Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Regimen Versus Boosted Protease Inhibitor (bPI) Along With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (FTC/TDF) Regimen in Virologically-Suppressed, HIV-1 Infected Participants (NCT NCT02269917)
NCT ID: NCT02269917
Last Updated: 2021-12-09
Results Overview
Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma human immunodeficiency virus - 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) level greater than or equal to (\>=)50 copies per milliliter (copies/mL) up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1149 participants
Through Week 48
2021-12-09
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Control (Baseline to Switch)
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
STARTED
|
766
|
383
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Treated
|
763
|
378
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
COMPLETED
|
649
|
352
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
NOT COMPLETED
|
117
|
31
|
0
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
352
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
314
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
38
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Control (Baseline to Switch)
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Lost to Follow-up
|
25
|
7
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Other
|
19
|
4
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Withdrawal by Subject
|
32
|
10
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Adverse Event
|
24
|
4
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Non-compliance with study drug
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Physician Decision
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Death
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
|
BL to EOE-Test and BL to Switch-Control
Randomized but not treated
|
3
|
5
|
0
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Death
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Pregnancy
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Until EOE)
Other
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Darunavir/Cobicistat/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) Regimen Versus Boosted Protease Inhibitor (bPI) Along With Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (FTC/TDF) Regimen in Virologically-Suppressed, HIV-1 Infected Participants
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Control (Baseline to Switch)
n=378 Participants
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
|
Total
n=1141 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86 • n=5 Participants
|
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.77 • n=7 Participants
|
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.83 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
140 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
205 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
623 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
313 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
936 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
111 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
649 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
317 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
966 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
155 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
237 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
573 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
282 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
855 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
155 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
82 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
237 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
151 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White Non-Hispanic
|
476 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
225 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
701 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
97 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
126 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
117 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
169 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Switzerland
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
313 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
181 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
494 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 48Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma human immunodeficiency virus - 1 (HIV-1) Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) level greater than or equal to (\>=)50 copies per milliliter (copies/mL) up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (HIV-1 RNA >=50 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through Week 48
|
2.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 1.5 to 3.9
|
2.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 0.9 to 4.1
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through 48 WeeksPopulation: ITT analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (Plasma HIV-1 RNA >=20 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through 48 Weeks
|
10.5 Percentage of Participants
Interval 8.4 to 12.9
|
11.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 8.4 to 15.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through 48 WeeksPopulation: ITT analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=200 copies/mL up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=200 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (Plasma HIV-1 RNA >=200 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through 48 Weeks
|
0.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 0.1 to 1.1
|
0.0 Percentage of Participants
Here NA signifies that the Confidence Interval (CI) was not estimable as no participants had virologic rebound in this group.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 48Population: ITT analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window (ie, 54 weeks) and last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason). Here Kaplan-Meier estimates percentage of participants with non-virologic rebound at week 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound at Week 48 by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
|
97.7 percentage of participants
Interval 96.4 to 98.6
|
97.8 percentage of participants
Interval 95.7 to 98.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Grade 3 (Severe) events were symptoms causing inability to perform usual social \& functional activities. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events were symptoms causing inability to perform basic self-care functions or medical or operative intervention indicated to prevent permanent impairment, persistent disability, or death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 48
Grade 3 AEs
|
5.6 Percentage of Participants
|
6.3 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 48
Grade 4 AEs
|
1.2 Percentage of Participants
|
1.9 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 48
SAEs
|
4.6 Percentage of Participants
|
4.8 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 48
Premature discontinuations due to AEs
|
1.4 Percentage of Participants
|
1.3 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 24 and 48Population: ITT analysis set included all participants randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Change from baseline in serum creatinine levels at Weeks 24 and 48 was assessed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=761 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 24
|
1.22 micro mole per liter
Standard Error 0.358
|
0.88 micro mole per liter
Standard Error 0.509
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 48
|
1.27 micro mole per liter
Standard Error 0.368
|
0.65 micro mole per liter
Standard Error 0.530
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Change from baseline in eGFRcr (by Cockcroft-Gault formula) was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. eGFRcr according to the Cockcroft Gault formula- Male: (140 - age in years)\*(weight in kilogram \[kg\])/72\*(serum creatinine in milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\])=eGFRcr (milliliter per minute \[mL/min\]); Female: (140 - age in years)\*(weight in kg)/72\*(serum creatinine in mg/dL)\*0.85=eGFRcr (mL/min).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=761 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Cockcroft-Gault Formula [eGFRcg]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 24
|
-0.38 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Standard Error 0.502
|
0.20 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Standard Error 0.715
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Cockcroft-Gault Formula [eGFRcg]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 48
|
-0.94 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Standard Error 0.492
|
-0.20 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Standard Error 0.708
