Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Regimen Versus Boosted Protease Inhibitor (bPI) Along With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (FTC/TDF) Regimen in Virologically-Suppressed, HIV-1 Infected Participants (NCT NCT02269917)

NCT ID: NCT02269917

Last Updated: 2021-12-09

Results Overview

Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma human immunodeficiency virus - 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) level greater than or equal to (\>=)50 copies per milliliter (copies/mL) up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

1149 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Through Week 48

Results posted on

2021-12-09

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Control (Baseline to Switch)
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
STARTED
766
383
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Treated
763
378
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
COMPLETED
649
352
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
NOT COMPLETED
117
31
0
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
STARTED
0
0
352
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
COMPLETED
0
0
314
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
38

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Control (Baseline to Switch)
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Lost to Follow-up
25
7
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Other
19
4
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Withdrawal by Subject
32
10
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Adverse Event
24
4
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Non-compliance with study drug
4
0
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Physician Decision
4
0
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Protocol Violation
2
1
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Death
4
0
0
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Randomized but not treated
3
5
0
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Death
0
0
1
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Lost to Follow-up
0
0
10
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Adverse Event
0
0
11
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Physician Decision
0
0
1
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Pregnancy
0
0
2
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
5
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Other
0
0
8

Baseline Characteristics

Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Regimen Versus Boosted Protease Inhibitor (bPI) Along With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (FTC/TDF) Regimen in Virologically-Suppressed, HIV-1 Infected Participants

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Control (Baseline to Switch)
n=378 Participants
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
Total
n=1141 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86 • n=5 Participants
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.77 • n=7 Participants
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
140 Participants
n=5 Participants
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
205 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
623 Participants
n=5 Participants
313 Participants
n=7 Participants
936 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
111 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
649 Participants
n=5 Participants
317 Participants
n=7 Participants
966 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
155 Participants
n=5 Participants
82 Participants
n=7 Participants
237 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
573 Participants
n=5 Participants
282 Participants
n=7 Participants
855 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
155 Participants
n=5 Participants
82 Participants
n=7 Participants
237 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
151 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Non-Hispanic
476 Participants
n=5 Participants
225 Participants
n=7 Participants
701 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
126 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
117 Participants
n=5 Participants
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
169 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
313 Participants
n=5 Participants
181 Participants
n=7 Participants
494 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 48

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma human immunodeficiency virus - 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) level greater than or equal to (\>=)50 copies per milliliter (copies/mL) up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (HIV-1 RNA >=50 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through Week 48
2.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 3.9
2.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.9 to 4.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through 48 Weeks

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (Plasma HIV-1 RNA >=20 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through 48 Weeks
10.5 Percentage of Participants
Interval 8.4 to 12.9
11.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 8.4 to 15.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through 48 Weeks

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 copies/mL up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=200 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (Plasma HIV-1 RNA >=200 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through 48 Weeks
0.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 0.1 to 1.1
0.0 Percentage of Participants
Here NA signifies that the Confidence Interval (CI) was not estimable as no participants had virologic rebound in this group.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Here Kaplan-Meier estimates percentage of participants with non-virologic rebound at week 48.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound at Week 48 by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
97.7 percentage of participants
Interval 96.4 to 98.6
97.8 percentage of participants
Interval 95.7 to 98.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Grade 3 (Severe) events were symptoms causing inability to perform usual social \& functional activities. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events were symptoms causing inability to perform basic self-care functions or medical or operative intervention indicated to prevent permanent impairment, persistent disability, or death.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 48
Grade 3 AEs
5.6 Percentage of Participants
6.3 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 48
Grade 4 AEs
1.2 Percentage of Participants
1.9 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 48
SAEs
4.6 Percentage of Participants
4.8 Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 48
Premature discontinuations due to AEs
1.4 Percentage of Participants
1.3 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all participants randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Change from baseline in serum creatinine levels at Weeks 24 and 48 was assessed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=761 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 24
1.22 micro mole per liter
Standard Error 0.358
0.88 micro mole per liter
Standard Error 0.509
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 48
1.27 micro mole per liter
Standard Error 0.368
0.65 micro mole per liter
Standard Error 0.530

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Change from baseline in eGFRcr (by Cockcroft-Gault formula) was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. eGFRcr according to the Cockcroft Gault formula- Male: (140 - age in years)\*(weight in kilogram \[kg\])/72\*(serum creatinine in milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\])=eGFRcr (milliliter per minute \[mL/min\]); Female: (140 - age in years)\*(weight in kg)/72\*(serum creatinine in mg/dL)\*0.85=eGFRcr (mL/min).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=761 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Cockcroft-Gault Formula [eGFRcg]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 24
-0.38 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Standard Error 0.502
0.20 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Standard Error 0.715
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Cockcroft-Gault Formula [eGFRcg]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 48
-0.94 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Standard Error 0.492
-0.20 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Standard Error 0.708

