Optimization With SonR Method in the ClinicAl pRactice

NCT ID: NCT02250547

Last Updated: 2017-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

278 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-31

Study Completion Date

2017-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluate the percentage of patients optimized at least once every month by the SonR automatic optimization method, until M6 follow-up, in Heart failure (HF) patients prevalently in sinus rhythm

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Thanks to the SonR technology it is possible to adjust the optimal VV and AV delays over time, in a fully automatic, time saving and operator independent way. It is possible to optimize the VV and AV delays in office, during follow-up visits, but also enable the automatic optimization that weekly optimize the AV and VV delays.

For the reasons mentioned above, the sponsor expects that the SonR optimization method increases the number of patients optimized systematically at each follow-up The purpose of this study is to evaluate the percentage of patients optimized at least once every month by the SonR automatic optimization method, until M6 follow-up, in HF patients prevalently in sinus rhythm.

The primary objective will be evaluated as the percentage of patients successfully optimized every month until M6.

A patient is considered successfully optimized by the SonR during one month if at least one Atri-Ventricular (AV) or Ventricular-Ventricular (VV) optimization is completed by the SonR automatic optimization method during the month.

Patients eligible for the analysis are those with SonR automatic optimization function enabled and at least 50% of the time in sinus rhythm

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CRT Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient eligible for implantation or implanted for less than 6 weeks (primo-implant, replacement, upgrade) with a a Paradym RF SonR CRT-D and SonRtip Atrial Lead, according to current available guidelines (RF=radio frequency)
* Patient has signed and dated informed consent (according to the laws and regulations of the country in which the observation is performed)

Exclusion Criteria

* Persistent atrial arrhythmias
* Already included in another interventional clinical study
* Not available for routine follow-up visits
* Inability to understand the purpose of the study
* Under guardianship
* Under18 years old
* Drug addiction or abuse
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

LivaNova

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carsten W Israel

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Evangelischen Krankenhaus Bielefeld - Germany

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Allgemeines Krankenhaus Linz (AKH LINZ)

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

CH Sud Francilien

Corbeil Essonne, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Haguenau

Haguenau, , France

Site Status

CH de Marne la Vallée

Jossigny, , France

Site Status

CMC du Mans - Pôle Santé Sud

Le Mans, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique du Bois

Lille, , France

Site Status

Chu Dupuytren

Limoges, , France

Site Status

CH St Philibert

Lomme, , France

Site Status

CH St Joseph et St Luc

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Polyclinique Beauregard

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Centre hospitalier Belford Montbéliard

Montbéliard, , France

Site Status

CH Poitiers

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Victor Provo

Roubaix, , France

Site Status

Evangelisches Krankenhaus

Bielefeld, , Germany

Site Status

PAP2 - Kardiologische Praxis Papenburg

Papenburg, , Germany

Site Status

Osp. S. Salvatore

L’Aquila, , Italy

Site Status

S.Giovanni Bosco

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital Espírito Santo, E.P.E

Evora, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital Central Faro

Faro, , Portugal

Site Status

Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte (CHLN) - Hospital de Santa Maria

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria France Germany Italy Portugal Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RCSY01 OSCAR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id