Innovative MRI Techniques to Improve Treatment Stratification of Patients With Esophageal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02253602

Last Updated: 2019-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

41 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current standard treatment of resectable esophageal cancer consists of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection. However, some patients develop recurrent disease despite chemoradiation and additional (systemic) treatment might have been indicated. Other patients show a (nearly) complete response after chemoradiation and could possibly have been treated with a less extensive treatment regimen. In patients without a threatened circumferential resection margin (CRM) and lymph node metastases chemoradiotherapy could possibly be omitted.

Better stratification of patients with esophageal cancer is therefore urgently needed. Functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques (MRI) can provide in vivo, quantitative information on tumor biology and may prove to be a useful non-invasive tool for this purpose. In this project, ultra-small superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIO) enhanced MRI using ferumoxytol (Rienso®), diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) and T2\* MRI will be developed, both in terms of improvement of acquisition and data processing techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The outcome of esophageal cancer is poor, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 10% worldwide. In resectable esophageal cancer, outcome can be improved by multimodality treatment. The current standard treatment of resectable esophageal cancer consists of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by resection. In the Netherlands, the preferred chemoradiation regimen consists of carboplatin plus paclitaxel with concurrent radiotherapy in 23 fractions of 1.8 Gray.1 In a meta-analysis the benefit of chemoradiation over surgery alone for both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma has been shown.2 However, not all patients benefit from this preoperative treatment regimen. Some patients develop recurrent disease despite chemoradiation and additional (systemic) treatment might have been indicated. In contrast, in other patients a (nearly) complete response is observed after chemoradiation and those patients could possibly have been treated with a less extensive treatment regimen. Furthermore, in patients without a threatened circumferential resection margin (CRM) and lymph node metastases chemoradiotherapy could possibly be omitted, reducing patients' risk for complications and unnecessary, expensive treatment. Thus, stratification of patients with esophageal cancer is urgently needed. Functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques (MRI) can provide in vivo, quantitative information on tumor biology and may prove to be a useful non-invasive tool for this purpose. In this project, ultra-small superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide (USPIO) enhanced MRI using ferumoxytol (Rienso®), diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) and T2\* MRI will be developed, both in terms of improvement of acquisition and data processing techniques. For patients with esophageal cancer, the proposed acquisition techniques and data processing have not been performed before.

Objectives of the study

1. To determine the optimal acquisition technique for USPIO enhanced MRI and DWI and T2\* MRI of esophageal cancer in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, time resolution and spatial resolution.
2. To determine the optimal data processing approach for USPIO enhanced MRI, DWI and T2\* MRI of esophageal cancer.
3. To explore the correlation between lymph node involvement on USPIO enhanced MRI in relation to results obtained at pathological examination.
4. To explore the correlation of DWI and T2\* MRI of esophageal cancer in relation to stromal involvement and markers of hypoxia and vasculature obtained at pathological examination.
5. To explore the accuracy of MRI concerning circumferential tumor delineation compared to pathological examination.
6. To determine the feasibility to detect lymph node involvement on USPIO enhanced MRI in initial staging, prior to preoperative chemoradiation therapy.
7. To determine the correlation between lymph node involvement on pre-treatment USPIO MRI in relation to results obtained at pathology after complete treatment.

The project will be executed in four steps:

1. Optimization of acquisition and data processing techniques of USPIO MRI, DWI and T2\* in five healthy volunteers to optimize field of view, number of slices, slice thickness (objectives 1 and 2).
2. Assessment of ferumoxytol dose-response with three different dose levels at three different time points in six healthy volunteers (two per dose-level) (objectives 1 and 2).
3. Using the data of (1) and (2): assessment of USPIO MRI, DWI and T2\* MRI in 20 esophageal cancer patients with clinically suspect lymph nodes directly before surgery (objectives 3, 4 and 5).
4. Using the data of (1) and (2): assessment of USPIO MRI, DWI and T2\* MRI in 10 esophageal cancer patients with clinically suspect lymph nodes, before initial start of the treatment (objectives 6 and 7).

For step 1 and 2 we aim to include healthy volunteers; for step 3 and 4 we aim to include patients with esophageal cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophageal Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ferumoxytol Dose optimization

We will assess three different dose levels of Ferumoxytol (4 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg).

Images will be acquired at baseline (before Ferumoxytol administration), during injection of Ferumoxytol and 24, 48 and 72 hours after Ferumoxytol administration to identify the optimal moment of scanning.To assess whether USPIOs are sufficiently cleared within 12 weeks from lymph nodes, the MRI scans will be repeated in all six volunteers at 12 weeks after Ferumoxytol administration. Thus, volunteers will undergo an MRI scan for five times. Ferumoxytol is administered only once

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ferumoxytol

Intervention Type DRUG

maximum rate of administration 1 ml/sec

Before Surgery

Twenty patients will be measured directly before surgery. Patients will be measured at baseline, during injection of Ferumoxytol and 24, 48 or 72 hours after Ferumoxytol administration, depending on the results of the dose optimization study. MR parameters will be correlated with pathology data.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ferumoxytol

Intervention Type DRUG

maximum rate of administration 1 ml/sec

Before Neoadjucant therapy

Ten patients will be measured before start of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Patients will be measured at baseline, during injection of Ferumoxytol and 24, 48 or 72 hours after Ferumoxytol administration, based on the dose optimization study. MR parameters will be correlated with pathology data.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ferumoxytol

Intervention Type DRUG

maximum rate of administration 1 ml/sec

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ferumoxytol

maximum rate of administration 1 ml/sec

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

USPIO Rienso

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with biopsy proven esophageal cancer (squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma)
* Suspected nodal involvement on EUS or CT at diagnosis.
* WHO-performance score 0-2
* Scheduled for surgery
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering adequate informed consent or compliance with the study protocol
* Contra-indications for MR scanning, including patients with a pacemaker, cochlear implant or neurostimulator; patients with non-MR compatible metallic implants in their eye, spine, thorax or abdomen; or a non-MR compatible aneurysm clip in their brain; patients with severe claustrophobia
* Active inflammatory diseases
* History of anaphylaxis or other hypersensitivity reactions
* History of iron overload
* History of abnormal liver function, or elevated liver enzymes (ALAT, ASAT \> 3 times upper limit of normal)
* Elevated Serum Transferrin Saturation (TSAT) (\>50%) or hemoglobin (\>10.5mmol/L)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

H.W.M. van Laarhoven

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hanneke WM van Laarhoven, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Academic Medical Center

Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL48757.018.14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.