A Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Safety of bioCSL Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV) in Adults Aged 18 Years and Above.

NCT ID: NCT02214225

Last Updated: 2017-03-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

3484 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study to assess the immune (antibody) response and safety of a bioCSL split virion, inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine, in comparison with a US licensed 2014/2015 trivalent influenza vaccine (bioCSL TIV-1), and a trivalent influenza vaccine containing the alternate B strain (bioCSL TIV-2), in healthy adult volunteers aged 18 years and above.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This multicenter, randomized, double-blinded study was conducted during the 2014-2015 Northern Hemisphere influenza immunization season to evaluate the non-inferior immune response of bioCSL QIV to that of bioCSL TIV-1 and bioCSL TIV-2 along with safety in healthy male and female adults aged ≥ 18 years. Each vaccinated subject had a maximum 25 day on-study period with a six month safety follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Influenza, Human

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV)

The bioCSL study vaccine is a sterile, thiomersal-free suspension containing 60 mcg total hemagglutinin antigen per 0.5 mL dose (15 mcg each of the four recommended influenza strains for the Northern Hemisphere 2014/2015 influenza season).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

One 0.5 mL intramuscular dose into the deltoid muscle

Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV-1)

The bioCSL study vaccine is a sterile, thiomersal-free suspension containing 45 mcg total hemagglutinin antigen per 0.5 mL dose (15 mcg each of the three recommended influenza strains for the Northern Hemisphere 2014/2015 influenza season).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV-1)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

One 0.5 mL intramuscular dose into the deltoid muscle.

Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV-2)

The bioCSL study vaccine is a sterile, thiomersal-free suspension containing 45 mcg total hemagglutinin antigen per 0.5 mL dose (15 mcg each of the recommended influenza A (H1N1-, H3N2-like) strains and the alternate B strain for the Northern Hemisphere 2014/2015 influenza season).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV-2)

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

One 0.5 mL intramuscular dose into the deltoid muscle.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine (QIV)

One 0.5 mL intramuscular dose into the deltoid muscle

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV-1)

One 0.5 mL intramuscular dose into the deltoid muscle.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Trivalent Influenza Vaccine (TIV-2)

One 0.5 mL intramuscular dose into the deltoid muscle.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males or non-pregnant females aged ≥ 18 years at the time of vaccination.
* Females of child-bearing potential (i.e., ovulating, pre-menopausal, not surgically sterile) must be abstinent or be willing to use a medically accepted contraceptive regimen for the duration of the On-study period. Females of child-bearing potential must return a negative urine pregnancy test result prior to vaccination with the vaccine.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known hypersensitivity to a previous dose of influenza vaccine or allergy to eggs, chicken protein, neomycin, polymyxin, or any components of bioCSL influenza vaccines.
* Vaccination against influenza in the previous 6 months.
* Known history of Guillain-Barré Syndrome or other demyelinating disease.
* Clinical signs of active infection and/or an oral temperature of ≥ 100.4°F (38.0°C).
* A clinically significant medical condition.
* Pregnant or lactating females.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Seqirus

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

bioCSL Pty Ltd Clinical Program Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Seqirus

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Site 296

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Site 286

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Site 315

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Site 301

Milford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Site 297

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 293

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Site Status

Site 292

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Site 289

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Site 294

Peoria, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Site 295

Mishawaka, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Site 317

Witchita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Site 291

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Site 310

Methuen, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Site 287

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Site 316

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Site 298

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Site 285

Binghamton, New York, United States

Site Status

Site 313

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Site 302

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site 306

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site 309

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site 305

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site 299

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Site 307

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Site 308

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site 311

Jefferson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site 312

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site 304

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Site 283

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 282

Forth Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 288

San Angelo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site 300

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Site 303

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Treanor JT, Albano FR, Sawlwin DC, Graves Jones A, Airey J, Formica N, Matassa V, Leong J. Immunogenicity and safety of a quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine compared with two trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines containing alternate B strains in adults: A phase 3, randomized noninferiority study. Vaccine. 2017 Apr 4;35(15):1856-1864. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.066. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28302411 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CSLCT-QIV-13-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.