Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety Study of Cenicriviroc for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in Adult Participants With Liver Fibrosis (NCT NCT02217475)
NCT ID: NCT02217475
Last Updated: 2019-05-10
Results Overview
Hepatic histological improvement in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS) at Year 1 was defined as a decrease (improvement) in NAS by ≥ 2 with at least a 1-point reduction in either lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning and with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage. The NAS was derived as the unweighted sum of steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) scores. The NAS ranges from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease. Evaluation of fibrosis stage was based on the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network (NASH CRN) fibrosis staging system, which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. Worsening of fibrosis stage was defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
289 participants
Year 1
2019-05-10
Participant Flow
In total, 812 participants were screened, and 289 participants were randomized to treatment period 1. Of the 289 participants randomized, 250 participants completed Treatment Period 1. A total of 242 participants entered Treatment Period 2 and 212 completed.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo/Cenicriviroc (CVC) 150 mg
Placebo-matching CVC tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2.
|
CVC 150mg/CVC 150 mg
CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period 1 (Year 1)
STARTED
|
72
|
72
|
145
|
|
Treatment Period 1 (Year 1)
Safety Analysis Set
|
72
|
72
|
144
|
|
Treatment Period 1 (Year 1)
COMPLETED
|
62
|
64
|
124
|
|
Treatment Period 1 (Year 1)
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
8
|
21
|
|
Discontinued After Period 1
STARTED
|
62
|
64
|
124
|
|
Discontinued After Period 1
COMPLETED
|
60
|
61
|
121
|
|
Discontinued After Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (Year 2)
STARTED
|
60
|
61
|
121
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (Year 2)
COMPLETED
|
58
|
59
|
109
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (Year 2)
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
2
|
12
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo/Cenicriviroc (CVC) 150 mg
Placebo-matching CVC tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2.
|
CVC 150mg/CVC 150 mg
CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Period 1 (Year 1)
Protocol Deviation (with non-compliance)
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 1 (Year 1)
Adverse Event
|
4
|
5
|
9
|
|
Treatment Period 1 (Year 1)
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Treatment Period 1 (Year 1)
Subject Withdrew Consent
|
5
|
2
|
11
|
|
Treatment Period 1 (Year 1)
Other Miscellaneous Reasons
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Discontinued After Period 1
Adverse Event
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
|
Discontinued After Period 1
Participant Withdrew Consent
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
|
Discontinued After Period 1
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (Year 2)
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
5
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (Year 2)
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (Year 2)
Subject Withdrew Consent
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (Year 2)
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
Treatment Period 2 (Year 2)
Other Miscellaneous Reasons
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and Safety Study of Cenicriviroc for the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) in Adult Participants With Liver Fibrosis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CVC 150mg/CVC 150 mg
n=145 Participants
CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo/Cenicriviroc (CVC) 150 mg
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching CVC tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2.
|
Placebo/Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Total
n=289 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.22 • n=5 Participants
|
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.38 • n=7 Participants
|
52.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.37 • n=5 Participants
|
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.59 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
137 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
238 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
129 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
250 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants regardless of starting treatment.
Hepatic histological improvement in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Score (NAS) at Year 1 was defined as a decrease (improvement) in NAS by ≥ 2 with at least a 1-point reduction in either lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning and with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage. The NAS was derived as the unweighted sum of steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) scores. The NAS ranges from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease. Evaluation of fibrosis stage was based on the nonalcoholic steatohepatitis clinical research network (NASH CRN) fibrosis staging system, which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. Worsening of fibrosis stage was defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=145 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participant With Hepatic Histological Improvement in NAS by ≥ 2 Points With at Least 1-Point Reduction in Either Lobular Inflammation or Hepatocellular Ballooning and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis at Year 1
|
27 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1Population: ITT population included all randomized participants regardless of starting treatment.
Complete resolution of steatohepatitis was defined as histopathologic interpretation of no fatty liver disease, or simple or isolated steatosis with no steatohepatitis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=145 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage and Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 1
|
4 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 2Population: ITT population Year 2 included all participants who had an evaluable year 1 biopsy and received at least 1 dose of study drug during Year 2.
Complete resolution of steatohepatitis was defined as histopathologic interpretation of no fatty liver disease, or simple or isolated steatosis with no steatohepatitis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=178 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage and Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 2
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1Population: ITT population included all randomized participants regardless of starting treatment.
Complete resolution of steatohepatitis was defined as histopathologic interpretation of no fatty liver disease, or simple or isolated steatosis with no steatohepatitis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=145 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 1
|
8 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 2Population: ITT population Year 2 included all participants who had an evaluable year 1 biopsy and received at least 1 dose of study drug during Year 2.
Complete resolution of steatohepatitis was defined as histopathologic interpretation of no fatty liver disease, or simple or isolated steatosis with no steatohepatitis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=178 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Steatohepatitis With no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 2
|
3 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1Population: ITT population included all randomized participants regardless of starting treatment.
