Trial Outcomes & Findings for Investigation of Iron Uptake From Micronutrient Fortified Powder Versus From Tailored Control in Milk (NCT NCT02254460)
NCT ID: NCT02254460
Last Updated: 2017-07-11
Results Overview
Iron uptake was measured using stable isotopes of 57Fe and 58Fe to label the test and control products. Fractional iron absorption levels of 57Fe and 58Fe were calculated, to give a direct measure of the iron uptake from each of the study treatments.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
Day 15
2017-07-11
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from two centers in India.
A total of 37 participants were screened, 25 were randomized and 24 completed the study. One participant withdrew from the study due to an adverse event (AE).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Test Followed by Control
Patients first received micronutrient fortified nutritional beverage powder (test) and then energy, iron and calcium equivalent beverage powder without micronutrient fortification (control), packed as 27 grams (g) individual sachets, administered as a single serve in a total volume of 100 milliliters (mL) lukewarm milk for oral consumption. 1mL solution containing 3 milligrams/milliliters (mg/mL) of the stable iron isotope (57Fe,58Fe) was added to the graduated drinking container followed by a sachet of the study beverage powder. Lukewarm milk was added to the container to make up the volume to 100mL of reconstituted beverage
|
Control Follwed by Test
Patients first received energy, iron and calcium equivalent beverage powder without micronutrient fortification (control) and then micronutrient fortified nutritional beverage powder (test), packed as 27g individual sachets, administered as a single serve in a total volume of 100mL of lukewarm milk for oral consumption. 1mL solution containing 3mg/mL of the stable iron isotope (57Fe,58Fe) was added to the graduated drinking container followed by a sachet of the study beverage powder. Lukewarm milk was added to the container to make up the volume to 100mL of reconstituted beverage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
13
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Test Followed by Control
Patients first received micronutrient fortified nutritional beverage powder (test) and then energy, iron and calcium equivalent beverage powder without micronutrient fortification (control), packed as 27 grams (g) individual sachets, administered as a single serve in a total volume of 100 milliliters (mL) lukewarm milk for oral consumption. 1mL solution containing 3 milligrams/milliliters (mg/mL) of the stable iron isotope (57Fe,58Fe) was added to the graduated drinking container followed by a sachet of the study beverage powder. Lukewarm milk was added to the container to make up the volume to 100mL of reconstituted beverage
|
Control Follwed by Test
Patients first received energy, iron and calcium equivalent beverage powder without micronutrient fortification (control) and then micronutrient fortified nutritional beverage powder (test), packed as 27g individual sachets, administered as a single serve in a total volume of 100mL of lukewarm milk for oral consumption. 1mL solution containing 3mg/mL of the stable iron isotope (57Fe,58Fe) was added to the graduated drinking container followed by a sachet of the study beverage powder. Lukewarm milk was added to the container to make up the volume to 100mL of reconstituted beverage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Investigation of Iron Uptake From Micronutrient Fortified Powder Versus From Tailored Control in Milk
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Overall
n=25 Participants
Micronutrient fortified nutritional beverage powder (test) and energy, iron and calcium equivalent beverage powder without micronutrient fortification (control), packed as 27 g individual sachets, administered as a single serve in a total volume of 100 mL lukewarm milk for oral consumption. 1mL solution containing 3mg/mL of the stable isotope (57Fe,58Fe) was added to the graduated drinking container followed by a sachet of the study beverage powder. Lukewarm milk was added to the container to make up the volume to 100mL of reconstituted beverage.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
Years
|
8.60 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.000 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 15Population: Per protocol (PP) population, defined as all participants who received at least one study treatment administration and who did not have any protocol violations deemed to affect evaluation of the iron absorption. This analysis was conducted on PP population.
Iron uptake was measured using stable isotopes of 57Fe and 58Fe to label the test and control products. Fractional iron absorption levels of 57Fe and 58Fe were calculated, to give a direct measure of the iron uptake from each of the study treatments.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test
n=24 Participants
Micronutrient fortified nutritional beverage powder, packed as 27g individual sachets, administered as a single serve in a total volume of 100 mL lukewarm milk for oral consumption. 1mL solution containing 3mg/mL of the stable iron isotope (57Fe,58Fe) was added to the graduated drinking container followed by a sachet of the study beverage powder (test). Lukewarm milk was added to the container to make up the volume to 100mL of reconstituted beverage.
|
Control
n=24 Participants
Energy, iron and calcium equivalent beverage powder without micronutrient fortification, packed as 27g individual sachets, administered as a single serve in a total volume of 100mL of lukewarm milk for oral consumption.1mL solution containing 3mg/mL of the stable iron isotope (57Fe,58Fe) was added to the graduated drinking container followed by a sachet of the study beverage powder (control). Lukewarm milk was added to the container to make up the volume to 100mL of reconstituted beverage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Fractional Iron Absorption
|
2.08 % Iron Absorbed
Standard Deviation 1.263
|
1.25 % Iron Absorbed
Standard Deviation 0.922
|
Adverse Events
Test
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Test
n=25 participants at risk
Micronutrient fortified nutritional beverage powder, packed as 27g individual sachets, administered as a single serve in a total volume of 100 mL lukewarm milk for oral consumption. 1mL solution containing 3mg/mL of the stable iron isotope (57Fe,58Fe) was added to the graduated drinking container followed by a sachet of the study beverage powder (test). Lukewarm milk was added to the container to make up the volume to 100mL of reconstituted beverage.
|
Control
n=24 participants at risk
Energy, iron and calcium equivalent beverage powder without micronutrient fortification, packed as 27g individual sachets, administered as a single serve in a total volume of 100mL of lukewarm milk for oral consumption. 1mL solution containing 3mg/mL of the stable iron isotope (57Fe, 58Fe) was added to the graduated drinking container followed by a sachet of the study beverage powder (control). Lukewarm milk was added to the container to make up the volume to 100mL of reconstituted beverage.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
4.0%
1/25
|
0.00%
0/24
|
Additional Information
GSK Response Center
GlaxoSmithKline
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER