A Study to Compare the Safety of Rivaroxaban Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Addition to Either Clopidogrel or Ticagrelor Therapy in Participants With Acute Coronary Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT02293395

Last Updated: 2017-12-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

3037 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-20

Study Completion Date

2016-10-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to estimate the risk of bleeding with rivaroxaban, compared with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), in addition to a single antiplatelet/ platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor antagonist (P2Y12 inhibitor agent: clopidogrel or ticagrelor), in participants with a recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS: including ST segment elevation myocardial infarction \[STEMI\] and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome \[NSTE-ACS\]).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, randomized (the study drug is assigned by chance), double-blind (neither physician nor participant knows the treatment that the participant receives), active-controlled (study in which the experimental treatment or procedure is compared to a standard treatment or procedure), parallel group (each group of participants will be treated at the same time), multicenter (when more than one hospital or medical school team work on a medical research study) study in participants with a recent ACS (STEMI or NSTE-ACS). All the eligible participants receiving background treatment of ASA plus clopidogrel (Stratum 1) or ASA plus ticagrelor (Stratum 2) will be randomly assigned to either receive ASA or rivaroxaban on background of P2Y12 receptor antagonists treatment. This study will include 3 phases: Screening Phase (up to 10 days, before study start on Day 1), Double-blind Treatment Phase (up to either 180 days after randomization of the last enrolled participant in the study or Day 360, whichever occurs earlier), and Follow-up Phase (up to 30 days). Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Acute Coronary Syndrome Myocardial infarction Unstable angina Acetylsalicylic acid Rivaroxaban JNJ-39039039 Bay 59-7939 Xarelto Clopidogrel Ticagrelor Plavix Brilinta Effient

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stratum 1/ASA

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100 milligram (mg) enteric-coated tablet once daily orally along with clopidogrel 75 mg once daily orally, up to either 180 days after randomization of the last enrolled participant in the study or Day 360, whichever occurs earlier.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acetylsalicylic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

ASA 100 mg enteric-coated tablet once daily orally.

Clopidogrel

Intervention Type DRUG

Clopidogrel 75 mg once daily orally.

Stratum 1/Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg tablet twice daily orally along with clopidogrel 75 mg once daily orally, up to either 180 days after randomization of the last enrolled participant in the study or Day 360, whichever occurs earlier.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rivaroxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg tablet twice daily orally.

Clopidogrel

Intervention Type DRUG

Clopidogrel 75 mg once daily orally.

Stratum 2/ASA

ASA 100 mg enteric-coated tablet once daily orally along with ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily orally, up to either 180 days after randomization of the last enrolled participant in the study or Day 360, whichever occurs earlier.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Acetylsalicylic acid

Intervention Type DRUG

ASA 100 mg enteric-coated tablet once daily orally.

Ticagrelor

Intervention Type DRUG

Ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily orally.

Stratum 2/Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg tablet twice daily orally along with ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily orally, up to either 180 days after randomization of the last enrolled participant in the study or Day 360, whichever occurs earlier.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Rivaroxaban

Intervention Type DRUG

Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg tablet twice daily orally.

Ticagrelor

Intervention Type DRUG

Ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily orally.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acetylsalicylic acid

ASA 100 mg enteric-coated tablet once daily orally.

Intervention Type DRUG

Rivaroxaban

Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg tablet twice daily orally.

