Trial Outcomes & Findings for Multi-Tracer PET Prediction and Assessment of Response to Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer Patients (NCT NCT02245217)
NCT ID: NCT02245217
Last Updated: 2021-10-15
Results Overview
The patients underwent baseline and repeat PET/CT imaging (after one cycle) with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and fluorothymidine (FLT). The percent change in the SUVmax for FDG was determined. From these percent change determinations, a response determination was obtained based on the EORTC criteria. EORTC response criteria define a response as \>25% reduction in SUVmax.
COMPLETED
NA
9 participants
1 month
2021-10-15
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PET/CT Imaging Arm
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT scan to assess treatment efficacy
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Multi-Tracer PET Prediction and Assessment of Response to Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PET/CT Imaging Arm
n=9 Participants
PET/CT scan to assess treatment efficacy
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthThe patients underwent baseline and repeat PET/CT imaging (after one cycle) with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and fluorothymidine (FLT). The percent change in the SUVmax for FDG was determined. From these percent change determinations, a response determination was obtained based on the EORTC criteria. EORTC response criteria define a response as \>25% reduction in SUVmax.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PET/CT Imaging Arm
n=7 Participants
PET/CT scan to assess treatment efficacy
|
|---|---|
|
FDG Therapeutic Responses to 1 Cycle
|
6 participant responses based on EORTC
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthPopulation: Patients who completed both baseline and follow-up imaging. A synthesis failure for FLT occurred on the follow-up imaging for one patient, so that patient was excluded from the FLT analysis.
The patients underwent baseline and repeat PET/CT imaging (after one cycle) with FDG and FLT. The percent change in the SUVmax for FLT was determined. From these percent change determinations, a response determination was obtained based on the EORTC criteria. EORTC response criteria define a response as \>25% reduction in SUVmax.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PET/CT Imaging Arm
n=6 Participants
PET/CT scan to assess treatment efficacy
|
|---|---|
|
FLT Therapeutic Responses to 1 Cycle
|
1 participant responses based on EORTC
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 monthThe patients underwent baseline and repeat PET/CT imaging (after one cycle) with FDG and FLT. Tumor response was determined by RECIST 1.1 and defined as a \>30% reduction in tumor size as determined by the sum of the longest diameters of each index lesion
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PET/CT Imaging Arm
n=7 Participants
PET/CT scan to assess treatment efficacy
|
|---|---|
|
RECIST 1.1 Therapeutic Responses to 1 Cycle
|
3 participant responses based on RECIST1.1
|
Adverse Events
PET/CT Imaging Arm
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place