The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=145 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 1
|
15 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 2Population: ITT analysis set Year 2 included all participants who have an evaluable year 1 biopsy and who received at least one dose of study drug during Year 2 (after the 1 year biopsy).
The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System which was scaled from 0 to 4 stages where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. As per NASH CRN system, no worsening of steatohepatitis was defined as no worsening of lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning grade.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=57 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=178 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Improvement in Fibrosis by at Least 1 Stage (NASH CRN System) and no Worsening of Steatohepatitis at Year 2
|
8 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Years 1 and 2Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
A TEAE was defined as any adverse event that started or worsened on or after the start of the study medication and up to 30 days after the discontinuation of the study medication. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, was life threatening, requires hospitalization or results in prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=72 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Deaths, Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), TEAEs Leading Study Drug to Discontinuation
TEAEs
|
137 Participants
|
68 Participants
|
70 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Deaths, Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), TEAEs Leading Study Drug to Discontinuation
Deaths
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Deaths, Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), TEAEs Leading Study Drug to Discontinuation
SAEs
|
25 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Deaths, Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), TEAEs Leading Study Drug to Discontinuation
TEAEs Leading Study Drug to Discontinuation
|
14 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Years 1 and 2Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Vital signs included blood pressure, temperature, heart rate, and respiration rate. Vital signs were reviewed by the Investigator for clinically significant changes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=72 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Years 1 and 2Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Grade 3-4 abnormal clinical laboratory values that occurred in ≥2% participants were reported. Criteria used for various parameters was:Fasting glucose Grade3:\>250 - 500 mg/dL and Grade4: \>500 mg/dL; Alanine aminotransferase(ALT)Grade3:\>5.0 - 20.0 ×Upper Limit of Normal(ULN)and Grade4:\>20.0 ×ULN; Aspartate aminotransferase(AST)Grade3: \>5.0 - 20.0 ×ULN and Grade4: \>20.0 ×ULN; Activated partial thromboplastin(APT)/Partial thromboplastin time(PTT)Grade3: \>2.5×ULN; Triglycerides Grade3 \>500 - 1000 mg/dL and Grade4: \>1000 mg/dL; Gamma-glutamyl transferase(GGT)Grade3: \>5.0 - 20.0 ×ULN and Grade4: \>20.0 ×ULN; Creatine kinase Grade 3: \>5.0 - 10.0 ×ULN and Grade4: \>10.0 ×ULN; Uric acid Grade3:(ULN - 10 mg/dL; ULN - 0.59 mmol/L) and Grade4: \>10 mg/dL; Amylase Grade3: \>2.0 - 5.0 ×ULN and Grade4: \>5.0 ×ULN; Lipase Grade3: \>2.0 - 5.0 xULN and Grade4: \>5.0 xULN; Phosphorus Grade3: \<2.0 - 1.0 mg/dL and Grade4: \<1.0 mg/dL and Absolute neutrophil Grade3: \<1.0 - 0.5 × 109/L and Grade4: \<0.5 × 109/L.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
n=121 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
n=61 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
n=60 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Fasting glucose (Grade 3)
|
17 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Fasting glucose (Grade 4)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
ALT (Grade 3)
|
17 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
ALT (Grade 4)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
AST (Grade 3)
|
7 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
AST (Grade 4)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
APT/PTT (Grade 3)
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Triglycerides (Grade 3)
|
5 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Triglycerides (Grade 4)
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
GGT (Grade 3)
|
8 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
GGT (Grade 4)
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Creatine kinase (Grade 3)
|
6 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Creatine kinase (Grade 4)
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Uric acid (Grade 3)
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Uric acid (Grade 4)
|
11 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Amylase (Grade 3)
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Amylase (Grade 4)
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Lipase (Grade 3)
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Lipase (Grade 4)
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Phosphorus (Grade 3)
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Phosphorus (Grade 4)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Absolute neutrophil (Grade 3)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities
Absolute neutrophil (Grade 4)
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Years 1 and 2Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
A 12-lead ECG was performed. ECG results were reviewed by the Investigator for clinically notable abnormalities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=72 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 2Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS) in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations.
Hepatic histological improvement in NAS at Year 2 was defined as a decrease (improvement) in NAS by ≥ 2 with at least a 1-point reduction in either lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning and with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage. The NAS was derived as the unweighted sum of steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) scores. The NAS ranges from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=215 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Hepatic Histological Improvement in NAS at Year 2
|
7 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
NAS was calculated using the following 3 categorical features: steatosis which was scaled from 0-3 (steatosis score is defined as 0= \<5%, 1= 5 - 33%, 2= \>33 - 66%, and 3= \>66%), lobular inflammation which was scaled from 0-3 (lobular inflammation score defined as 0= no foci, 1= \< 2 foci/200x, 2= 2-4 foci/200x, and 3= \> 4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning which was scaled from 0-2 (hepatocellular ballooning score is defined as 0=none, 1=few balloon cells, 2=many cells/prominent ballooning). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=126 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 1
Baseline (Steatosis)
|
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.57
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 1
Change from Baseline (Steatosis)
|
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 1
Baseline (Lobular Inflammation)
|
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 1
Change from Baseline (Lobular Inflammation)
|
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 1
Baseline (Hepatocellular Ballooning)
|
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 1
Change from Baseline (Hepatocellular Ballooning)
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 2Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
NAS was calculated using the following 3 categorical features: steatosis which was scaled from 0-3 (steatosis score is defined as 0= \<5%, 1= 5 - 33%, 2= \>33 - 66%, and 3= \>66%), lobular inflammation which was scaled from 0-3 (lobular inflammation score defined as 0= no foci, 1= \< 2 foci/200x, 2= 2-4 foci/200x, and 3= \> 4 foci/200x), and hepatocellular ballooning which was scaled from 0-2 (hepatocellular ballooning score is defined as 0=none, 1=few balloon cells, 2=many cells/prominent ballooning). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=54 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=159 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 2
Baseline (Steatosis)
|
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 2
Change from Baseline (Steatosis)
|
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 2
Baseline (Lobular Inflammation)
|
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 2
Change from Baseline (Lobular Inflammation)
|
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 2
Baseline (Hepatocellular Ballooning)
|
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in the 3 Categorical Features of NAS (Steatosis, Lobular Inflammation, Hepatocellular Ballooning) at Year 2
Change from Baseline (Hepatocellular Ballooning)
|
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.68
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations.
Hepatic histological improvement in NAS was defined as a decrease (improvement) in NAS by ≥ 2 with at least a 1-point reduction in either steatosis, lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning and with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage. The NAS was derived as the unweighted sum of steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) scores. The NAS ranges from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease. Worsening was defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Hepatic Histological Improvement With a Minimum 2-Point Improvement in NAS With at Least a 1-Point Improvement in More Than 1 Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 1
|
24 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 2Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations.
Hepatic histological improvement in NAS was defined as a decrease (improvement) in NAS by ≥ 2 with at least a 1-point reduction in either steatosis, lobular inflammation or hepatocellular ballooning and with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage. The NAS was derived as the unweighted sum of steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocellular ballooning (0 to 2) scores. The NAS ranges from 0-8 with the higher score indicating more aggressive disease. Worsening was defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=215 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Hepatic Histological Improvement With a Minimum 2-Point Improvement in NAS With at Least a 1-point Improvement in More Than 1 Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 2
|
6 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations.
Resolution of NASH was defined as having no hepatocellular ballooning (grade 0) and minimal to no lobular inflammation (grade 1 or 0) with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage (worsening defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH Using a Modified Definition Based on Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 1
|
7 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 2Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations.
Resolution of NASH was defined as having no hepatocellular ballooning (grade 0) and minimal to no lobular inflammation (grade 1 or 0) with no concurrent worsening of fibrosis stage (worsening defined as progression of NASH CRN fibrosis stage).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=215 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Resolution of NASH Using a Modified Definition Based on Categorical Features of NAS and no Concurrent Worsening of Fibrosis Stage at Year 2
|
1 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
The morphometric quantitative collagen on liver biopsy was determined as percent collagen area (PCA) using Sirius red stain on liver biopsy at Year 1. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=123 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=121 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Collagen on Liver Biopsy at Year 1
Baseline
|
2.49 percent collagen area
Standard Deviation 2.004
|
2.37 percent collagen area
Standard Deviation 1.827
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Collagen on Liver Biopsy at Year 1
Change from Baseline to Year 1
|
-0.14 percent collagen area
Standard Deviation 2.389
|
0.02 percent collagen area
Standard Deviation 2.357
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 2Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
The morphometric quantitative collagen on liver biopsy was determined as percent collagen area (PCA) using Sirius red stain on liver biopsy at Year 2. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=51 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=150 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Collagen on Liver Biopsy at Year 2
