Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P; CBD) as Adjunctive Treatment for Seizures Associated With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in Children and Adults (NCT NCT02224690)
NCT ID: NCT02224690
Last Updated: 2022-09-28
Results Overview
Drop seizures were recorded by the participant or caregiver using an interactive voice response system (IVRS) diary. Drop seizures were defined as the subset of tonic-clonic, tonic or atonic seizures that were reported as drop seizures in the IVRS. Percentage change from baseline was calculated as: (frequency during the treatment period - frequency during baseline/frequency during baseline) \* 100. The frequency during each period was based on 28-day averages and calculated as: (number of seizures in the period/number of reported days in the IVRS period) \*28. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1 (28-day average). Negative percentages show an improvement from baseline.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
171 participants
Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) (Day 99) or Early Termination (ET)
2022-09-28
Participant Flow
The dose level of 20 milligram (mg) per kilogram (kg) per day (mg/kg/day) was recommended by the GWEP1332 Part A (NCT02091206) Data Safety Monitoring Committee after assessment of safety and pharmacokinetic data. The investigational medicinal product (IMP) was given daily in 2 divided doses (the preferred dosing regimen for antiepileptic drugs).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
Participants received GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. Participants titrated GWP42003-P to 20 mg/kg/day over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the open-label extension (OLE) study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo (0 mg/milliliter \[mL\] cannabidiol \[CBD\]), volume matched to the 20 mg/kg/day dose, administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. To maintain the blinded aspect of the study, participants titrated the placebo dose over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
86
|
85
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
86
|
85
|
|
Overall Study
Intent to Treat (ITT) Analysis Set
|
86
|
85
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
72
|
84
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
Participants received GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. Participants titrated GWP42003-P to 20 mg/kg/day over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the open-label extension (OLE) study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Placebo
Participants received placebo (0 mg/milliliter \[mL\] cannabidiol \[CBD\]), volume matched to the 20 mg/kg/day dose, administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. To maintain the blinded aspect of the study, participants titrated the placebo dose over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
8
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Met Withdrawal Criteria
|
4
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Use of G-tube
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Did not meet eligibility criteria
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol (GWP42003-P; CBD) as Adjunctive Treatment for Seizures Associated With Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome in Children and Adults
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
n=86 Participants
Participants received GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. Participants titrated GWP42003-P to 20 mg/kg/day over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Placebo
n=85 Participants
Participants received placebo (0 mg/mL CBD), volume matched to the 20 mg/kg/day dose, administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. To maintain the blinded aspect of the study, participants titrated the placebo dose over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Total
n=171 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
15.478 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.685 • n=5 Participants
|
15.284 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7945 • n=7 Participants
|
15.381 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2264 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment (EOT) (Day 99) or Early Termination (ET)Population: ITT Analysis Set: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized.
Drop seizures were recorded by the participant or caregiver using an interactive voice response system (IVRS) diary. Drop seizures were defined as the subset of tonic-clonic, tonic or atonic seizures that were reported as drop seizures in the IVRS. Percentage change from baseline was calculated as: (frequency during the treatment period - frequency during baseline/frequency during baseline) \* 100. The frequency during each period was based on 28-day averages and calculated as: (number of seizures in the period/number of reported days in the IVRS period) \*28. Baseline included all available data prior to Day 1 (28-day average). Negative percentages show an improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
n=86 Participants
Participants received GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. Participants titrated GWP42003-P to 20 mg/kg/day over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Placebo
n=85 Participants
Participants received placebo (0 mg/mL CBD), volume matched to the 20 mg/kg/day dose, administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. To maintain the blinded aspect of the study, participants titrated the placebo dose over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline In Drop Seizure Frequency During The Treatment Period
|
-43.90 percentage change
Interval -69.62 to 1.93
|
-21.80 percentage change
Interval -45.72 to 1.74
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (Day 99) or ETPopulation: ITT Analysis Set: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized.
Drop seizures were recorded by the participant or caregiver using an IVRS diary. Drop seizures included the subset of tonic-clonic, tonic or atonic seizures that were reported as drop seizures in IVRS. Percentage change from baseline was calculated as per the primary outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
n=86 Participants
Participants received GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. Participants titrated GWP42003-P to 20 mg/kg/day over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Placebo
n=85 Participants
Participants received placebo (0 mg/mL CBD), volume matched to the 20 mg/kg/day dose, administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. To maintain the blinded aspect of the study, participants titrated the placebo dose over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number Of Participants With a ≥50% Reduction From Baseline in Drop Seizure Frequency During The Treatment Period
|
38 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to EOT (Day 99) or ETPopulation: ITT Analysis Set: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized.
Total seizures included the sum of all seizures (tonic-clonic, tonic, atonic, clonic, myoclonic, countable partial, other partial and absence seizures) recorded by the participant or caregiver using an IVRS diary. Percentage change from baseline was calculated as per the primary outcome measure. Negative percentages show an improvement from baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
n=86 Participants
Participants received GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. Participants titrated GWP42003-P to 20 mg/kg/day over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Placebo
n=85 Participants
Participants received placebo (0 mg/mL CBD), volume matched to the 20 mg/kg/day dose, administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. To maintain the blinded aspect of the study, participants titrated the placebo dose over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage Change From Baseline In Total Seizure Frequency During The Treatment Period
|
-41.24 percentage change
Interval -62.85 to -13.0
|
-13.70 percentage change
Interval -45.0 to 7.27
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Last Visit (Day 99) or ETPopulation: ITT Analysis Set: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of IMP and had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy endpoint measurement. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment group to which they were randomized.
The S/CGIC was used to assess the participant's overall condition on a 7-point scale, using the markers "very much improved, much improved, slightly improved, no change, slightly worse, much worse, or very much worse" (1 = very much improved; 7 = very much worse). On Day 1 (prior to starting IMP), the caregiver was asked to write a brief description of the participant's overall condition as a memory aid for the S/CGIC questionnaire at subsequent visits. If both a CGIC and SGIC were completed then the CGIC was used; if only a CGIC was completed then the CGIC was used; if only a SGIC was completed then the SGIC was used. Last visit for endpoints assessed at clinic visits was defined as the last scheduled visit (not including the end of taper or safety follow-up visits) at which participant's last evaluation was performed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
n=84 Participants
Participants received GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. Participants titrated GWP42003-P to 20 mg/kg/day over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Placebo
n=85 Participants
Participants received placebo (0 mg/mL CBD), volume matched to the 20 mg/kg/day dose, administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. To maintain the blinded aspect of the study, participants titrated the placebo dose over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Subject/Caregiver Global Impression Of Change Assessment (S/CGIC)
Very Much Improved
|
15 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Subject/Caregiver Global Impression Of Change Assessment (S/CGIC)
Much Improved
|
14 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Subject/Caregiver Global Impression Of Change Assessment (S/CGIC)
Slightly Improved
|
20 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Subject/Caregiver Global Impression Of Change Assessment (S/CGIC)
No Change
|
27 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Subject/Caregiver Global Impression Of Change Assessment (S/CGIC)
Slightly Worse
|
7 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Subject/Caregiver Global Impression Of Change Assessment (S/CGIC)
Much Worse
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Subject/Caregiver Global Impression Of Change Assessment (S/CGIC)
Very Much Worse
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
Adverse Events
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
n=86 participants at risk
Participants received GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. Participants titrated GWP42003-P to 20 mg/kg/day over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Placebo
n=85 participants at risk
Participants received placebo (0 mg/mL CBD), volume matched to the 20 mg/kg/day dose, administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. To maintain the blinded aspect of the study, participants titrated the placebo dose over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Acute hepatic failure
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Perirectal abscess
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pilonidal cyst
|
0.00%
0/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
3.5%
3/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia adenoviral
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
2.3%
2/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
4.7%
4/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
4.7%
4/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Drug level increased
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
3.5%
3/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test abnormal
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Oxygen saturation decreased
|
0.00%
0/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases increased
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
2.3%
2/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
|
0.00%
0/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure cluster
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Status epilepticus
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
3.5%
3/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial secretion retention
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypercapnia
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
2.3%
2/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia aspiration
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory distress
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
2.4%
2/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
1.2%
1/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
0.00%
0/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/Day Dose
n=86 participants at risk
Participants received GWP42003-P 20 mg/kg/day administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. Participants titrated GWP42003-P to 20 mg/kg/day over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
Placebo
n=85 participants at risk
Participants received placebo (0 mg/mL CBD), volume matched to the 20 mg/kg/day dose, administered orally, half in the morning and half in the evening. To maintain the blinded aspect of the study, participants titrated the placebo dose over 11 days and remained at this dose for the 12-week maintenance period. If the participant did not immediately enter the OLE study, the maintenance period was followed by a 10-day taper (10% per day) period.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
18.6%
16/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
8.2%
7/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
9.3%
8/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
16.5%
14/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.8%
5/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
4.7%
4/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
12.8%
11/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
8.2%
7/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.8%
5/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
2.4%
2/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
5.8%
5/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
2.4%
2/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.3%
2/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
7.1%
6/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
12.8%
11/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
2.4%
2/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
14.0%
12/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
9.4%
8/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sedation
|
8.1%
7/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
3.5%
3/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
5.9%
5/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.3%
2/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
5.9%
5/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
8.1%
7/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
2.4%
2/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.8%
5/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
2.4%
2/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
7.0%
6/86 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
1.2%
1/85 • Day 1 through Day 137 (Safety Follow-up)
Safety Analysis Set: All participants randomized to treatment who received at least 1 dose of IMP. Participants were analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60