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Change from baseline in eGFRcr (by CKD-EPI) was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. eGFRcr per CKD-EPI formula - Female: 1) Serum creatinine (Scr) less than or equal to (\<=)0.7 mg/dL: 144\*(Scr/0.7)\^-0.329\*0.993age; 2) Scr greater than (\>)0.7 mg/dL: 144\*(Scr/0.7)\^-1.209\*0.993age. Male: 1) Scr \<=0.9 mg/dL: 141\*(Scr/0.9)\^-0.411\*0.993age; 2) Scr \>0.9 mg/dL: 141\*(Scr/0.9)\^-1.209\*0.993age.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=761 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 24
-1.67 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.359
-0.75 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.510
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 48
-1.97 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.369
-0.88 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.531

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Change from baseline in eGFRcyst (by CKD-EPI) was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. eGFRcyst according to the CKD-EPI formula - 1) Serum Cystatin C (Scyst) \<=0.8 mg/L: 133\*(Scyst/0.8)\^-0.499\*0.996age (\*0.932 if female); 2) Scyst \>0.8 mg/L: 133\*(Scyst/0.8)\^-1.328\*0.996age (\*0.932 if female).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (eGFRcyst, by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI]) at Weeks 24 and 48
eGFRcyst: Change at Week 24
0.21 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.338
-0.93 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.483
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (eGFRcyst, by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI]) at Weeks 24 and 48
eGFRcyst: Change at Week 48
-0.42 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.360
-1.76 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.517

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Change from baseline in UACR and UPCR was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. Lower levels of albumin or protein in the urine indicates better proximal tubular function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=761 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UACR: Baseline
6.20 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval 1.4 to 632.1
7.14 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval 1.1 to 268.0
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UACR: Change at Week 24
-0.78 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -185.4 to 422.2
0.44 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -238.5 to 145.0
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UACR: Change at Week 48
-0.76 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -195.8 to 344.3
0.40 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -121.7 to 110.9
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UPCR: Baseline
61.56 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval 16.9 to 1158.1
62.90 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval 14.7 to 870.9
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UPCR: Change at Week 24
-14.63 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -509.6 to 734.6
0.07 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -359.9 to 400.8
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UPCR: Change at Week 48
-22.25 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -520.1 to 386.6
-7.37 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -368.7 to 432.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Change from baseline in URBPCR and UB2MGCR was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. Retinol binding protein is a marker of proximal tubular function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=748 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=371 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
URBPCR: Baseline
126.19 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval 20.3 to 116216.2
137.16 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval 12.9 to 73958.4
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
URBPCR: Change at Week 24
-30.27 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -69873.2 to 2004.4
7.76 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -6040.1 to 60740.4
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
URBPCR: Change at Week 48
-27.09 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -67540.0 to 1764.3
19.66 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -5778.3 to 65203.3
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UB2MGCR: Baseline
156.85 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval 3.8 to 91216.2
172.25 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval 9.8 to 92740.1
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UB2MGCR: Change at Week 24
-72.64 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -72264.6 to 13536.2
12.08 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -20084.8 to 58357.6
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UB2MGCR: Change at Week 48
-67.02 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -72323.4 to 21190.2
20.24 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -22173.5 to 135576.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Percent change from baseline in urine FEPO4 was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Fractional Excretion of Phosphate (FEPO4) at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 24
3.58 Percent change
Interval -89.4 to 1940.4
8.55 Percent change
Interval -78.5 to 281.8
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Fractional Excretion of Phosphate (FEPO4) at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 48
8.42 Percent change
Interval -97.9 to 1430.3
8.57 Percent change
Interval -76.3 to 452.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Percentage of participants with virologic response based on HIV-1 RNA \<20, \<50, and \<200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 48 using FDA snapshot approach. FDA Snapshot approach analysis was based on the last observed viral load data: virologic response was defined as HIV-1 RNA \<20/50/200 copies/mL (observed case).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA Less Than (<)20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Approach
<20 copies/mL
89.8 Percentage of Participants
Interval 87.4 to 91.8
88.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 84.7 to 91.4
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA Less Than (<)20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Approach
<50 copies/mL
94.9 Percentage of Participants
Interval 93.1 to 96.3
93.7 Percentage of Participants
Interval 90.7 to 95.9
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA Less Than (<)20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Approach
<200 copies/mL
95.0 Percentage of Participants
Interval 93.2 to 96.5
94.2 Percentage of Participants
Interval 91.3 to 96.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Percentage of participants with virologic response based on HIV-1 RNA \<20, \<50, and \<200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 48 using TLOVR algorithm approach. TLOVR was defined as sustained HIV-1 RNA \<20/50/200 copies/mL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm
<20 copies/mL
86.0 Percentage of Participants
Interval 83.3 to 88.4
83.6 Percentage of Participants
Interval 79.5 to 87.2
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm
<50 copies/mL
93.7 Percentage of Participants
Interval 91.7 to 95.3
92.9 Percentage of Participants
Interval 89.8 to 95.2
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm
<200 copies/mL
95.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 93.7 to 96.8
94.7 Percentage of Participants
Interval 91.9 to 96.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Change from baseline in CD4+ cell count was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48
Baseline
653.3 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 9.12
641.7 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 13.15
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 24
14.3 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 5.99
8.5 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 7.76
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 48
21.0 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 5.97
9.1 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 8.41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this endpoint.

Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability cumulative through Week 48 (Approach 1).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=215 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=102 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of Greater Than (>)95 Percent (%) (Approach 1) Through Week 48
91.6 Percentage of Participants
85.3 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 48

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this endpoint.

Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability cumulative treatment adherence up to time point where not more than one bottle was missing, or if available, through Week 48, whichever came sooner (Approach 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=631 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=268 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of >95% (Approach 2) Through Week 48
82.7 percentage of participants
77.2 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to Week 48

Population: The ITT population with confirmed virologic rebound and with HIV-1 RNA value \>=400 copies/mL was analyzed.

HIV-1 genotypes were analyzed from samples of participants with confirmed virologic rebound (virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window) and with HIV-1 RNA value \>=400 copies/mL or who discontinued with last HIV-1 RNA \>=400 copies/mL. Number of participants who developed resistance to any of the study drug was determined.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=19 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=8 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Number of Participants With Resistance to Study Drug
1 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Predose at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48

Population: The PK analysis set included all participants randomized to D/C/F/TAF group and received at least 1 dose of study drug in study, and for whom plasma concentration data of any analytes of interest were available. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Predose (trough) plasma concentration (C0h) of darunavir was determined. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data was only analyzed for participants in the D/C/F/TAF group as per planned analysis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=750 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 2
1775.29 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1698.84
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 4
1732.00 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1389.44
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 8
1910.30 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1501.94
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 12
1643.38 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1328.41
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 24
2022.99 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1965.64
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 36
1806.37 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1669.43
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 48
1899.79 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1833.09

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for biomarker data. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Percent change from baseline in bone biomarkers: P1NP and CTX was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
P1NP: Percent change at Week 24
-22.971 Percent Change
Standard Error 1.8818
-0.027 Percent Change
Standard Error 2.7325
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
P1NP: Percent change at Week 48
-26.752 Percent Change
Standard Error 1.8960
-3.751 Percent Change
Standard Error 2.6988
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
CTX: Percent change at Week 24
-16.772 Percent Change
Standard Error 2.2575
16.312 Percent Change
Standard Error 3.8855
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
CTX: Percent change at Week 48
-10.517 Percent Change
Standard Error 3.2325
5.433 Percent Change
Standard Error 4.1118

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for biomarker data. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Percent change from baseline in bone biomarker: PTH was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Baseline in Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 24
-3.092 Percent change
Standard Error 2.5941
12.034 Percent change
Standard Error 4.1777
Percent Change From Baseline in Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 48
-4.510 Percent change
Standard Error 2.5375
9.436 Percent change
Standard Error 4.4784

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for biomarker data. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Percent change from baseline in bone biomarker: 25-hydroxy vitamin D was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Baseline in 25-hydroxy Vitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 24
-3.0 Percent change
Standard Error 5.06
4.2 Percent change
Standard Error 6.13
Percent Change From Baseline in 25-hydroxy Vitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 48
25.2 Percent change
Standard Error 5.51
24.9 Percent change
Standard Error 7.46

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for bone mineral density (BMD) data. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Percent change from baseline in spine and hip BMD was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD: Percent change at Week 24
1.55 Percent change
Standard Error 0.276
0.18 Percent change
Standard Error 0.342
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD: Percent change at Week 48
2.06 Percent change
Standard Error 0.324
0.01 Percent change
Standard Error 0.391
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD: Percent change at Week 24
0.91 Percent change
Standard Error 0.230
0.00 Percent change
Standard Error 0.279
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD: Percent change at Week 48
1.62 Percent change
Standard Error 0.244
-0.08 Percent change
Standard Error 0.288

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48

Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for BMD data. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.

