Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-10-31
2020-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim 1:
Determine the association between a proxy measure of LBM obtained via portable, diagnostic, musculoskeletal US and LBM as determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
The working hypothesis is that a 6-muscle model of LBM derived from US and DXA LBM values will exhibit a significant positive association and attain a coefficient of determination \> .80.
Aim 2:
Determine the association between US echointensity features and IMAT as determined by CT scan.
US echointensity values will be acquired from the rectus femoris and analyzed to determine the association with IMAT. The working hypothesis is that higher echointensity values measured with grayscale analysis will be negatively associated with the Hounsfield units obtained from the CT scan (p \< .05).
Aim 3:
Examine the association between US echointensity values and biologic factors that impair insulin sensitivity.
Excessive IMAT and intra-myocellular triglyceride levels result in increased levels of biologic factors such as inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-6), which may affect insulin sensitivity. The investigators hypothesis is that proxy measures of IMAT via echointensity values will be positively associated with biomarkers of inflammation and insulin homeostasis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Younger Veterans
Male Veterans, 45-64.9 years of age. (Exposures include DXA scanning and CT imaging.)
DXA scanning
Exposure: Participants will undergo DXA scanning in the supine position per manufacturer guidelines to estimate absolute and percentage of total lean body mass (LBM) and body fat (BF).
CT imaging
Exposure: Estimates of intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) will be obtained with CT imaging. This measure will be restricted to a single leg (dominant side) in the mid-femur region, using a single 10mm axial image slice (120 kVp, 200 to 250 mA).
Young-Old Veterans
Male Veterans, 65-84.9 years of age. (Exposures include DXA scanning and CT imaging.)
DXA scanning
Exposure: Participants will undergo DXA scanning in the supine position per manufacturer guidelines to estimate absolute and percentage of total lean body mass (LBM) and body fat (BF).
CT imaging
Exposure: Estimates of intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) will be obtained with CT imaging. This measure will be restricted to a single leg (dominant side) in the mid-femur region, using a single 10mm axial image slice (120 kVp, 200 to 250 mA).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
DXA scanning
Exposure: Participants will undergo DXA scanning in the supine position per manufacturer guidelines to estimate absolute and percentage of total lean body mass (LBM) and body fat (BF).
CT imaging
Exposure: Estimates of intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) will be obtained with CT imaging. This measure will be restricted to a single leg (dominant side) in the mid-femur region, using a single 10mm axial image slice (120 kVp, 200 to 250 mA).
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. You are a male.
3. You are between the ages of 45 - 85 years.
4. Must be able to stand comfortably for 10 minutes and walk a short distance (use of assistive devices are acceptable).
\-
Exclusion Criteria
2. Body Mass Index (BMI) \<18.5 or \>32.5.
3. Musculoskeletal conditions that would stop you from performing the physical assessment test.
4. Muscle weakness due to neurological disease or injury (such as stroke or spinal cord injury).
5. Moderate to severe sepsis (blood infection) or edema (such as swelling of a limb).
6. Currently prescribed medications that affect glucose or insulin.
7. Uncontrolled cardiovascular disease.
8. Hospitalization over the last three months.
9. Diagnosis of diabetes.
\-
45 Years
85 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical Center
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Harris-Love
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Harris-Love, MPT, DSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington DC VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington DC VA Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harris-Love MO, Adams B, Hernandez HJ, DiPietro L, Blackman MR. Disparities in the consequences of sarcopenia: implications for African American Veterans. Front Physiol. 2014 Jul 7;5:250. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00250. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.
Harris-Love MO, Monfaredi R, Ismail C, Blackman MR, Cleary K. Quantitative ultrasound: measurement considerations for the assessment of muscular dystrophy and sarcopenia. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Jul 14;6:172. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00172. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.
Gollie JM, Harris-Love MO, Patel SS, Shara NM, Blackman MR. Rate of Force Development Is Related to Maximal Force and Sit-to-Stand Performance in Men With Stages 3b and 4 Chronic Kidney Disease. Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Sep 28;2:734705. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.734705.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MIRB01671
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id