Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Clinical Study in Participants With Huntington's Disease (HD) to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Three Oral Doses of Laquinimod (NCT NCT02215616)
NCT ID: NCT02215616
Last Updated: 2020-05-04
Results Overview
UHDRS is a research tool developed by Huntington Disease (HD) Study Group to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of HD. Components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behaviour, functional abilities, independence scale and total functional capacities. Motor function assessment includes TMS and Total Functional Capacity (TFC) score. The UHDRS TMS assesses all the motor features of HD and includes maximal chorea, maximal dystonia, ocular pursuit, saccade initiation and velocity, dysarthria, tongue protrusion, finger tapping, hand pronation and supination, luria, rigidity, bradykinesia, gait, tandem walking, and retropulsion pull test. Each of these was rated on a scale of 0 (normal motor function) to 4 (severely impaired motor function). TMS score is a sum of individual scores ranging from 0 (normal motor function) to 124 (severely impaired motor function). Lower TMS scores indicate better motor function.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
352 participants
Baseline, Week 52
2020-05-04
Participant Flow
A total of 468 participants were screened, of whom 116 participants were screen failures and 352 participants were enrolled. Of 352 enrolled participants, 123 participants were randomized in 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive laquinimod 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 milligrams/day (mg/day), or matching placebo prior to 10 January 2016.
As of 10 January 2016; following recommendation of Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), treatment of laquinimod 1.5 mg dose arm was discontinued as a proactive safety measure. After 10 January 2016; additional eligible participants, who were enrolled, were randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to receive laquinimod 0.5 mg/day, 1.0 mg/day, or matching placebo.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received 3 capsules of matching laquinimod placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 2 capsules of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.0 mg
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.0 mg laquinimod) and 1 capsule of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.5 mg
Participants received 3 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.5 mg laquinimod), orally once daily. The treatment of this high dose arm was discontinued as of 10 January 2016.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
108
|
107
|
107
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least 1 Dose of Study Drug
|
108
|
107
|
106
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
97
|
90
|
93
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
17
|
14
|
13
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received 3 capsules of matching laquinimod placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 2 capsules of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.0 mg
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.0 mg laquinimod) and 1 capsule of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.5 mg
Participants received 3 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.5 mg laquinimod), orally once daily. The treatment of this high dose arm was discontinued as of 10 January 2016.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor requested to stop study drug
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
7
|
4
|
9
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
8
|
2
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Other than specified
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=108 Participants
Participants received 3 capsules of matching laquinimod placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=107 Participants
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 2 capsules of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.0 mg
n=107 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.0 mg laquinimod) and 1 capsule of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.5 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received 3 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.5 mg laquinimod), orally once daily. The treatment of this high dose arm was discontinued as of 10 January 2016.
|
Total
n=352 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
43.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.76 • n=108 Participants
|
43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.75 • n=107 Participants
|
44.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.83 • n=107 Participants
|
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.03 • n=30 Participants
|
43.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.64 • n=352 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
56 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
173 Participants
n=352 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
52 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
179 Participants
n=352 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
104 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
103 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
105 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
340 Participants
n=352 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
0 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=352 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=352 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
0 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=352 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
|
2 Participants
n=108 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=352 Participants
|
|
Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale - Total Motor Score (UHDRS-TMS)
|
26.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.63 • n=108 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
24.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.23 • n=107 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
22.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.74 • n=106 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
26.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75 • n=30 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
24.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.12 • n=351 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
|
Normalized Caudate Volume
|
6.06 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.857 • n=106 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
5.78 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.818 • n=103 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
6.02 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.781 • n=102 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
5.39 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.218 • n=28 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
5.90 milliliters (mL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.781 • n=339 Participants • 'Number analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this parameter.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants in the ITT population (all randomized participants) who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline TMS assessment. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
UHDRS is a research tool developed by Huntington Disease (HD) Study Group to provide a uniform assessment of the clinical features and course of HD. Components of the full UHDRS assess motor function, cognition, behaviour, functional abilities, independence scale and total functional capacities. Motor function assessment includes TMS and Total Functional Capacity (TFC) score. The UHDRS TMS assesses all the motor features of HD and includes maximal chorea, maximal dystonia, ocular pursuit, saccade initiation and velocity, dysarthria, tongue protrusion, finger tapping, hand pronation and supination, luria, rigidity, bradykinesia, gait, tandem walking, and retropulsion pull test. Each of these was rated on a scale of 0 (normal motor function) to 4 (severely impaired motor function). TMS score is a sum of individual scores ranging from 0 (normal motor function) to 124 (severely impaired motor function). Lower TMS scores indicate better motor function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=98 Participants
Participants received 3 capsules of matching laquinimod placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=92 Participants
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 2 capsules of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.0 mg
n=95 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.0 mg laquinimod) and 1 capsule of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.5 mg
n=4 Participants
Participants received 3 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.5 mg laquinimod), orally once daily. The treatment of this high dose arm was discontinued as of 10 January 2016.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in UHDRS-TMS at Week 52
|
1.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.00
|
1.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.34
|
2.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.27
|
