Trial Outcomes & Findings for Apixaban for Early Prevention of Recurrent Embolic Stroke and Hemorrhagic Transformation (NCT NCT02283294)

NCT ID: NCT02283294

Last Updated: 2021-11-30

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

91 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

180 days

Results posted on

2021-11-30

Participant Flow

Ninety one patients were enrolled/consented into the study. Three patients of the 91 consented did not meet one or more of the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were excluded prior to randomization assignment.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Apixaban
Apixaban twice a day for 180 days with drug initiation day 0-3 (TIA), day 3-5(small stroke) or day 7- 9 (medium stroke) respectively Apixaban
Warfarin
standard of care warfarin starting at day 7±5 (TIA) or day 14 ±5 (small to medium ischemic stroke). Warfarin
Overall Study
STARTED
41
47
Overall Study
Received Allocated Treatment Intervention
38
31
Overall Study
COMPLETED
38
39
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
8

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Apixaban
Apixaban twice a day for 180 days with drug initiation day 0-3 (TIA), day 3-5(small stroke) or day 7- 9 (medium stroke) respectively Apixaban
Warfarin
standard of care warfarin starting at day 7±5 (TIA) or day 14 ±5 (small to medium ischemic stroke). Warfarin
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
6
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
1
0
Overall Study
Thrombus on transesophageal echocardiogram
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Apixaban for Early Prevention of Recurrent Embolic Stroke and Hemorrhagic Transformation

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Apixaban
n=41 Participants
Apixaban twice a day for 180 days with drug initiation day 0-3 (TIA), day 3-5(small stroke) or day 7- 9 (medium stroke) respectively Apixaban
Warfarin
n=47 Participants
standard of care warfarin starting at day 7±5 (TIA) or day 14 ±5 (small to medium ischemic stroke). Warfarin
Total
n=88 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
63 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
72.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.9 • n=5 Participants
74.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5 • n=7 Participants
73.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=7 Participants
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic White
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
41 participants
n=5 Participants
47 participants
n=7 Participants
88 participants
n=5 Participants
Hypertension
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
46 Participants
n=7 Participants
84 Participants
n=5 Participants
Hyperlipidemia
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
Coronary artery disease (CAD)
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
Diabetes Mellitus
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Peripheral Artery Disease
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior Stroke
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prosthetic Heart Valve / Valve Replacement
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Thyroid Disease
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Congestive Heart Failure Symptoms
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Past Medical History Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction < 40%
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Transient Ischemic Attack
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Thromboembolism History
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
New Onset Atrial Fibrillation
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior Use of Anticoagulation within last 3 months
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Former Tobacco Use History
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Former Alcohol Use History
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Former Illegal Drug Use History
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Height
1.67 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.11 • n=5 Participants
1.712 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.14 • n=7 Participants
1.69 m
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.13 • n=5 Participants
Weight
82.10 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.09 • n=5 Participants
88.08 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.73 • n=7 Participants
85.29 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.48 • n=5 Participants
Body Mass Index
29.15 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.68 • n=5 Participants
30.05 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.60 • n=7 Participants
29.63 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.16 • n=5 Participants
Body Surface Area
1.90 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.28 • n=5 Participants
1.99 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.31 • n=7 Participants
1.95 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.30 • n=5 Participants
Heart Rate
76.56 bpm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.46 • n=5 Participants
76.62 bpm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.61 • n=7 Participants
76.60 bpm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.56 • n=5 Participants
Systolic Blood Pressure
130.85 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.64 • n=5 Participants
134.53 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.13 • n=7 Participants
132.82 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.43 • n=5 Participants
Current Tobacco Use
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occasional Tobacco Use
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Current Alcohol Use
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Occasional Alcohol Use
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Diastolic Blood Pressure
74.07 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.76 • n=5 Participants
70.26 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.50 • n=7 Participants
72.03 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.70 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 180 days