Baseline
|
2.57 percent collagen area
Standard Deviation 2.156
|
2.48 percent collagen area
Standard Deviation 1.892
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Collagen on Liver Biopsy at Year 2
Change from Baseline to Year 2
|
-0.17 percent collagen area
Standard Deviation 2.576
|
-0.09 percent collagen area
Standard Deviation 2.160
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 1Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
The hepatic tissue fibrogenic protein α-SMA level was determined as percent α-SMA + area using α-SMA stain on liver biopsy at Year 1. A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=122 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=122 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Tissue Fibrogenic Protein Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) at Year 1
Baseline
|
2.41 percentage of α-SMA positive cells/area
Standard Deviation 2.264
|
2.49 percentage of α-SMA positive cells/area
Standard Deviation 2.885
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Tissue Fibrogenic Protein Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) at Year 1
Change from Baseline to Year 1
|
0.77 percentage of α-SMA positive cells/area
Standard Deviation 3.529
|
0.79 percentage of α-SMA positive cells/area
Standard Deviation 3.861
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 2Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
The hepatic tissue fibrogenic protein α-SMA level was determined as percent α-SMA + area using α-SMA stain on liver biopsy at Year 2. A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=52 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=152 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Tissue Fibrogenic Protein Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) at Year 2
Change from Baseline to Year 2
|
2.10 percentage of α-SMA positive cells/area
Standard Deviation 4.533
|
1.38 percentage of α-SMA positive cells/area
Standard Deviation 3.793
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hepatic Tissue Fibrogenic Protein Alpha-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA) at Year 2
Baseline
|
2.47 percentage of α-SMA positive cells/area
Standard Deviation 2.679
|
2.44 percentage of α-SMA positive cells/area
Standard Deviation 2.505
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
The morphometric quantitative fat content was done to find out the amount of fat accumulated in the liver. A liver biopsy was performed to determine percent fat area, at Year 1. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=123 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=121 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Fat Content on Liver Biopsy at Year 1
Baseline
|
22.42 percent fat area
Standard Deviation 10.016
|
21.58 percent fat area
Standard Deviation 8.740
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Fat Content on Liver Biopsy at Year 1
Change from Baseline to Year 1
|
-3.39 percent fat area
Standard Deviation 9.120
|
-2.79 percent fat area
Standard Deviation 8.127
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 2Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
The morphometric quantitative fat content was done to find out the amount of fat accumulated in the liver. A liver biopsy was performed to determine percent fat area, at Year 2. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=50 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=150 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Fat Content on Liver Biopsy at Year 2
Change from Baseline to Year 2
|
-5.06 percent fat area
Standard Deviation 9.739
|
-2.96 percent fat area
Standard Deviation 9.230
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Morphometric Quantitative Fat Content on Liver Biopsy at Year 2
Baseline
|
23.30 percent fat area
Standard Deviation 10.300
|
21.62 percent fat area
Standard Deviation 9.575
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 1Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
The participant's histologic fibrosis stage was determined using the NASH CRN system and Ishak scale score assessment at Year 1. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System which was scaled from 0 to 4 where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. The histologic fibrosis stage based on the Ishak assessment was divided into 1 to 6 stages. Fibrosis was staged with the Ishak scale (ranging from 0=No fibrosis to 6=Cirrhosis). A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=126 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 1
Baseline (NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage)
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 1
Baseline (Ishak Fibrosis Stage)
|
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 1
Change from Baseline (Ishak Fibrosis Stage)
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.20
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 1
Change from Baseline (NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage)
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 2Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
The participant's histologic fibrosis stage was determined using the NASH CRN system and Ishak scale score assessment at Year 1. The evaluation of fibrosis stage associated with NASH was based on the NASH CRN Fibrosis Staging System which was scaled from 0 to 4 where, 0=None to 4=Cirrhosis. The histologic fibrosis stage based on the Ishak assessment was divided into 1 to 6 stages. Fibrosis was staged with the Ishak scale (ranging from 0=No fibrosis to 6=Cirrhosis). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=54 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=159 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 2
Baseline (NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage)
|
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 2
Change from Baseline (NASH CRN Fibrosis Stage)
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 2
Baseline (Ishak Fibrosis Stage)
|
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Histologic Fibrosis Stage (NASH CRN System and Ishak Scale Score) at Year 2
Change from Baseline (Ishak Fibrosis Stage)
|
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 1Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
Portal inflammation on liver biopsy was graded from 0 to 4 where 0= None, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Marked. A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=126 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=124 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Portal Inflammation Grade on Liver Biopsy at Year 1
Baseline
|
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Portal Inflammation Grade on Liver Biopsy at Year 1
Change from Baseline to Year 1
|
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.74
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Year 2Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at the given time-point.
Portal inflammation on liver biopsy was graded from 0 to 4 where 0= None, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, and 3= Marked. A positive change from Baseline indicates worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=54 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=159 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Portal Inflammation Grade on Liver Biopsy at Year 2
Baseline
|
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.64
|
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.67
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Portal Inflammation Grade on Liver Biopsy at Year 2
Change from Baseline to Year 1
|
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
APRI is the ratio of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet count. It is calculated using formula, APRI = (AST level \[/ULN\] / platelet counts \[10\^9/L\]) \* 100. An APRI index of \<=0.50 indicated the absence of significant fibrosis and an index of \> 1.50 indicated the presence of significant fibrosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
0.649 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3661
|
0.596 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4089
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
-0.005 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3012
|
0.065 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3152
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
0.663 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3811
|
0.578 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3794
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
0.009 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3968
|
0.102 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4536
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
0.662 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3915
|
0.580 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3939
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
0.066 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.5572
|
0.093 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3852
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
APRI is the ratio of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet count. It is calculated using formula, APRI = (AST level \[/ULN\] / platelet counts \[10\^9/L\]) \* 100. An APRI index of \<=0.50 indicated the absence of significant fibrosis and an index of \> 1.50 indicated the presence of significant fibrosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=215 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 15)
|
0.619 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3157
|
0.584 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3572
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
0.002 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3422
|
0.118 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4095
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
0.620 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3305
|
0.586 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3612
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
0.038 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4033
|
0.133 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4269
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
0.633 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3156
|
0.584 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.3617
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Count Ratio Index (APRI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
-0.020 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4721
|
0.086 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4153
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
Fibrosis-4 is the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It is a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), AST and age that is calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[U/L\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \< 1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. A positive change from Baseline indicates increased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
1.444 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6753
|
1.417 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6893
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
0.021 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4236
|
0.071 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4209
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
0.015 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.4591
|
0.099 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.5246
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
1.500 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.7268
|
1.388 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6771
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
1.503 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.7442
|
1.398 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6834
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
0.106 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6876
|
0.117 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.5069
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
Fibrosis-4 is the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It is a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), AST and age that is calculated using formula: FIB-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[U/L\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A FIB-4 index of \< 1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. A positive change from Baseline indicates increased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=215 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 15)
|
1.409 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6706
|
1.440 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6714
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
0.075 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.5982
|
0.213 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6462
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
1.389 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6699
|
1.440 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6895
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
0.094 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.5891
|
0.219 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.5559
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
1.426 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6841
|
1.444 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6838
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
0.064 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.8103
|
0.166 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.6086
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 6 and 12Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
Hyaluronic acid is a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis marker. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
70.7 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 110.49
|
69.5 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 80.56
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
-0.2 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 81.30
|
10.9 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 58.46
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
68.7 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 107.63
|
68.2 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 78.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
-2.4 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 75.03
|
10.7 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 79.58
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 18 and 24Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
Hyaluronic acid is a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis marker. A positive change from Baseline indicates increased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=215 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
19.3 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 70.64
|
13.0 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 95.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
46.4 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 32.67
|
79.6 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 111.36
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
5.7 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 34.66
|
1.4 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 81.20
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Marker of Hepatic Fibrosis: Hyaluronic Acid at Months 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
46.6 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 32.91
|
79.7 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 112.46
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
NFS is calculated using formula: NFS = -1.675 + 0.037 \* age (years) + 0.094 \* Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m\^2) + 1.13 \* Impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 \* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio - 0.013 × platelet (\*10\^9/L) - 0.66 \* albumin (g/dL). A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
-1.227 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.5255
|
-1.012 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.2558
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
0.029 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5150
|
0.087 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.4608
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
-1.119 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.4935
|
-1.064 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.2403
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
0.051 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.4747
|
0.094 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5460
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
-1.132 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.4609
|
-1.040 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.1393
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
0.121 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5117
|
0.139 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5016
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
NFS is calculated using formula: NFS = -1.675 + 0.037 \* age (years) + 0.094 \* Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m\^2) + 1.13 \* Impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/diabetes (yes = 1, no = 0) + 0.99 \* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio - 0.013 × platelet (\*10\^9/L) - 0.66 \* albumin (g/dL). A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=215 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
0.046 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5809
|
0.196 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5583
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
0.046 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.6188
|
0.185 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.6184
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 15)
|
-1.252 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.4602
|
-1.051 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.3410
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
0.057 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5981
|
0.225 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5654
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
-1.284 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.4910
|
-1.057 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.3309
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
-1.245 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.4778
|
-1.100 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 1.3228
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 6 and 12Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
The markers of fibrosis assessed in this test comprised hyaluronic acid (CHA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (CTIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (CP3NP); these are components of the extracellular matrix and basement sinusoidal membrane of the liver and are elevated during activation of the stellate cell. The ELF tests were performed on Centaur device and the composite score was calculated as follows: ELF score = 2.278 + 0.851 ln(CHA) + 0.751 ln (CP3NP) + 0.394 ln(CTIMP1). ELF score \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
-0.786 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.7179
|
-0.837 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.7238
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
-0.022 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.4901
|
0.060 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5228
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
-0.795 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.7435
|
-0.801 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.7162
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
-0.064 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5602
|
0.041 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.5727
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 18 and 24Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
The markers of fibrosis assessed in this test comprised hyaluronic acid (CHA), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (CTIMP1) and procollagen III N-terminal peptide (CP3NP); these are components of the extracellular matrix and basement sinusoidal membrane of the liver and are elevated during activation of the stellate cell. The ELF tests were performed on Centaur device and the composite score was calculated as follows: ELF score = 2.278 + 0.851 ln(CHA) + 0.751 ln (CP3NP) + 0.394 ln(CTIMP1). ELF score \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased fibrosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=215 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
-0.129 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.6606
|
-0.087 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.6113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
-0.940 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.6587
|
-0.765 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.7127
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
-0.931 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.6387
|
-0.758 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.7307
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis: Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test (ELF) Score at Months 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
-0.024 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.7375
|
0.096 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 0.6437
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: FAS in Year 1 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
Caspase-cleaved cytokeratin levels (CK18M30) and total M-65 (CK-18 \[M-65\]) were measured as biomarkers of hepatocyte apoptosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased hepatocyte apoptosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=143 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
601.6 U/L
Standard Deviation 431.77
|
594.2 U/L
Standard Deviation 554.20
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
-56.4 U/L
Standard Deviation 451.14
|
-59.0 U/L
Standard Deviation 485.76
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
550.3 U/L
Standard Deviation 360.64
|
552.9 U/L
Standard Deviation 393.92
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
10.6 U/L
Standard Deviation 461.98
|
-26.1 U/L
Standard Deviation 512.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
555.3 U/L
Standard Deviation 356.28
|
567.9 U/L
Standard Deviation 500.53
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
99.7 U/L
Standard Deviation 824.50
|
107.8 U/L
Standard Deviation 830.28
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Month 0) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: FAS in Year 2 included all participants who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug, had a measurable Screening biopsy, and had no major eligibility violations. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
Caspase-cleaved cytokeratin levels (CK18M30) and total M-65 (CK-18 \[M-65\]) were measured as biomarkers of hepatocyte apoptosis. A negative change from Baseline indicates decreased hepatocyte apoptosis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=72 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=215 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M30), Baseline (Month 18)
|
578.8 U/L
Standard Deviation 293.93
|
540.9 U/L
Standard Deviation 453.90
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M30), Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
23.8 U/L
Standard Deviation 402.98
|
57.3 U/L
Standard Deviation 476.92
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M30), Baseline (Month 24)
|
575.4 U/L
Standard Deviation 293.64
|
541.8 U/L
Standard Deviation 462.29
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M30), Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
-30.0 U/L
Standard Deviation 369.60
|
39.7 U/L
Standard Deviation 437.60
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M65), Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
7.4 U/L
Standard Deviation 570.92
|
124.9 U/L
Standard Deviation 522.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M30), Baseline (Month 15)
|
570.8 U/L
Standard Deviation 297.42
|
536.4 U/L
Standard Deviation 459.06
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M30), Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
-39.6 U/L
Standard Deviation 287.44
|
-13.3 U/L
Standard Deviation 450.16
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M65), Baseline (Month 15)
|
772.7 U/L
Standard Deviation 337.24
|
687.4 U/L
Standard Deviation 404.83
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M65), Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
134.7 U/L
Standard Deviation 534.46
|
88.6 U/L
Standard Deviation 559.11
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M65), Baseline (Month 18)
|
777.8 U/L
Standard Deviation 344.07
|
694.8 U/L
Standard Deviation 401.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M65), Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
158.0 U/L
Standard Deviation 732.63
|
181.5 U/L
Standard Deviation 620.57
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Hepatocyte Apoptosis: Caspase Cleaved (CK-18 [M-30]) Levels and Total M-65 (CK-18 [M-65]) Levels at Months 15, 18 and 24
CK-18(M65), Baseline (Month 24)
|
770.2 U/L
Standard Deviation 335.05
|
693.9 U/L
Standard Deviation 409.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased weight.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
97.21 kg
Standard Deviation 22.368
|
95.59 kg
Standard Deviation 20.590
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
-0.50 kg
Standard Deviation 2.652
|
-0.63 kg
Standard Deviation 2.632
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
96.63 kg
Standard Deviation 22.139
|
95.06 kg
Standard Deviation 20.651
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
-0.08 kg
Standard Deviation 4.301
|
-0.28 kg
Standard Deviation 4.166
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
97.18 kg
Standard Deviation 22.224
|
95.18 kg
Standard Deviation 20.386
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
-0.55 kg
Standard Deviation 3.319
|
-0.47 kg
Standard Deviation 3.466
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased weight.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=182 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 15)
|
98.25 kg
Standard Deviation 24.087
|
95.32 kg
Standard Deviation 20.749
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
0.15 kg
Standard Deviation 3.448
|
-0.44 kg
