Trial Outcomes & Findings for Treating Diabetic Lipohypertrophy With Intensive Education Versus Standard Care (NCT NCT02271594)
NCT ID: NCT02271594
Last Updated: 2021-06-09
Results Overview
The mean HbA1c from baseline to be compared to six months
TERMINATED
NA
31 participants
6 months
2021-06-09
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intensive Training
The intervention consists of instructing patients in whom lipohypertrophy (LH) is detected and who are currently injecting into it to move injections to non-LH areas; reducing insulin doses initially by 10-20% to avoid hypoglycaemia and then titrating to target control; instructing these patients to correctly rotate sites (leaving 1 cm between injection punctures and allowing used sites to heal for 2-4 weeks before injecting in them again); instructing these patients to forego needle reuse; and instructing these patients to switch to 4 mmx32G needles. A battery of tools (described below) will be used to deliver and reinforce this training, including frequent contact by phone or other electronic means after the initial training.
|
Standard Care
Standard care means affording the patients randomized to the control arm the customary education and follow-up usually given at the centre. This would include appraising them of the presence of LH (if they were not previously aware) and stating that injections should not be given into that area. The training approach, tools and intensive follow-up given the Intervention arm patients will not be given to the Controls. Additionally, at their return visit (3 and 6 months), Control patients will be asked if they did indeed change their injection habits (e.g. stopped injecting into LH) since entering the study. Those who did and those who did not will be analysed separately to see if there is a difference in outcomes and both groups will be compared to the Intervention arm patients.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
19
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
19
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Intensive Training
The intervention consists of instructing patients in whom lipohypertrophy (LH) is detected and who are currently injecting into it to move injections to non-LH areas; reducing insulin doses initially by 10-20% to avoid hypoglycaemia and then titrating to target control; instructing these patients to correctly rotate sites (leaving 1 cm between injection punctures and allowing used sites to heal for 2-4 weeks before injecting in them again); instructing these patients to forego needle reuse; and instructing these patients to switch to 4 mmx32G needles. A battery of tools (described below) will be used to deliver and reinforce this training, including frequent contact by phone or other electronic means after the initial training.
|
Standard Care
Standard care means affording the patients randomized to the control arm the customary education and follow-up usually given at the centre. This would include appraising them of the presence of LH (if they were not previously aware) and stating that injections should not be given into that area. The training approach, tools and intensive follow-up given the Intervention arm patients will not be given to the Controls. Additionally, at their return visit (3 and 6 months), Control patients will be asked if they did indeed change their injection habits (e.g. stopped injecting into LH) since entering the study. Those who did and those who did not will be analysed separately to see if there is a difference in outcomes and both groups will be compared to the Intervention arm patients.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Study closed; recruiting failure
|
19
|
12
|
Baseline Characteristics
Treating Diabetic Lipohypertrophy With Intensive Education Versus Standard Care
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intensive Training
n=19 Participants
The intervention consists of instructing patients in whom lipohypertrophy (LH) is detected and who are currently injecting into it to move injections to non-LH areas; reducing insulin doses initially by 10-20% to avoid hypoglycaemia and then titrating to target control; instructing these patients to correctly rotate sites (leaving 1 cm between injection punctures and allowing used sites to heal for 2-4 weeks before injecting in them again); instructing these patients to forego needle reuse; and instructing these patients to switch to 4 mmx32G needles. A battery of tools (described below) will be used to deliver and reinforce this training, including frequent contact by phone or other electronic means after the initial training.
|
Standard Care
n=12 Participants
Standard care means affording the patients randomized to the control arm the customary education and follow-up usually given at the centre. This would include appraising them of the presence of LH (if they were not previously aware) and stating that injections should not be given into that area. The training approach, tools and intensive follow-up given the Intervention arm patients will not be given to the Controls. Additionally, at their return visit (3 and 6 months), Control patients will be asked if they did indeed change their injection habits (e.g. stopped injecting into LH) since entering the study. Those who did and those who did not will be analysed separately to see if there is a difference in outcomes and both groups will be compared to the Intervention arm patients.
|
Total
n=31 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=5 Participants
|
53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=7 Participants
|
52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Study terminated prior to study endpoint; no 6-month data were collected
The mean HbA1c from baseline to be compared to six months
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Data were not collected
Number of BG values within target range
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Not recorded
Number and severity of hypoglycemic reactions
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Not recorded
The mean TDD from baseline to be compared to six months
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Not recorded
The mean health care costs from baseline to be compared to six months
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Intensive Training
Standard Care
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place