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Apixaban
n=41 Participants
Apixaban twice a day for 180 days with drug initiation day 0-3 (TIA), day 3-5(small stroke) or day 7- 9 (medium stroke) respectively Apixaban
Warfarin
n=47 Participants
Standard of care warfarin starting at day 7±5 (TIA) or day 14 ±5 (small to medium ischemic stroke). Warfarin
Number of Participants With a Composite Endpoint of Fatal Stroke, Recurrent Ischemic Stroke, or TIA
7 Participants
12 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 180 days

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Apixaban
n=41 Participants
Apixaban twice a day for 180 days with drug initiation day 0-3 (TIA), day 3-5(small stroke) or day 7- 9 (medium stroke) respectively Apixaban
Warfarin
n=47 Participants
Standard of care warfarin starting at day 7±5 (TIA) or day 14 ±5 (small to medium ischemic stroke). Warfarin
Number of Participants With an Intracranial Hemorrhage Assessed by MRI/CT
5 Participants
6 Participants

Adverse Events

Apixaban

Serious events: 11 serious events
Other events: 36 other events
Deaths: 2 deaths

Warfarin

Serious events: 14 serious events
Other events: 41 other events
Deaths: 4 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Apixaban
n=41 participants at risk
Apixaban twice a day for 180 days with drug initiation day 0-3 (TIA), day 3-5(small stroke) or day 7- 9 (medium stroke) respectively Apixaban
Warfarin
n=47 participants at risk
standard of care warfarin starting at day 7±5 (TIA) or day 14 ±5 (small to medium ischemic stroke). Warfarin
Endocrine disorders
Pancreatic Cancer
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Third Degree AV Block
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Fatal Stroke
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Worsening Congestive Heart Failure
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Left Hip Fracture
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Worsening Atrial Fibrillation
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Symptomatic Hypotension
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Symptomatic PH1 Hemorrhagic Transformation
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
TIA
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
GI Bleed
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small Bowel Obstruction
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancolitis
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Acute Encephalopathy
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian Cyst
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Second Digit Right Foot Amputation
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Recurrent Stroke
12.2%
5/41 • Number of events 5 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
14.9%
7/47 • Number of events 7 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Fracture
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Worsening Back Pain
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bilateral Leg Weakness / Trouble with Ambulation
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right Hip Pain
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Altered Mental Status
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Metabolic Encephalopathy
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Shortness of Breath
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Symptomatic Anemia
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ostectomy Left Foot
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Apixaban
n=41 participants at risk
Apixaban twice a day for 180 days with drug initiation day 0-3 (TIA), day 3-5(small stroke) or day 7- 9 (medium stroke) respectively Apixaban
Warfarin
n=47 participants at risk
standard of care warfarin starting at day 7±5 (TIA) or day 14 ±5 (small to medium ischemic stroke). Warfarin
Cardiac disorders
Fatigue
12.2%
5/41 • Number of events 5 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
10.6%
5/47 • Number of events 5 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Dizziness
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
19.1%
9/47 • Number of events 10 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Shortness of Breath
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
8.5%
4/47 • Number of events 4 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
7.3%
3/41 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
10.6%
5/47 • Number of events 6 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus Bradycardia
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Intermittent Headaches
12.2%
5/41 • Number of events 5 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
10.6%
5/47 • Number of events 5 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Tract Infection
14.6%
6/41 • Number of events 6 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Asymptomatic Bleed
12.2%
5/41 • Number of events 5 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
10.6%
5/47 • Number of events 5 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Fever
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Difficulty Finding Words
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Intermittent Cognitive Impairment
7.3%
3/41 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper Respiratory Infection
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute Kidney Injury
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Bilateral Lower Extremity Edema
24.4%
10/41 • Number of events 11 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 4 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intermittent Leg Cramping
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Body / Muscle Aches
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain with Ambulation
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right Hip Pain
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Cough
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Dry Mouth
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Altered Sense of Taste
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Left Calf Sore
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Hypertension
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lower Back Pain
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Cold Symptoms
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Sore Throat
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Worsening Hearing Loss
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Gout Right Foot
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Ataxia
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Right or Left Sided Weakness
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Shakiness
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Intermittent Lightheadedness
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Blood Clot in Descending Aorta
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Bronchitis
7.3%
3/41 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Pleuritic Chest Pain
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Decreased Appetite
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Generalized Weakness
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Chest Pain or Tightness
14.6%
