eHealth Intervention to Promote Self-regulation of Physical Activity and Fruit and Vegetable Intake Among Adults Who Visit General Practice
NCT ID: NCT02211040
Last Updated: 2017-05-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
426 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-31
2015-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Identifying the Effect and Working Mechanisms of MyPlan 2.0 in Older Adults
NCT03799146
Effectiveness of and Engagement in a Mobile Exergame With Tailored Feedback
NCT03659604
Effectiveness of MyPlan 2.0. in Older Adults
NCT03783611
Rewarding Healthy Food Choices: a Mobile Serious Game Intervention in Adolescents
NCT02622165
Effectiveness of a Web-based, Computer-tailored, Pedometer-based Physical Activity Intervention for Adults: a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02080585
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A three-arm clustered quasi-experimental design will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Therefore, general practitioners will be recruited and patients will be randomly assigned at general practice level. Within each practice, patients can be allocated in three groups. Group one is an intervention group in which general practitioners select and motivate adults to use the intervention. In group two, the selection and motivation of adults will be conducted by a researcher in the waiting room and finally, group three will be a control group in which adults are also selected by a researcher. The distinction between the two intervention groups is made to evaluate if general practitioners influence when recruiting participants leads to beneficial effects compared to when investigators recruit participants. Furthermore, it will also be investigated if the implementation of the intervention by general practitioners is feasible.
In the intervention groups, adults are asked to complete session one (S1) and measurements questions on a tablet in general practice or are referred with a flyer to do this at their computer at home. Adults, who do not use the tablet, have to fill in a short questionnaire and leave their email address to send them a reminder email to complete session one at home. In session one, adults choose themselves for which behaviour(s) they want to complete the intervention. One week (S2) and one month (S3) after session one is completed, adults will receive an email to respectively start session two and three for the chosen behaviour(s). In the control group, adults have to fill in a questionnaire at base line in general practice or at home (C1) and one month post intervention (C2).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No general practitioner involvement
The selection and motivation of adults will be conducted by a researcher in the waiting room. There is no extra motivation of the general practitioner.
My Plan
The intervention consists of three sessions for each behaviour (ie., physical activity, fruit and vegetables intake) and is available on a website and tablets to deliver it in general practice.
Adults can start session one on a tablet in general practice or on their own computer at home, after receiving a flyer in general practice.
In this first session adults receive general information, monitor their behaviour and receive tailored feedback to increase awareness.
Adults are also guided to set goals and self-efficacy is increased by modeling and problem solving methods.
In the second and third session, adults can evaluate if they reached their goals, make coping plans and adapt their action plans.
General practitioner involvement
An intervention group in which general practitioners select and motivate adults to be more physical active and eat more fruit and vegetables.
My Plan
The intervention consists of three sessions for each behaviour (ie., physical activity, fruit and vegetables intake) and is available on a website and tablets to deliver it in general practice.
Adults can start session one on a tablet in general practice or on their own computer at home, after receiving a flyer in general practice.
In this first session adults receive general information, monitor their behaviour and receive tailored feedback to increase awareness.
Adults are also guided to set goals and self-efficacy is increased by modeling and problem solving methods.
In the second and third session, adults can evaluate if they reached their goals, make coping plans and adapt their action plans.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
My Plan
The intervention consists of three sessions for each behaviour (ie., physical activity, fruit and vegetables intake) and is available on a website and tablets to deliver it in general practice.
Adults can start session one on a tablet in general practice or on their own computer at home, after receiving a flyer in general practice.
In this first session adults receive general information, monitor their behaviour and receive tailored feedback to increase awareness.
Adults are also guided to set goals and self-efficacy is increased by modeling and problem solving methods.
In the second and third session, adults can evaluate if they reached their goals, make coping plans and adapt their action plans.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having access to internet
Exclusion Criteria
* Younger than 18 years
* Not understanding the Dutch Language
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Welfare, Public Health and Family, Flemish government, Belgium
UNKNOWN
University Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Vakgroepsport
Professor doctor Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jolien Plaete
Ghent, East Flanders, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Van Dyck D, Plaete J, Cardon G, Crombez G, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Effectiveness of the self-regulation eHealth intervention 'MyPlan1.0.' on physical activity levels of recently retired Belgian adults: a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res. 2016 Oct;31(5):653-64. doi: 10.1093/her/cyw036. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Plaete J, Crombez G, Van der Mispel C, Verloigne M, Van Stappen V, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Effect of the Web-Based Intervention MyPlan 1.0 on Self-Reported Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults Who Visit General Practice: A Quasi-Experimental Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Feb 29;18(2):e47. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5252.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Funding
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BE670201421382
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.