Trial Outcomes & Findings for National Prevalence and Impact of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NCT NCT02284399)
NCT ID: NCT02284399
Last Updated: 2019-06-19
Results Overview
Total Number of patient undergoing invasive diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK) before (control group = Jan - July 2010) and after (test group=Jan 2012-June 2014) NIPT testing came to market
COMPLETED
4488 participants
4 years
2019-06-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
IDTFK Group Pre-NIPT (January 2010-July 2010)
A control group of pregnant women, prior to the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who present to participating centers between January 2010-June 2010 and are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).
* non-invasive prenatal testing: Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) of fetal cell free DNA in maternal circulation.
* Invasive Diagnostic testing for Fetal Karyotype (IDTFK) = Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS)
|
IDTFK Group Post NIPT - (January 2012-June 2014)
Pregnant women who present to participating centers between January 2012-June 2014, after the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).
* non-invasive prenatal testing: Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) of fetal cell free DNA in maternal circulation.
* Invasive Diagnostic testing for Fetal Karyotype (IDTFK) = Amniocentesis or CVS
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1414
|
3074
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1414
|
3074
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
IDTFK Group Post NIPT - (January 2012-June 2014)
n=3074 Participants
Pregnant women who present to participating centers between January 2012-June 2014, after the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).
|
IDTFK Group Pre-NIPT (January 2010-July 2010)
n=1414 Participants
A control group of pregnant women, prior to the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who present to participating centers between January 2010-June 2010 and are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).
|
Total
n=4488 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
3074 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1414 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4488 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3074 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1414 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4488 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication for invasive test was Advance Maternal Age (AMA)
|
2071 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
996 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3067 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication for invasive test was Family History of Aneuploidy
|
304 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
431 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication for invasive test was a Positive Serum Screening Test
|
995 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
499 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1494 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication for invasive test was Ultrasound Abnormality noted
|
961 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
292 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1253 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Indication for and invasive test was a Positive cell free DNA (cfDNA)
|
133 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
133 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Karyotype Results of Amniocentesis and CVS - Normal Result
Normal karyotype
|
2687 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
1310 indications
n=7 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
3997 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
|
Karyotype Results of Amniocentesis and CVS - Normal Result
T21
|
205 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
60 indications
n=7 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
265 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
|
Karyotype Results of Amniocentesis and CVS - Normal Result
T18
|
72 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
19 indications
n=7 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
91 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
|
Karyotype Results of Amniocentesis and CVS - Normal Result
T13
|
24 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
5 indications
n=7 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
29 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
|
Karyotype Results of Amniocentesis and CVS - Normal Result
45X
|
34 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
6 indications
n=7 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
40 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
|
Karyotype Results of Amniocentesis and CVS - Normal Result
47XXY
|
6 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
4 indications
n=7 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
10 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
|
Karyotype Results of Amniocentesis and CVS - Normal Result
OTHER
|
40 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
10 indications
n=7 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
50 indications
n=5 Participants • Note: percentages sum to more than 100% because some patient had more than one indication.
|
|
Indication for an invasive test was multifetal gestation
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: This was an observational study that looked to compare the number of patient who underwent IDTFK during Jan 2010-July 2010 (prior to the adoption of NIPT) with the number of patients who underwent IDTFK during Jan 2012-June 2014 (after the adoption of NIPT).
Total Number of patient undergoing invasive diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK) before (control group = Jan - July 2010) and after (test group=Jan 2012-June 2014) NIPT testing came to market
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDTFK Group Pre-NIPT (January 2010-July 2010)
n=1414 Participants
A control group of pregnant women, prior to the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who present to participating centers between January 2010-June 2010 and are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).
|
IDTFK Group Post NIPT - (January 2012-June 2014)
n=3074 Participants
Pregnant women who present to participating centers between January 2012-June 2014, after the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).
non-invasive prenatal testing: Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) of fetal cell free DNA in maternal circulation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Patient Undergoing IDTFK Before (Control) and After (Test) NIPT Testing Came to Market
|
1414 Participants
|
3074 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4 yearsPopulation: The number of positive tests identified between the control and the test periods.
Will determine if frequency of positive tests for abnormal karyotypes between the control period and the study period where different.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
IDTFK Group Pre-NIPT (January 2010-July 2010)
n=3074 Participants
A control group of pregnant women, prior to the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who present to participating centers between January 2010-June 2010 and are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).
|
IDTFK Group Post NIPT - (January 2012-June 2014)
n=1414 Participants
Pregnant women who present to participating centers between January 2012-June 2014, after the release of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT), who are undergoing invasive prenatal diagnostic testing for fetal karyotype (IDTFK).
non-invasive prenatal testing: Noninvasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) of fetal cell free DNA in maternal circulation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Frequency of Positive Tests for Abnormal Karyotype Before and After the Adoption of NIPT Testing.
|
454 Participants
|
104 Participants
|
Adverse Events
IDTFK Group Pre-NIPT (January 2010-July 2010)
IDTFK Group Post NIPT - (January 2012-June 2014)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place