The Goal dIrected perFusion Trial in Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02250131

Last Updated: 2023-11-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

350 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Previous studies (1-5) have demonstrated that oxygen delivery (DO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are associated with renal outcome in cardiac surgery. The critical value for DO2 is around 262 - 272 mL/min/m2, and the correspondent critical value of DO2/VCO2 ratio is around 5.0.

Patients with nadir DO2 and DO2/VCO2 ratio below these critical levels have an increased incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac operations.

These observations offer an interpretation for the well-known deleterious effects of excessive hemodilution during CPB, supported by many studies where an association between nadir hematocrit (HCT) on CPB and bad outcomes (especially renal) was found (6-8). It is reasonable to hypothesize that a low oxygen delivery may determine an ischemic damage to the kidney, that due to its peculiar circulation is particularly susceptible to a decrease in the oxygen supply.

However, there is no evidence that a strategy directed towards the specific goal of avoiding critical values of DO2 during CPB may actually decrease the postoperative AKI rate.

The present study is designed to verify the hypothesis that a strategy based on a goal-directed perfusion, aimed to avoid a nadir DO2 below the critical threshold, is effective in limiting the postoperative AKI rate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

2\. Study design Multicenter, international, prospective, randomized and controlled study. Patient population

1. Inclusion criteria: Adult (\> 18 years) patients undergoing cardiac operations with CPB.

Expected CPB duration \> 90 minutes.
2. Exclusion criteria: severe chronic renal failure (dialysis or serum creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dL); emergent (must be operated immediately) procedure; moderate-severe anemia (preoperative HCT \< 32%); expected nadir CPB temperature \< 32 °C.
3. Withdrawal criteria (after randomization): Need for allogeneic blood transfusions before CPB. Need for allogeneic blood to prime the CPB circuit. DHCA or other violations of the entry criteria. CPB duration below 90 minutes will not be withdrawal criterion, but a subroup analysis is anticipated.

Primary outcomes

Incidence of AKI, defined according to the AKIN criteria (9) as:

AKI stage 1: peak postoperative serum creatinine \> 1.5 x baseline or absolute increase 0.3 mg/dL, within the first 48 hours after surgery.

AKI stage 2: peak postoperative serum creatinine \> 2.0 x baseline, within the first 48 hours after surgery (AKI stage 3 will be incorporated in the AKI stage 2 group).

Any AKI: stage 1 or higher Peak serum creatinine: within the first 48 postoperative hours. Diagnosis of AKI must be reached within the first 48 hours after surgery, but staging may require a longer time (up to 7 days after surgery).

Secondary outcomes Length of ICU stay (days) Transfusion (red blood cells) rate and amount of red blood cells units transfused Major morbidity (according to STS): mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours, AKI stage 2, surgical revision, mediastinitis, stroke.

Operative (in-hospital) mortality 3. Sample size The power analysis is based on the primary outcome "any AKI".

Data from the previous study (1) provide the following figures for the total patient population:

Any AKI rate: 21.2% AKI stage 1: 8.8% AKI stage 2-3: 12.4% With the following distribution according to a cut-off value settled at a nadir DO2 of 280 mL/min/m2.

Outcome All cases N=354 DO2 \< 280 mL/min/m2 N= 181 DO2 ≥ 280 mL/min/m2 N= 173 P Any AKI 75 (21.2%) 54 (29.8%) 21 (12.1%) 0.001 AKI stage 1 31 (8.8%) 23 (12.7%) 8 (4.6%) 0.007 AKI stage 2-3 44 (12.4%) 31 (17.1%) 13 (7.5%) 0.006

Based on the above table, we know that the Control Group will spontaneously meet the goal in 50% of the cases, and that will have an any AKI rate of 21%.

We hypothesize that the Goal-Directed Perfusion (GDP) group will meet the goal in 95% of the cases. When the goal is met, the AKIN rate will be 12%; when it is not, it will be 29% This will lead to an expected AKI rate in GDP group of 12.8%.

Therefore, the effect size will be a 40% reduction in the AKI rate (12.8% in GDP group, 21% in Control group.

Based on this effect size, an alpha value of 0.05 and a beta value of 0.20, the number of patients in each group is 350, for a total patient population of 700.

Data analysis will be restricted to patients with a CPB duration \> 60 minutes. Same applies to extremely long CPB duration, based on the percentile distribution of CPB.

Interim analyses planned at 25%, 50%, and 75% of patients enrollment, with stopping rules for futility, safety, efficacy. Stopping rule for futility: relative risk for the primary outcome not inclusing the hypothesized value of 0.6 within 99% confidence interval at 50% interim analysis or 95% at 75% interim analysis. Stopping rule for efficacy in presence of a difference in favour of the GDP arm at a P value of 0.01 at 25% interim analysis or 0.05 at the 50% and 75% interim analyses. Stopping rule for safety in presence of a difference in favor of the control arm at a P value of 0.01 at the 25% interim analysis or 0.05 at the 50% and 75% interim analyses (Ethics Committe amendment August 2016).

4\. Interventions Patients will be randomly allocated to the Control or the GDP group. Randomization will be performed locally at each participating Institution, using computer-generated schemes.

The patients in control Group will be treated according to the local standards. The patients in GDP group will be treated according to the GDP (see table below).

CONTROL (N=350) TREATMENT (N=350) GDP monitor GDP monitor NO Blood prime (withdrawal) NO Blood prime (withdrawal) Priming volume and nature according to local standards Priming volume and nature according to local standards Perfusion targeted on body surface area and °C Perfusion targeted on DO2 ≥ 280 mL/min/m2 Perfusion pressure according to local standards Perfusion pressure according to local standards Transfusion triggered by HCT according to local standards Transfusion triggered by venous oxygen saturation \< 68% and/or oxygen extraction rate \> 40% Postoperative care according to local standards Postoperative care according to local standards

Details of the GDP protocol:

The main intervention to achieve the target value of DO2 is increasing the pump flow. Additional interventions include hemofiltration to increase the HCT.

Transfusion protocol

1. During CPB: Transfusions are mandatory below a HCT of 18%. Transfusions are generally prohibited for an HCT \> 21%. However, based on the individual judgement that the patient is actually in need for packed red cells, transfusions are allowed between an HCT of 22% and 24%. In this case, this will be considered as a protocol violation, but the patient will not be withdrawn.

Transfusions are always prohibited for an HCT \> 24%.
2. After CPB: HCT \< 18%: packed red cells are mandatory HCT between 19% and 23%: packed red cells are allowed HCT between 24% and 30%: packed red cells generally prohibited, but admitted based on physician's judgement. This represents a protocol violation. In this case, this will be considered as a protocol violation, but the patient will not be withdrawn.

HCT \> 30%: packed red cells are prohibited.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Kidney Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Routine cardiopulmonary bypass technique. Flow adjusted on BSA and temperature

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Goal Directed Perfusion

Perfusion targeted at oxygen delivery

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Perfusion targeted at oxygen delivery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Flow on cardiopulmonary bypass based on a target oxygen delivery \> 280 mL/min/m2

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Perfusion targeted at oxygen delivery

Flow on cardiopulmonary bypass based on a target oxygen delivery \> 280 mL/min/m2

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cardiopulmonary bypass machine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing cardiac operations with CPB. Expected CPB duration \> 90 minutes.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marco Ranucci

Director of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia and ICU Dept

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marco Ranucci, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IRCCS Policlinico San Donato

San Donato Milanese, MI, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ranucci M. Perioperative renal failure: hypoperfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass? Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;11(4):265-8. doi: 10.1177/1089253207311141.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18270190 (View on PubMed)

Ranucci M, Isgro G, Romitti F, Mele S, Biagioli B, Giomarelli P. Anaerobic metabolism during cardiopulmonary bypass: predictive value of carbon dioxide derived parameters. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jun;81(6):2189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.025.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16731152 (View on PubMed)

Ranucci M, Romitti F, Isgro G, Cotza M, Brozzi S, Boncilli A, Ditta A. Oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary bypass and acute renal failure after coronary operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Dec;80(6):2213-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.05.069.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16305874 (View on PubMed)

de Somer F, Mulholland JW, Bryan MR, Aloisio T, Van Nooten GJ, Ranucci M. O2 delivery and CO2 production during cardiopulmonary bypass as determinants of acute kidney injury: time for a goal-directed perfusion management? Crit Care. 2011 Aug 10;15(4):R192. doi: 10.1186/cc10349.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21831302 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GIFT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id