Efficacy and Tolerability of Cisplatin Plus Alternating Weekly Temozolomide in Recurrent High-grade Gliomas

NCT ID: NCT02263105

Last Updated: 2018-07-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Currently, the prognosis of recurrent high-grade gliomas is still dismal with no standard treatment protocol established. Cisplatin (CDDP), recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) as a chemotherapeutic agent in salvage treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas, was shown to reduce O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyl transferase (AGAT) activity and potentially capable of enhancing the antitumor effects of temozolomide (TMZ). Compared to the standard 5-day TMZ regimen, alternating weekly regimen that deliver more prolonged exposure of TMZ may lead to higher cumulative doses, and may deplete more O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), thus reducing the resistance of tumor cells to TMZ.

The investigators therefore initiate a single-arm Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of CDDP plus alternating weekly TMZ regimen in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

High-grade Gliomas

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CDDP plus Temozolomide

Patients were treated with CDDP and TMZ. CDDP was administered iv from Day 1 to 3 with everyday dose of 30mg. TMZ was orally administered from Day 1 to 7 and Day 15 to 21, with everyday dose of 125mg/m2 (Level 2). The period of one chemotherapy cycle is 28 days. TMZ dose levels were listed in Table 1.

Table 1 TMZ dose levels Dose levels Daily TMZ dose( mg/m2/d ) TMZ dose per cycle(mg/m2)

1. 150 2100
2. 125 1750
3. 100 1400
4. 75 1050

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CDDP

Intervention Type DRUG

Temozolomide

Intervention Type DRUG

If hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 4.0) from the previous cycle had been grade 0 or 1, then TMZ dose escalation to was allowed to the maximum of 150 mg/m2. If grade 4 hematologic toxicity or grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity had occurred, then TMZ dose was reduced in 25 mg/m2 steps. If grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity occurred, patient treatment was halted. If grade 4 hematologic toxicity or grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity continued when TMZ dose was in the minimum of 75 mg/m2, patient treatment was halted.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CDDP

Intervention Type DRUG

Temozolomide

If hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 4.0) from the previous cycle had been grade 0 or 1, then TMZ dose escalation to was allowed to the maximum of 150 mg/m2. If grade 4 hematologic toxicity or grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity had occurred, then TMZ dose was reduced in 25 mg/m2 steps. If grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity occurred, patient treatment was halted. If grade 4 hematologic toxicity or grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity continued when TMZ dose was in the minimum of 75 mg/m2, patient treatment was halted.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Histological diagnosis of primary tumor as high-grade gliomas (WHO III or IV)
* All patients should complete radiation therapy for primary gliomas.
* MRI showed unequivocal evidence of tumor recurrence or progression.
* The time to be enrolled should be more than 90 days after the radiation therapy.
* Written informed consent
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) score: 0-2
* The patients with recurrent gliomas were treated without dose-dense TMZ therapy before enrollment.
* Surgical interventions for recurrent gliomas are permitted and patients with no residual tumor are permitted

Exclusion Criteria

* Abnormal function of liver or renal (value more than 1.5 fold normal upper limit)
* Blood routing: Hb \< 90g/L, absolute neutrophil count≤1.5\*10\^9/L, platelet \< 100\*10\^9/L
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Allergic to administered drugs
* Radiation therapy in the previous 90 days before enrollment
* The patients with recurrent gliomas were treated with dose-dense TMZ therapy before enrollment.
* Acute infection in need of antibiotics intravenously
* Participation in other clinical trials in the 90 days before enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Huashan Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhang Zhenyu

M.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhiyong Qin, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Huashan Hospital

Ying Mao, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Huashan Hospital

Yu Yao, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Huashan Hospital

ZhenYu Zhang

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Huashan Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Huashan Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Huashan H

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CAT001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.