Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of MHAA4549A in Combination With Oseltamivir Versus Oseltamivir in Participants With Severe Influenza A Infection (NCT NCT02293863)
NCT ID: NCT02293863
Last Updated: 2018-06-18
Results Overview
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
168 participants
From randomization up to 60 days
2018-06-18
Participant Flow
Enrolled in the study were 168 participants. The participant flow is reported for the safety population (158 participants), which included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
56
|
55
|
47
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
47
|
42
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
9
|
13
|
9
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
4
|
6
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Reason Not Specified
|
0
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of MHAA4549A in Combination With Oseltamivir Versus Oseltamivir in Participants With Severe Influenza A Infection
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=56 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=55 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=47 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
Total
n=158 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
65.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.5 • n=5 Participants
|
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2 • n=7 Participants
|
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9 • n=5 Participants
|
60.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
71 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
99 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Stated
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska native
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
128 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 60 daysPopulation: Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=56 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=55 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=47 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
|
80.4 percentage of participants
|
67.3 percentage of participants
|
74.5 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 60 daysPopulation: Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Reported are the number of participants positive for ATAs at baseline, the number of participants with treatment-induced ATAs and the number of participants with treatment-enhanced ATAs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=56 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=55 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=47 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549A
Positive for ATAs at baseline
|
0 participants
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549A
Treatment-induced ATAs
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies (ATA) to MHAA4549A During and Following Administration of MHAA4549A
Treatment-enhanced ATAs
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 60 daysPopulation: Intent-to-treat infected (ITTi) population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
The time to normalization of respiratory function was defined as the time to removal of the participant from oxygen (O2) supplementation in order to maintain a blood oxygen saturation level (SpO2) equal to or greater than 95% as measured by pulse oximetry.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Normalization of Respiratory Function
|
4.28 days
Interval 3.06 to 6.6
|
2.78 days
Interval 2.52 to 4.2
|
2.65 days
Interval 1.58 to 4.52
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1-7, 14 and 30Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
The clinical status of participants was defined by five mutually exclusive categories: 1. Death; 2. In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU); 3. Non-ICU hospitalization, requiring supplemental oxygen (O2); 4. Non-ICU hospitalization, not requiring supplemental oxygen (O2); 5. Not hospitalized.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 1: Death
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 1: In ICU
|
42.6 percentage of participants
|
38.5 percentage of participants
|
43.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 1: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O2
|
57.4 percentage of participants
|
61.5 percentage of participants
|
52.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 1: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O2
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
4.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 1: Not hospitalized
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 2: Death
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
2.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 2: In ICU
|
42.6 percentage of participants
|
38.5 percentage of participants
|
38.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 2: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O2
|
40.7 percentage of participants
|
51.9 percentage of participants
|
31.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 2: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O2
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
20.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 2: Not hospitalized
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 3: In ICU
|
37.0 percentage of participants
|
32.7 percentage of participants
|
34.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 3: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O2
|
31.5 percentage of participants
|
42.3 percentage of participants
|
27.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 3: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O2
|
20.4 percentage of participants
|
19.2 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 4: Death
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
2.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 4: In ICU
|
35.2 percentage of participants
|
30.8 percentage of participants
|
29.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 4: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O2
|
25.9 percentage of participants
|
21.2 percentage of participants
|
18.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 4: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O2
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
36.5 percentage of participants
|
29.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 4: Not hospitalized
|
16.7 percentage of participants
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
20.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 5: Death
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
2.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 5: In ICU
|
27.8 percentage of participants
|
26.9 percentage of participants
|
27.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 5: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O2
|
25.9 percentage of participants
|
19.2 percentage of participants
|
18.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 5: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O2
|
24.1 percentage of participants
|
34.6 percentage of participants
|
27.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 5: Not hospitalized
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
19.2 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 6: Death
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
2.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 6: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O2
|
27.8 percentage of participants
|
34.6 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 6: Not hospitalized
|
25.9 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
34.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 7: Death
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
2.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 7: In ICU
|
18.5 percentage of participants
|
21.2 percentage of participants
|
20.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 7: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O2
|
24.1 percentage of participants
|
13.5 percentage of participants
|
15.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 7: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O2
|
14.8 percentage of participants
|
28.8 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 14: Death
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 14: In ICU
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
11.5 percentage of participants
|
9.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 14: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O2
|
7.4 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
6.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 14: Not hospitalized
|
70.4 percentage of participants
|
76.9 percentage of participants
|
72.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 30: Death
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
9.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 30: In ICU
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
4.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 30: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O2
|
5.6 percentage of participants
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
4.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 30: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O2
|
1.9 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 30: Not hospitalized
|
85.2 percentage of participants
|
82.7 percentage of participants
|
81.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 3: Death
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
0.0 percentage of participants
|
2.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 3: Not hospitalized
|
11.1 percentage of participants
|
5.8 percentage of participants
|
11.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 6: In ICU
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
23.1 percentage of participants
|
22.7 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 6: Non-ICU, requiring supplemental O2
|
22.2 percentage of participants
|
15.4 percentage of participants
|
15.9 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 7: Not hospitalized
|
40.7 percentage of participants
|
34.6 percentage of participants
|
36.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Clinical Status Using a Categorical Ordinal Outcome
Day 14: Non-ICU, not requiring supplemental O2
|
14.8 percentage of participants
|
3.8 percentage of participants
|
4.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 hours after end of infusion (infusion duration = approximately 120 minutes) up to Day 60Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
Clinical failure after 24 hours post-infusion of study drug was defined as progression to increased O2 requirement defined by an increase in oxygen supplementation from low flow oxygen (i.e., 2-6 liters per minute \[L/min\]) to high flow oxygen (i.e., \> 6 L/min) or from oxygen supplementation alone to any positive pressure ventilation (PPV) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), progression to ICU, prolonged ventilation or O2 support defined by \> 2 weeks, or death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Failure
|
14.8 percentage of participants
Interval 8.82 to 22.95
|
25.0 percentage of participants
Interval 17.22 to 34.32
|
22.7 percentage of participants
Interval 14.63 to 32.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 60 daysPopulation: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
Description: Clinical resolution of abnormal vital signs was defined as meeting three out of five of the following criteria: 1. SpO2 ≥ 95% without supplemental O2; 2. Respiratory rate \< 24 breaths per minute without supplemental O2; 3. Core temperature \< 37.2 Celsius (C) immediately prior to receipt of any antipyretic drug, and at least 6-8 hours from the last dose of antipyretic or core temperature \> 36 C in participants who are initially hypothermic; 4. Heart rate (HR) \< 100 beats/minute; 5. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \>90 mmHg. Reported here is the percentage of participants who had clinical resolution of at least three out of five abnormal vital signs by the end of study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Resolution of Abnormal Vital Signs
|
81.3 percentage of participants
Interval 62.88 to 92.9
|
73.3 percentage of participants
Interval 53.6 to 87.82
|
66.7 percentage of participants
Interval 44.1 to 84.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 14, 30 and 60Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause
Day 30
|
5.6 percentage of participants
Interval 2.06 to 11.95
|
7.7 percentage of participants
Interval 3.4 to 14.79
|
9.1 percentage of participants
Interval 4.02 to 17.35
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause
Day 60
|
7.4 percentage of participants
Interval 3.27 to 14.26
|
9.6 percentage of participants
Interval 4.75 to 17.11
|
9.1 percentage of participants
Interval 4.02 to 17.35
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died Due to Any Cause
Day 14
|
1.9 percentage of participants
Interval 0.19 to 7.01
|
3.8 percentage of participants
Interval 1.03 to 9.91
|
6.8 percentage of participants
Interval 2.53 to 14.56
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately prior to MHAA4549A infusion and oseltamivir dosing on Day 1, immediately prior to oseltamivir dosing on Days 2 to 10, Days 14, 20, 25, 30, on day of discharge from hospital (up to Day 60), and at study completion (Day 60)Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Influenza A viral load was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in nasopharyngeal samples at multiple time points during the study. AUEC is the area under the viral load-time curve expressed as log10 (viral particles/milliliter x hour) = log10 (vp/mL x hour).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=48 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=46 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=39 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under Viral Load-Time Curve (AUEC ) of Influenza A Virus
|
25.72 log10 (vp/mL x hour).
Standard Deviation 15.92
|
21.99 log10 (vp/mL x hour).
Standard Deviation 16.57
|
25.03 log10 (vp/mL x hour).
Standard Deviation 13.48
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately prior to MHAA4549A infusion and oseltamivir dosing on Day 1, immediately prior to oseltamivir dosing on Days 2 to 10, Days 14, 20, 25, 30, on day of discharge from hospital (up to Day 60), and at study completion (Day 60)Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Influenza A viral load was measured by qPCR in nasopharyngeal samples at multiple time points during the study. Reported here is the peak Influenza A viral load expressed as log10 vp/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=48 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=46 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=39 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Peak Influenza A Viral Load
|
5.70 log10 vp/mL
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
5.37 log10 vp/mL
Standard Deviation 1.39
|
5.28 log10 vp/mL
Standard Deviation 1.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately prior to MHAA4549A infusion and oseltamivir dosing on Day 1, immediately prior to oseltamivir dosing on Days 2 to 10, Days 14, 20, 25, 30, on day of discharge from hospital (up to Day 60), and at study completion (Day 60)Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Influenza A viral load was measured by qPCR in nasopharyngeal samples at multiple time points during the study. Reported here is the duration of viral shedding.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Viral Shedding
|
4.00 days
Interval 3.66 to 5.6
|
4.63 days
Interval 3.63 to 4.97
|
4.60 days
Interval 3.57 to 5.53
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 60 daysPopulation: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Hospitalization
|
8.95 days
Interval 5.9 to 10.29
|
7.65 days
Interval 6.94 to 8.02
|
6.69 days
Interval 6.0 to 8.86
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 60 daysPopulation: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay
|
4.66 days
Interval 3.91 to 7.1
|
6.60 days
Interval 4.82 to 10.53
|
5.29 days
Interval 3.25 to 6.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 60 daysPopulation: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Using Antibiotics for Respiratory Infections
|
13.0 percentage of participants
Interval 7.36 to 20.84
|
11.5 percentage of participants
Interval 6.17 to 19.37
|
11.4 percentage of participants
Interval 5.63 to 20.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 60 daysPopulation: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
The following were considered secondary complications of influenza: pneumonia, including hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilation-acquired pneumonia (VAP), exacerbations of chronic lung disease, myocarditis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), otitis media, or other related complications.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Secondary Complications of Influenza
|
13.0 percentage of participants
Interval 7.36 to 20.84
|
15.4 percentage of participants
Interval 9.17 to 23.79
|
13.6 percentage of participants
Interval 7.32 to 22.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 30 and 60Population: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Readmitted to Hospital Due to Any Cause
|
1.9 percentage of participants
Interval 0.19 to 7.01
|
3.8 percentage of participants
Interval 1.03 to 9.91
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From randomization up to 60 daysPopulation: ITTi population included all randomized participants who were confirmed to be influenza A infected, with participants grouped according to the treatment assigned at randomization. Here, number analyzed are the participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=54 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=52 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=44 Participants
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Ventilation
|
4.11 days
Interval 2.72 to 5.32
|
7.05 days
Interval 1.92 to 13.12
|
5.89 days
Interval 4.13 to 13.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 minutes (min) before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK)-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.
AUC0-inf is reported as day\*microgram/milliliter (day\*mcg/mL).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=38 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=31 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUC ) of MHAA4549A
|
11400 day*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 4530
|
26700 day*mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 9810
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)Population: PK-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=38 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=31 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax ) of MHAA4549A
|
916 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 294
|
2220 mcg/mL
Standard Deviation 556
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)Population: PK-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=38 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=31 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Elimination Half-Life (Terminal t1/2) of MHAA4549A
|
19.0 day
Standard Deviation 4.91
|
17.8 day
Standard Deviation 3.88
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)Population: PK-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=38 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=31 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Observed Clearance (CL-obs) of MHAA4549A
|
288 mL/day
Standard Deviation 158
|
350 mL/day
Standard Deviation 130
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 min before & 60 min after end of MHAA4549A infusion (infusion duration = 120 min) on Day 1; immediately prior to oseltamivir dose on Days 2, 3, 5, 7; on Days 14, 30; on day of discharge (up to Day 60); at study completion (Day 60)Population: PK-evaluable population included all participants, who received MHAA4549A and from whom evaluable PK samples were obtained.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=38 Participants
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=31 Participants
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Observed Steady State Volume of Distribution (Vss_obs) of MHAA4549A
|
6410 mL
Standard Deviation 3170
|
7450 mL
Standard Deviation 2270
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Placebo + Oseltamivir
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=56 participants at risk
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=55 participants at risk
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=47 participants at risk
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
5.5%
3/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
6.4%
3/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
3.6%
2/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
4.3%
2/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute pulmonary oedema
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumomediastinum
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary congestion
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal wall haematoma
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal ischaemia
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Ulcer
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Suture rupture
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic intracranial haemorrhage
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypovolaemic shock
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hepatocellular carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Extubation
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intensive care unit acquired weakness
|
0.00%
0/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo + Oseltamivir
n=56 participants at risk
Participants received a single IV dose of placebo matched to MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 3600 mg + Oseltamivir
n=55 participants at risk
Participants received a single low intravenous (IV) dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
MHAA4549A 8400 mg + Oseltamivir
n=47 participants at risk
Participants received a single high IV dose of MHAA4549A on Day 1 and standard oseltamivir therapy for minimum of 5 days.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
3.6%
2/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
7.3%
4/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
4.3%
2/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
5.4%
3/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
3.6%
2/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
4.3%
2/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
7.1%
4/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
3.6%
2/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
8.5%
4/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
7.1%
4/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
3.6%
2/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
4.3%
2/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
5.5%
3/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
4.3%
2/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
6.4%
3/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
5.5%
3/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
12.5%
7/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
8.5%
4/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
5.4%
3/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
7.3%
4/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
4.3%
2/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
5.4%
3/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
5.5%
3/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
4.3%
2/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.6%
2/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
7.3%
4/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
4.3%
2/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
12.5%
7/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
5.5%
3/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
7.1%
4/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
7.3%
4/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
7.1%
4/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
5.5%
3/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
2.1%
1/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
5.4%
3/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
9.1%
5/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
0.00%
0/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
3.6%
2/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
3.6%
2/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
6.4%
3/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.8%
1/56 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
1.8%
1/55 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
6.4%
3/47 • From randomization up to 60 days
Safety Population included all randomized participants who received study drug, with participants grouped according to the treatment actually received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER