An International Randomized Study to Compare SPIES Versus WLI

NCT ID: NCT02252549

Last Updated: 2021-07-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

700 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-04-30

Study Completion Date

2021-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which the efficacy between SPIES assisted and WLI assisted TURB are compared. Subjects in the experimental arm (Arm A) will undergo SPIES assisted TURB, whereas subjects in the control arm (Arm B) will receive treatment with WLI assisted TURB only. Baseline characteristics will be recorded, as well as short and long-term follow up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which the recurrence rates of cancer between SPIES assisted and WLI assisted TURB are compared. Randomization is stratified by tumor multiplicity (single or multiple), tumor status (primary or recurrent) and macroscopic findings (papillary or flat, where CIS is scored as flat lesion). Patients randomized into the experimental arm (Arm A) will undergo SPIES and WLI assisted TURB, whereas the patients in the control arm (Arm B) will undergo WLI only assisted TURB. WLI is chosen as control, since it is considered the gold standard for detecting bladder tumors. Short and long term follow up will be recorded in order to evaluate the health gains for patients over a longer period. Perioperative (30 days) complications will be compared between the two treatment arms to evaluate the safety of SPIES.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bladder Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

SPIES+WLI assisted TURB

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SPIES+WLI assisted TURB

Intervention Type DEVICE

B

WLI assisted TURB

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

WLI assisted TURB

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SPIES+WLI assisted TURB

Intervention Type DEVICE

WLI assisted TURB

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has signed informed consent
* Is scheduled for treatment of a primary or recurrent NMIBC
* Is aged 18 years or older
* Has or has had no tumors in the upper urinary tract
* Has had no previous irradiation of the pelvis

Exclusion Criteria

* Gross haematuria at the time of TURB (i.e. heavy bladder bleeding resulting in marked amounts of blood in the urine which may interfere with cystoscopy)
* Participation in other clinical studies with investigational drugs either concurrently or within the last 30 days
* Pregnancy or breast-feeding (all women of child-bearing potential must document a negative serum or urine pregnancy test at screening and are suggested to use the contraceptive pill or an intrauterine device (IUD) during the treatments and for at least one months thereafter)
* Conditions associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance
* Has had instillation therapy in the six months prior to the screening visit
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean de la Rosette

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de la Rosette J, Martov A, Hurle R, Favre G, Mamoulakis C, Castanheira de Oliveira M, Stenzl A, Linares-Espinos E, Trelles Guzman CR, Gravas S, Knoll T, Boz MY, Herrmann T, Laguna P. Conventional white light imaging-assisted transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) versus IMAGE1S-assisted TURBT in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: trial protocol and 18 months results. World J Urol. 2022 Mar;40(3):727-738. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03866-4. Epub 2021 Nov 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34741631 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NL50451.018.14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.