Change from baseline in spine, hip, and femoral neck BMD T-Score was assessed at Week 24 and 48. T-score values \>= -1.0 were considered normal, T-score values \< -1.0 to -2.5 indicate osteopenia and T-score values \< -2.5 indicate osteoporosis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD T-score: Baseline
-0.713 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0850
-0.467 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1260
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD T-score: Change at Week 24
0.102 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0172
-0.033 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0253
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD T-score: Change at Week 48
0.132 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0217
-0.063 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0264
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD T-score: Baseline
-0.575 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0643
-0.484 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0839
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD T-score: Change at Week 24
0.037 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0108
-0.024 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0144
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD T-score: Change at Week 48
0.095 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0122
-0.016 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0139
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Femoral Neck BMD T-score: Baseline
-0.782 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0625
-0.699 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0899
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Femoral Neck BMD T-score: Change at Week 24
0.019 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0128
-0.044 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0183
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Femoral Neck BMD T-score: Change at Week 48
0.039 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0146
-0.039 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0214

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>=20 copies/mL up to and including Week 96, last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason), and last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at the study cutoff of Week 96 (that is, any last viral load \[re\]test having occurred no later than 6 weeks after Week 96). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (HIV-1 RNA >=20 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through Week 96
13.8 percentage of participants
Interval 11.4 to 16.4
8.8 percentage of participants
Interval 6.1 to 12.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>=50 copies/mL up to and including Week 96, last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason), and last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \>=50copies/mL at the study cutoff of Week 96 (that is, any last viral load \[re\]test having occurred no later than 6 weeks after Week 96). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (HIV-1 RNA >=50 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through Week 96
3.1 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 4.6
2.3 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>=200 copies/mL up to and including Week 96, last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=200 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason), and last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \>=200 copies/mL at the study cutoff of Week 96 (that is, any last viral load \[re\]test having occurred no later than 6 weeks after Week 96). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (HIV-1 RNA >=200 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through Week 96
0.5 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 1.3
0.6 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 2.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Here Kaplan-Meier estimates percentage of participants with non-virologic rebound at Week 96.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound at Week 96 by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
96.7 percentage of participants
Interval 95.1 to 97.8
97.8 percentage of participants
Interval 95.4 to 98.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96 (Comprising up to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF and 44 weeks of D/C/F/TAF exposure [that is, from the switch to D/C/F/TAF at Week 52 up to Week 96])

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Percentage of participants with virologic response based on HIV-1 RNA \<20, \<50, and \<200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 96 using FDA snapshot approach. FDA Snapshot approach analysis was based on the last observed viral load data: virologic response was defined as having last available HIV-1 RNA \<20/50/200 copies/mL (observed case).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
<20 copies/mL
85.3 percentage of participants
Interval 82.6 to 87.8
89.8 percentage of participants
Interval 86.1 to 92.7
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
<50 copies/mL
90.7 percentage of participants
Interval 88.4 to 92.7
93.8 percentage of participants
Interval 90.7 to 96.0
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
<200 copies/mL
91.2 percentage of participants
Interval 89.0 to 93.1
95.5 percentage of participants
Interval 92.7 to 97.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96 (Comprising up to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF and 44 weeks of D/C/F/TAF exposure [that is, from the switch to D/C/F/TAF at Week 52 up to Week 96])

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Percentage of participants with virologic response based on HIV-1 RNA \<20, \<50, and \<200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 96 using TLOVR algorithm approach. TLOVR was defined as sustained HIV-1 RNA \<20/50/200 copies/mL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the TLOVR Algorithm
<20 copies/mL
79.6 percentage of participants
Interval 76.5 to 82.4
88.1 percentage of participants
Interval 84.2 to 91.3
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the TLOVR Algorithm
<50 copies/mL
89.6 percentage of participants
Interval 87.3 to 91.7
94.3 percentage of participants
Interval 91.4 to 96.5
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the TLOVR Algorithm
<200 copies/mL
91.7 percentage of participants
Interval 89.6 to 93.6
95.7 percentage of participants
Interval 93.1 to 97.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96 (Comprising up to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF and 44 weeks of D/C/F/TAF exposure [that is, from the switch to D/C/F/TAF at Week 52 up to Week 96])

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

Percentage of participants with virologic failure based on HIV-1 RNA \>=20, \>=50, and \>=200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 96 using FDA snapshot approach. FDA Snapshot approach analysis was based on the last observed viral load data: virologic failure was defined by the FDA snapshot approach as having last available HIV-1 RNA \>=20/50/200 copies/mL at Week 96; virologic failure - leading to discontinuation; virologic failure - discontinued due to other reason and last available HIV-1 RNA \>=20/50/200 copies/mL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Based on HIV-1 RNA >=20, >=50, and >=200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
>=20 copies/mL
6.8 percentage of participants
Interval 5.1 to 8.8
6.0 percentage of participants
Interval 3.7 to 9.0
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Based on HIV-1 RNA >=20, >=50, and >=200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
>=50 copies/mL
1.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 2.2
1.7 percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 3.7
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Based on HIV-1 RNA >=20, >=50, and >=200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
>=200 copies/mL
0.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.9
0 percentage of participants
NA signifies that confidence interval was not calculated as none of the participants had HIV RNA \<200 copies/mL.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Comprising 44 weeks of D/C/F/TAF exposure [that is, from the switch to D/C/F/TAF at Week 52])

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Based on non-completing=failure (NC=F) analysis with values after discontinuation imputed with the reference value. Other (intermittent) missing values are imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).

Change from reference in CD4+ cell count was assessed at Week 96. The change from reference in CD4+ count at a given time point is defined as: CD4+ at a given time point minus reference CD4+. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96
32.07 cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 8.0
13.07 cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 10.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm), up to Week 48 (Control arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies total number of participants with screening/baseline and endpoint genotype. Due to the low proportion of rebounders of which the majority had low viral load values, few samples were eligible for postbaseline genotyping.

HIV-1 genotypes were analyzed from samples of participants with confirmed virologic rebound in case they had HIV-1 RNA values \>=400 copies/mL at failure or at later time points, including participants who discontinued with last HIV-1 RNA \>=400 copies/mL. Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>=20 copies/mL up to and including Week 96, last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason), and last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at the study cutoff of Week 96 (that is, any last viral load \[re\]test having occurred no later than 6 weeks after Week 96). Number of participants who developed resistance to any of the study drug (DRV, FTC, and TFV/TAF) were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=9 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=3 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=7 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Number of Participants With Resistance to Study Drug Through Week 96
DRV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs)
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Resistance to Study Drug Through Week 96
TFV RAMs
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Resistance to Study Drug Through Week 96
FTC RAMs
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability cumulative through Week 96 (Approach 1).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=379 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=236 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of >95 (Approach 1) Through Week 96
91.6 percentage of participants
87.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability cumulative treatment adherence up to time point where not more than one bottle was missing, or if available, through Week 96, whichever came sooner (Approach 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=646 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=320 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of >95% (Approach 2) Through Week 96
82.8 percentage of participants
80.9 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Grade 3 (Severe) events were symptoms causing inability to perform usual social \& functional activities. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events were symptoms causing inability to perform basic self-care functions or medical or operative intervention indicated to prevent permanent impairment, persistent disability, or death. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 96
Grade 3 AEs
10.5 percentage of participants
6.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 96
Grade 4 AEs
2.4 percentage of participants
1.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 96
SAEs
8.7 percentage of participants
6.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 96
Premature discontinuations due to AEs
2.2 percentage of participants
2.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Change from reference in serum creatinine levels at Week 96 was assessed. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=692 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=336 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in Serum Creatinine Levels at Week 96
0.0 micro mole per liter
Interval -35.0 to 44.0
0.0 micro mole per liter
Interval -45.0 to 29.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Change from reference in eGFRcr (by Cockcroft-Gault formula) was assessed at Week 96. eGFRcr according to the Cockcroft Gault formula- Male: (140 - age in years)\*(weight in kilogram \[kg\])/72\*(serum creatinine in milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\])=eGFRcr (milliliter per minute \[mL/min\]); Female: (140 - age in years)\*(weight in kg)/72\*(serum creatinine in mg/dL)\*0.85=eGFRcr (mL/min). For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=692 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=336 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Cockcroft-Gault Formula [eGFRcg]) at Week 96
-0.9 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Interval -65.0 to 58.0
0.0 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Interval -44.0 to 157.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and participants at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Change from reference in eGFRcr (by CKD-EPI) was assessed at Week 96. eGFRcr per CKD-EPI formula - Female: 1) Serum creatinine (Scr) less than or equal to (\<=)0.7 mg/dL: 144\*(Scr/0.7)\^-0.329\*0.993\^age; 2) Scr greater than (\>)0.7 mg/dL: 144\*(Scr/0.7)\^-1.209\*0.993\^age. Male: 1) Scr \<=0.9 mg/dL: 141\*(Scr/0.9)\^-0.411\*0.993\^age; 2) Scr \>0.9 mg/dL: 141\*(Scr/0.9)\^-1.209\*0.993\^age. . For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=692 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=336 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (by CKD-EPI) at Week 96
-1.3 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Interval -37.0 to 35.0
-0.7 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Interval -31.0 to 49.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and participants at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Change from reference in eGFRcyst (by CKD-EPI) was assessed at Week 96. eGFRcyst according to the CKD-EPI formula - 1) Serum Cystatin C (Scyst) \<=0.8 mg/L: 133\*(Scyst/0.8)\^-0.499\*0.996\^age (\*0.932 if female); 2) Scyst \>0.8 mg/L: 133\*(Scyst/0.8)\^-1.328\*0.996\^age (\*0.932 if female). For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=686 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=332 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (by CKD-EPI) at Week 96
-0.9 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Interval -42.0 to 30.0
1.0 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Interval -30.0 to 105.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Change from reference in UACR was assessed at Week 96. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=694 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=334 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in UACR at Week 96
-0.63 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -209.3 to 2019.7
-0.93 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -234.6 to 13230.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Change from reference in URBPCR was assessed at Week 96. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=675 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=331 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in URBPCR at Week 96
-25.08 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -61980.5 to 1393.0
-39.07 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -82240.7 to 869.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Change from reference in UPCR was assessed at Week 96. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=675 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=331 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in UPCR at Week 96
-22.23 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -533.3 to 2314.7
-12.81 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -722.1 to 453.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Change from reference in UB2MGCR was assessed at Week 96. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=664 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=332 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in UB2MGCR at Week 96
-68.22 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -71549.3 to 7433.1
-110.31 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -152500.2 to 12288.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Percent change from reference in FEPO4 at Week 96 was reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=688 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=334 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Reference in FEPO4 at Week 96
4.15 percent change
Interval -88.0 to 524.8
-3.19 percent change
Interval -77.9 to 547.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Percent change from reference in serum P1NP levels at Week 96 was reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=183 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=96 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Reference in Levels of Serum P1NP at Week 96
-19.899 percent change
Standard Error 2.2151
-18.466 percent change
Standard Error 3.1169

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Percent change from reference in serum CTX at Week 96 was reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=178 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=98 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Reference in Levels of Serum CTX at Week 96
-10.192 percent change
Standard Error 3.0592
-21.755 percent change
Standard Error 3.4926

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Percent change from reference in PTH at Week 96 was reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=169 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=97 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Reference in Levels of PTH at Week 96
-17.171 percent change
Standard Error 2.6774
-20.466 percent change
Standard Error 3.2559

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.

Percent change from reference in 25-OH Vitamin D at Week 96 were reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=141 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=98 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Reference in Levels of 25-OH Vitamin D at Week 96
24.6 percent change
Standard Error 5.16
-1.9 percent change
Standard Error 3.33

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified categories.

The BMD is the amount of mineral in gram per square centimeter of bone, which was assessed by DXA scan. Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values" of change. Percent change from reference in hip and spine BMD was assessed. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=173 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=99 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percent Change From Reference in Hip and Spine BMD at Week 96
Hip region BMD-T score
0.0173 percent change
Standard Error 0.00217
0.0108 percent change
Standard Error 0.00328
Percent Change From Reference in Hip and Spine BMD at Week 96
Spine region BMD-T score
0.0193 percent change
Standard Error 0.00286
0.0279 percent change
Standard Error 0.00381

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF

Population: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified categories.

BMD status was assessed using BMD T-scores; normal bone status was defined by a BMD T-score \>= -1, osteopenia by a T-score \>= -2.5 to \<-1.0, and osteoporosis by a T-score \<-2.5. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=173 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=99 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Change From Reference in BMD T-score of Hip and Spine at Week 96
Hip region BMD
0.122 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0154
0.077 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0230
Change From Reference in BMD T-score of Hip and Spine at Week 96
Spine region BMD
0.176 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0259
0.255 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0339

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (at every 6 months, up to 42 months)

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified timepoints.

Virologic rebound is defined as participants who show confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL, or for which the last available (single) HIV-1 RNA value on treatment was \>=50 copies/mL. Here, Kaplan-Meier estimates (%) of non-virologic rebound at every 6 months interval are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=671 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=323 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 6 months
99.4 percentage of participants
Interval 98.4 to 99.8
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 12 months
98.0 percentage of participants
Interval 96.5 to 98.9
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 96.0 to 99.4
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 18 months
97.6 percentage of participants
Interval 95.9 to 98.6
98.1 percentage of participants
Interval 95.4 to 99.2
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 24 months
97.1 percentage of participants
Interval 94.9 to 98.3
96.5 percentage of participants
Interval 92.3 to 98.4
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 30 months
95.3 percentage of participants
Interval 91.3 to 97.5
96.5 percentage of participants
Interval 92.3 to 98.4
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 36 months
92.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.0 to 96.7
96.5 percentage of participants
Interval 92.3 to 98.4
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 42 months
92.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.0 to 96.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified timepoints.

Percentage of participants with non-treatment failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates were reported. Treatment failure was defined as having either protocol-defined virologic rebound or having discontinued for reasons other than alternate access to D/C/F/TAF (or other antiretroviral \[ARV\]).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=680 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=326 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 6 months
98.1 percentage of participants
Interval 96.7 to 98.9
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 96.3 to 99.4
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 12 months
94.3 percentage of participants
Interval 92.2 to 95.9
95.4 percentage of participants
Interval 92.3 to 97.2
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 18 months
91.6 percentage of participants
Interval 89.0 to 93.6
92.2 percentage of participants
Interval 88.3 to 94.8
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 24 months
89.4 percentage of participants
Interval 86.1 to 91.9
89.7 percentage of participants
Interval 85.0 to 93.0
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 30 months
87.0 percentage of participants
Interval 82.7 to 90.4
88.1 percentage of participants
Interval 82.0 to 92.2
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 36 months
84.9 percentage of participants
Interval 78.2 to 89.6
82.6 percentage of participants
Interval 67.4 to 91.1
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 42 months
81.7 percentage of participants
Interval 71.9 to 88.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified timepoints.

Percentage of participants with HIV RNA \<50, \<20, \<200 copies/mL post Week 96 to end of extension were reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=688 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=334 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 24 months (<200 copies/mL)
99.6 percentage of participants
Interval 98.0 to 100.0
99.3 percentage of participants
Interval 95.9 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 30 months (<200 copies/mL)
100 percentage of participants
Interval 97.3 to 100.0
100 percentage of participants
Interval 94.4 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 36 months (<200 copies/mL)
100 percentage of participants
Interval 93.2 to 100.0
100 percentage of participants
Interval 86.8 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 42 months (<200 copies/mL)
100 percentage of participants
Interval 79.4 to 100.0
100 percentage of participants
Interval 59.0 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 6 months (<20 copies/mL)
91.4 percentage of participants
Interval 89.1 to 93.4
93.4 percentage of participants
Interval 90.2 to 95.8
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 12 months (<20 copies/mL)
93.9 percentage of participants
Interval 91.7 to 95.7
91.4 percentage of participants
Interval 87.6 to 94.3
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 18 months (<20 copies/mL)
96.1 percentage of participants
Interval 93.9 to 97.7
92.9 percentage of participants
Interval 88.7 to 95.9
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 24 months (<20 copies/mL)
96.1 percentage of participants
Interval 93.1 to 98.0
95.5 percentage of participants
Interval 90.5 to 98.3
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 30 months (<20 copies/mL)
95.6 percentage of participants
Interval 90.6 to 98.4
92.2 percentage of participants
Interval 82.7 to 97.4
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 36 months (<20 copies/mL)
94.2 percentage of participants
Interval 84.1 to 98.8
96.2 percentage of participants
Interval 80.4 to 99.9
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 42 months (<20 copies/mL)
93.8 percentage of participants
Interval 69.8 to 99.8
100 percentage of participants
Interval 59.0 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 6 months (<50 copies/mL)
97.8 percentage of participants
Interval 96.4 to 98.8
97.9 percentage of participants
Interval 95.7 to 99.2
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 12 months (<50 copies/mL)
98.4 percentage of participants
Interval 97.0 to 99.2
97.4 percentage of participants
Interval 94.8 to 98.8
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 18 months (<50 copies/mL)
99.6 percentage of participants
Interval 98.4 to 99.9
98.7 percentage of participants
Interval 96.2 to 99.7
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 24 months (<50 copies/mL)
99.3 percentage of participants
Interval 97.4 to 99.9
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 94.7 to 99.8
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 30 months (<50 copies/mL)
99.3 percentage of participants
Interval 95.9 to 100.0
100 percentage of participants
Interval 94.4 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 36 months (<50 copies/mL)
98.1 percentage of participants
Interval 89.7 to 100.0
100 percentage of participants
Interval 86.8 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 42 months (<50 copies/mL)
100 percentage of participants
Interval 79.4 to 100.0
100 percentage of participants
Interval 59.0 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 6 months (<200 copies/mL)
99.1 percentage of participants
Interval 98.1 to 99.7
99.7 percentage of participants
Interval 98.3 to 100.0
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 12 months (<200 copies/mL)
99.3 percentage of participants
Interval 98.3 to 99.8
98.7 percentage of participants
Interval 96.6 to 99.6
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 18 months (<200 copies/mL)
100 percentage of participants
Interval 99.2 to 100.0
99.1 percentage of participants
Interval 96.8 to 99.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)

Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure and n (number analyzed) signifies participants analyzed at specified timepoints

The immunologic change was determined by Cluster of CD4+ cell count. CD4+ cell count post-Week 96 to end of extension were assessed.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=682 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=332 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 6 months
706.4 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 10.51
681.3 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 14.99
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 12 months
707.6 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 11.93
676.2 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 14.57
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 24 months
712.7 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 15.98
686.4 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 21.20
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 30 months
730.4 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 23.24
685.8 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 28.61
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 36 months
732.0 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 33.10
733.3 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 54.73
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 42 months
714.3 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 56.26
705.6 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 112.99
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 18 months
713.3 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 12.16
686.1 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 17.05

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability and was calculated cumulative from start of treatment/switch to last study drug intake by determination of the cumulative treatment adherence in participants who returned all dispensed bottles prior to or at the last visit in the study from Week 96 to end of extension.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=363 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=216 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of >95% From Week 96 to End of Extension
89.5 percentage of participants
89.4 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)

Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.

AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Grade 3 (Severe) events were symptoms causing inability to perform usual social \& functional activities. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events were symptoms causing inability to perform basic self-care functions or medical or operative intervention indicated to prevent permanent impairment, persistent disability, or death. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=699 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=337 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Grade 3 AEs
5.7 percentage of participants
5.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Grade 4 AEs
2.1 percentage of participants
1.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
SAEs
7.3 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Premature discontinuations due to AEs
1.1 percentage of participants
2.1 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline to End of Extension [EOE])

Serious events: 114 serious events
Other events: 584 other events
Deaths: 4 deaths

Control (Baseline to Switch)

Serious events: 18 serious events
Other events: 222 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Switch to D/C/F/TAF Group

Serious events: 42 serious events
Other events: 213 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 participants at risk
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until the D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months
Control (Baseline to Switch)
n=378 participants at risk
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF Group
n=352 participants at risk
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until the D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block complete
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.52%
4/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Endocrine disorders
Cushing's syndrome
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal adhesions
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fissure
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fistula
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal inflammation
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inflammatory bowel disease
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal rupture
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peptic ulcer
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal perforation
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
General disorders
Brain death
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
General disorders
Chest pain
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
General disorders
Hernia
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.57%
2/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
General disorders
Surgical failure
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis acute
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Immune system disorders
Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Abdominal abscess
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Abscess oral
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Anal abscess
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.85%
3/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis perforated
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.57%
2/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Colon gangrene
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Diarrhoea infectious
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
0.52%
4/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Epididymitis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Escherichia sepsis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Fournier's gangrene
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.52%
4/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis shigella
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Groin abscess
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis A
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex meningitis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Infection
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Infectious pleural effusion
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Lymphogranuloma venereum
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Malaria
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Orchitis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Perineal abscess
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
1.3%
10/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.85%
3/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia respiratory syncytial viral
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Secondary syphilis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.57%
2/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Syphilis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Alcohol poisoning
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
0.39%
3/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Eye injury
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fracture
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foreign body in gastrointestinal tract
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament injury
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Multiple fractures
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Musculoskeletal injury
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
0.39%
3/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative ileus
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skull fracture
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Toxicity to various agents
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Investigations
Amylase increased
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Investigations
Biopsy lymph gland
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Investigations
Oxygen saturation decreased
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Polyarthritis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Seronegative arthritis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Anal squamous cell carcinoma
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Anogenital warts
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cholangiocarcinoma
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Enchondromatosis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hodgkin's disease
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoma
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Retinal melanoma
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Spinal cord neoplasm
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery aneurysm
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Essential tremor
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.39%
3/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Paraparesis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Radiculopathy
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Ectopic pregnancy
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Product Issues
Device breakage
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Product Issues
Device loosening
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Adjustment disorder
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.85%
3/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Drug abuse
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Major depression
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Personality disorder
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.85%
3/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
0.39%
3/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder mass
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Cystocele
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Social circumstances
Bereavement
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Vascular disorders
Lymphocele
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery stenosis
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 participants at risk
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until the D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months
Control (Baseline to Switch)
n=378 participants at risk
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
Switch to D/C/F/TAF Group
n=352 participants at risk
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until the D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
8.4%
64/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
1.9%
7/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
2.6%
9/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
13.6%
104/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
4.8%
18/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
11.4%
40/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
5.4%
41/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
2.1%
8/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.4%
12/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
5.4%
41/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
1.1%
4/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
1.7%
6/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
7.1%
54/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.4%
13/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
5.4%
19/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
9.6%
73/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
2.6%
10/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
6.0%
21/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
5.8%
44/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.2%
12/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
4.3%
15/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
6.9%
53/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
1.9%
7/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
2.8%
10/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
18.9%
144/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
11.1%
42/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
11.9%
42/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
7.6%
58/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
2.9%
11/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
4.0%
14/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
6.8%
52/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.2%
12/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.7%
13/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Syphilis
7.5%
57/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.4%
13/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
5.7%
20/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
21.4%
163/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
10.3%
39/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
15.9%
56/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D deficiency
9.7%
74/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
7.7%
29/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.1%
11/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
11.0%
84/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
2.4%
9/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
6.2%
22/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
14.0%
107/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
6.1%
23/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
8.8%
31/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteopenia
6.4%
49/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
5.8%
22/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
6.7%
51/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
4.0%
15/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
4.0%
14/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
12.2%
93/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
4.8%
18/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
8.2%
29/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
5.4%
41/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.2%
12/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
4.0%
14/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
9.8%
75/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
4.5%
17/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
6.0%
21/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
5.6%
43/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.4%
13/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
2.0%
7/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
5.6%
43/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
1.6%
6/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.4%
12/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
6.2%
47/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
1.9%
7/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
3.1%
11/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.

Additional Information

Medical Officer

Janssen Research & Development

Phone: 844-434-4210

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER