Trial Outcomes & Findings for 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared With Acarbose When in Combination With Metformin in Patients With T2D Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy (NCT NCT02243176)

NCT ID: NCT02243176

Last Updated: 2017-04-14

Results Overview

Primary Objective: Efficacy of saxagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control compared with acarbose plus metformin in patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin. By Measure absolute change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

689 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From baseline to 24 week

Results posted on

2017-04-14

Participant Flow

A total of 689 patients were enrolled into this study from 35 sites in China. The enrolled patient number ranged from 10 to 58 among 24 centers, and 2 to 9 patients from eight centers, none was enrolled in 3 centers. The enrolment period was from 24 Sep 2014 to 29 Sep 2015.

A total of 201 patients were enrolled but not randomized: 171 patients did not meet eligibility criteria, and 24 patients were voluntary discontinuations, two patients developed study-specific withdrawal criteria, one patient lost follow-up, and three patient failed due to other reasons

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Saxagliptin
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Overall Study
STARTED
244
244
Overall Study
COMPLETED
230
229
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
14
15

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Saxagliptin
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Overall Study
Other reason
1
2
Overall Study
protocol specified withdrawal critera
1
3
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
2
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
8
7
Overall Study
Adverse Event
2
2

Baseline Characteristics

24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared With Acarbose When in Combination With Metformin in Patients With T2D Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Total
n=481 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
54.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.51 • n=93 Participants
56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81 • n=4 Participants
55.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.69 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
91 Participants
n=93 Participants
105 Participants
n=4 Participants
196 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
147 Participants
n=93 Participants
138 Participants
n=4 Participants
285 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian (China Mainland)
238 Participants
n=93 Participants
243 Participants
n=4 Participants
481 Participants
n=27 Participants
Height
166.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=93 Participants
165.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.75 • n=4 Participants
166.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.87 • n=27 Participants
Weight
73.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.61 • n=93 Participants
72.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.27 • n=4 Participants
72.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43 • n=27 Participants
BMI
26.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.47 • n=93 Participants
26.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.49 • n=4 Participants
26.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.48 • n=27 Participants
Duration of diabetes mellitus (years)
5.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=93 Participants
5.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.76 • n=4 Participants
5.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.58 • n=27 Participants
Type of diabetes mellitus
Type 2
238 Participants
n=93 Participants
243 Participants
n=4 Participants
481 Participants
n=27 Participants
Type of diabetes mellitus
Other
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Currently taking antidiabetic medication
238 Participants
n=93 Participants
243 Participants
n=4 Participants
481 Participants
n=27 Participants
Any diabetes mellitus complications
No
214 Participants
n=93 Participants
221 Participants
n=4 Participants
435 Participants
n=27 Participants
Any diabetes mellitus complications
Yes
24 Participants
n=93 Participants
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
46 Participants
n=27 Participants
Any relevant medical conditions
Yes
119 Participants
n=93 Participants
125 Participants
n=4 Participants
244 Participants
n=27 Participants
Any relevant medical conditions
No
65 Participants
n=93 Participants
64 Participants
n=4 Participants
129 Participants
n=27 Participants
Any relevant medical conditions
Missing
54 Participants
n=93 Participants
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
108 Participants
n=27 Participants
Any current medication,excluding antidiabetic drugs
Yes
59 Participants
n=93 Participants
73 Participants
n=4 Participants
132 Participants
n=27 Participants
Any current medication,excluding antidiabetic drugs
No
179 Participants
n=93 Participants
170 Participants
n=4 Participants
349 Participants
n=27 Participants
HbA1c (%)
8.23 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85 • n=93 Participants
8.16 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81 • n=4 Participants
8.20 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.83 • n=27 Participants
FPG
9.01 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.14 • n=93 Participants
8.81 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.95 • n=4 Participants
8.90 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.04 • n=27 Participants
2hPPG
11.17 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.82 • n=93 Participants
10.25 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.89 • n=4 Participants
10.7 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.89 • n=27 Participants
Triglycerides
1.99 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12 • n=93 Participants
1.96 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.38 • n=4 Participants
1.97 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26 • n=27 Participants
TC
4.78 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07 • n=93 Participants
4.82 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94 • n=4 Participants
4.80 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01 • n=27 Participants
LDL
2.73 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.89 • n=93 Participants
2.77 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79 • n=4 Participants
2.75 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84 • n=27 Participants
HDL
1.16 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.29 • n=93 Participants
1.2 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=4 Participants
1.18 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Population: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.

Primary Objective: Efficacy of saxagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control compared with acarbose plus metformin in patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin. By Measure absolute change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)
-0.82 % (HbA1c)
Standard Error 0.06
-0.78 % (HbA1c)
Standard Error 0.06

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Population: The Per Protocol analysis set was a subset of the Full analysis set that included subjects who did not have significant protocol deviations that affect the study outcome. The exclusions from the PP analysis set was determined prior to database lock.

The primary endpoint was analyzed based on Per protocol analysis set as the supportive analysis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=219 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=204 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)
-0.83 % (HbA1c)
Standard Error 0.06
-0.80 % (HbA1c)
Standard Error 0.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 weeks

Population: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.

Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients with any gastrointestinal adverse events.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Proportion (%) of Patients With Any GI Adverse Events
NO
94.5 percentage of participants
75.3 percentage of participants
Proportion (%) of Patients With Any GI Adverse Events
YES
5.5 percentage of participants
24.7 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 24 weeks

Population: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.

Secondary Objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving a therapeutic glycemic response defined as HbA1c\<7.0%

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=230 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=229 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response Defined as HbA1c<7.0%
38.3 percentage of participants
41.5 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Whole study duration

Population: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.

Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving HbA1c\<7.0% without GI adverse events.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=230 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=229 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving HbA1c<7.0% Without GI Adverse Events
37.0 percentage of participants
28.8 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Population: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.

Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
-0.99 mmol/l
Standard Error 0.13
-1.01 mmol/l
Standard Error 0.13

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Population: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.

Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=227 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=232 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Change From Baseline in 2H Postprandial Glucose (2HPPG)
-0.77 mmol/l
Standard Error 0.176
-1.07 mmol/l
Standard Error 0.174

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Population: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.

Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function was estimated by the Homeostasis model assessment-β (HOMA-β), which was defined as fasting insulin (mU/mL) x 20 / (fasting glucose (mmol/mL) - 3.5, body weight at week 24

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=227 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=225 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Change From Baseline in HOMA-β
20.56 mU/mmol
Standard Error 5.932
13.08 mU/mmol
Standard Error 5.958

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From baseline to 24 week

Population: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.

Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
-1.36 kg
Standard Error 0.18
-2.05 kg
Standard Error 0.18

Adverse Events

Saxagliptin

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 27 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Acarbose

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 74 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=241 participants at risk
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=244 participants at risk
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Infections and infestations
herpes zoster
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
0.00%
0/244 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
Hepatobiliary disorders
cholecystitis
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
Renal and urinary disorders
Chronic kidney disease
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
0.00%
0/244 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
0.00%
0/244 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
Infections and infestations
Infection
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
0.00%
0/244 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Saxagliptin
n=241 participants at risk
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
Acarbose
n=244 participants at risk
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
3.7%
9/241 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
7.0%
17/244 • Number of events 17 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
1.2%
3/241 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
10.2%
25/244 • Number of events 25 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
7.4%
18/244 • Number of events 18 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.

Additional Information

Xia, Zhang

ASTRAZENECA INVESTMENT (CHINA) CO., LTD.

Phone: +86 21 6030 2288

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60