Standard Deviation 4.257
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
96.98 kg
Standard Deviation 22.210
|
95.23 kg
Standard Deviation 20.823
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
0.05 kg
Standard Deviation 4.194
|
-0.16 kg
Standard Deviation 4.458
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
96.98 kg
Standard Deviation 22.210
|
95.19 kg
Standard Deviation 20.972
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Weight at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
-0.91 kg
Standard Deviation 5.649
|
-0.56 kg
Standard Deviation 5.081
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
The body mass index is a value derived from the mass (weight in kgs) and height (in centimeters) of an individual and is calculated as the body mass divided by the square of the body height. A negative change from Baseline represents decreased BMI.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
34.129 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 7.2492
|
33.706 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 5.7812
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
-0.172 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.9200
|
-0.232 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 0.9500
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
34.196 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 7.3086
|
33.547 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 5.6037
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
-0.182 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.1558
|
-0.196 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.2500
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
34.029 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 7.1358
|
33.374 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 5.6631
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
-0.013 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.7507
|
-0.145 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.4891
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
The body mass index is a value derived from the mass (weight in kgs) and height (in centimeters) of an individual and is calculated as the body mass divided by the square of the body height. A negative change from Baseline represents decreased BMI.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=182 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
-0.006 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.2799
|
-0.113 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.6311
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
34.473 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 7.8964
|
33.345 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 5.9443
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 15)
|
34.713 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 8.0431
|
33.392 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 5.9669
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
-0.039 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.5931
|
-0.040 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.7153
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
34.473 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 7.8964
|
33.278 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 6.0012
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
-0.393 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 2.0613
|
-0.178 kg/m^2
Standard Deviation 1.8515
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased in waist circumference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
110.35 cm
Standard Deviation 14.866
|
110.25 cm
Standard Deviation 13.406
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
0.07 cm
Standard Deviation 5.147
|
0.05 cm
Standard Deviation 5.396
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
110.42 cm
Standard Deviation 14.986
|
110.12 cm
Standard Deviation 13.561
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
0.42 cm
Standard Deviation 8.827
|
-0.54 cm
Standard Deviation 5.876
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
109.77 cm
Standard Deviation 14.617
|
110.02 cm
Standard Deviation 13.711
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
0.44 cm
Standard Deviation 6.584
|
-1.10 cm
Standard Deviation 6.255
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased in waist circumference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=182 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
0.11 cm
Standard Deviation 7.907
|
-1.00 cm
Standard Deviation 6.503
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 15)
|
110.19 cm
Standard Deviation 14.360
|
110.26 cm
Standard Deviation 14.486
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
0.52 cm
Standard Deviation 5.520
|
-0.18 cm
Standard Deviation 6.280
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
109.48 cm
Standard Deviation 12.703
|
110.25 cm
Standard Deviation 14.517
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
1.36 cm
Standard Deviation 7.966
|
-0.21 cm
Standard Deviation 6.578
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
109.36 cm
Standard Deviation 12.608
|
110.08 cm
Standard Deviation 14.606
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased hip circumference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
114.92 cm
Standard Deviation 16.150
|
112.35 cm
Standard Deviation 13.802
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
-0.30 cm
Standard Deviation 4.921
|
-0.11 cm
Standard Deviation 6.475
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
-0.25 cm
Standard Deviation 5.876
|
-0.08 cm
Standard Deviation 7.474
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
115.09 cm
Standard Deviation 16.270
|
112.16 cm
Standard Deviation 13.320
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
-0.84 cm
Standard Deviation 4.396
|
-0.18 cm
Standard Deviation 5.715
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
114.46 cm
Standard Deviation 15.970
|
111.66 cm
Standard Deviation 13.376
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased hip circumference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=182 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 15)
|
114.56 cm
Standard Deviation 17.500
|
113.00 cm
Standard Deviation 14.183
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
-0.06 cm
Standard Deviation 5.361
|
-0.83 cm
Standard Deviation 7.050
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
0.55 cm
Standard Deviation 7.791
|
-0.90 cm
Standard Deviation 6.066
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
114.34 cm
Standard Deviation 17.408
|
112.88 cm
Standard Deviation 14.225
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
-0.95 cm
Standard Deviation 7.700
|
-1.21 cm
Standard Deviation 6.677
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Hip Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
114.28 cm
Standard Deviation 17.871
|
112.70 cm
Standard Deviation 14.168
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased forearm circumference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
32.95 cm
Standard Deviation 7.346
|
33.38 cm
Standard Deviation 4.835
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
0.97 cm
Standard Deviation 6.023
|
0.10 cm
Standard Deviation 6.486
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
32.70 cm
Standard Deviation 7.290
|
33.25 cm
Standard Deviation 4.734
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
0.82 cm
Standard Deviation 6.748
|
-0.01 cm
Standard Deviation 3.447
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
32.51 cm
Standard Deviation 7.277
|
33.09 cm
Standard Deviation 4.771
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
0.83 cm
Standard Deviation 6.656
|
-0.43 cm
Standard Deviation 3.516
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased forearm circumference.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=182 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 15)
|
32.88 cm
Standard Deviation 7.783
|
32.91 cm
Standard Deviation 5.662
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
1.61 cm
Standard Deviation 6.534
|
0.01 cm
Standard Deviation 5.052
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
32.63 cm
Standard Deviation 7.718
|
32.87 cm
Standard Deviation 5.696
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
1.79 cm
Standard Deviation 6.715
|
0.02 cm
Standard Deviation 4.709
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
32.79 cm
Standard Deviation 7.660
|
33.02 cm
Standard Deviation 5.561
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Forearm Circumference at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
0.78 cm
Standard Deviation 6.124
|
-0.64 cm
Standard Deviation 4.408
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 3, 6 and 12Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 1 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased Tricep Skinfold Thickness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=144 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=144 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 6)
|
28.53 mm
Standard Deviation 13.763
|
25.38 mm
Standard Deviation 12.769
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 6
|
-2.72 mm
Standard Deviation 8.091
|
-1.52 mm
Standard Deviation 9.287
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 3)
|
28.32 mm
Standard Deviation 13.677
|
25.41 mm
Standard Deviation 12.593
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 3
|
-1.21 mm
Standard Deviation 6.548
|
-0.62 mm
Standard Deviation 8.704
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 3, 6 and 12
Baseline (Month 12)
|
28.54 mm
Standard Deviation 13.981
|
25.14 mm
Standard Deviation 12.969
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 3, 6 and 12
Change from Baseline to Month 12
|
-1.34 mm
Standard Deviation 9.389
|
-0.26 mm
Standard Deviation 10.653
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to Months 15, 18 and 24Population: Safety Analysis Set Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis at both Baseline and the given time-point.