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Change from baseline in eGFRcr (by CKD-EPI) was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. eGFRcr per CKD-EPI formula - Female: 1) Serum creatinine (Scr) less than or equal to (\<=)0.7 mg/dL: 144\*(Scr/0.7)\^-0.329\*0.993age; 2) Scr greater than (\>)0.7 mg/dL: 144\*(Scr/0.7)\^-1.209\*0.993age. Male: 1) Scr \<=0.9 mg/dL: 141\*(Scr/0.9)\^-0.411\*0.993age; 2) Scr \>0.9 mg/dL: 141\*(Scr/0.9)\^-1.209\*0.993age.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=761 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 24
|
-1.67 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.359
|
-0.75 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.510
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI]) at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 48
|
-1.97 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.369
|
-0.88 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.531
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Change from baseline in eGFRcyst (by CKD-EPI) was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. eGFRcyst according to the CKD-EPI formula - 1) Serum Cystatin C (Scyst) \<=0.8 mg/L: 133\*(Scyst/0.8)\^-0.499\*0.996age (\*0.932 if female); 2) Scyst \>0.8 mg/L: 133\*(Scyst/0.8)\^-1.328\*0.996age (\*0.932 if female).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (eGFRcyst, by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI]) at Weeks 24 and 48
eGFRcyst: Change at Week 24
|
0.21 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.338
|
-0.93 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.483
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (eGFRcyst, by Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI]) at Weeks 24 and 48
eGFRcyst: Change at Week 48
|
-0.42 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.360
|
-1.76 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Error 0.517
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Change from baseline in UACR and UPCR was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. Lower levels of albumin or protein in the urine indicates better proximal tubular function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=761 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UACR: Baseline
|
6.20 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval 1.4 to 632.1
|
7.14 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval 1.1 to 268.0
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UACR: Change at Week 24
|
-0.78 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -185.4 to 422.2
|
0.44 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -238.5 to 145.0
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UACR: Change at Week 48
|
-0.76 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -195.8 to 344.3
|
0.40 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -121.7 to 110.9
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UPCR: Baseline
|
61.56 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval 16.9 to 1158.1
|
62.90 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval 14.7 to 870.9
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UPCR: Change at Week 24
|
-14.63 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -509.6 to 734.6
|
0.07 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -359.9 to 400.8
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UPCR: Change at Week 48
|
-22.25 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -520.1 to 386.6
|
-7.37 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -368.7 to 432.3
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this endpoint; and 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Change from baseline in URBPCR and UB2MGCR was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48. Retinol binding protein is a marker of proximal tubular function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=748 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=371 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
URBPCR: Baseline
|
126.19 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval 20.3 to 116216.2
|
137.16 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval 12.9 to 73958.4
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
URBPCR: Change at Week 24
|
-30.27 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -69873.2 to 2004.4
|
7.76 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -6040.1 to 60740.4
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
URBPCR: Change at Week 48
|
-27.09 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -67540.0 to 1764.3
|
19.66 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -5778.3 to 65203.3
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UB2MGCR: Baseline
|
156.85 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval 3.8 to 91216.2
|
172.25 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval 9.8 to 92740.1
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UB2MGCR: Change at Week 24
|
-72.64 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -72264.6 to 13536.2
|
12.08 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -20084.8 to 58357.6
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Urine Retinol Binding Protein to Creatinine Ratio (URBPCR) and Urine Beta-2 Microglobulin to Creatinine Ratio (UB2MGCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
UB2MGCR: Change at Week 48
|
-67.02 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -72323.4 to 21190.2
|
20.24 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -22173.5 to 135576.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Percent change from baseline in urine FEPO4 was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Fractional Excretion of Phosphate (FEPO4) at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 24
|
3.58 Percent change
Interval -89.4 to 1940.4
|
8.55 Percent change
Interval -78.5 to 281.8
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Urine Fractional Excretion of Phosphate (FEPO4) at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 48
|
8.42 Percent change
Interval -97.9 to 1430.3
|
8.57 Percent change
Interval -76.3 to 452.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Percentage of participants with virologic response based on HIV-1 RNA \<20, \<50, and \<200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 48 using FDA snapshot approach. FDA Snapshot approach analysis was based on the last observed viral load data: virologic response was defined as HIV-1 RNA \<20/50/200 copies/mL (observed case).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA Less Than (<)20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Approach
<20 copies/mL
|
89.8 Percentage of Participants
Interval 87.4 to 91.8
|
88.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 84.7 to 91.4
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA Less Than (<)20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Approach
<50 copies/mL
|
94.9 Percentage of Participants
Interval 93.1 to 96.3
|
93.7 Percentage of Participants
Interval 90.7 to 95.9
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA Less Than (<)20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Approach
<200 copies/mL
|
95.0 Percentage of Participants
Interval 93.2 to 96.5
|
94.2 Percentage of Participants
Interval 91.3 to 96.3
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Percentage of participants with virologic response based on HIV-1 RNA \<20, \<50, and \<200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 48 using TLOVR algorithm approach. TLOVR was defined as sustained HIV-1 RNA \<20/50/200 copies/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm
<20 copies/mL
|
86.0 Percentage of Participants
Interval 83.3 to 88.4
|
83.6 Percentage of Participants
Interval 79.5 to 87.2
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm
<50 copies/mL
|
93.7 Percentage of Participants
Interval 91.7 to 95.3
|
92.9 Percentage of Participants
Interval 89.8 to 95.2
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 48 as Defined by the Time to Loss of Virologic Response (TLOVR) Algorithm
<200 copies/mL
|
95.4 Percentage of Participants
Interval 93.7 to 96.8
|
94.7 Percentage of Participants
Interval 91.9 to 96.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Change from baseline in CD4+ cell count was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=378 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48
Baseline
|
653.3 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 9.12
|
641.7 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 13.15
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 24
|
14.3 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 5.99
|
8.5 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 7.76
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) Cell Count at Weeks 24 and 48
Change at Week 48
|
21.0 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 5.97
|
9.1 Cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 8.41
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this endpoint.
Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability cumulative through Week 48 (Approach 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=215 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=102 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of Greater Than (>)95 Percent (%) (Approach 1) Through Week 48
|
91.6 Percentage of Participants
|
85.3 Percentage of Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 48Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this endpoint.
Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability cumulative treatment adherence up to time point where not more than one bottle was missing, or if available, through Week 48, whichever came sooner (Approach 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=631 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=268 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of >95% (Approach 2) Through Week 48
|
82.7 percentage of participants
|
77.2 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 48Population: The ITT population with confirmed virologic rebound and with HIV-1 RNA value \>=400 copies/mL was analyzed.
HIV-1 genotypes were analyzed from samples of participants with confirmed virologic rebound (virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL up to, and including the upper bound of the Week 48 window) and with HIV-1 RNA value \>=400 copies/mL or who discontinued with last HIV-1 RNA \>=400 copies/mL. Number of participants who developed resistance to any of the study drug was determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=19 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=8 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Resistance to Study Drug
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48Population: The PK analysis set included all participants randomized to D/C/F/TAF group and received at least 1 dose of study drug in study, and for whom plasma concentration data of any analytes of interest were available. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Predose (trough) plasma concentration (C0h) of darunavir was determined. Pharmacokinetic (PK) data was only analyzed for participants in the D/C/F/TAF group as per planned analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=750 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 2
|
1775.29 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1698.84
|
—
|
—
|
|
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 4
|
1732.00 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1389.44
|
—
|
—
|
|
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 8
|
1910.30 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1501.94
|
—
|
—
|
|
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 12
|
1643.38 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1328.41
|
—
|
—
|
|
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 24
|
2022.99 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1965.64
|
—
|
—
|
|
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 36
|
1806.37 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1669.43
|
—
|
—
|
|
Predose (Trough) Plasma Concentration (C0h) of Darunavir
Week 48
|
1899.79 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1833.09
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for biomarker data. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Percent change from baseline in bone biomarkers: P1NP and CTX was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
P1NP: Percent change at Week 24
|
-22.971 Percent Change
Standard Error 1.8818
|
-0.027 Percent Change
Standard Error 2.7325
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
P1NP: Percent change at Week 48
|
-26.752 Percent Change
Standard Error 1.8960
|
-3.751 Percent Change
Standard Error 2.6988
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
CTX: Percent change at Week 24
|
-16.772 Percent Change
Standard Error 2.2575
|
16.312 Percent Change
Standard Error 3.8855
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Serum Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide (P1NP) and Serum Collagen Type 1 Beta Carboxy Telopeptide (CTX) Levels at Weeks 24 and 48
CTX: Percent change at Week 48
|
-10.517 Percent Change
Standard Error 3.2325
|
5.433 Percent Change
Standard Error 4.1118
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for biomarker data. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Percent change from baseline in bone biomarker: PTH was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 24
|
-3.092 Percent change
Standard Error 2.5941
|
12.034 Percent change
Standard Error 4.1777
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 48
|
-4.510 Percent change
Standard Error 2.5375
|
9.436 Percent change
Standard Error 4.4784
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for biomarker data. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Percent change from baseline in bone biomarker: 25-hydroxy vitamin D was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in 25-hydroxy Vitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 24
|
-3.0 Percent change
Standard Error 5.06
|
4.2 Percent change
Standard Error 6.13
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in 25-hydroxy Vitamin D at Weeks 24 and 48
Percent change at Week 48
|
25.2 Percent change
Standard Error 5.51
|
24.9 Percent change
Standard Error 7.46
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for bone mineral density (BMD) data. Here 'n' specifies participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Percent change from baseline in spine and hip BMD was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD: Percent change at Week 24
|
1.55 Percent change
Standard Error 0.276
|
0.18 Percent change
Standard Error 0.342
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD: Percent change at Week 48
|
2.06 Percent change
Standard Error 0.324
|
0.01 Percent change
Standard Error 0.391
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD: Percent change at Week 24
|
0.91 Percent change
Standard Error 0.230
|
0.00 Percent change
Standard Error 0.279
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Spine and Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD: Percent change at Week 48
|
1.62 Percent change
Standard Error 0.244
|
-0.08 Percent change
Standard Error 0.288
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 48Population: The bone investigation substudy (BIS) analysis set included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in the study, and had at least one postbaseline value for BMD data. Here 'n' specifies those participants who were analyzed for this endpoint at given time point.