6/41 • Number of events 6 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 4 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Infections and infestations
Staph Infection Right Foot
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Hemoptysis
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Left Foot Cellulitis
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Intermittent Cardiac Pauses
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fall without Injury
17.1%
7/41 • Number of events 9 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
6.4%
3/47 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Left Foot Pain
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Unsteady Gait
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intermittent Left Leg Pain
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Renal and urinary disorders
Erectile Dysfunction
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary Edema
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Supratherapeutic INR
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
19.1%
9/47 • Number of events 29 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Eye disorders
Left Eye Subconjunctival Hemorrhage
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Bruising
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
17.0%
8/47 • Number of events 12 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Left Ankle Swelling
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Renal and urinary disorders
Vaginal Bleeding
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 3 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right Ankle Pain
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Hypotension
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Hyponatremia
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right Foot Droop
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sensory Peripheral Neuropathy
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fall with Injury
9.8%
4/41 • Number of events 4 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Abrasions
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
12.8%
6/47 • Number of events 8 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Orthostatic Loss of Consciousness
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute Renal Failure
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Hypokalemia
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Hyperkalemia
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Facial and Neck Swelling
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Left Lower Facial Numbness
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
4.9%
2/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bilateral Lower Extremity Pain
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Abnormal Liver Tests
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Parathesia
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Total Bilirubin Elevated
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular Tachycardia
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small Benign Cysts, Right Hepatic Lobe
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasticity
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Upper Extremity Stiffness
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Left Lower Extremity Edema
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Vertigo
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Right Chest Basal Cell Removal
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Upper Left Back Basal Cell Removal
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Upset
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Left Middle Finger Pain
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Sinus Infection
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bibasilar Rales
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Pacemaker Implant for Arrhythmia
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Diaphoretic
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Responsive Only to Painful Stimuli
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Right Temporal Laceration
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Slurred Speech
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Scalp Hematoma
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Blood in Sputum
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Minor Head Injury
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right Great Toenail Removal Status Post Toe Injury
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Left Hamstring Injury
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Coarse Breath Sounds
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Esophagitis
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Actinic Keratosis Left Forearm
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Peeling
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Bleed
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Acute Gastric Ulcer with Hemorrhage
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Eye disorders
Diploplia
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Renal and urinary disorders
Blood in Semen
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Distention
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 2 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Motor Vehicle Accident with Injury
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Right Flank Pain
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
White Tongue
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Lesion to Nose
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Generalized Body Numbness
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Thrombus in Appendage
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Syncopal Episode
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Viral Illness
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Infections and infestations
Ear and Nose Infection
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Infections and infestations
Bladder Infection
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
General disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Midpelvic Mass
2.4%
1/41 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
0.00%
0/47 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Fluid Overload
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Cardiac disorders
Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Right Lower Extremity Blister
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Bilateral Lower Extremity Dermatitis
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.00%
0/41 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 210 +/- 10 days
Adverse event assessment was performed at each of the patient follow up visits at baseline, day 14, day 30, day 60, day 120, day 150, day 180, and day 210. At each follow up visit, patients were evaluated by study coordinator, cardiologist, and neurologist. A physical exam, patient interview, electrocardiogram, and review of patient records were performed. Labs were evaluated for clinical significance at day 30, day 90, and day 180 visits.

Additional Information

David Rose, MD

University of South Florida

Phone: 813-259-8577

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place