatments including bronchodilator on COPD. Our previous study showed that Ventilation-drive coupling may be more sensitive and accurate to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled bronchodilators in patients with COPD because it could better reflect the pathological and physiological characteristics of COPD.

Based on the above conclusion, the present study were performed using the experimental methods of placebo and self-controlled. We aimd to explore the value of ventilation-drive coupling in evaluating the efficacy of bronchodilators on COPD and provide a reasonable basis for the clinical application of this index.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups:

1. Group A: Patients inhaled placebo, ipratropium 80μg, salbutamol 400 μg in sequence;
2. Group B: Patients inhaled placebo, salbutamol 400μg, ipratropium 80 μg in sequence.

The data were collected in 30 minutes after patients inhaled placebo,in 30 minutes after ipratropium and in 15 minutes after salbutamol.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

The medication order: subjects inhaled placebo,ipratropium bromide 80μg, salbutamol 400μg in sequence.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

physiological saline

ipratropium bromide

Intervention Type DRUG

80 µg inhalation once

salbutamol

Intervention Type DRUG

400 µg inhalation once

Group B

The medication order: subjects inhaled placebo, salbutamol 400μg, ipratropium 80μg in sequence.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

physiological saline

ipratropium bromide

Intervention Type DRUG

80 µg inhalation once

salbutamol

Intervention Type DRUG

400 µg inhalation once

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo

physiological saline

Intervention Type DRUG

ipratropium bromide

80 µg inhalation once

Intervention Type DRUG

salbutamol

400 µg inhalation once

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Physiological Saline 9 mg/ml atrovent Ventolin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged 40-70 years old; Patients with pulmonary function test of FEV1/FVC \< 70% and FEV1%pred \< 50%; Patients in a clinically stable state; Patients who signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with signs of an airway infection; Patients with an acute exacerbation during the previous 4 weeks; Patients with giant bulla(≥3cm in diameter); Patients with recent upper abdominal surgery; Patients with one or more of the following diseases: esophageal cancer, reflux esophagitis, severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea hypopnea index\>15/hr), neuromuscular disease, or significant heart failure; Patients with poor compliance.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zhujiang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chen Xin, Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical Unversity

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Zhujiang Hospital,Southern Medical Universtiy

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CX62782296

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.