11.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 52Population: FAS included all participants in the ITT population (all randomized participants) who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-baseline TMS assessment. Here, 'Overall number of participants analyzed' signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Brain atrophy was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of caudate volume. Caudate volume atrophy is a sensitive biomarker in very early HD and correlates with disease progression. Brain atrophy in the caudate refers to the shrinkage in volume, so that a decrease in volume is a positive value, while an increase in volume is a negative value. Percent change in caudate volume at Week 52 was calculated as the change in caudate volume since the baseline visit, divided by the baseline caudate volume and multiplied by 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=87 Participants
Participants received 3 capsules of matching laquinimod placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=87 Participants
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 2 capsules of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.0 mg
n=85 Participants
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.0 mg laquinimod) and 1 capsule of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.5 mg
n=2 Participants
Participants received 3 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.5 mg laquinimod), orally once daily. The treatment of this high dose arm was discontinued as of 10 January 2016.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Caudate Volume (Brain Atrophy) at Week 52
|
5.13 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.265
|
4.03 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.275
|
3.14 percent change
Standard Deviation 3.360
|
4.11 percent change
Standard Deviation 0.598
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
Laquinimod 1.0 mg
Laquinimod 1.5 mg
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=108 participants at risk
Participants received 3 capsules of matching laquinimod placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=107 participants at risk
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 2 capsules of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.0 mg
n=106 participants at risk
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.0 mg laquinimod) and 1 capsule of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.5 mg
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received 3 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.5 mg laquinimod), orally once daily. The treatment of this high dose arm was discontinued as of 10 January 2016.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Defect conduction intraventricular
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Burn infection
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal viral infection
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis chronic
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Multiple injuries
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic liver injury
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast cancer metastatic
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastric cancer
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cluster headache
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Product Issues
Device dislocation
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychiatric decompensation
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Mediastinal haematoma
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Cutaneous lupus erythematosus
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=108 participants at risk
Participants received 3 capsules of matching laquinimod placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 0.5 mg
n=107 participants at risk
Participants received 1 capsule of laquinimod 0.5 mg and 2 capsules of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.0 mg
n=106 participants at risk
Participants received 2 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.0 mg laquinimod) and 1 capsule of matching placebo, orally once daily for 52 weeks.
|
Laquinimod 1.5 mg
n=29 participants at risk
Participants received 3 capsules of laquinimod 0.5 mg (total 1.5 mg laquinimod), orally once daily. The treatment of this high dose arm was discontinued as of 10 January 2016.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.93%
1/108 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.5%
7/107 • Number of events 10 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
2.8%
3/108 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
3/106 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
8.3%
9/108 • Number of events 9 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
11.2%
12/107 • Number of events 14 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
8.5%
9/106 • Number of events 11 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 6 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
3.7%
4/108 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.7%
5/107 • Number of events 10 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.7%
5/106 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
13.8%
4/29 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.8%
3/108 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.5%
7/107 • Number of events 10 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.8%
4/106 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
6.5%
7/108 • Number of events 9 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
7.5%
8/107 • Number of events 8 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.6%
7/106 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
17.6%
19/108 • Number of events 33 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.3%
10/107 • Number of events 12 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.4%
10/106 • Number of events 13 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
6.5%
7/108 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
4.6%
5/108 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
5.6%
6/108 • Number of events 8 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
8.3%
9/108 • Number of events 15 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
9.3%
10/107 • Number of events 12 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.7%
5/106 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 6 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
|
1.9%
2/108 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.9%
2/107 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.8%
4/106 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
7.5%
8/107 • Number of events 10 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
6/106 • Number of events 10 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Blood folate decreased
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
6/106 • Number of events 6 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
3/106 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
10.3%
3/29 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Investigations
Pancreatic enzymes increased
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.9%
2/107 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
4.6%
5/108 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
4.7%
5/107 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.8%
4/106 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
6.5%
7/108 • Number of events 8 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.5%
7/107 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
7.5%
8/106 • Number of events 12 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Balance disorder
|
0.00%
0/108 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.93%
1/107 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Chorea
|
2.8%
3/108 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/106 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
6.5%
7/108 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
17.8%
19/107 • Number of events 22 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
13.2%
14/106 • Number of events 31 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
17.2%
5/29 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
3.7%
4/108 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.94%
1/106 • Number of events 1 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
4.6%
5/108 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/107 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
3.7%
4/108 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.7%
4/107 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
1.9%
2/106 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Irritability
|
3.7%
4/108 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.6%
6/107 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
3/106 • Number of events 3 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 2 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
3.7%
4/108 • Number of events 5 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
2.8%
3/107 • Number of events 4 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
5.7%
6/106 • Number of events 7 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
0.00%
0/29 • Baseline up to Week 56
Safety analysis set included all participants who had received at least 1 dose of study drug.
|
Additional Information
Director, Clinical Research
Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Sponsor has the right 60 days before submission for publication to review/provide comments. If the Sponsor's review shows that potentially patentable subject matter would be disclosed, publication or public disclosure shall be delayed for up to 90 additional days in order for the Sponsor, or Sponsor's designees, to file the necessary patent applications. In multicenter trials, each PI will postpone single center publications until after disclosure or publication of multicenter data.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER