Carbetocin Trial: Carbetocin Appropriate Rate Better Equilibrium Between Tonus (TOnus) and CIrculatioN
NCT ID: NCT02221531
Last Updated: 2018-01-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-08-31
2015-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A meta-analysis has shown that routine administration of an oxytocic agent after caesarean delivery leads to a reduced blood loss and decreases the risk of PPH (Cotter et al., Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2001). The two most commonly used oxytocic drugs after operative delivery are oxytocin and carbetocin, a synthetic oxytocin-analogue. Carbetocin has the advantage over oxytocin of having a longer half-life and therefore reducing the use of additional uterotonics. Based on the findings of reduced cardiovascular side-effects with a short-infusion as compared to a bolus injection found for oxytocin (Thomas et al., Br J Anaesth, 2007), our study hypothesis is that a slower administration rate of carbetocin minimises the cardiovascular side effects without compromising the uterine tone. Therefore, we aim to investigate a short infusion of carbetocin 100 mcg applied in 100ml sodium chlorid compared to a bolus application in women undergoing primary or secondary caesarean delivery. This prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial will take place at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. We hypothesize uterine contraction not to be inferior (primary efficacy endpoint) and the mean arterial pressure to be higher after a short-infusion than after a bolus administration (primary safety endpoint).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Carbetocin Versus Ergometrin in the Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage
NCT04300452
Effect of the Uterotonic Carbetocin on Acute Post Cesarean-Section Pain
NCT02642263
Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin for Prevention of Postcesarean Hemorrhage in Pregnancy With High Risk for PPH
NCT04089176
Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin and Ergometrine for the Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage
NCT03578263
Carbetocin Versus Oxytocin and Ergometrine for the Prevention of Postpartum Haemorrhage Following Caesarean Section
NCT02101567
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Short infusion
Carbetocin 100 microgram will be applied intravenously in a short infusion over about a minute
Carbetocin Short-infusion
Short-infusion of Carbetocin 100 microgram as compared to bolus application of Carbetocin 100 microgram (double dummy method)
Bolus application
Carbetocin 100 microgram will be applied intravenously by bolus application over about 15 seconds
Carbetocin Bolus application
Carbetocin 100 microgram given intravenously as a bolus application over about 15 seconds
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Carbetocin Short-infusion
Short-infusion of Carbetocin 100 microgram as compared to bolus application of Carbetocin 100 microgram (double dummy method)
Carbetocin Bolus application
Carbetocin 100 microgram given intravenously as a bolus application over about 15 seconds
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* singleton pregnancy
* caesarean section under regional anaesthesia
* older than 18 years
* written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* secondary caesarean section due to fetal distress
* comorbidities (cardiovascular, kidney or liver disorder, epilepsy)
* obstetric diseases (hypertension, (pre-)eclampsia)
* uterine malformation (including uterine fibroids)
* bleeding disorder
* known hypersensitivity to carbetocin or oxytocin
* fetal malformation
18 Years
46 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association United Kingdom
OTHER
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Salome Dell-Kuster, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Basel
Basel, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dell-Kuster S, Hoesli I, Lapaire O, Seeberger E, Steiner LA, Bucher HC, Girard T. Efficacy and safety of carbetocin given as an intravenous bolus compared with short infusion for Caesarean section - double-blind, double-dummy, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):772-780. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex034.
Dell-Kuster S, Hoesli I, Lapaire O, Seeberger E, Steiner LA, Bucher HC, Girard T. Efficacy and safety of carbetocin applied as an intravenous bolus compared to as a short-infusion for caesarean section: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Mar 22;17:155. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1285-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2014-088
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.