Trial Outcomes & Findings for 24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared With Acarbose When in Combination With Metformin in Patients With T2D Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy (NCT NCT02243176)
NCT ID: NCT02243176
Last Updated: 2017-04-14
Results Overview
Primary Objective: Efficacy of saxagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control compared with acarbose plus metformin in patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin. By Measure absolute change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24
COMPLETED
PHASE4
689 participants
From baseline to 24 week
2017-04-14
Participant Flow
A total of 689 patients were enrolled into this study from 35 sites in China. The enrolled patient number ranged from 10 to 58 among 24 centers, and 2 to 9 patients from eight centers, none was enrolled in 3 centers. The enrolment period was from 24 Sep 2014 to 29 Sep 2015.
A total of 201 patients were enrolled but not randomized: 171 patients did not meet eligibility criteria, and 24 patients were voluntary discontinuations, two patients developed study-specific withdrawal criteria, one patient lost follow-up, and three patient failed due to other reasons
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
244
|
244
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
230
|
229
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
15
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Other reason
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
protocol specified withdrawal critera
|
1
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
8
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
24-Week, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group, Open-label, Active Controlled Phase IV Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared With Acarbose When in Combination With Metformin in Patients With T2D Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Monotherapy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
Total
n=481 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.51 • n=93 Participants
|
56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81 • n=4 Participants
|
55.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.69 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
91 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
196 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
147 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
138 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
285 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian (China Mainland)
|
238 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
243 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
481 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Height
|
166.3 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=93 Participants
|
165.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.75 • n=4 Participants
|
166.1 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.87 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
73.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.61 • n=93 Participants
|
72.6 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.27 • n=4 Participants
|
72.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.43 • n=27 Participants
|
|
BMI
|
26.4 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.47 • n=93 Participants
|
26.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.49 • n=4 Participants
|
26.3 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.48 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Duration of diabetes mellitus (years)
|
5.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4 • n=93 Participants
|
5.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.76 • n=4 Participants
|
5.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.58 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Type of diabetes mellitus
Type 2
|
238 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
243 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
481 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Type of diabetes mellitus
Other
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Currently taking antidiabetic medication
|
238 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
243 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
481 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Any diabetes mellitus complications
No
|
214 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
221 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
435 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Any diabetes mellitus complications
Yes
|
24 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Any relevant medical conditions
Yes
|
119 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
244 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Any relevant medical conditions
No
|
65 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
129 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Any relevant medical conditions
Missing
|
54 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Any current medication,excluding antidiabetic drugs
Yes
|
59 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
73 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
132 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Any current medication,excluding antidiabetic drugs
No
|
179 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
349 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
HbA1c (%)
|
8.23 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.85 • n=93 Participants
|
8.16 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81 • n=4 Participants
|
8.20 %
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.83 • n=27 Participants
|
|
FPG
|
9.01 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.14 • n=93 Participants
|
8.81 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.95 • n=4 Participants
|
8.90 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.04 • n=27 Participants
|
|
2hPPG
|
11.17 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.82 • n=93 Participants
|
10.25 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.89 • n=4 Participants
|
10.7 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.89 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Triglycerides
|
1.99 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.12 • n=93 Participants
|
1.96 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.38 • n=4 Participants
|
1.97 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.26 • n=27 Participants
|
|
TC
|
4.78 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.07 • n=93 Participants
|
4.82 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94 • n=4 Participants
|
4.80 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01 • n=27 Participants
|
|
LDL
|
2.73 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.89 • n=93 Participants
|
2.77 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79 • n=4 Participants
|
2.75 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.84 • n=27 Participants
|
|
HDL
|
1.16 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.29 • n=93 Participants
|
1.2 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=4 Participants
|
1.18 mmol/l
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.3 • n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 weekPopulation: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.
Primary Objective: Efficacy of saxagliptin plus metformin on glycemic control compared with acarbose plus metformin in patients with T2D inadequately controlled with metformin. By Measure absolute change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 24
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)
|
-0.82 % (HbA1c)
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.78 % (HbA1c)
Standard Error 0.06
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 weekPopulation: The Per Protocol analysis set was a subset of the Full analysis set that included subjects who did not have significant protocol deviations that affect the study outcome. The exclusions from the PP analysis set was determined prior to database lock.
The primary endpoint was analyzed based on Per protocol analysis set as the supportive analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=219 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=204 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 24 (DAO)
|
-0.83 % (HbA1c)
Standard Error 0.06
|
-0.80 % (HbA1c)
Standard Error 0.07
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.
Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients with any gastrointestinal adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion (%) of Patients With Any GI Adverse Events
NO
|
94.5 percentage of participants
|
75.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Proportion (%) of Patients With Any GI Adverse Events
YES
|
5.5 percentage of participants
|
24.7 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeksPopulation: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.
Secondary Objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving a therapeutic glycemic response defined as HbA1c\<7.0%
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=230 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=229 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response Defined as HbA1c<7.0%
|
38.3 percentage of participants
|
41.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Whole study durationPopulation: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.
Secondary Objective: Assessment of any gastrointestinal adverse events of saxagliptin versus acarbose. by measure proportion (%) of patients achieving HbA1c\<7.0% without GI adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=230 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=229 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion (%) of Patients Achieving HbA1c<7.0% Without GI Adverse Events
|
37.0 percentage of participants
|
28.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 weekPopulation: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.
Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
-0.99 mmol/l
Standard Error 0.13
|
-1.01 mmol/l
Standard Error 0.13
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 weekPopulation: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.
Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=227 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=232 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 2H Postprandial Glucose (2HPPG)
|
-0.77 mmol/l
Standard Error 0.176
|
-1.07 mmol/l
Standard Error 0.174
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 weekPopulation: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.
Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function was estimated by the Homeostasis model assessment-β (HOMA-β), which was defined as fasting insulin (mU/mL) x 20 / (fasting glucose (mmol/mL) - 3.5, body weight at week 24
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=227 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=225 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HOMA-β
|
20.56 mU/mmol
Standard Error 5.932
|
13.08 mU/mmol
Standard Error 5.958
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From baseline to 24 weekPopulation: The Full analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least 1 randomized IP dose, and had at least 1 non-missing baseline and 1 post-baseline efficacy data assessments.
Secondary objective: Effects of saxagliptin versus acarbose on the additional parameters, by measure change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2h postprandial glucose, β-cell function, body weight at week 24
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=238 Participants
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=243 Participants
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
|
-1.36 kg
Standard Error 0.18
|
-2.05 kg
Standard Error 0.18
|
Adverse Events
Saxagliptin
Acarbose
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=241 participants at risk
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=244 participants at risk
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
herpes zoster
|
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/244 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Chronic kidney disease
|
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
0.41%
1/244 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/244 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic function abnormal
|
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/244 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.41%
1/241 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
0.00%
0/244 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Saxagliptin
n=241 participants at risk
The dose of saxaglitpin will be 5mg oral qd. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocated to this arm.
|
Acarbose
n=244 participants at risk
Patients who take acarbose will begin with 50mg tid for 7 days then be titrated to 100mg tid till the end of the study. A call visit (V5) will be performed at Week 1 for adverse event and reminding patients the dose titration of acrabose. An estimated total of 480 patients (240 per treatment arm) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the active treatment arm and the active comparator arm. So estimated 240 patients will be allocalted to this arm.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
3.7%
9/241 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
7.0%
17/244 • Number of events 17 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
1.2%
3/241 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
10.2%
25/244 • Number of events 25 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/241 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
7.4%
18/244 • Number of events 18 • Adverse Events were collected from time of signature of informed consent, throughout the treatment period. That was about 28 weeks for every subject.
Unresolved AEs unresolved at the subject's last visit were followed up by the Investigator for as long as medically indicated, but without furtherrecording in the CRF. Below reported AEs were Treatment Emergent Adverse Events which were AEs from the first dose of investigational product to the end of follow-up.
|
Additional Information
Xia, Zhang
ASTRAZENECA INVESTMENT (CHINA) CO., LTD.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60