Innovative MRI Techniques to Improve Treatment Stratification of Patients With Esophageal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT02253602
Last Updated: 2019-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-30
2018-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Better stratification of patients with esophageal cancer is therefore urgently needed. Functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques (MRI) can provide in vivo, quantitative information on tumor biology and may prove to be a useful non-invasive tool for this purpose. In this project, ultra-small superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIO) enhanced MRI using ferumoxytol (Rienso®), diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) and T2\* MRI will be developed, both in terms of improvement of acquisition and data processing techniques.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Positron Emission Tomography in Determining Stage of Esophageal Cancer
NCT00004867
Chemoradiation and Panitumumab for Esophageal Cancer
NCT01077999
A Phase II Study of Chemoradiotherapy With Nimotuzumab in Unresectable Esophageal Cancer
NCT04207918
Preoperative Image-guided Identification of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer
NCT03474341
PReoperative Identification Of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer
NCT02125448
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objectives of the study
1. To determine the optimal acquisition technique for USPIO enhanced MRI and DWI and T2\* MRI of esophageal cancer in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, time resolution and spatial resolution.
2. To determine the optimal data processing approach for USPIO enhanced MRI, DWI and T2\* MRI of esophageal cancer.
3. To explore the correlation between lymph node involvement on USPIO enhanced MRI in relation to results obtained at pathological examination.
4. To explore the correlation of DWI and T2\* MRI of esophageal cancer in relation to stromal involvement and markers of hypoxia and vasculature obtained at pathological examination.
5. To explore the accuracy of MRI concerning circumferential tumor delineation compared to pathological examination.
6. To determine the feasibility to detect lymph node involvement on USPIO enhanced MRI in initial staging, prior to preoperative chemoradiation therapy.
7. To determine the correlation between lymph node involvement on pre-treatment USPIO MRI in relation to results obtained at pathology after complete treatment.
The project will be executed in four steps:
1. Optimization of acquisition and data processing techniques of USPIO MRI, DWI and T2\* in five healthy volunteers to optimize field of view, number of slices, slice thickness (objectives 1 and 2).
2. Assessment of ferumoxytol dose-response with three different dose levels at three different time points in six healthy volunteers (two per dose-level) (objectives 1 and 2).
3. Using the data of (1) and (2): assessment of USPIO MRI, DWI and T2\* MRI in 20 esophageal cancer patients with clinically suspect lymph nodes directly before surgery (objectives 3, 4 and 5).
4. Using the data of (1) and (2): assessment of USPIO MRI, DWI and T2\* MRI in 10 esophageal cancer patients with clinically suspect lymph nodes, before initial start of the treatment (objectives 6 and 7).
For step 1 and 2 we aim to include healthy volunteers; for step 3 and 4 we aim to include patients with esophageal cancer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ferumoxytol Dose optimization
We will assess three different dose levels of Ferumoxytol (4 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg).
Images will be acquired at baseline (before Ferumoxytol administration), during injection of Ferumoxytol and 24, 48 and 72 hours after Ferumoxytol administration to identify the optimal moment of scanning.To assess whether USPIOs are sufficiently cleared within 12 weeks from lymph nodes, the MRI scans will be repeated in all six volunteers at 12 weeks after Ferumoxytol administration. Thus, volunteers will undergo an MRI scan for five times. Ferumoxytol is administered only once
Ferumoxytol
maximum rate of administration 1 ml/sec
Before Surgery
Twenty patients will be measured directly before surgery. Patients will be measured at baseline, during injection of Ferumoxytol and 24, 48 or 72 hours after Ferumoxytol administration, depending on the results of the dose optimization study. MR parameters will be correlated with pathology data.
Ferumoxytol
maximum rate of administration 1 ml/sec
Before Neoadjucant therapy
Ten patients will be measured before start of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Patients will be measured at baseline, during injection of Ferumoxytol and 24, 48 or 72 hours after Ferumoxytol administration, based on the dose optimization study. MR parameters will be correlated with pathology data.
Ferumoxytol
maximum rate of administration 1 ml/sec
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ferumoxytol
maximum rate of administration 1 ml/sec
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Suspected nodal involvement on EUS or CT at diagnosis.
* WHO-performance score 0-2
* Scheduled for surgery
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Contra-indications for MR scanning, including patients with a pacemaker, cochlear implant or neurostimulator; patients with non-MR compatible metallic implants in their eye, spine, thorax or abdomen; or a non-MR compatible aneurysm clip in their brain; patients with severe claustrophobia
* Active inflammatory diseases
* History of anaphylaxis or other hypersensitivity reactions
* History of iron overload
* History of abnormal liver function, or elevated liver enzymes (ALAT, ASAT \> 3 times upper limit of normal)
* Elevated Serum Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) (\>50%) or hemoglobin (\>10.5mmol/L)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
H.W.M. van Laarhoven
MD, PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hanneke WM van Laarhoven, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Academic Medical Center
Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL48757.018.14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.