Intervention Type DRUG

Clopidogrel

Clopidogrel 75 mg once daily orally.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ticagrelor

Ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily orally.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Aspirin JNJ-39039039 Bay 59-7939 Xarelto Plavix Brilinta

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants, 18 years or older, must have symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (angina, or symptoms thought to be equivalent) within 48 hours of hospital presentation, or developed ACS while being hospitalized, and has a diagnosis of: a) ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); b) non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, participant who is 54 years of age or younger must also have either diabetes mellitus or a history of a prior myocardial infarction (MI), in addition to the presenting ACS event
* Participant must be randomized within the screening window of 10 days after hospital admission for the index ACS event. Participant should have received acute phase treatment for the index ACS, such as intravenous anticoagulant or antiplatelet, and are receiving maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with either clopidogrel plus acetyl salicylic acid (ASA), or ticagrelor plus ASA, with the intent to continue the treatment with a platelet adenosine diphosphate P2Y12 receptor antagonist (P2Y12 inhibitor) after randomization
* Participants must agree to provide a pharmacogenomics deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sample

Exclusion Criteria

* Participant has any conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, contraindicates anticoagulant therapy or would have an unacceptable risk
* Participant with a prior stroke of any etiology or transient ischemic attack (TIA)
* Participant who received thrombolytic therapy as treatment for the index ACS event cannot be enrolled in the ticagrelor stratum
* Participant has anticipated need for chronic administration of omeprazole or esomeprazole concomitantly with clopidogrel
* Participant has known allergy or intolerance to ASA or rivaroxaban
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke Clinical Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alexander City, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Banning, California, United States

Site Status

Sylmar, California, United States

Site Status

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Jupiter, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Athens, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Cumming, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Tucker, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Jerseyville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Munster, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Bay City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Mount Clemens, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Kalispell, Montana, United States

Site Status

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mount, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Sanford, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Bartlesville, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Abington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Langhorne, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Sayre, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

York, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Danville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Puyallup, Washington, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Caba, , Argentina

Site Status

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Cordooba, , Argentina

Site Status

Corrientes, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

La Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Mar del Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Resistencia, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario, , Argentina

Site Status

Salta, , Argentina

Site Status

San Martín, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Brisbane, , Australia

Site Status

Cairns, , Australia

Site Status

Chermside, , Australia

Site Status

Elizabeth Vale, , Australia

Site Status

Herston, , Australia

Site Status

Hobart, , Australia

Site Status

Launceston, , Australia

Site Status

Liverpool, , Australia

Site Status

Murdoch, , Australia

Site Status

Nambour, , Australia

Site Status

New Lambton Heights, , Australia

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

Brasschaat, , Belgium

Site Status

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Huy, , Belgium

Site Status

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Mol, , Belgium

Site Status

Roeselare, , Belgium

Site Status

Ronse, , Belgium

Site Status

Turnhout, , Belgium

Site Status

Belo Horizonte, , Brazil

Site Status

Blumenau, , Brazil

Site Status

Campina Grande do Sul, , Brazil

Site Status

Campinas, , Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, , Brazil

Site Status

Marília, , Brazil

Site Status

Passo Fundo, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Recife, , Brazil

Site Status

Salvador, , Brazil

Site Status

São José do Rio Preto, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Tatuí, , Brazil

Site Status

Uberlândia, , Brazil

Site Status

Votuporanga, , Brazil

Site Status

Blagoevgrad, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Burgas, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Haskovo, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Lovech, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pazardzhik, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sandanski, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Varna, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

New West Minister, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Newmarket, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saint-Charles-Borromée, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Kolin Iii., , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Plzen-Bory, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Třebíč, , Czechia

Site Status

Znojmo, , Czechia

Site Status

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Køge, , Denmark

Site Status

Silkeborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Chambray-lès-Tours, , France

Site Status

Jossigny, , France

Site Status

Le Coudray, , France

Site Status

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Montauban, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Périgueux, , France

Site Status

Balatonfüred, , Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Székesfehérvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Gifu, , Japan

Site Status

Kagawa, , Japan

Site Status

Kitakyushu, , Japan

Site Status

Kobe, , Japan

Site Status

Kumamoto, , Japan

Site Status

Matsue, , Japan

Site Status

Nagano, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Sayama-Shi, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Uwajima-Shi, , Japan

Site Status

Yokohama, , Japan

Site Status

Yonago, , Japan

Site Status

Yotsui 2-8-1, , Japan

Site Status

's-Hertogenbosch, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amersfoort, , Netherlands

Site Status

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Blaricum, , Netherlands

Site Status

Den Helder, , Netherlands

Site Status

Gouda, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Hoofddorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Hoogeveen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Schiedam, , Netherlands

Site Status

The Hague, , Netherlands

Site Status

Bielsko-Biala, , Poland

Site Status

Bytom, , Poland

Site Status

Chrzanów, , Poland

Site Status

Dąbrowa Górnicza, , Poland

Site Status

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Grodzisk Mazowiecki, , Poland

Site Status

Inowrocław, , Poland

Site Status

Kędzierzyn-Koźle, , Poland

Site Status

Kielce, , Poland

Site Status

Koszalin, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Nowy Targ, , Poland

Site Status

Nysa, , Poland

Site Status

Oświęcim, , Poland

Site Status

Polanica-Zdrój, , Poland

Site Status

Puławy, , Poland

Site Status

Tychy, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Włocławek, , Poland

Site Status

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Chita, , Russia

Site Status

Ivanovo, , Russia

Site Status

Kaliningrad, , Russia

Site Status

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnoyarsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Orenburg, , Russia

Site Status

Penza, , Russia

Site Status

Perm, , Russia

Site Status

Rostov-on-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Syktyvkar, , Russia

Site Status

Tyumen, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

Incheon, , South Korea

Site Status

Seongnam, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Suwon, , South Korea

Site Status

A Coruña, , Spain

Site Status

Almería, , Spain

Site Status

Ávila, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Murcia, , Spain

Site Status

Sant Boi de Llobregat, , Spain

Site Status

Tarragona, , Spain

Site Status

Falun, , Sweden

Site Status

Jönköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Östersund, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Sundsvall, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Adana, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Aydin, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Bursa, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Diyarbakır, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Eskişehir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kahramanmaraş, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kocaeli, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Konya, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Sivas, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Cherkasy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lutsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ternopil, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zhytomyr, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Czechia Denmark France Hungary Japan Netherlands Poland Russia South Korea Spain Sweden Turkey (Türkiye) Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gibson WJ, Nafee T, Travis R, Yee M, Kerneis M, Ohman M, Gibson CM. Machine learning versus traditional risk stratification methods in acute coronary syndrome: a pooled randomized clinical trial analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jan;49(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01940-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31535314 (View on PubMed)

Povsic TJ, Ohman EM, Roe MT, White J, Rockhold FW, Montalescot G, Cornel JH, Nicolau JC, Steg PG, James S, Bode C, Welsh RC, Plotnikov AN, Mundl H, Gibson CM. P2Y12 Inhibitor Switching in Response to Routine Notification of CYP2C19 Clopidogrel Metabolizer Status Following Acute Coronary Syndromes. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Jul 1;4(7):680-684. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1510.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31141104 (View on PubMed)

Ohman EM, Roe MT, Steg PG, James SK, Povsic TJ, White J, Rockhold F, Plotnikov A, Mundl H, Strony J, Sun X, Husted S, Tendera M, Montalescot G, Bahit MC, Ardissino D, Bueno H, Claeys MJ, Nicolau JC, Cornel JH, Goto S, Kiss RG, Guray U, Park DW, Bode C, Welsh RC, Gibson CM. Clinically significant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2017 May 6;389(10081):1799-1808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30751-1. Epub 2017 Mar 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28325638 (View on PubMed)

Povsic TJ, Roe MT, Ohman EM, Steg PG, James S, Plotnikov A, Mundl H, Welsh R, Bode C, Gibson CM. A randomized trial to compare the safety of rivaroxaban vs aspirin in addition to either clopidogrel or ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome: The design of the GEMINI-ACS-1 phase II study. Am Heart J. 2016 Apr;174:120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.01.004. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26995378 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RIVAROXACS2002

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2014-004266-26

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR106261

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id