A negative change from Baseline represents decreased Tricep Skinfold Thickness.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=60 Participants
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
CVC 150 mg
n=182 Participants
Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1.
|
Placebo/Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo Then CVC 150 mg
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then Cenicriviroc 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
Placebo Then Placebo
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2. Includes AEs that occurred in Year 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 24)
|
29.91 mm
Standard Deviation 14.532
|
24.82 mm
Standard Deviation 13.025
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 24
|
-3.11 mm
Standard Deviation 8.553
|
-1.33 mm
Standard Deviation 10.521
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 15)
|
29.84 mm
Standard Deviation 14.422
|
25.41 mm
Standard Deviation 13.212
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 15
|
-1.45 mm
Standard Deviation 9.364
|
-1.59 mm
Standard Deviation 8.918
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 15, 18 and 24
Baseline (Month 18)
|
29.84 mm
Standard Deviation 14.655
|
25.07 mm
Standard Deviation 12.856
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tricep Skinfold Thickness at Months 15, 18 and 24
Change from Baseline to Month 18
|
-2.27 mm
Standard Deviation 8.854
|
-2.64 mm
Standard Deviation 8.864
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
CVC 150mg/CVC 150 mg
Placebo/Cenicriviroc (CVC) 150 mg
Placebo/Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CVC 150mg/CVC 150 mg
n=144 participants at risk
CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo/Cenicriviroc (CVC) 150 mg
n=72 participants at risk
Placebo-matching CVC tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2.
|
Placebo/Placebo
n=72 participants at risk
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Concussion
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Facial bones fracture
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint injury
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lumbar vertebral fracture
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic haemothorax
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arrhythmia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Inguinal hernia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pancreatic neoplasm
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Peripheral nerve sheath tumour malignant
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung disorder
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ischaemic
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine polyp
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Peritoneal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vasculitis gastrointestinal
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrist fracture
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
1.4%
2/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar spinal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Psoriatic arthropathy
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
VIIth nerve paralysis
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
1.4%
2/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Bladder dysplasia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.69%
1/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypovolaemia
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Haemangioma of skin
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Bipolar disorder
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CVC 150mg/CVC 150 mg
n=144 participants at risk
CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
Placebo/Cenicriviroc (CVC) 150 mg
n=72 participants at risk
Placebo-matching CVC tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 1 then CVC 150 mg tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Year 2.
|
Placebo/Placebo
n=72 participants at risk
Placebo-matching cenicriviroc (CVC) tablet, once daily in the morning with food in Years 1 and 2.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
3.5%
5/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
6.9%
10/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.7%
7/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
2.1%
3/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
4.2%
6/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.1%
3/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
3.5%
5/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
9/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
10.4%
15/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
9/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
22.2%
32/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
19.4%
14/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
20.8%
15/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
11.1%
16/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
12/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
13.9%
10/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
12.5%
18/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.3%
6/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
15.3%
11/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
19.4%
28/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.3%
6/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
8/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
9.0%
13/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
9.0%
13/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.3%
6/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
6.2%
9/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
4.2%
6/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
12.5%
18/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
16.7%
24/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
13.9%
10/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
18.1%
13/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
3.5%
5/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.6%
8/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
11.8%
17/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
13.9%
10/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
14.6%
21/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
9/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.7%
7/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
12.5%
18/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
9/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
8/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
7.6%
11/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
12.5%
18/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
9/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
7.6%
11/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
15.3%
11/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
16.7%
12/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
7.6%
11/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
16.0%
23/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
10.4%
15/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
9.7%
14/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.4%
1/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.3%
6/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
16.7%
24/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
20.8%
15/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
12.5%
9/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
9.0%
13/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
6.9%
10/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
11.1%
16/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.3%
6/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
9.0%
13/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
5.6%
8/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
2/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
6.9%
10/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
5/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
8.3%
12/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.1%
8/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
6.9%
10/144 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
4/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.2%
3/72 • Baseline to Year 2
Safety Analysis Set Year 1 and Year 2 included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER