Effect of Memantine on ERP in Early Schizophrenia and Healthy Subjects

NCT ID: NCT02233556

Last Updated: 2015-12-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with schizophrenia are deeply affected by the positive symptoms, negative symptoms and cognitive impairment. A generalized cognitive deficit could be frequently observed and traced back to early stage of the disease. Currently medication intervention significantly improves positive symptoms through dopamine receptor modification, leaving alone the negative symptoms and cognitive impairment. Besides dopamine dysregulation, more and more attention had been paid to the association of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) type glutamate receptor and schizophrenia, focusing on the neurobiological and cognitive biomarkers change. Memantine, an uncompetitive antagonist of NMDA type glutamate receptor approved as cognitive enhancer for Alzheimer's disease, is a potential candidate for preventing cognitive decline of schizophrenia. Previous randomized clinical trials failed to demonstrate its efficacy on chronic schizophrenic patients and it might be related to the chronic and irreversible disease process. There is also study supporting that memantine induces change in mismatch negativity (MMN) in frontal cortex of healthy subjects. This study will compare the MMN change of healthy subjects and the population of early schizophrenia, who has persistent neurobiological, cognitive biomarkers or negative symptoms despite subsided positive symptoms. Both male and female aged 20-45 years old outpatients with a length of illness for less than 5 years since first diagnosed as schizophrenia, currently receiving treatment by atypical antipsychotics in a relatively stable condition will be recruited. Healthy subjects will be recruited comparing their age and sex. We plan to recruit 10 subjects for both patient and healthy subjects with a total of 20 participants. All participants will receive general clinical, cognitive and event-related potential (ERP) evaluation as baseline before taking medication. Twenty mg of memantine will be given 4 hours before ERP retest. The analyses will be performed based on the change of ERP using paired-t sample test. Baseline clinical and cognitive symptoms will be analyzed as possible confounders.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this proposal, we use one-dose memantine trial to compare the difference of MMN change between healthy subjects and early schizophrenia patients. The cognitive and negative symptoms will be counted as possible confounding variables. We would like to make connection and association between neurobiological and neurocognitive markers for further treatment application.

The specific aim of this project is to test if memantine will influence the ERPs change, as in healthy subjects, in patients with early schizophrenia. The specific study population is been known of just have their first episode psychosis subsided, conventionally defined by significantly improved positive symptoms, yet some of them complaining of cognitive decline or presenting with persistent negative symptoms. Previous study showed improvement in mismatch negativity was correlated with general function improvement in schizophrenia. Although a recent study failed to demonstrate positive effects on residual psychopathology of a group of chronic stable schizophrenic patients. In this study we are targeting at a specific population of early schizophrenic patients to examine the efficacy of memantine on neurobiological markers and possible application to general psychopathology. Our objectives include:

1. Test memantine effects on the change of ERPs, especially focus on mismatch negativity.
2. Compare the ERP difference between healthy subjects and early schizophrenic patients
3. Examine whether the effect of memantine will be affected by any significant baseline clinical variables or predisposed cognitive deficits.

First if we could replicate the ERP change in healthy subjects influenced by memantine, and we could further compare the difference between healthy subjects and patient subjects. It may support the hypothesis of NMDA-type glutamate receptor dysregulation theory in schizophrenia. If further association is detected through larger scale study between ERP and clinical symptoms, we could apply memantine in the add-on treatment of schizophrenia. As memantine is already an approved medicine for treatment of moderate to severe Alzheimer disease in many countries worldwide, hopefully we can add a new indication to its original clinical application. Thus it will become the first medicine that can help a condition which has rendered a lot of schizophrenic patients marked impairments in their social and occupational functioning from the early stage of their life. We believe this impact will be even bigger than the original indication of memantine, which is exclusively for patients with dementia. Rather than delaying deterioration of cognitive functioning in patient's late life, an adjuvant therapy for early intervention in schizophrenia aiming at improving cognitive function and hence restoring social and occupational functioning bears greater impact on a patient's life trajectory and lessen the burden of a society. Furthermore, the results from this project will provide critical evidence to support or refute the hypoglutaminergic theory of schizophrenia, which might be an important complement to the hyperdopaminergic theory. With a better understanding of the pathophysiology of schizophrenia not only focusing on dopaminergic system-related positive symptoms but also glutamatergic system-related cognitive and negative symptoms, will provide theoretic base of psychopharmacology in developing agents targeting at different systems to improve the outcome of schizophrenia from the early stage or even the putative pre-psychotic stage of the illness.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Schizophrenia

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

event-related potential mismatch negativity NMDA Glutamate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Memantine

This study has only one arm. i.e. Single dose of memantine 20mg

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Memantine

Intervention Type DRUG

Taking 20mg(2 capsules) of memantine, followed by Event related potential assessments as below:

1. Mismatch negativity(MMN)
2. P50

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Memantine

Taking 20mg(2 capsules) of memantine, followed by Event related potential assessments as below:

1. Mismatch negativity(MMN)
2. P50

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ebixa 10 mg, manufactured by Lunbeck A/S, Denmark

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Both male and female outpatients
2. Age 20-45 years old at the time of screening
3. A diagnosis of schizophrenia based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV
4. A duration of illness for less than 5 years since initially diagnosed as schizophrenia
5. Currently receiving treatment mainly by an atypical antipsychotic (risperidone, olanzapine, amisulpiride, aripiprazole, quetiapine, ziprasidone, paliperidone), including long-acting injectable antipsychotic
6. A first generation antipsychotic agent only for a low-dose, as needed use purpose
7. No revised use of benzodiazepines, antidepressants, anticholinergics, or other concomitant medications during past 3 months


1. Both male and female
2. Age 20-45 years old at the time of screening
3. No psychiatric diagnosis based on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV
4. No current use of any pharmaceutical agents in past 2 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

1. A score of 5 or more on any of the 7 positive symptom items of the PANSS rating at screening
2. Scores of 4 on at least 3 of the 7 positive symptom items of the PANSS rating at screening
3. A major relapse resulting in readmission or doubling the dosage of previous effective antipsychotic treatment during the course of illness
4. A change of current antipsychotic medication in recent 3 months
5. Mental retardation known as IQ below 70 prior to the diagnosis of schizophrenia
6. A history of pervasive mental disorder or bipolar disorder
7. A medical condition with significant cognitive sequelae
8. A history of substance dependence
9. A history of hypersensitivity to memantine or other drugs of the same class, such as amantadine
10. Pregnancy, plan to get pregnant during the study period, or lactating women
11. Abnormal liver function (AST, ALT higher than doubling the upper limits of normal range) or abnormal renal function (blood creatinine \> 1.3 mg/dL)
12. A history of epilepsy
13. A history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, stroke, or severe heart block.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ming-Hsien Hsieh, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taiwan University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Taiwan University Hospital

Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ming-Hsien Hsieh, MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +886-2-23123456

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ming-Hsien Hsieh, MD, PhD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201308083MINB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id