Functional Later Rehabilitation in Older Adults: Effectiveness of Physical Exercises

NCT ID: NCT02295527

Last Updated: 2017-11-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hip fractures resulting from falls increase substantially with advancing age and less than a half of the elderly that have sustained and survived after the surgery regain their former levels of mobility. There is increasing evidence that rehabilitation interventions involving exercises and extended beyond the sub acute phase or even in a later stage of care have a positive impact on various functional abilities. The purpose of this study is to determine if an exercise program training for people who have suffered a fall-related hip fracture will improve functional mobility when compared with usual care. Randomized controlled trial using blinded assessors and intention-to-treat analysis. We will recruit 82 older adults, 60 years or over who have suffered a hip fracture due to a fall and have or have not completed physiotherapy and/or rehabilitation. These participants will be in a later stage rehabilitation phase (6 months up to 2 years after the fracture). Participants randomized to the Intervention Group (IG) will be submitted to a physical exercise program involving a progressive and challenging balance training and a neuromuscular and functional training of the lower limbs, conducted at home by physiotherapists, once a week, lasting about one hour, in the first, second and third month after randomization and will be oriented to perform exercises, twice a week, through a booklet. Visits to follow up exercises progression will be conducted once a month, from de fourth to the sixth month and each two months until the end of the follow up at the 12th month, summing up 18 sessions. Participants will receive monthly phone calls to increase exercise adherence. The control group will receive usual care. The primary outcome will be mobility-related disability and participants will be assessed in the baseline, at the end of the intervention (3 months), at 6 and 12 months. The participants will receive monthly phone calls to investigate falls and exercise adherence. Adverse effects will be monitored.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over a lifetime, about half of women and a quarter of men will suffer a fragility bone fracture \[1, 2\], mostly due to falling \[2\]. Among the most serious and common fractures are hip fractures, reaching significant levels of mortality \[2\] and disability \[3\]. Hip fracture is an increasingly important problem internationally, particularly in developing countries, due to the growth in the numbers of older people. It is estimated that in 2050 the global number of hip fractures will be between 7.3 and 21.3 million \[4\] and the cost with the treatment will be approximately of 131.5 billion dollars \[5\], due the population increase.

Physical and psychological limitations post-fracture, such as decreased mobility \[6\] and muscle strength of lower limbs \[7\], deficit balance \[6\], lack of trust \[7\], fear of falling \[6\] and increased risk of falls \[8\], hamper around 40% of older people from returning to their daily activities to live independently and safely \[3, 9\]. Even after two years of injury, more than half of the elderly do not regain the functional level prior to injury \[10\], persisting with moderate to high risk of falls \[6\].

Risk of falls and future falls in this population may be due either to physical limitations \[11, 12\] (due to insufficient recovery of balance, muscle strength and consequently mobility) and the fact they have already suffered a fracture previously \[13\], further increasing the chances of new fractures in this population \[14\].

There is no consensus about the best intervention for functionality of the elderly after hip fracture. However, recently different exercise programs have been suggested to improve the mobility of these patients \[8\]. Some studies have shown the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs in the period of up to 6 months after injury \[15-18\]. Although, few studies have explored the late period rehabilitation (over 6 months) \[19, 20\], when functional limitations can persist due to inadequate dose as well as the type of exercise performed. Population in Brazil is growing age in one of the fastest rates in the world and will be even greater in the coming decades. The number of seniors will double between 2002 and 2020, from 15 million to 32 million and reach 64 million by 2050 (about 30% of the total population in Brazil) \[21\]. Furthermore, the elderly aged 80 and over will increase exponentially over the next four decades, putting a growing and disproportionate demand on the health system and social support \[21\].

The purpose of this study is to determine if an exercise program training for people who have suffered a fall-related hip fracture will improve functional mobility when compared with usual care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Fractures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Home-based physical exercise

Participants randomized to the Intervention Group (IG) will be submitted to a physical exercise program involving a progressive and challenging balance training and a neuromuscular and functional training of the lower limbs, conducted at home by physiotherapists, once a week, lasting about one hour, in the first, second and third month after randomization and will be oriented to perform exercises, twice a week, through a booklet. Visits to follow up exercises progression will be conducted once a month, from de fourth to the sixth month and each two months until the end of the follow up at the 12th month, summing up 18 sessions. Participants will receive monthly phone calls to increase exercise adherence.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Home-based physical exercise intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Progressive strengthening of muscle groups ankle dorsi flexors, knee extensors and hip abductors and progressive balance training according to individual capacity:weight-bearing, limits of stability, change of position/direction, maintenance of static and dynamic stability, anticipatory adjustments using different bases of support and different sensory conditions. Dynamic exercises involving spin on its own axis, sitting and standing, up and down stairs, functional reach, steps in different directions and walk training. In the first session the physiotherapist will choose two exercises that best address the participant function goals and will add more exercises each week according to the level of participants' ability and motivation. Participants will receive a detailed booklet, containing photos and instructions of the12 exercises.Visits to follow up exercises will be conducted by the physiotherapists to progress the exercises.

Control Group Usual Care

This group will receive usual care and the booklet regarding bone health information.

Group Type OTHER

Control Group Usual Care

Intervention Type OTHER

This group will receive usual care and will not have any disadvantage in participating in the study. We understand that usual care is what participant receives based on the network of health care in which he/she is inserted. The participants will receive at baseline assessment a diary falls logbook and a guidance booklet containing information about prevention of falls, fractures and bone health that will be explained at the moment.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Home-based physical exercise intervention

Progressive strengthening of muscle groups ankle dorsi flexors, knee extensors and hip abductors and progressive balance training according to individual capacity:weight-bearing, limits of stability, change of position/direction, maintenance of static and dynamic stability, anticipatory adjustments using different bases of support and different sensory conditions. Dynamic exercises involving spin on its own axis, sitting and standing, up and down stairs, functional reach, steps in different directions and walk training. In the first session the physiotherapist will choose two exercises that best address the participant function goals and will add more exercises each week according to the level of participants' ability and motivation. Participants will receive a detailed booklet, containing photos and instructions of the12 exercises.Visits to follow up exercises will be conducted by the physiotherapists to progress the exercises.

Intervention Type OTHER

Control Group Usual Care

This group will receive usual care and will not have any disadvantage in participating in the study. We understand that usual care is what participant receives based on the network of health care in which he/she is inserted. The participants will receive at baseline assessment a diary falls logbook and a guidance booklet containing information about prevention of falls, fractures and bone health that will be explained at the moment.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

REATIVE Usual care

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* After the first hip fragility fracture following a fall from standing height or while turning
* Surgically treated in the later stage of rehabilitation phase (6 months up to 2 years after the fracture).

Exclusion Criteria

* Sustained a hip fracture trauma due to falls from higher surfaces or motor vehicle accidents or due to a tumors or disease (other than osteoporosis)
* Several cognitive impairment, assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination adjusted for educational level \[22\];
* Inability to walk, either with walking aid;
* Progressive or severe neurological disease (e.g., Parkinson's disease, stroke);
* Communication disability (several uncompensated visual or hearing deficits);
* Medical condition contraindications exercise (e.g. unstable angina, severe valvular heart disease, large or expanding aortic aneurysm, etc.) \[23\];
* Engaged in a regular exercise program, with a frequency more or equal than twice a week, 30 minutes a day (excluding walking and senior dance) \[24\].
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Monica Rodrigues Perracini

Professor at Master's and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Monica R Perracini, Phd

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidade Cidade de São Paulo

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidade Cidade de São Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Monica R Perracini, Phd

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +551121781565

Email: [email protected]

Camila A Lima, Ms

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +5511992105950

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Monica R Perracini, Phd

Role: primary

Camila A Lima

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD, Kyer C, Cooper C; IOF Fracture Working Group. Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int. 2013 Aug;24(8):2135-52. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2348-z. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23589162 (View on PubMed)

Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S3-7. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1702-6. Epub 2004 Sep 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15365697 (View on PubMed)

Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, Hebel JR, Kenzora JE. Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: a prospective study. J Gerontol. 1990 May;45(3):M101-7. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.3.m101.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2335719 (View on PubMed)

Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(5):407-13. doi: 10.1007/pl00004148.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9425497 (View on PubMed)

Johnell O. The socioeconomic burden of fractures: today and in the 21st century. Am J Med. 1997 Aug 18;103(2A):20S-25S; discussion 25S-26S. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(97)90023-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9302894 (View on PubMed)

Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA, Gruber W, Robinson C. Incidence of and risk factors for falls following hip fracture in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 2005 Jul;85(7):648-55.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15982171 (View on PubMed)

Portegijs E, Edgren J, Salpakoski A, Kallinen M, Rantanen T, Alen M, Kiviranta I, Sihvonen S, Sipila S. Balance confidence was associated with mobility and balance performance in older people with fall-related hip fracture: a cross-sectional study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2340-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.022. Epub 2012 Jun 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22698990 (View on PubMed)

Handoll HH, Sherrington C, Mak JC. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Mar 16;(3):CD001704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21412873 (View on PubMed)

Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing. 2006 Sep;35 Suppl 2:ii37-ii41. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl084.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16926202 (View on PubMed)

Magaziner J, Hawkes W, Hebel JR, Zimmerman SI, Fox KM, Dolan M, Felsenthal G, Kenzora J. Recovery from hip fracture in eight areas of function. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Sep;55(9):M498-507. doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.9.m498.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10995047 (View on PubMed)

Sherrington C, Tiedemann A, Cameron I. Physical exercise after hip fracture: an evidence overview. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;47(2):297-307. Epub 2011 May 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21555983 (View on PubMed)

Lord SR, Menz HB, Tiedemann A. A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Phys Ther. 2003 Mar;83(3):237-52.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12620088 (View on PubMed)

Perracini MR, Ramos LR. [Fall-related factors in a cohort of elderly community residents]. Rev Saude Publica. 2002 Dec;36(6):709-16. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102002000700008. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12488937 (View on PubMed)

Berry SD, Samelson EJ, Hannan MT, McLean RR, Lu M, Cupples LA, Shaffer ML, Beiser AL, Kelly-Hayes M, Kiel DP. Second hip fracture in older men and women: the Framingham Study. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 8;167(18):1971-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.18.1971.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17923597 (View on PubMed)

Binder EF, Brown M, Sinacore DR, Steger-May K, Yarasheski KE, Schechtman KB. Effects of extended outpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Aug 18;292(7):837-46. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.7.837.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15315998 (View on PubMed)

Mangione KK, Palombaro KM. Exercise prescription for a patient 3 months after hip fracture. Phys Ther. 2005 Jul;85(7):676-87.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15982174 (View on PubMed)

Sherrington C, Lord SR, Herbert RD. A randomised trial of weight-bearing versus non-weight-bearing exercise for improving physical ability in inpatients after hip fracture. Aust J Physiother. 2003;49(1):15-22. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60184-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12600250 (View on PubMed)

Mitchell SL, Stott DJ, Martin BJ, Grant SJ. Randomized controlled trial of quadriceps training after proximal femoral fracture. Clin Rehabil. 2001 Jun;15(3):282-90. doi: 10.1191/026921501676849095.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11386398 (View on PubMed)

Sherrington C, Lord SR, Herbert RD. A randomized controlled trial of weight-bearing versus non-weight-bearing exercise for improving physical ability after usual care for hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 May;85(5):710-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00620-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15129393 (View on PubMed)

Sherrington C, Lord SR. Home exercise to improve strength and walking velocity after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Feb;78(2):208-12. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90265-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9041904 (View on PubMed)

Gragnolati M, Jorgensen OH, Rocha R, Fruttero A. Growing Old in an Older Brazil: Implicatios of population aging on growth, porverty, public finance, and service delivery. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank; 2011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Bertolucci PH, Brucki SM, Campacci SR, Juliano Y. [The Mini-Mental State Examination in a general population: impact of educational status]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1994 Mar;52(1):1-7. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8002795 (View on PubMed)

Frankel JE, Bean JF, Frontera WR. Exercise in the elderly: research and clinical practice. Clin Geriatr Med. 2006 May;22(2):239-56; vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2005.12.002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16627076 (View on PubMed)

Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, Macera CA, Castaneda-Sceppa C. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1435-45. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180616aa2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17762378 (View on PubMed)

Singh MA. Exercise comes of age: rationale and recommendations for a geriatric exercise prescription. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 May;57(5):M262-82. doi: 10.1093/gerona/57.5.m262. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11983720 (View on PubMed)

Freire AN, Guerra RO, Alvarado B, Guralnik JM, Zunzunegui MV. Validity and reliability of the short physical performance battery in two diverse older adult populations in Quebec and Brazil. J Aging Health. 2012 Aug;24(5):863-78. doi: 10.1177/0898264312438551. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22422762 (View on PubMed)

Fleck MP, Louzada S, Xavier M, Chachamovich E, Vieira G, Santos L, Pinzon V. [Application of the Portuguese version of the abbreviated instrument of quality life WHOQOL-bref]. Rev Saude Publica. 2000 Apr;34(2):178-83. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102000000200012. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10881154 (View on PubMed)

Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, Saxena S, von Korff M, Pull C; WHO/NIH Joint Project. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21076562 (View on PubMed)

Merom D, Delbaere K, Cumming R, Voukelatos A, Rissel C, Van Der Ploeg HP, Lord SR. Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire for seniors: validity and responsiveness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(5):947-54. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000196.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24743107 (View on PubMed)

Ruggero CR, Bilton TL, Teixeira LF, Ramos Jde L, Alouche SR, Dias RC, Perracini MR. Gait speed correlates in a multiracial population of community-dwelling older adults living in Brazil: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 28;13:182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-182.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23448191 (View on PubMed)

Fairhall NJ, Dyer SM, Mak JC, Diong J, Kwok WS, Sherrington C. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 7;9(9):CD001704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36070134 (View on PubMed)

Lima CA, Sherrington C, Guaraldo A, Moraes SA, Varanda RD, Melo JA, Kojima KE, Perracini M. Effectiveness of a physical exercise intervention program in improving functional mobility in older adults after hip fracture in later stage rehabilitation: protocol of a randomized clinical trial (REATIVE Study). BMC Geriatr. 2016 Nov 29;16(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0370-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27894271 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAAE: 27398814.7.0000.0064

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id