Name Generator Order Effects in Social Networks

NCT ID: NCT02217748

Last Updated: 2015-12-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1557 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-07-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of our study was to determine the extent to which the order of specific items in a multiple name generator survey affects how social networks are measured.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Interpersonal relationships are one feature of the social environment that have been shown to have important influences on health and health behaviors (Berkman et al., 2000; Berkman \& Syme, 1979) and mental health (Tsai et al., 2014). While the majority of these studies have been conducted in resource-rich settings, studies conducted in resource-limited settings have similarly demonstrated associations between social networks and health (Perkins, Subramanian, \& Christakis, 2014). In this literature, the tie between two persons is the important unit of measurement. Classically, the social tie is typically elicited using a "name generator" survey that inquires about ties based on the affective content of the relationship (Laumann, 1966; Wellman, 1979) or normative bonds such as kinship ties (Kleiner \& Parker, 1976).

Another popular approach to eliciting social ties has employed multiple name generators inquiring about specific types of interactions, such as discussions about important matters or exchanges of money (Burt, 1984; Marsden, 1987; McCallister \& Fischer, 1978). These types of name generators have strong face validity, are less likely to be subjectively interpreted in different ways by different respondents, and are therefore likely to be more reliable. These are accompanied by a heavy respondent burden, however, and single-item name generators may perform comparably to multiple name generators only under limited circumstances (Marin \& Hampton, 2007). It remains unclear, however, whether the order of name generators may affect study participant responses. While no studies have examined this empirically, there is a broad literature on public opinion polling suggesting that alternative specifications of question ordering can have important effects on respondents' answers (McFarland, 1981).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Social Interaction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Survey questionnaire version 1

Name generator order: leisure, money, support

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Survey questionnaire version 2

Name generator order: leisure, support, money

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Survey questionnaire version 3

Name generator order: money, leisure, support

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Survey questionnaire version 4

Name generator order: money, support, leisure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Survey questionnaire version 5

Name generator order: support, leisure, money

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Survey questionnaire version 6

Name generator order: support, money, leisure

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Survey questionnaire

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Each of the survey questionnaires administers the name generators in a different order

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged 18 years and older
* Emancipated minors aged 16-18 years
* Considers Nyakabare Parish their primary place of residence
* Capable of providing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Minors younger than 18 years, with the exception of emancipated minors
* Does not consider Nyakabare Parish their primary place of residence
* Unable to communicate with research staff, e.g., due to deafness, mutism, or aphasia
* Persons with psychosis, neurological damage, acute intoxication, or an intelligence quotient less than 70, as determined in the field by non-clinical research staff in consultation with a supervisor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mbarara University of Science and Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alexander Tsai

Assistant Professor of Psychiatry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexander C Tsai, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Bernard Kakuhikire, MBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mbarara University of Science and Technology

Mbarara, , Uganda

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Uganda

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MH096620-S2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id