Change from baseline in spine, hip, and femoral neck BMD T-Score was assessed at Week 24 and 48. T-score values \>= -1.0 were considered normal, T-score values \< -1.0 to -2.5 indicate osteopenia and T-score values \< -2.5 indicate osteoporosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=209 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=108 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD T-score: Baseline
|
-0.713 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0850
|
-0.467 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.1260
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD T-score: Change at Week 24
|
0.102 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0172
|
-0.033 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0253
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Spine BMD T-score: Change at Week 48
|
0.132 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0217
|
-0.063 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0264
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD T-score: Baseline
|
-0.575 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0643
|
-0.484 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0839
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD T-score: Change at Week 24
|
0.037 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0108
|
-0.024 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0144
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Hip BMD T-score: Change at Week 48
|
0.095 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0122
|
-0.016 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0139
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Femoral Neck BMD T-score: Baseline
|
-0.782 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0625
|
-0.699 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0899
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Femoral Neck BMD T-score: Change at Week 24
|
0.019 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0128
|
-0.044 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0183
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) T-Score at Weeks 24 and 48
Femoral Neck BMD T-score: Change at Week 48
|
0.039 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0146
|
-0.039 Units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0214
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>=20 copies/mL up to and including Week 96, last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason), and last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at the study cutoff of Week 96 (that is, any last viral load \[re\]test having occurred no later than 6 weeks after Week 96). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (HIV-1 RNA >=20 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through Week 96
|
13.8 percentage of participants
Interval 11.4 to 16.4
|
8.8 percentage of participants
Interval 6.1 to 12.3
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>=50 copies/mL up to and including Week 96, last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason), and last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \>=50copies/mL at the study cutoff of Week 96 (that is, any last viral load \[re\]test having occurred no later than 6 weeks after Week 96). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (HIV-1 RNA >=50 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through Week 96
|
3.1 percentage of participants
Interval 2.0 to 4.6
|
2.3 percentage of participants
Interval 1.0 to 4.4
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>=200 copies/mL up to and including Week 96, last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=200 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason), and last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \>=200 copies/mL at the study cutoff of Week 96 (that is, any last viral load \[re\]test having occurred no later than 6 weeks after Week 96). Percentage of participants with virologic rebound were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Rebound (HIV-1 RNA >=200 Copies/mL) Cumulative Through Week 96
|
0.5 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 1.3
|
0.6 percentage of participants
Interval 0.1 to 2.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Here Kaplan-Meier estimates percentage of participants with non-virologic rebound at Week 96.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound at Week 96 by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
|
96.7 percentage of participants
Interval 95.1 to 97.8
|
97.8 percentage of participants
Interval 95.4 to 98.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96 (Comprising up to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF and 44 weeks of D/C/F/TAF exposure [that is, from the switch to D/C/F/TAF at Week 52 up to Week 96])Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Percentage of participants with virologic response based on HIV-1 RNA \<20, \<50, and \<200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 96 using FDA snapshot approach. FDA Snapshot approach analysis was based on the last observed viral load data: virologic response was defined as having last available HIV-1 RNA \<20/50/200 copies/mL (observed case).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
<20 copies/mL
|
85.3 percentage of participants
Interval 82.6 to 87.8
|
89.8 percentage of participants
Interval 86.1 to 92.7
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
<50 copies/mL
|
90.7 percentage of participants
Interval 88.4 to 92.7
|
93.8 percentage of participants
Interval 90.7 to 96.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
<200 copies/mL
|
91.2 percentage of participants
Interval 89.0 to 93.1
|
95.5 percentage of participants
Interval 92.7 to 97.4
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96 (Comprising up to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF and 44 weeks of D/C/F/TAF exposure [that is, from the switch to D/C/F/TAF at Week 52 up to Week 96])Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Percentage of participants with virologic response based on HIV-1 RNA \<20, \<50, and \<200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 96 using TLOVR algorithm approach. TLOVR was defined as sustained HIV-1 RNA \<20/50/200 copies/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the TLOVR Algorithm
<20 copies/mL
|
79.6 percentage of participants
Interval 76.5 to 82.4
|
88.1 percentage of participants
Interval 84.2 to 91.3
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the TLOVR Algorithm
<50 copies/mL
|
89.6 percentage of participants
Interval 87.3 to 91.7
|
94.3 percentage of participants
Interval 91.4 to 96.5
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Response Based on HIV-1 RNA <20, <50, and <200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the TLOVR Algorithm
<200 copies/mL
|
91.7 percentage of participants
Interval 89.6 to 93.6
|
95.7 percentage of participants
Interval 93.1 to 97.6
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96 (Comprising up to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF and 44 weeks of D/C/F/TAF exposure [that is, from the switch to D/C/F/TAF at Week 52 up to Week 96])Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
Percentage of participants with virologic failure based on HIV-1 RNA \>=20, \>=50, and \>=200 copies/mL threshold were analyzed at Week 96 using FDA snapshot approach. FDA Snapshot approach analysis was based on the last observed viral load data: virologic failure was defined by the FDA snapshot approach as having last available HIV-1 RNA \>=20/50/200 copies/mL at Week 96; virologic failure - leading to discontinuation; virologic failure - discontinued due to other reason and last available HIV-1 RNA \>=20/50/200 copies/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Based on HIV-1 RNA >=20, >=50, and >=200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
>=20 copies/mL
|
6.8 percentage of participants
Interval 5.1 to 8.8
|
6.0 percentage of participants
Interval 3.7 to 9.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Based on HIV-1 RNA >=20, >=50, and >=200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
>=50 copies/mL
|
1.2 percentage of participants
Interval 0.5 to 2.2
|
1.7 percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 3.7
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure Based on HIV-1 RNA >=20, >=50, and >=200 Copies/mL Threshold at Week 96 as Defined by the FDA Snapshot Approach
>=200 copies/mL
|
0.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.9
|
0 percentage of participants
NA signifies that confidence interval was not calculated as none of the participants had HIV RNA \<200 copies/mL.
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAF (Comprising 44 weeks of D/C/F/TAF exposure [that is, from the switch to D/C/F/TAF at Week 52])Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Based on non-completing=failure (NC=F) analysis with values after discontinuation imputed with the reference value. Other (intermittent) missing values are imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Change from reference in CD4+ cell count was assessed at Week 96. The change from reference in CD4+ count at a given time point is defined as: CD4+ at a given time point minus reference CD4+. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in CD4+ Cell Count at Week 96
|
32.07 cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 8.0
|
13.07 cells per cubic millimeter (cells/mm^3)
Standard Error 10.7
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm), up to Week 48 (Control arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies total number of participants with screening/baseline and endpoint genotype. Due to the low proportion of rebounders of which the majority had low viral load values, few samples were eligible for postbaseline genotyping.
HIV-1 genotypes were analyzed from samples of participants with confirmed virologic rebound in case they had HIV-1 RNA values \>=400 copies/mL at failure or at later time points, including participants who discontinued with last HIV-1 RNA \>=400 copies/mL. Virologic rebound was defined as: confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level \>=20 copies/mL up to and including Week 96, last available on-treatment (single) HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at premature discontinuation (irrespective of reason), and last available on-treatment HIV-1 RNA \>=20 copies/mL at the study cutoff of Week 96 (that is, any last viral load \[re\]test having occurred no later than 6 weeks after Week 96). Number of participants who developed resistance to any of the study drug (DRV, FTC, and TFV/TAF) were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=9 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=3 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=7 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Resistance to Study Drug Through Week 96
DRV resistance-associated mutations (RAMs)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Resistance to Study Drug Through Week 96
TFV RAMs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Resistance to Study Drug Through Week 96
FTC RAMs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability cumulative through Week 96 (Approach 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=379 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=236 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of >95 (Approach 1) Through Week 96
|
91.6 percentage of participants
|
87.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability cumulative treatment adherence up to time point where not more than one bottle was missing, or if available, through Week 96, whichever came sooner (Approach 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=646 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=320 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of >95% (Approach 2) Through Week 96
|
82.8 percentage of participants
|
80.9 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Through Week 96 (D/C/F/TAF arm) and from Week 52 to Week 96 (Switch to D/C/F/TAF arm)Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Grade 3 (Severe) events were symptoms causing inability to perform usual social \& functional activities. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events were symptoms causing inability to perform basic self-care functions or medical or operative intervention indicated to prevent permanent impairment, persistent disability, or death. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=352 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 96
Grade 3 AEs
|
10.5 percentage of participants
|
6.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 96
Grade 4 AEs
|
2.4 percentage of participants
|
1.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 96
SAEs
|
8.7 percentage of participants
|
6.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and Grade 4 AEs, SAEs, and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Through Week 96
Premature discontinuations due to AEs
|
2.2 percentage of participants
|
2.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from reference in serum creatinine levels at Week 96 was assessed. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=692 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=336 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in Serum Creatinine Levels at Week 96
|
0.0 micro mole per liter
Interval -35.0 to 44.0
|
0.0 micro mole per liter
Interval -45.0 to 29.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from reference in eGFRcr (by Cockcroft-Gault formula) was assessed at Week 96. eGFRcr according to the Cockcroft Gault formula- Male: (140 - age in years)\*(weight in kilogram \[kg\])/72\*(serum creatinine in milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\])=eGFRcr (milliliter per minute \[mL/min\]); Female: (140 - age in years)\*(weight in kg)/72\*(serum creatinine in mg/dL)\*0.85=eGFRcr (mL/min). For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=692 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=336 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (eGFRcr, by Cockcroft-Gault Formula [eGFRcg]) at Week 96
|
-0.9 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Interval -65.0 to 58.0
|
0.0 milliliter per minute (mL/min)
Interval -44.0 to 157.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and participants at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from reference in eGFRcr (by CKD-EPI) was assessed at Week 96. eGFRcr per CKD-EPI formula - Female: 1) Serum creatinine (Scr) less than or equal to (\<=)0.7 mg/dL: 144\*(Scr/0.7)\^-0.329\*0.993\^age; 2) Scr greater than (\>)0.7 mg/dL: 144\*(Scr/0.7)\^-1.209\*0.993\^age. Male: 1) Scr \<=0.9 mg/dL: 141\*(Scr/0.9)\^-0.411\*0.993\^age; 2) Scr \>0.9 mg/dL: 141\*(Scr/0.9)\^-1.209\*0.993\^age. . For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=692 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=336 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine (by CKD-EPI) at Week 96
|
-1.3 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Interval -37.0 to 35.0
|
-0.7 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Interval -31.0 to 49.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and participants at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from reference in eGFRcyst (by CKD-EPI) was assessed at Week 96. eGFRcyst according to the CKD-EPI formula - 1) Serum Cystatin C (Scyst) \<=0.8 mg/L: 133\*(Scyst/0.8)\^-0.499\*0.996\^age (\*0.932 if female); 2) Scyst \>0.8 mg/L: 133\*(Scyst/0.8)\^-1.328\*0.996\^age (\*0.932 if female). For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=686 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=332 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Cystatin C (by CKD-EPI) at Week 96
|
-0.9 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Interval -42.0 to 30.0
|
1.0 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Interval -30.0 to 105.0
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from reference in UACR was assessed at Week 96. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=694 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=334 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in UACR at Week 96
|
-0.63 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -209.3 to 2019.7
|
-0.93 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -234.6 to 13230.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from reference in URBPCR was assessed at Week 96. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=675 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=331 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in URBPCR at Week 96
|
-25.08 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -61980.5 to 1393.0
|
-39.07 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -82240.7 to 869.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from reference in UPCR was assessed at Week 96. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=675 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=331 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in UPCR at Week 96
|
-22.23 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -533.3 to 2314.7
|
-12.81 milligram per gram (mg/g)
Interval -722.1 to 453.1
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Change from reference in UB2MGCR was assessed at Week 96. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=664 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=332 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in UB2MGCR at Week 96
|
-68.22 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -71549.3 to 7433.1
|
-110.31 microgram per gram (mcg/g)
Interval -152500.2 to 12288.4
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ F/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Percent change from reference in FEPO4 at Week 96 was reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=688 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=334 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Reference in FEPO4 at Week 96
|
4.15 percent change
Interval -88.0 to 524.8
|
-3.19 percent change
Interval -77.9 to 547.8
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Percent change from reference in serum P1NP levels at Week 96 was reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=183 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=96 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Reference in Levels of Serum P1NP at Week 96
|
-19.899 percent change
Standard Error 2.2151
|
-18.466 percent change
Standard Error 3.1169
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Percent change from reference in serum CTX at Week 96 was reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=178 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=98 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Reference in Levels of Serum CTX at Week 96
|
-10.192 percent change
Standard Error 3.0592
|
-21.755 percent change
Standard Error 3.4926
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Percent change from reference in PTH at Week 96 was reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=169 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=97 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Reference in Levels of PTH at Week 96
|
-17.171 percent change
Standard Error 2.6774
|
-20.466 percent change
Standard Error 3.2559
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure.
Percent change from reference in 25-OH Vitamin D at Week 96 were reported. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=141 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=98 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Reference in Levels of 25-OH Vitamin D at Week 96
|
24.6 percent change
Standard Error 5.16
|
-1.9 percent change
Standard Error 3.33
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified categories.
The BMD is the amount of mineral in gram per square centimeter of bone, which was assessed by DXA scan. Positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values" of change. Percent change from reference in hip and spine BMD was assessed. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=173 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=99 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Reference in Hip and Spine BMD at Week 96
Hip region BMD-T score
|
0.0173 percent change
Standard Error 0.00217
|
0.0108 percent change
Standard Error 0.00328
|
—
|
|
Percent Change From Reference in Hip and Spine BMD at Week 96
Spine region BMD-T score
|
0.0193 percent change
Standard Error 0.00286
|
0.0279 percent change
Standard Error 0.00381
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Reference 1 to Week 96 for D/C/F/TAF+ FTC/TDF Group and Reference 2 to Week 96 for Switch to D/C/F/TAFPopulation: BIS analysis set included all participants who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of study drug in study and had at least one post-baseline value for either biomarker/BMD data. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified categories.
BMD status was assessed using BMD T-scores; normal bone status was defined by a BMD T-score \>= -1, osteopenia by a T-score \>= -2.5 to \<-1.0, and osteoporosis by a T-score \<-2.5. For the D/C/F/TAF group, reference is the comparative treatment phase baseline as in Week 48 analysis (Reference 1). For the Switch to D/C/F/TAF (late switch) group, the last value prior to the switch was used as reference (reference 2).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=173 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=99 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Reference in BMD T-score of Hip and Spine at Week 96
Hip region BMD
|
0.122 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0154
|
0.077 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0230
|
—
|
|
Change From Reference in BMD T-score of Hip and Spine at Week 96
Spine region BMD
|
0.176 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0259
|
0.255 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.0339
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (at every 6 months, up to 42 months)Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified timepoints.
Virologic rebound is defined as participants who show confirmed HIV-1 RNA \>=50 copies/mL, or for which the last available (single) HIV-1 RNA value on treatment was \>=50 copies/mL. Here, Kaplan-Meier estimates (%) of non-virologic rebound at every 6 months interval are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=671 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=323 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 6 months
|
99.4 percentage of participants
Interval 98.4 to 99.8
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 12 months
|
98.0 percentage of participants
Interval 96.5 to 98.9
|
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 96.0 to 99.4
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 18 months
|
97.6 percentage of participants
Interval 95.9 to 98.6
|
98.1 percentage of participants
Interval 95.4 to 99.2
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 24 months
|
97.1 percentage of participants
Interval 94.9 to 98.3
|
96.5 percentage of participants
Interval 92.3 to 98.4
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 30 months
|
95.3 percentage of participants
Interval 91.3 to 97.5
|
96.5 percentage of participants
Interval 92.3 to 98.4
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 36 months
|
92.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.0 to 96.7
|
96.5 percentage of participants
Interval 92.3 to 98.4
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Virologic Rebound by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 42 months
|
92.4 percentage of participants
Interval 83.0 to 96.7
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure; and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified timepoints.
Percentage of participants with non-treatment failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates were reported. Treatment failure was defined as having either protocol-defined virologic rebound or having discontinued for reasons other than alternate access to D/C/F/TAF (or other antiretroviral \[ARV\]).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=680 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=326 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 6 months
|
98.1 percentage of participants
Interval 96.7 to 98.9
|
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 96.3 to 99.4
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 12 months
|
94.3 percentage of participants
Interval 92.2 to 95.9
|
95.4 percentage of participants
Interval 92.3 to 97.2
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 18 months
|
91.6 percentage of participants
Interval 89.0 to 93.6
|
92.2 percentage of participants
Interval 88.3 to 94.8
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 24 months
|
89.4 percentage of participants
Interval 86.1 to 91.9
|
89.7 percentage of participants
Interval 85.0 to 93.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 30 months
|
87.0 percentage of participants
Interval 82.7 to 90.4
|
88.1 percentage of participants
Interval 82.0 to 92.2
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 36 months
|
84.9 percentage of participants
Interval 78.2 to 89.6
|
82.6 percentage of participants
Interval 67.4 to 91.1
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Non-Treatment Failure by Kaplan-Meier Estimates
Week 96 + 42 months
|
81.7 percentage of participants
Interval 71.9 to 88.4
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure and 'n' specifies participants analyzed for specified timepoints.
Percentage of participants with HIV RNA \<50, \<20, \<200 copies/mL post Week 96 to end of extension were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=688 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=334 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 24 months (<200 copies/mL)
|
99.6 percentage of participants
Interval 98.0 to 100.0
|
99.3 percentage of participants
Interval 95.9 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 30 months (<200 copies/mL)
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 97.3 to 100.0
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 94.4 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 36 months (<200 copies/mL)
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 93.2 to 100.0
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 86.8 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 42 months (<200 copies/mL)
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 79.4 to 100.0
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 59.0 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 6 months (<20 copies/mL)
|
91.4 percentage of participants
Interval 89.1 to 93.4
|
93.4 percentage of participants
Interval 90.2 to 95.8
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 12 months (<20 copies/mL)
|
93.9 percentage of participants
Interval 91.7 to 95.7
|
91.4 percentage of participants
Interval 87.6 to 94.3
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 18 months (<20 copies/mL)
|
96.1 percentage of participants
Interval 93.9 to 97.7
|
92.9 percentage of participants
Interval 88.7 to 95.9
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 24 months (<20 copies/mL)
|
96.1 percentage of participants
Interval 93.1 to 98.0
|
95.5 percentage of participants
Interval 90.5 to 98.3
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 30 months (<20 copies/mL)
|
95.6 percentage of participants
Interval 90.6 to 98.4
|
92.2 percentage of participants
Interval 82.7 to 97.4
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 36 months (<20 copies/mL)
|
94.2 percentage of participants
Interval 84.1 to 98.8
|
96.2 percentage of participants
Interval 80.4 to 99.9
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 42 months (<20 copies/mL)
|
93.8 percentage of participants
Interval 69.8 to 99.8
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 59.0 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 6 months (<50 copies/mL)
|
97.8 percentage of participants
Interval 96.4 to 98.8
|
97.9 percentage of participants
Interval 95.7 to 99.2
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 12 months (<50 copies/mL)
|
98.4 percentage of participants
Interval 97.0 to 99.2
|
97.4 percentage of participants
Interval 94.8 to 98.8
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 18 months (<50 copies/mL)
|
99.6 percentage of participants
Interval 98.4 to 99.9
|
98.7 percentage of participants
Interval 96.2 to 99.7
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 24 months (<50 copies/mL)
|
99.3 percentage of participants
Interval 97.4 to 99.9
|
98.5 percentage of participants
Interval 94.7 to 99.8
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 30 months (<50 copies/mL)
|
99.3 percentage of participants
Interval 95.9 to 100.0
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 94.4 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 36 months (<50 copies/mL)
|
98.1 percentage of participants
Interval 89.7 to 100.0
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 86.8 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 42 months (<50 copies/mL)
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 79.4 to 100.0
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 59.0 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 6 months (<200 copies/mL)
|
99.1 percentage of participants
Interval 98.1 to 99.7
|
99.7 percentage of participants
Interval 98.3 to 100.0
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 12 months (<200 copies/mL)
|
99.3 percentage of participants
Interval 98.3 to 99.8
|
98.7 percentage of participants
Interval 96.6 to 99.6
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants With HIV RNA <50, <20, <200 Copies/mL Post Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 18 months (<200 copies/mL)
|
100 percentage of participants
Interval 99.2 to 100.0
|
99.1 percentage of participants
Interval 96.8 to 99.9
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)Population: The ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluated for this outcome measure and n (number analyzed) signifies participants analyzed at specified timepoints
The immunologic change was determined by Cluster of CD4+ cell count. CD4+ cell count post-Week 96 to end of extension were assessed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=682 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=332 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 6 months
|
706.4 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 10.51
|
681.3 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 14.99
|
—
|
|
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 12 months
|
707.6 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 11.93
|
676.2 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 14.57
|
—
|
|
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 24 months
|
712.7 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 15.98
|
686.4 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 21.20
|
—
|
|
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 30 months
|
730.4 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 23.24
|
685.8 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 28.61
|
—
|
|
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 36 months
|
732.0 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 33.10
|
733.3 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 54.73
|
—
|
|
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 42 months
|
714.3 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 56.26
|
705.6 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 112.99
|
—
|
|
CD4+ Cell Count Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Week 96 + 18 months
|
713.3 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 12.16
|
686.1 cells/mm^3
Standard Error 17.05
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) indicates the number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Treatment adherence (defined as adherence of \>95%) was assessed by the drug accountability and was calculated cumulative from start of treatment/switch to last study drug intake by determination of the cumulative treatment adherence in participants who returned all dispensed bottles prior to or at the last visit in the study from Week 96 to end of extension.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=363 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=216 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Adherence of >95% From Week 96 to End of Extension
|
89.5 percentage of participants
|
89.4 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 96 to end of extension (up to 42 months)Population: ITT analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study treatment.
AE is any untoward medical occurrence in participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Grade 3 (Severe) events were symptoms causing inability to perform usual social \& functional activities. Grade 4 (Life-threatening) events were symptoms causing inability to perform basic self-care functions or medical or operative intervention indicated to prevent permanent impairment, persistent disability, or death. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline [BL] to End of Extension [EOE])
n=699 Participants
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months (end of extension).
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
n=337 Participants
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF treatment up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Grade 3 AEs
|
5.7 percentage of participants
|
5.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Grade 4 AEs
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
1.5 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
SAEs
|
7.3 percentage of participants
|
7.7 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Grade 3 and 4 AEs, Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Premature Discontinuation Due to AEs Post-Week 96 to End of Extension
Premature discontinuations due to AEs
|
1.1 percentage of participants
|
2.1 percentage of participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline to End of Extension [EOE])
Control (Baseline to Switch)
Switch to D/C/F/TAF Group
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 participants at risk
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until the D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months
|
Control (Baseline to Switch)
n=378 participants at risk
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF Group
n=352 participants at risk
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until the D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial flutter
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrioventricular block complete
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.52%
4/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Cushing's syndrome
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal adhesions
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fissure
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fistula
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal inflammation
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hiatus hernia
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inflammatory bowel disease
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Intestinal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal rupture
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peptic ulcer
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal perforation
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Brain death
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Hernia
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.57%
2/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Surgical failure
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatitis acute
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abdominal abscess
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess oral
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Anal abscess
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.85%
3/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis perforated
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.57%
2/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Colon gangrene
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diarrhoea infectious
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.52%
4/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Epididymitis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Escherichia sepsis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fournier's gangrene
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.52%
4/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis shigella
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Groin abscess
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis A
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex meningitis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infectious pleural effusion
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lymphogranuloma venereum
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Malaria
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Orchitis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perineal abscess
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.3%
10/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.85%
3/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia respiratory syncytial viral
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Secondary syphilis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.57%
2/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Syphilis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Alcohol poisoning
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.39%
3/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Eye injury
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fibula fracture
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foreign body in gastrointestinal tract
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament injury
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Multiple fractures
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Musculoskeletal injury
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.39%
3/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative ileus
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skull fracture
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Subdural haematoma
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Toxicity to various agents
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Investigations
Biopsy lymph gland
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Investigations
Oxygen saturation decreased
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetic ketoacidosis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Polyarthritis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rhabdomyolysis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Seronegative arthritis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Anal squamous cell carcinoma
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Anogenital warts
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cholangiocarcinoma
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Enchondromatosis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Hodgkin's disease
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoma
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Retinal melanoma
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Spinal cord neoplasm
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery aneurysm
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Essential tremor
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.39%
3/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraparesis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Radiculopathy
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient ischaemic attack
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Ectopic pregnancy
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Product Issues
Device breakage
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Product Issues
Device loosening
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Adjustment disorder
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.85%
3/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Drug abuse
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Major depression
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Personality disorder
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Schizophrenia
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.85%
3/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.39%
3/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder mass
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Cystocele
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menorrhagia
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Social circumstances
Bereavement
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Aortic stenosis
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.26%
1/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.26%
2/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lymphocele
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
|
0.00%
0/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.28%
1/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery stenosis
|
0.13%
1/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
D/C/F/TAF (Test) (Baseline to End of Extension [EOE])
n=763 participants at risk
Participants received a single fixed dose combination (FDC) tablet containing darunavir (DRV) 800 milligram (mg)/ cobicistat (COBI) 150 mg/ emtricitabine (FTC) 200 mg/ tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) 10 mg (D/C/F/TAF tablet), orally once daily up to Week 48. After Week 48, all participants continued to receive D/C/F/TAF treatment (that is, initial switch to D/C/F/TAF group) up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until the D/C/F/TAF became commercially available up to 42 months
|
Control (Baseline to Switch)
n=378 participants at risk
Participants received a boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) (limited to darunavir \[DRV\] or atazanavir with low-dose ritonavir \[rtv\] or cobicistat \[COBI\], or lopinavir with rtv) combined with emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (F/TDF) up to Week 48.
|
Switch to D/C/F/TAF Group
n=352 participants at risk
After Week 52, participants earlier receiving treatment with bPI+F/TDF switched to D/C/F/TAF up to Week 96. After Week 96, participants were given the opportunity to continue D/C/F/TAF treatment until the D/C/F/TAF became commercially available for up to 42 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
8.4%
64/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
1.9%
7/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
2.6%
9/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
13.6%
104/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
4.8%
18/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
11.4%
40/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.4%
41/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
2.1%
8/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.4%
12/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
5.4%
41/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
1.1%
4/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
1.7%
6/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
7.1%
54/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.4%
13/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
5.4%
19/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
9.6%
73/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
2.6%
10/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
6.0%
21/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
5.8%
44/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.2%
12/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
4.3%
15/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
6.9%
53/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
1.9%
7/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
2.8%
10/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
18.9%
144/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
11.1%
42/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
11.9%
42/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
7.6%
58/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
2.9%
11/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
4.0%
14/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
6.8%
52/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.2%
12/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.7%
13/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Syphilis
|
7.5%
57/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.4%
13/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
5.7%
20/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
21.4%
163/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
10.3%
39/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
15.9%
56/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D deficiency
|
9.7%
74/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
7.7%
29/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.1%
11/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
11.0%
84/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
2.4%
9/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
6.2%
22/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
14.0%
107/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
6.1%
23/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
8.8%
31/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteopenia
|
6.4%
49/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
5.8%
22/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
0.00%
0/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
6.7%
51/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
4.0%
15/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
4.0%
14/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
12.2%
93/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
4.8%
18/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
8.2%
29/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
5.4%
41/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.2%
12/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
4.0%
14/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
9.8%
75/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
4.5%
17/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
6.0%
21/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
5.6%
43/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.4%
13/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
2.0%
7/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.6%
43/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
1.6%
6/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.4%
12/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.2%
47/763 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
1.9%
7/378 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
3.1%
11/352 • Up to 5 years and 4 months
Safety was performed using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis set included all the participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment in the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested in writing, such publication will be withheld for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER